Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
MANAGEMENT
LOCATION STRATEGY
One of the most important decisions a firm
makes
A strategic decision
Global in nature
Impacts fixed & variable costs of operation
Objective : Maximize benefits
FACTORS
National Factors
Regional Factors
Community Factors
Site Factors
NATIONAL FACTORS
1. Political risks, government rules, attitudes,
incentives
2. National, state, local governments attitudes
toward private and intellectual property, zoning,
pollution, employment stability
3. Cultural and economic issues
4. Location of markets
5. Labor talent, attitudes, productivity, costs
6. Availability of supplies, communications, energy
7. Exchange rates and currency risks
2006-2007 Rank
1
6
7
8
10
15
16
23
42
54
58
62
2005 Rank
4
1
10
6
9
23
13
22
38
48
59
53
Ranking Corruption
Rank
1
1
1
5
7
11
14
15
16
17
20
34
70
121
Country
Finland
Iceland
New Zealand
Singapore
Switzerland
UK
Canada
Hong Kong
Germany
Japan
USA, Belgium
Israel, Taiwan
Brazil, China, Mexico
Russia
REGIONAL FACTORS
Corporate desires
Attractiveness of region
Labor availability, costs, attitudes towards unions
Costs and availability of utilities
Environmental regulations
Government incentives and fiscal policies
Proximity to raw materials and customers
Land/construction costs
Communication
SITE FACTORS
QUANTITATIVE FACTORS
SOME EXAMPLES
Mining, Quarrying, and Heavy Manufacturing
Near their raw material sources
Abundant supply of utilities
Land and construction costs are inexpensive
Light Manufacturing
Availability and cost of labor
Warehousing
Proximity to transportation facilities
Incoming and outgoing transportation costs
SOME EXAMPLES
R&D and High-Tech Manufacturing
Ability to recruit/retain scientists, engineers, etc.
Near companies with similar technology interests
Changes in inputs
Labor skills and/or costs
Materials costs and/or availability
Utility costs
Changes in technology
Analyzing Manufacturing/Service
Location Decisions
Consumer Behavior
Research
Market Research
Weighted Rating
10
10
20
20
80
5
7
4
1
1
7
6
6
40
10
2
14
60
60
80
20
5
7
4
8
10
1
4
2
10
5
4
10
80
100
10
8
4
20
50
40
100
TOTAL
340
72
410
QUANTITATIVE METHODS
Locating a Single Facility
conventional cost analysis
CG Method
Pros ease of communication and understanding
Cons time value of money ignored and
qualitative factors not considered
QUANTITATIVE METHODS
SINGLE FACILITY LOCATION
20
19
18
15
14
13
5
4
6
2
3
1
10
7
6
10
Center-of-Gravity Method
dixQi
x - coordinate =
Qi
i
diyQi
y - coordinate =
Qi
i
where
dix =
diy =
Qi =
x-coordinate of location i
y-coordinate of location i
Quantity of goods moved to or from
location i
C G METHOD
CENTER
VOLUME
1
2
3
4
5
6
175
100
275
350
150
50
6
8
10
10
6
6
13
15
14
19
20
18
n
Xi Vi
Xcg =
Vi
A MTHEMATICAL MODELLING
COMPUTER SIMULATION
Linear Programming Model
Transportation model
Computer Simulation
FROM / TO
Z
A
B
C
D
..
G
------
MULTIFACILITY LOCATIONS
i = 10
Minimize Total Cost = Fj +
Cij X Di
i = 1
MULTIATTRIBUTES LOCATION
OBJECTIVE
FACTOR COST
LOCATIONRs CRORES
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
5.5
4.1
3.5
3.9
3.2
TRANSPORT LABOUR
INFRASTRU - COMMUNITY
CTURE
SUPPORT
GOOD
GOOD
FAIR
VERY GOOD
EXCELLENT
FAIR
GOOD EXCELLENT
GOOD
GOOD EXCELLENT GOOD
FAIR
VERY GOOD GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
VERY GOOD VERY GOOD
VERY GOOD EXCELLENT VERY GOOD EXCELLENT
CLASSIFICATION OF FACTORS
Critical : Precludes location ( 0 or 1 )
Objective : Quantified
Subjective : Community support
MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES
LMi =CFMi X [ K X OFMi + ( 1 - K ) X SFMi]
SFMi =
( SFWk X Swik )
MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES
LOCATION
TRANSPORT
( 0.2 )
LABOUR
( 0.3 )
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
0.75
0.5
0
0.5
0.75
0
1
OBJECTIVE
FACTOR
LOCATION MEASURE
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
0
0.56
0.8
0.64
0.92
COMMUNITY SUBJECTIVE
INFRASTRU - SUPPORT
FACTOR
CTURE( 0.3 )
(0.3)
MEASURE
0
0.5
1
0.5
0.75
0.75
SUBJECTIVE
FACTOR
LOCATION
MEASURE
MEASURE
0.4
0.55
0.65
0.375
0.475
0.875
0.88
0.11
0.578
0.715
0.607
0.911
0.75
1
0.5
0
0.75
1
0.4
0.55
0.65
0.375
0.475
0.875
Location Strategies
Service/Retail/Professional Location
Goods-Producing Location
Revenue Focus
Cost Focus
Volume/revenue
Drawing area; purchasing power
Competition; advertising/pricing
Physical quality
Parking/access; security/lighting;
appearance/image
Cost determinants
Rent
Management caliber
Operations policies (hours, wage rates)
Tangible costs
Transportation cost of raw material
Shipment cost of finished goods
Energy and utility cost; labor; raw
material; taxes, and so on
Intangible and future costs
Attitude toward union
Quality of life
Education expenditures by state
Quality of state and local government
Location Strategies
Service/Retail/Professional Location
Goods-Producing Location
Techniques
Techniques
Transportation method
Factor-rating method
Locational break-even analysis
Multiple attributes
Location Strategies
Service/Retail/Professional Location
Goods-Producing Location
Assumptions
Assumptions
HOTEL CHAINS
La Quinta started with 35 independent
variables and worked to refine a regression
model to predict profitability
The final model had only four variables
Price of the inn
Median income levels
r2 = .51
51% of the profitability
is predicted by just
these four variables!