PEER EVALUATION TOWARD STUDENTS

PERCEPTION IN PEER TEACHING CLASS C

(English Language Teaching, Brawijaya
University)

Pembimbing :
Didik Hartono Mp.D

PRESENTED BY

Nur Kholisoh

Meyvi Natasha

Evi Kurniawati

Johara Indrawati

Dyah Ayu Rahmatillah

Maghfirah Fitriyah

Dhylis Titian Awaly

OUTLINE
Introductio
n

Outlin
e

Literature
Review

Methodology

CHAPTER I

Backgrou
nd

Peer evaluation plays an important

Specific
role
focus

1.

Statement
of the
problem

How
is students
toward
peer evaluation
in
links
learnersperception
skill to make
perfect
their
acquire foreign language.
peer ability
teachingtoclass?
2. What is the effect of peer evaluation for students in
According
to Phielix,
Prins, & Kirschner (2010) and
peer Learner
teaching
class?
Yang (2010), students are able Assesor
to see different
( practicer)
perspectives
and think and understand concepts
more deeply through peer evaluation.

CHAPTER I
Objective
of the
study

Definition
of Terms

Peer teaching can be defined either by

relationship
between
and
1.the
To know
and describe
studentsteacher
perception
student
or
by the in
method
of teaching
toward
peer
evaluation
peer
teaching
classof
- Peer evaluation : The evaluation
that
occurs.
Generally
one
thinks
of or
a
: describe
The
to see,
hear,
2.Perception
To know
and
the effect
of
peer
creative
work
or ability
performance
by
other
peer as for
one
who
in rank
or the
become
aware
of is
something
through
evaluation
students
in equal
peer
class
people in
the
same
fieldteaching
in order
to
experience
senses
maintain or enhance the quality of the
work or performance in that field.

CHAPTER II
Review
on
Theorie
s
Definition of
Peer Evaluation
The use of peer
evaluation
Peer evaluation in
peer teaching
subject

Previous
Studies
1
2

The result are

Each students
whoisperform
as a teacher,
the rest
This journal
mainly discuss
about evaluated
the effect ofby
peer
ofThis
thefeedback/evaluation
students
which talk
also
pretend
topeer
be
onabout
writing
skill
in schools
university
level.
journal
is mainly
using
evaluationstudents.
There are two types of peer evaluation. to improve
As
cited
in students
http://www.foundationcoalition.org,
twelfth
grade
ability in writing by using peer evaluation.
First
is evaluation
by ranking.
Each
evaluator
has
an
sheet
to
rate
their
This
project
aims
to
investigate
the
effects
of
introducing
peer
Could
help
improve
students
ability
by
serving
for
the
if
the
situation
is
in
a
group
work,
peer
Inpurpose
ranking,
the
peer
who
their
friends
score
feedback
toperformance
aisare
group
of university-level
students
in
a students
context
where
teammates
inmeaningful
front
of athe
class.
The
result
of
There
lack
inevaluate
honesty
while
evaluating
their
The
toSome
provide
instruction
toevaluation
onthe
how
sake
of
a
summative
evaluation,
formative
assessment
or
peer
evaluation
can
beAdefined
as
the
best
part
to
the
worst
(bushell,
2006;
Pope,
teacher-fronted
classes
arethe
considered
predominant.
Also,
to
find
classmate.
For
example,
just
because
student
and
B
are
bestout
tofrom
effectively
review
and
provide
feedback
to
their
peers
writing
in
evaluation
become
performers
formative
grade.
The
Effects
of
Integrating
Peer
Feedback
into
for grading and feedback to the student.
2001;
in
peterson
2011).
if peer
feedback
helped
toas
develop
social,
cognitive,
affective
and
aIffriend,
method
to
individual
grades
for
team
Student
Aadjust
give
more
better
grade
even
though
the student
the
classroom.
University-Level
ESL
Writing
Curriculum:
A met
Peer
Evaluation
an
Effective
Tool
to
Improve
an evaluation
serve
as
a
feedback,
then
the
students
linguistic
skills.
B performance
is not
with
the
grade
thatevaluation
hasasking
been
given
Second
is by
rating.
Inequal
rating,
the
evaluator
score
theiris
The
finding
of by
this
research
showed
that
peer
an
assignments
using
data
collected
by
Twelfth-Grade
Students'
Writing
need
to
receive
the
results
of
their
peer
evaluation
and
a
(Barclay
and
Harland,
1995).
effectivebyway
to help
students
improve
their
writing in preparation
friend
judging
their
performance
charcteristics
and
team
members
to
evaluate
each
team
member.
mechanism to be provided
for
discussion
(Peterson
and
college.
more for
subjective.
Peterson, 2011).

Research
Method

Location
Participa
nts
Data
Collection
Observation
Questionaire
Interview

BAB III
METHODOLO
GY in
This is the instrument of observation

criteria
To collect
data ideal
in qualitative
research
But sometimes we can use the scale
In thisinterview,
research, qualitative
we used
observation and
approach
is
the
most
suitable
wayinto
byresearch,
using
questionaire.
The work
takes
place
in one
classroom
For
this
we
worked
with
The
observation
sheets aims
tothe
carry
out
the
investigation.
All
Faculty
of
Culture
Studies,
University
using
thisthe
tool
the
data
canof
be
In By
this
questinare
consist
ofteaching
10
questions
35
students
who
study
the
This
interview
consist
of
5
questions
which
are
observe
peer
Things
that
are
observed
associated
with
Brawijaya
Malang.
The
located
inthe
FIBthe
UB
data
collected
is
about
which
are
designed
to
structured
questions
collected
from
their
own
experience
designed
with
the
purpose
of
obtaining
activity
which
includes
the
bachelor
degree
English
the situation
of
thein
class
and the
2.5
with
blanks
to
be
filled
in,
multiple
choice
The
aimtheir
of of
questionaire
isthat
tokeep
collect
experiences
from
the
researcher
when
information
about
experiences
they
have
on
the
andstudents
points
view
that
the
activeness
and
students
creativity
perceptions
can
be
Education
Program.
By
using
interview
we
get
some
specific
questions,
and
also
contain
of
opensubject
that
is
being
analysed.
regular
or
infrequent
routine
data,
doing
observation
and
the
personal
during
the
process
of
learning
in
the
observed
during
the
implementation
of
interviewer
on
the
subject
in
information
in
deeply
which
we
need
to
take
endedand
questions
where
the
respondent
is
data
for
specialized
studies.
classroom
using
peer
peer
assessment
take
place
points
of
view
of
several
participants
discussion
and
thisquestions.
make
antheir
account
inreply
the
interview
encouraged
to
at
length
and
choose
(Danida,1998).
evaluation/assessment.
analysis
of data
from
different
own focus
to some
extent
perspective and indetify the
successes of the research.