Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
BY :MANJUNATH JOIS
1SI04ME413
INTRODUCTION
The Hybrid Engine conjugates the advantages of the
conventional pistons engine with those of the rotary
engine, eliminating the main disadvantages of both. It
consists of a 4-stroke engine of positive displacement
devised with rotating and reciprocal technology, reason
why it has the advantages of the rotary engines in
relation with its packaging size, power density and
operation simplicity, and the proven reliability and fuel
efficiency of the reciprocal piston engines.
ENGINE
Stator
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
OPERATION
The engine operation are shown in
figures 21, 22, 23 and 24. Each
cylinder is performed a complete
cycle by each complete rotation of
the rotor. Meanwhile, each satellite
makes two complete rotations on
its own axis. Each piston makes
four strokes or phases to complete
a cycle. In each phase, the rotor
turns 90 degrees, and then, each
crank turns 180 degrees in the
same direction and on its own axis
ADVANTAGES
"MULTIFUEL" CAPACITY
The incorporation of a continuous injection device ( in spite of the
spark plug), extending the duration of the combustion, the possibility
of adjusting the distribution of the intake, and the capability for
operating at high compression ratio, permit that this engine can use
various types of liquid and gaseous fuels
COMPRESSION RATIO
As is known, in an internal combustion engine, the maximum
efficiency is obtained accomplishing the mixture ignition with highpressure. Most of the rotary engines known have the drawback of
not to be able to work with high compression ratio. The conventional
sealed system, and the operation without valves enable this engine
operates to high compression.
VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY
1 The volumetric efficiency is even greater to the conventional reciprocal
pistons engines. Due to the fact that the intake and exhaust ports can have
equal section that the cylinders, the "breathing" capacity is very great
2 The volume occupied and the overall weight is reduced in more than 50%.
The number of parts is fewer about 30% to the equivalent conventional
engine. The moving parts are reduced about 70%.
CONCLUSION
THANK YOU