Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The resulting conflict between France and the United States became all the more bitter
because the two sides,profoundly misunderstanding each other ,never seemed to be
talking about the same subject.
Nothing within Frances centuries-long tradition of conducting diplomacy led it to such
conclusions.Ever since Richelieu, Frances initiatives had invariably grown out of a
calculation of risks and reward.As the product of that tradition , de Gaule was less
concerned with the nature of consultative machinery than with accumulating options
for the contingency of disagreement.De Gaulle believed that these options would
determine the relative bargaining positions.To de Gaulle,sound relations among nations
depended on calculations of interests,not on formal procedures for settling disputes.He
did not view harmony as a natural state,but as something that had to be wrested out of a
conflict of interests:Man limited by his nature is infinite in his desires.The world is
thus of opposing forces.Of course,human wisdom has often succeded in preventing
these rivalries from degeneration into murderous conflicts.But the competition of
efforts is the condition of life....In the last analysis and as always ,it is only in
equilibrium that the world will find peace.
In the first decade of the postwar era ,it seemed as if nuclear monopoly had fulfilled
Americas visions of omnipotence.But by the end of the 1950s it was becoming
obvious that each of the nuclear superpowers would soon be able to inflict on the other
a level of devastation no previous society could have imagined,threatening the survival
of civilization itself.This realization was at the heart of a revolution that was about to
change the very nature of international relations.Though weapons had been
progressively growing more sophisticated,their destructiveness had remained relatively
limited up until the end of the Second WW.Never had the military gap between a
superpower and a non-nuclear state been greater;never was it less likely to be
invoked.Neither North Korea nor North Vietnam was deterred by Americans nuclear
arsenal from pursuing its objectives,even against America military forces;nor were the
Afghan guerrillas deterred by the nuclear capacity of the Soviet Union.The nuclear Age
turned strategy into deterrence ,and deterrence into an esosteric intellectual exercise.To
enhance nuclear deterrence,America and its allies had an incentive to emphasize both
the certainty and the ferocity of their reaction to challenge.To increase the credibility of
the threat,but also to reduce the scale of the disaster shuld deterrence fail,America had
an even greater incentive to find ways to make nuclear war more calculable and less
catastrophic.Discriminating targeting,central command and control,and a strategy of
flexible response became increasingly fashionable among Americas defense
intellectuals.