Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DESIGN
rriverajrmsn
COORDINATION
The process of integrating the objectives and activities
of the separate units (departments or functional
areas)of an organization in order to achieve
organizational goals efficiently.
Without coordination, individuals and departments
would lose sight of their role within the organization.
They would begin to pursue their own specialized
interests, often at the expense of the larger
organizational goals
JAMES D. THOMPSON 3
VARIETIES OF
INTERDEPENDENCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS
Pooled interdependence- exists when organizational
units do not depend upon one another to carry out their
day-to-day work but to depend on the adequate
performance of each unit for ultimate survival (least)
Sequential interdependence- one organizational unit
must act before the next can. (greater)
Reciprocal interdependence- involves give and take
relationships between units (greatest)
4 TYPES OF DIFFERENCES IN
ATTITUDE AND WORKING STYLE
1. Basic management
techniques
a. Management hierarchy
b. Rules and procedures
c. Plans and goals
2. Increase coordination
potential
d. Vertical information
e. Lateral relationships
3. Reduce need for
coordination
f. Slack resources
g. Interdependent units
WAYS OF
REDUCING THE NEED FOR COORDINATION
GALBRAITH
Complexity
Complex
Cost
Information
processing capacity
Inexpensive
Low
Expensive
High
SPAN OF MANAGEMENT
The number of subordinates who report directly to a
given manager
Two major reasons why the choice of appropriate span is
important
1. SOM may affect the efficient utilization of managers
and the effective performance of subordinates
2. Presence of relationships between SOM throughout
the organization and organizational structure
ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN
Organizational design/ structure or architecture- defines
how activities such as task allocation, coordination and
supervision are directed towards the achievement of
the organizational aims. It can also be considered the
viewing glass or perspective through which individuals
see their organization and its environment
Delegation of authority,
Discipline,
Chain of commands,
Congenial workplace,
Compensation package,
Centralization,
Scalar chains,
Order,
Equity,
Night of
Iron
NEOCLASSICAL APPROACH
Douglas McGregor- Motivational theory of X and Y
Theory x ('authoritarian management' style)
The average person dislikes work and will avoid it he/she can.
Therefore most people must be forced with the threat of
punishment to work towards organizational objectives.
The average person prefers to be directed; to avoid
responsibility; is relatively unambitious, and wants security above
all else.
NEOCLASSICAL APPROACH
Chris Argyris- Adult personality
Argyris believed that managers who treat people positively and
as responsible adults will achieve productivity. Mature workers
want additional responsibilities, variety of tasks, and the ability
to participate in decisions. He also came to the conclusion that
problems with employees are the result of mature personalities
managed using outdated practices.
NEOCLASSICAL APPROACH
Rensis Likert
Management systems
Exploitative authoritative (I)
Exploitative authoritative is rooted in classical theory. In this system,
managers tend to use threats, fear, and punishment to motivate their workers.
Managers at the top of the hierarchy make all of the decisions and are usually
unaware of the problems faced by those in the lower levels of the organization.
Decisions are imposed on subordinates, and motivation is characterized by
threats.[3] The orders issued from the top make up the goals for the
organization. As a result, workers tend to be hostile toward organizational goals
and may engage in behavior that is counter to those goal.
NEOCLASSICAL APPROACH
Less controlling than the exploitative authoritative system, under this system motivation is
based on the potential for punishment and partially on rewards. The decision making area
is expanded by allowing lower-level employees to be involved in policy-making but is
limited by the framework given to them from upper-level management. Major policy
decisions are still left to those at the top, who have some awareness of the problems that
occur at lower levels. This creates mainly downward communication from supervisors to
employees with little upward communication, causing subordinates to be somewhat
suspicious of communication coming from the top. The managers at the top feel more
responsibility towards organizational goals than those employees at the bottom, who feel
very little responsibility. This contrast in feelings toward responsibility can result in a
conflict and negative attitudes with the organization's goals. Subordinates in this system
can become hostile towards each other because of the competition that is created
between them. Satisfaction among workers is low to moderately-low and productivity is
measured at fair to good.
NEOCLASSICAL APPROACH
This theory is very closely related to the human-relations theory. Motivation of workers is
gained through rewards, occasional punishments, and very little involvement in making
decisions and goals. Lower-level employees, in this system, have the freedom to make
specific decisions that will affect their work. Upper-management still has control over
policies and general decisions that affect an organization. Managers will talk to their
subordinates about problems and action plans before they set organizational goals.
Communication in this system flows both downward and upward, though upward is more
limited. This promotes a more positive effect on employee relationships and allows them
to be more cooperative. Lower-level employees are seen as consultants to decisions that
were made and are more willing to accept them because of their involvement.
Satisfaction in this system improves from benevolent authoritative as does productivity.
NEOCLASSICAL APPROACH
Likert argued that the participative system was the most effective form of management.
This system coincides with human-resources theory. This system promotes genuine
participation in making decisions and setting goals through free-flowing horizontal
communication and tapping into the creativity and skills of workers. Managers are fully
aware of the problems that go on in the lower-levels of the organization. All organizational
goals are accepted by everyone because they were set through group participation.
There is a high level of responsibility and accountability of the organizational goals in all
of the employees. Managers motivate employees through a system that produces
monetary awards and participation in goal setting. Satisfaction among employees is the
highest out of the four systems as is production.
CONTINGENCY APPROACHES TO
ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN
A class of behavioral theory that claims that there is no
universal/ best way of managing an organization, instead, the
optimal course of action is contingent (dependent) upon the
internal and external situation.
SOLUTIONS