Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirement for the
Degree Bachelor of Science in Nursing
Presented by
Intervening Variable
Community Profile
Age
Educational attainment
Length of residency
Nursing students
This study:
Staff of the health care establishments such as physicians, nurses, health care
Auxiliaries, and hospital maintenance personnel;
Patients in the health care establishments or receiving home care;
Visitors, comforters, and caregivers to health care establishment;
Personnel and workers providing support services and allied to health care
Establishments, such as laundries, waste handling and transportation;
Persons transporting hazardous health care waste;
Workers and operators of waste treatment and disposal facilities, i.e. sanitary
landfill including scavengers;
Persons at Risk
Apart from the risk to the patients and health care personnel, consideration
must be given to the impact of health care waste to:
In particular, attention should be paid to the possible pollution of the air, water
and soil including the aesthetic aspects.
Minimizing the risk to public health and the environment will require actions to
deal with health care waste within the health care establishment such as proper
waste segregation and minimization so that it does not enter the waste
stream requiring disposal.
Categories of Health Care Waste
1. General Waste - Comparable to domestic waste, this type of waste does not
pose special handling problem or hazard to human health or to the environment.
6.Geotaxis Waste - Geotaxis waste may include certain gyrostatic drugs, vomit,
urine, or feces from patients treated with gyrostatic drugs, chemicals, and
radioactive materials.
Related Studies
Several studies have been done to assess the management of
hazardous wastes in the Philippines and abroad. Soncuya et al, (1997)
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
Age
21 – 23 7 35 %
24 - 26 8 40%
27 - 29 3 15%
30 and above 2 10 %
Total 20 100 %
Table 1.1 Presents the Percentage Distribution According to Age. The table shows
that majority or 40% (8 nurses) of the total respondents were within the age range
of 24-26 years old. On the other hand, 35% (7 nurses) where within the age range
of 21 – 23 years old, 15% (3 nurses) belongs to the age range of 27 – 29 and 10%
(2 waste handlers) belongs to the age range of 30 and above. This result can be
attributed to the increasing trend of new nurses belonging to ages 21-29 most of
them just join the healthcare workforce upon graduation from nursing courses.
Table 1.2 Percentage Distributions According to Length of Service
Profile Frequency Percentage
Length of Service
3 years and below 18 90 %
4 years and above 2 10 %
Total 20 100 %
Age
21 – 29 3 10 %
30 - 38 3 10 %
39 - 47 10 33.33 %
48 - 70 14 46.67 %
Total 30 100 %
•Waste segregation
•Treatment done to the waste before disposal
•Collection and transportation of waste
•Waste storage area and equipments
•Personal protective equipments/measures
•Hospital educational programs
Table 3.1 Mean Distribution According to Waste Segregation
Waste Segregation Mean Interpretation
3. Terminated IVF, blood and body fluids are properly 4.2 Highly Effective
separated from general wastes.
4. I always make sure that sharps are never mixed 4.7 Highly Effective
with non sharps.
5. I never find needles and syringes and other sharp 4.65 Highly Effective
waste mixed with infectious or general waste.
7. Bags and containers for infectious waste are 4.3 Highly Effective
properly marked with the international infectious
substance symbol.
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly
Effective
These results would mean that the respondents apply
waste minimization on their respective departments and
recycling is their main measure to achieve waste
minimization. Waste minimization is centered on the
elimination or reduction of the healthcare waste stream.
Recycling is collecting waste and processing it into
something new. Many items in the hospital can be
recycled. Items such as organics, plastic, paper, glass
and metal can be recycled easily (DOH Manual). An
effective healthcare waste management considers the
basic element of waste minimization therefore it is
beneficial for all hospitals in Iligan City to implement such
measures.
Table 3.2 Mean Distribution According to Treatment of waste
Treatment of waste Mean Interpretation
10. Proper on-site treatment is done prior to the 4.2 Highly Effective
disposal of infectious waste.
11. Proper sterilization prior to the disposal of 4.2 Highly Effective
pathological wastes such as blood and body fluids is
done.
12. Proper encapsulation is done prior to disposal of 4.1 Highly Effective
sharps.
Over all Mean 4.16 Highly Effective
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly Effective
It shows that the respondents of this study concur that they able to
treat infectious waste prior to disposal. The purpose of treating
healthcare waste is to change the biological character of the waste to
minimize its potential to cause harm. In an interview with the waste
manager they make use of chemical substance as means of treatment.
• These results would mean that the respondents do perform
sterilization of pathological waste prior to disposal.
• The subjects concur that proper encapsulation is done prior to
disposal of sharps are done.
Table 3.3 Mean Distribution According to Collection and
Transportation of waste
Collection and Transportation of waste Mean Interpretation
13. The establishment utilized wheeled trolleys, 4.15 Highly Effective
containers, or carts in the transportation of healthcare
wastes.
14. Waste are collected daily (or as frequently as 4.35 Highly Effective
required) and transported to the designated central
storage site.
Over all Mean 4.25 Highly Effective
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly Effective
17. Appropriate containers or bag holder in all locations 4.1 Highly Effective
where particular categories of waste may be generated
are in place.
18. There is a storage area for healthcare waste which 4.5 Highly Effective
is properly enclosed and is located within the
establishment.
19. Colored garbage bags are immediately replaced 3.55 Effective
with new ones of the same type after disposal of
waste.
Over all Mean 4.18 Highly Effective
Table 3.5 Mean Distribution According to Personal Protective
Equipment/ Measures
Personal protective equipment/measures Mean Interpretation
20. Appropriate personal protective equipment in 3.3 Effective
handling waste such as heavy-duty gloves, boots, etc is
made available.
21. Protective measurements are available such as 3.6 Effective
soap and warm water, and immunization against
hepatitis b and tetanus infection.
Over all Mean 3.45 Effective
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly
Effective
•It has an overall mean of 3.3 and interpreted as effective. These results would mean that
majority of the respondents find the availability of appropriate personal protective equipment to
be adequate. However, as observed waste handlers lack the use of protective gears which is
clearly given less importance. Among staffs who routinely handle health care waste, awareness
of the need for safety may decrease with time, which will increase the risk of injury. Periodic
refresher course is therefore recommended (DOH manual).
• It has an overall mean of 3.6 and interpreted as effective. Again these results would mean
that majority of the respondents find the availability of protective measures to be just adequate.
Table 3.6 Mean Distribution According to Hospital educational
programs
Hospital educational programs Mean Interpretation
22. I have undergone training program on hospital 3.45 Effective
waste management.
23. The hospital provides annual education on waste 3.5 Effective
management for employee.
24. I am taught about the color coding for waste 4.1 Highly Effective
segregation.
25. There is training on how to deal with injuries and 3.85 Highly Effective
exposure in handling healthcare wastes.
26. There are billboards and other propaganda 3.85 Highly Effective
materials on environmental sanitation to motivate
cleanliness
Over all Mean 3.75 Effective
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly Effective
• In an interview with their hospital waste manager, it was discovered during an interview that
they only train and educate newly hired employees. In developed countries, training programs and
educational classes are instituted repeatedly for all personnel and the content of these programs
is specifically designed to different personnel (Hospital waste management in Dhaka City, 2005).
•Based on the color coding for waste segregation lecture, The table shows that respondents
clearly understand the color coding system in waste segregation.
•The result shows that billboards and other propaganda materials are being utilized in
promoting proper waste disposal.
Problem IV: What is the status of the
healthcare personnel’s health awareness
and perception on hospital waste
management:
4.1 Health awareness
4.2 Perception
Table 4.1 Health awareness on
Hospital Waste Management Mean Interpretation
1. I have the knowledge of the definition of clinical 4.85 Strongly Agree
waste.
2. I am aware of danger exposed to myself by the 4.8 Strongly Agree
clinical wastes
3. I am aware of the danger exposed to others by the 4.75 Strongly Agree
clinical wastes
4. I am aware of the effects of the clinical wastes to the 4.75 Strongly Agree
environment
5. I am familiar with the waste management policy and 4.65 Strongly Agree
procedures for healthcare waste management.
6. I am familiar with the clinical waste management plan 4.65 Strongly Agree
by the hospital.
7. I am aware of my duties and responsibilities in 4.75 Strongly Agree
maintaining proper waste management
8. I am able to identify various type of clinical wastes 4.65 Strongly Agree
9. I know how to segregate, contain and label the 4.6 Strongly Agree
clinical wastes properly
10. I know how to deal with any accident with clinical 4.3 Strongly Agree
spills, injury or exposure in handling healthcare wastes.
Over all Mean 4.67 Highly Effective
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly Effec
Table 4.2 Perception on Hospital Waste Management
Mean Interpretation
8. I am aware that proper rules and regulations should 4.83 Strongly Agree
be implemented regarding waste management.
Over all Mean 4.89 Highly Effective
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly Effec
Table 5.2 Perception on Hospital Waste Management
Mean Interpretation
1. I am satisfied with how the hospital manages their 4.8 Strongly Agree
waste over the past years.
2. The hospital waste are properly stored or covered. 4.76 Strongly Agree
3. The hospital’s final disposal site area is secured. 4.76 Strongly Agree
4. The hospital conducts proper awareness about 4.66 Strongly Agree
healthcare waste to the community.
5. Staff of the health care establishment is able to 4.53 Strongly Agree
explain to incoming patients and visitors the health care
waste management policy.
6. Hospital wastes are properly contained which 4.7 Strongly Agree
prevents environmental odors from affecting the
neighboring community.
7. Community concerns are properly addressed by the 4.56 Strongly Agree
hospital about healthcare waste management.
Over all Mean 4.68 Highly Effective
Legend: 0 - 1.25= Poor 1.26-2.5= Less Effective 2.6-3.75= Effective 3.76-5.0= Highly Effective
Problem VI: Is there a significant relationship
between health awareness and waste
management practices of health workers.
Table 6.1 Correlation of the Health awareness of health workers and waste
management practices
Variables R Interpretation Hypothesis
Segregation = .306 Not significant Accepted
This means health workers gives much awareness on the storage area and
equipment they use. The better is their waste storage practice means that they have
higher awareness on the safety protective measures. Health workers have high level
of awareness on the impact of medical waste on occupational health as well as
environmental issues. To minimize the risk to public health and the environment it is
imperative to have a proper storage area and equipments so that injury and infection
can be prevented (WHO, 1999).
Problem VII: Is there a significant relationship
between perception and waste management
practices of health workers.
Table 7.1 Correlation of the perception of health workers and
waste management practices
It means that the better is the waste management practices namely collection and
transportation, storage area and equipment, personal protective equipment, and
hospital educational programs the greater is their perception on hospital waste
management. Similarly, good practices are more likely adhered if hospital
management support is well provided. Collection and transportation, and storage area
and equipment are perceived by them because it is visible and they can observe the
actual activity of waste disposal and storage of waste. Personal protective equipment
and measures is related to their perception as they easily observe the supplies that
exist and the one’s lacking. Hospital educational program is also related to their
perception because they understand the importance of continuous educational and
training programs.
Problem VIII: Is there a significant relationship
between the profile variables of both health
workers and community respondents to their
health awareness and perception:
8.1 Health awareness of health workers
8.2 Perception health workers
8.3 Health awareness of community respondents
8.4 Perception of community respondents
Tables 8.1 Correlation of the Health workers profile
variables to their Health awareness.
The impression is that the longer their stay in the community and
the higher their age, the greater is their awareness of the need for
proper waste disposal to promote and maintain a healthy
environment in the community. It is highly noted that with increasing
age and length of stay comes with knowledge and experience.
Tables 8.4 Correlation of the neighboring community profile
variables to their perception.
This finding shows that the longer their stay in the community and the higher
their age makes their perception on hospital waste management greater. It is highly
noted that with increasing age and length of stay comes with knowledge and
experience.
Problem IX: Is there a significant relationship
between the profile of health workers and
their waste management practices:
9.1 Age
9.2 Length of services
Table 9.1 Correlation of the Waste Management Practices to
their Age.
Variables R Interpretation Hypothesis
Segregation = .107 Not significant Accepted
It also shows that the hypotheses of these items are accepted since it
stated that both variables have no significance. Respondents age does
not make a difference to the waste management practices, since majority
of the respondents are generally young.
Table 9.2 Correlation of the Waste Management Practices to
their Length of service.
Variables R Interpretation Hypothesis
Segregation = .125 Not significant Accepted
This study was conducted within Iligan City which aims to seek
out the Impact of Waste Management Practices on Health
Awareness and Perception of Healthcare Personnel and
Neighboring Communities in Selected Hospitals in Iligan City. It
aims to explore the different factors of Healthcare personnel profile
namely Age, and Length of service with regards to their relationship
to their health awareness and perception and to the Hospital waste
management practices. It also aims to explore the different factors
of Community respondents profile namely Age, Educational
attainment, and Length of residency with regards to their
relationship to their Health awareness and perception on hospital
waste management.
Also, to correlate the relationship of dependent variables
Health awareness and perception of health workers with
the independent variables Hospital waste management
practices namely Waste Segregation, Treatment done to
Waste before Disposal, Collection and Transportation of
Waste, Waste Storage Area and Equipments, Personal
Protective Equipments and Measures, and Hospital
Educational Programs.
1. It was discovered during an interview with their hospital waste manager that
they practice the color-coding system but is not sufficient enough to sustain it
due to lack of budget and supplies. However, they were able to develop
means on how to manage their healthcare waste through separation of
infectious waste from non- infectious waste.
2. It is observed that waste handlers lack the use of protective gears which is
clearly given less importance. Appropriate personal protective equipment in
handling waste such as heavy-duty gloves, and boots are not made
available. These findings suggest that readily available personal protective
equipments are crucial to ensure their use. Protective measures such as
soap are provided but not regularly, and immunization against hepatitis b and
tetanus infection are not provided.
3. Garbage bags are not immediately replaced with new ones of the same type
after disposal of waste because there are not enough funds for the container
bags.
CONCLUSION
4. Respondent’s have undergone training regarding hospital waste
management. However, in an interview with their hospital waste manager,
it was discovered that they only train and educate newly hired employees.
5. Although wastes are properly sorted in the hospital, the local government
garbage collectors do not follow proper segregation and disposes it in the
city dump site - a practice that defeats the purpose of waste segregation
in hospitals.
6. Waste storage area and equipments is known to have a significant
relationship to the health awareness of health workers.
7. Collection and transportation of waste, Waste storage area and
equipments, Personal protective equipments and measures, and Hospital
educational programs are known to have significant relationship to health
workers perception.
8. Neighboring community profile variables namely age and length of
residence are known to have a significant relationship with their health
awareness.
9. Neighboring community profile variables namely age and length of
residence are known to have a significant relationship with their
perception on hospital waste management.
Recommendations
Considering the results and conclusions made, the
researchers offer the following recommendations:
1. Hospitals should conduct regular orientation on
the hospitals waste segregation and waste
management policies to patients and new staff.
2. Ensure worker safety through education, training
and proper personal protective equipments.
3. Reactivate committees and hold monthly
meetings to discuss and address issues related
to updates on waste management and
environmental health awareness.
Recommendations
4. Ensure proper dissemination of information through
supervisors/managers of each department and
discussed to their members. Hold event such as Waste
Management Week or an Infection Control Week once a
year.
5. Consider training for all garbage collectors by the DOH,
because there is a need for education as to the hazards
of improper disposal of healthcare waste.
6. The city government should propose a separate
dumpsite for all healthcare wastes and set limit to public
access to decrease the risk of epidemics of infectious
diseases. Other recommendation for future research
would be to determine the waste generation rate of
hospitals in Iligan City.
Gregorio T. Lluch Hospital Waste Management
Gregorio T. Lluch Hospital Waste Management
Gregorio T. Lluch Hospital Waste Management
Gregorio T. Lluch Hospital Waste Management
St. Mary’s Maternity and Children’s Hospital