Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Conclusion
of
s
t
c
e
.
eff
x
g
a
n
i
w
t
asta ears with rs.
v
e
d
e
e
s
v
h
i
t
r
w
d
d
e
e
r
s
bu
crib ock his c
s
o
t
e
k
d
a
y
l
e
e
b
p
s
s
o
s
t
y
o
t
t
as
Od
o
w
n
e
n
h
d
t
o
i
e
lut
sk
r in
a
o
e
s
e
m
r
s
i
o
a
H
s
.H
r
n
e
o
g
i
t
n
c
distra ays, passe
d
Nowa
g:
n
i
w
o
l
fol
e
h
t
m
o
r
f
y
l
s
ain
n
m
o
i
t
t
l
a
u
ic
es
n
r
u
s
m
n
o
om
ct i
c
a
t
r
i
t
p
s
i
k
oc
dd
c
n
a
a
s
r
int
ion
atio
t
/
u
p
t
r
i
u
s
e
r
t
r
d
in
e
t
r
Inte
a
o
p
r
i
e
c
ti
oll
n
r
t
a
n
n
o
u
C
an
r
o
n
Pilot /
k
or
itio
d
w
n
n
o
w
c
l
do
a
m
r
d
o
a
bn
a
He
n
a
to
g
n
i
d
n
Respo
% of
Events
72 %
inappropriate action
Inadequate crew coordination,
cross-check and back-up
Insufficient horizontal or vertical
situational awareness
Inadequate or insufficient
understanding of prevailing
63 %
52 %
48 %
conditions
Slow or delayed action
Incorrect or incomplete pilot /
controller communications
45 %
33 %
Use
To receive
Multiple
AIRS
over
SIE
only
ALERTS
COCKPIT /
CABIN
EFFECTS
CREW
DIAGNOSIS
HMI
ASPECTS
PROCEDURE(S)
PROCEDURE
TYPE
PROCEDURE
ACCESS
PROCEDURE
CONTENTS
CREW PERFORMANCE
PROCEDURE
EXECUTION
OPERATIONAL
ENVIRONMENT
CREW
ERROR
MANAGEMENT
CREW
ACTIONS
WEATHER /
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
THREAT
MANAGEMENT
AIRCRAFT
ATTITUDE
AND
FLIGHT PATH
CONTROL
CREW
COORDINATION
:
g
a
n
i
e
r
rn
ENVIRONMENT & CIRCUMSTANCES
o
a
t
W
t
p
m
e
AIRCRAFT
t
t ORGANIZATIONAL
RUNWAY
SYSTEMS
CREW a
t
CONDITIONS
CONDITION /
FACTORS
FACTORS
o
n
CONFIG
Do
Difficulty
in use of systems
Automation
Condition
not understood
not detected
Abnormal
Late
combination of
procedures
Procedure
scope
incomplete
Entry
Noise
False
Complex
indication
problem recognition
in procedure
unclear
Procedure
/ A/C
configuration mismatch
ECAM
warning
Workload management
Over-speed
NATP SOPs
NATP C/Ls
Incomplete
configuration
Inadequate
separation
Delayed action
Inadequate
ATC instruction
Cockpit/cabin comms
Undetected/unchallenged
crew error
Briefings
Flight monitoring
Pilot/controller
Operational
In-flight
communication
stress
failure
Fatigue/vigilance
Company
policies
Operational Factors
Situational
Recognition/
Diagnosis
Human Factors
Crew
Performance
Procedures
SAFETY
ISSUES
OGHFA 1_HP_04_VIS_Managing Interruptions and Distractions
ORGANISATION
CREW
CREW
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
PERSONAL
INFORMATION
POST INCIDENT
STRESS
OPERATIONAL
STRESS
First Party
AIRPORT
FACILITIES
WORKLOAD
MANAGEMENT
Third Party
First Party
DISTRACTION
Third Party
Third Party
First Party
MEMORY LAPSE
Third Party
RTO
Decide
/ Act :
WHAT DECISION OR ACTION to get back on track?
Verify
21
22
helping
helping
Perceive
Students should be
allowed to make
& catch their own mistakes.
Situation
Mitigate
Errors that are not
detected timely should be better debriefed.
Awarenes
s
Comprehend
Trap
LOSA found that crews failed to detect 42% of errors noted by
Threat
cockpit observers.
Management
Project
Avoid
Increasing
ESSAI : Enhanced Safety through Situation Awareness Integration in training (EEC program)
OGHFA 1_HP_04_VIS_Managing Interruptions and Distractions
Monitoring
What effect does being tired or being less alert have on your monitoring
behavior ?
Divided
Break
C/L, keep hand on radio, write down ATC, C/L for baro set,