Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Block Diagram
Signaling
of errors
Power Spectrum
Bandwidth efficiency
Rb
Bits/s/Hz
Coherent PSK
Binary
Consider
and
2
1 t
cos 2f c t
Tb
2
2 t
sin 2f c t
Tb
BPSK
s1
1
s0
We place s0 to minimize
probability of error
BPSK
We
s0
Rotate
BPSK
2
s0
s1
We
BPSK
Finally,
we have
s1 t Eb 1 (t )
2 Eb
cos 2f c t
Tb
2 Eb
s0 t Eb 1 (t )
cos 2f c t
Tb
BPSK
BPSK
Probability
1
erfc
Eb
N0
BPSK
2E
cos 2f c t 2i 1 ; 0 t T
T
4
is symbol duration
E is signal energy per symbol
There are 4 symbols for i = 1, 2, 3, and 4
QPSK
2
2
si t E cos 2i 1
cos 2f c t E sin 2i 1
sin 2f c t
4 T
4 T
E cos 2i 1 1 t E sin 2i 1 2 t ; 0 t T
4
4
Which
4
si
E sin 2i 1
4
E cos 2i 1
QPSK
i
10
3 / 4
00
5 / 4
01
11
7 / 4
Coordinate of
Message point
si1
E/2
E/2
E/2
E/2
si2
E/2
E/2
E/2
E/2
QPSK
2
(01)
s3
s2
(00)
s4 (11)
s1
(10)
QPSK signals
QPSK
Block
diagrams of
(a) QPSK
transmitter
and (b)
coherent
QPSK
receiver.
signal
constellation
given in the
figure
Z3
(10)
s3
Z4
s4 (11)
E/2
E/2
s2
Z2
(00)
Z1
E/2
s1
E / 2 (10)
QPSK
We
since
Probability
given by
1 erfc
E
2N0
QPSK
If
Pe 1 PC erfc
erfc
2N0
E
2N0
1 erfc 2
4
E
2N0
QPSK
Since
Eb
N0
The
1
1
Pe per bit Pe per symbol erfc
2
2
Which
Eb
N0
BPSK vs QPSK
Power spectrum density of BPSK vs. QPSK
BPSK
QPSK
1.8
1.6
Normalized PSD, Sf/2E b
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Normalized frequency,fTb
1.6
1.8
QPSK
Conclusion
QPSK
OFFSET QPSK
90 degree shift in phase
2
(01)
s3
s2
(00)
s4 (11)
s1
(10)
OFFSET QPSK
OFFSET QPSK
Whenever
OFFSET QPSK
2
1
0
-1
-2
Original Signal
2
1. 5
1
0. 5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
Filtered signal
OFFSET QPSK
To solve
OFFSET QPSK
In
OFFSET QPSK
Inphase
QPSK
1
0. 5
-0.5
-1
1
4
Q phase
QPSK
0. 5
-0.5
-1
1
1
0
4
2
1
QPSK
10
-1
-2
01
1
10
00
6
Inphase
Offset QPSK
0.5
-0.5
-1
Q phase
Offset QPSK
0.5
-1
-0.5
2
1
Offset QPSK
-1
-2
10
10
01
00
7
Offset QPSK
OFFSET QPSK
Bandwidths
Pe erfc
Which
E
2N 0
QPSK.
/4-shifted QPSK
Try
/4-shifted QPSK
As the result,
the phase of the
signal can be
changed in
order of /4 or
3/4
/4-shifted QPSK
Since
00
+/4
+3/4
-3/4
-/4
01
11
10
/4-shifted QPSK:00101001
Step
/4
00
/4
/2
/2
10
-/4
/4
/4
10
-/4
01
3/4
3/4
/4-shifted QPSK
01
10
QPSK
01
10
0
-2
0.5
1.5
2
2.5
OFFSET
QPSK
3.5
4.5
0.5
1.5
2
2.5
D OFFSET
QPSK
3.5
4.5
0.5
1.5
3.5
4.5
2
0
-2
1
0
-1
2.5
/4-shifted QPSK
Since
/4-shifted QPSK
Illustrating the
possibility of phase
angles wrapping
around the positive
real axis.
M-array PSK
At
2E
2
i 1 ,
cos 2f c t
T
M
i 1,2, , M
M-array PSK
Signal-space diagram
for octaphase-shift
keying (i.e., M 8). The
decision boundaries are
shown as dashed lines.
Signal-space diagram
illustrating the
application of the union
bound for octaphaseshift keying.
M-array PSK
Probability
of errors
Pe erfc
E
sin / M ;
N0
M 4
M-ary PSK
0
10
-10
10
-20
10
-30
10
-40
10
QPSK
8-ary PSK
16-ary PSK
-50
10
10
15
Eb/N0 dB
20
25
30
M-array PSK
Power
Spectra (M-array)
S PSK ( f ) 2 E sinc 2 Tf
2 Eb log 2 M sinc 2 Tb f log 2 M
M=2,
we have
S BPSK ( f ) 2 Eb sinc 2 Tb f
M-array PSK
Tbf
M-array PSK
Bandwidth efficiency:
We only consider the bandwidth of the main lobe
(or null-to-null bandwidth)
2 Rb
2
2
B
T Tb log 2 M log 2 M
M-ary QAM
QAM
M-ary QAM
Again,
we have
2
1 t
cos 2f c t ;0 t T
T
2
2 t
sin 2f c t 0 t T
Tb
M-ary QAM
QAM
square Constellation
Having
16-QAM
(3,3)
(3,1)
(1,3)
(1,1)
(3,3)
(3,1)
ai , bi
(3,1) (1,1) (1,1) (3,1)
L-ary, 4-PAM
16-QAM
16-QAM
Calculation
of Probability of errors
Since
1
d
Pe 1 erfc
2 N
L
1 1 erfc
E0
N0
16-QAM
A
Probability
Pe symbol 1 Pc symbol 1 1 Pe 2
1 1 2 Pe Pe 2 2 Pe
16-QAM
Hence,
we have
Pe symbol 2 1
erfc
M
But
E0
N0
We
have
Pe symbol 2 1
erfc
M
3E av
2 M 1 N 0
Coherent FSK
FSK
Binary FSK
Transmitted
signals are
2 Eb
cos 2f i t , 0 t Tb
Tb
si t
0,
where
nc i
fi
; i 1,2
Tb
elsewhere
Binary FSK
S1(t)
represented symbol 1.
S2(t)
represented symbol 0.
This
Binary FSK
There
2
cos 2f i t , 0 t Tb
Tb
i t
0,
As
elsewhere
s1
and s 2
0
Eb
BFSK
the figure, we have d12 2 Eb
In case of Pr(0)=Pr(1), the probability of
error is given by
From
1
Pe erfc
We
Eb
2N0
TRANSMITTER
RECEIVER
2 Eb
t
cos 2f c t
Tb
Tb
t
t
2 Eb
2 Eb
cos cos 2f c t
sin sin 2f c t
Tb
Tb
Tb
Tb
t
2 Eb
cos
Tb
T
b
have
S BI f F
For
gt
t
2 Eb
cos
Tb
Tb
Eb
2Tb
1
f
2Tb
1
f
2Tb
t
2 Eb
sin
Tb
Tb
S BQ
8EbTb cos 2 Tb f
2 4Tb2 f 2 1
we obtain
S B ( f ) S BI ( f ) S BQ ( f )
signal is given by
s t
At
2 Eb
t
cos 2f c t
Tb
Tb
t = 0, we have
s 0
The
2 Eb
0
cos 2f c 0
Tb
Tb
2 Eb
cos 0
Tb
t = Tb, we have
s Tb
2 Eb
Tb
cos 2f c Tb
Tb
Tb
2 Eb
cos
Tb
We
We
s t
2 Eb
cos 2f 2 t 0 for "0"
Tb
2 Eb
cos 2f c t t
Tb
2 Eb
cos 2f1t 0 for "1"
Tb
MSK
Where
Observe
h
t 0 t
Tb
that
h
f1 f c
2Tb
and
h
f2 fc
2Tb
1
f c f1 f 2
2
MSK
h
For
Sundes FSK, h = 1.
For MSK, h = 0.5.
h cannot be any smaller because the
orthogonality between cos(2f1t) and cos(2f2t)
is still held for h < 0.5.
Orthogonality guarantees that both signal will
not interfere each other in detection process.
MSK
Phase
MSK
Signal
into
s t
2 Eb
cos 2f c t t
Tb
2 Eb
2 Eb
cos t cos 2f c t
sin t sin 2f c t
Tb
Tb
s I t cos 2f c t sQ t sin 2f c t
where
t 0
t ;0 t Tb
2Tb
MSK
Symbol
(0)
(Tb)
/2
-/2
-/2
/2
MSK
For
t 0
t ;Tb t 0
2Tb
Lets
We
know that
t
t
t
sin 0 sin
cos 0
cos 0 cos
2Tb
2Tb
2Tb
MSK
(0) can be either 0 or depending on
the past history. We have
Since
t
t
t
cos
cos 0
cos 0 cos
2Tb
2Tb
2Tb
t
2 Eb
s I (t )
cos
Tb
2Tb
;Tb t Tb
MSK
Similarly
we can write
t Tb
t Tb
2Tb
for
Furthermore,
MSK
Hence,
we have
t Tb
t Tb
t Tb
sin Tb
cos Tb sin
sin Tb cos
2Tb
2Tb
2Tb
t
t
sin Tb cos
cos Tb sin
2Tb 2
2Tb 2
we
t
t
t Tb
sin Tb
cos
sin
2Tb
2Tb 2
2Tb
MSK
Hence,
we have
t
2 Eb
sQ (t )
sin
Tb
2Tb
;0 t 2Tb
The
t
2
1 t
cos
Tb
2Tb
2 t
cos 2f c t ;0 t Tb
t
2
sin
Tb
2Tb
sin 2f c t ;0 t Tb
MSK
We
s t
E b cos 0 1 (t ) E b sin Tb 2 (t )
s11 (t ) s 2 2 (t )
Where s1 Eb cos 0
and
s 2 Eb sin Tb
MSK
Symbol
(0)
s1
(Tb)
Eb
/2
Eb
Eb
-/2
Eb
Eb
-/2
Eb
Eb
/2
s2
Eb
1
Pe erfc
Eb
N0
Phase:
/2
/2
/2
-/2
MSK
We
Block
Tb
x1 x(t )1 (t )dt
Tb
2Tb
x 2 x(t ) 2 (t )dt
0
4
MSK
BPSK
QPSK
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Normalized Frequency, fTb
1.6
1.8
MSK
Probability
32 E b cos 2Tb f
S MSK ( f )
2 16Tb2 f 2 1
sin(2ft)
cos(2ft)
cos(2ft)
Receiver
Transmitter
2E
cos 2f i t ; i 1,2,0 t Tb
T
Problem
we have
2E
cos 2f i t
T
2E
2E
cos cos 2f i t
sin sin 2f i t
T
T
si11 (t ) si 2 2 (t )
To get
0
T
0
T
The
1/ 2
2
2
T
0
0
Decision
This
cos(2fit).
T
y (t ) x t cos 2f i T t x( ) cos 2f i T t d
0
y (t ) cos 2f i (T t ) x( ) cos 2f i d
0
T
- sin 2f i (T t ) x( ) sin 2f i d
0
at t=T is
li x( ) cos 2f i d
Which
x( ) cos 2f i d
2 1/ 2
of Errors
1
E
Pe exp
2
2N 0
Noncoherent: BFSK
For
BFSK, we have
2 Eb
cos 2f i t ; 0 t Tb
Tb
si t
; elsewhere
Noncoherent: BFSK
Noncoherent: BFSK
Probability
of Errors
Eb
1
Pe exp
2
2N 0
DPSK
Differential
Instead
PSK
DPSK
Or
we have
s1 (t )
and
s 2 (t )
Eb
cos 2f c t ;
2Tb
0 t 2Tb
Eb
cos 2f c t ;
2Tb
Tb t 2Tb
Eb
cos 2f c t ;
2Tb
0 t 2Tb
Eb
cos 2f c t ;
2Tb
Tb t 2Tb
DPSK
In
Hence,
Pe exp
2
N0
DPSK: Transmitter
d k bk d k 1 bk d k 1
DPSK
{bk}
1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
{dk-1}
1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Differential
encoded {dk}
1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
Transmitted
Phase
0 0 0 0 0
DPSK: Receiver
DPSK: Receiver
From
say 0
If