Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Posttraumatic Growth
Resilience
dynamic developmental process
positive adaption
despite adversity or trauma
personality trait or attribute
Two-dimensional construct
Exposure to adversity
Positive adjustment outcomes
Posttraumatic Growth
Age (older)
Gender (female)
Severity and type of stressor/trauma
Higher income
More time since traumatic event
Existential awareness (lifes fragility)
Religiosity
Higher levels of social support
Calhoun & Tedeschi, 1999, 2004 (Milam et al., 2004)
Discussion
Does this sound a bit like a clich to you?
Measures of PTG
Qualitative (indirect) measures
Secondary analysis of PTSD interviews
Coding for elements of PTG
(Salter & Stallard, 2004)
Quantitative measures
For adults: Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (Tedeschi
& Calhoun, 1996)
PTGI-Revised for Children and Adolescents
(Yaskowich, 2002)
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children Revised
(PTGI-C-R) (Kilmer et al., 2009)
Perception of Changes in Self scale (Kazak et al., 2001)
3 areas of PTG
Perception of Self
Interpersonal relationships
Philosophy of life
PTGI
Negative life events (within previous 3 years)
Closed-ended checklist of life change units, including
10 major neg. events (Coddington et al, 1972)
Common neg. life events
PTG Measure
Perceptions of Changes in Self (PCS)
Kazak et al., 1996, 2001
Domains of PTG
Perception of Self
least applicable
None used words survivor or victim
Face reality of vulnerability
Philosophy of Life
PTGI-C
PTG score 37-84 (m=65.11)
Correlations with other variables
Sign. corr. with competency belief
No other sign. corr. (e.g. age, gender, severity, social
support)
Social
support
Ruminative thinking
Competency beliefs
PTG
Critique
Hypothesized model
Several factors remain untested
Cryder et al. discuss link between PTG and
social support (but no sign. Corr.)
No control groups
Normal developmental process?
Positive bias
A positive bias?
N=276 adults
Two factors
Method (PTGI)
42.5% exposure
linked to stressful event
not linked to specific event (generally past 4 years)
>5y
Whichyoull
one do
Later
getyou
like the
whats
in most?
this
box. So, put
the one you
Which
one do
like
the most
in you
likebox.
the least?
the
doll
sponge
>5y
Now, lets work
How do you feel now,
on another task
about whats in the box?
and later you
get whats in
the box.
< 5y
Whats in
Before
you
open
theyou
box?
How
do
Whathow
did did
you
the box,
feel
now?
Verythink
good,
isnow
in the
you
feel
you get whats
box?
in the box.
doll
sponge
ToM: Introspection
(Flavell et al., 1995)
Do not
think
< 8 years
No
thoughts
easy
having no
thoughts
Theory of mind
Not mentioned in literature on PTG
Although Kilmer mentions psychological
mindedness
Discussion
Do you think PTG in young children is
possible?
Some problems:
Extend of literature (two fields: clin. and dev.)
Dev. lit: childrens understanding quite
sophisticated
struggle about similar issues
Resilience
Recovery
Tree will bend to accommodate wind, so it wont
break, and will return to upright position when wind
stops
Resistance
Tree stands still, undisturbed, in face of howling wind
Reconfiguration
Tree not simply make temporary accommodation,
then resume original shape
instead, it changes its shape (making it more resitant
to break in future winds)
Resistance
People who exhibit normal functioning before, during, and after a
stressor (even long after a stressor)
Reconfiguration
Individuals reconfigure their cognitions, beliefs, and behaviors in
manner that allows them to adapt to traumatic experiences
Possibly withstanding future trauma
Discussion
Whats normal response following
traumatic event?
E.g. loss of a loved one
Related question
External adaption criteria
Accommodation, achievement, absence of
delinquency
Internal
Psychological well-being, low level of distress
Or both
(Luther et al. 2000)
Historical overview
Atypical schizophrenics (Garmezy, 1970)
Children from mothers with schizophrenia (Garmezy, 1974;
Masten et al., 1990)
Low SES
Parental mental illness
Urban poverty
Community violence
Chronic illness
Catastrophic live events
Models/approach to resilience
(Masten, 2001)
Variable focused
Link among measures of degree of risk/or
adversity, outcome, potential quality of
individual or environment (to
compensate/protect)
Person focused
Compare people with different profiles (within
or across time) on sets of criteria to ascertain
what differentiates resilient from non resilient
children
Three models
Main effect
Indirect
Interaction
Bipolar +
predictor Risk
Outcome
+
+
Effective
parenting
Risk
Outcome
Risk
Risk activated
moderator
Person focused
+ variables assembled in naturally occurring
configuration, well suited for search for
common and uncommon patterns in lives
- Can obscure specific linkages
Positive Psychology
The role of positive emotions
Fredericksons broaden-and-built theory