Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Manufacturing Environment
Classification of Clean Areas
Comparison of classifications
Table 1
5
Manufacturing Environment
Classification of Clean Areas
Classified in terms of airborne particles (Table 2)
Manufacturing Environment
Four grades of clean areas:
Grade D (equivalent to Class 100,000, ISO 8):
Clean area for carrying out less critical stages in
manufacture of aseptically prepared products eg.
handling of components after washing.
Manufacturing Environment
Grade A (equivalent to Class 100 (US Federal
Standard 209E), ISO 5 (ISO 14644-1):
Local zone for high risk operations eg. product filling,
stopper bowls, open vials, handling sterile materials,
aseptic connections, transfer of partially stoppered
containers to be lyophilized.
Conditions usually provided by laminar air flow
workstation.
Manufacturing Environment
Limits for viable particles (microbiological
contamination)
Table 3
These are average values
Individual settle plates may be exposed for less than 4 hours
Values are for guidance only - not intended to represent specifications
Levels (limits) of detection of microbiological contamination should be
established for alert and action purposes and for monitoring trends of
air
quality in the facility
9
Manufacturing Environment
Environmental Monitoring
Physical
Particulate matter
Differential pressures
Air changes, airflow patterns
Clean up time/recovery
Temperature and relative humidity
Airflow velocity
10
Manufacturing Environment
Environmental Monitoring - Physical
Particulate matter
Particles significant because they can contaminate and
also carry organisms
Critical environment should be measured not more than
30cm from worksite, within airflow and during
filling/closing operations
Preferably a remote probe that monitors continuously
Difficulties when process itself generates particles (e.g.
powder filling)
Appropriate alert and action limits should be set and
corrective actions defined if limits exceeded
11
Manufacturing Environment
Environmental Monitoring - Physical
Differential pressures
Positive pressure differential of 10-15 Pascals should be
maintained between adjacent rooms of different
classification (with door closed)
Most critical area should have the highest pressure
Pressures should be continuously monitored and
frequently recorded.
Alarms should sound if pressures deviate
Any deviations should be investigated and effect on
environmental quality determined
12
Manufacturing Environment
Environmental Monitoring - Physical
Air Changes/Airflow patterns
Air flow over critical areas should be uni-directional
(laminar flow) at a velocity sufficient to sweep particles
away from filling/closing area
for B, C and D rooms at least 20 changes per hour are
ususally required
Clean up time/recovery
Particulate levels for the Grade A at rest state should
be achieved after a short clean-up period of 20 minutes
after completion of operations (guidance value)
Particle counts for Grade A in operation state should
be maintained whenever product or open container is
exposed
13
Manufacturing Environment
Environmental Monitoring - Physical
Temperature and Relative Humidity
Ambient temperature and humidity should not be
uncomfortably high (could cause operators to
generate particles) (18C)
Airflow velocity
Laminar airflow workstation air speed of approx
0.45m/s 20% at working position (guidance value)
14
Manufacturing Environment
Personnel
Minimum number of personnel in clean areas
especially during aseptic processing
Special cases
supervision in case of outside staff
decontamination procedures (e.g. staff who worked with
animal tissue materials)
15
Manufacturing Environment
Personnel (2)
High standards of hygiene and cleanliness
should not enter clean rooms if ill or with open
wounds
Manufacturing Environment
Personnel (3)
Clothing of appropriate quality:
Grade D
hair, beard, moustache covered
protective clothing and shoes
Grade C
hair, beard, moustache covered
single or 2-piece suit (covering wrists, high neck),
shoes/overshoes
no fibres/particles to be shed
Grade A and B
headgear, beard and moustache covered, masks,
gloves
not shedding fibres, and retain particles shed by
operators
17
Manufacturing Environment
Personnel (4)
Outdoor clothing not in change rooms leading to
Grade B and C rooms
Change at every working session, or once a day (if
supportive data)
Change gloves and masks at every working session
Frequent disinfection of gloves during operations
Washing of garments separate laundry facility
No damage, and according to validated procedures
(washing and sterilization)
18
Aseptic Processing
In aseptic processing, each component is
individually sterilised, or several components are
combined with the resulting mixture sterilized.
Most common is preparation of a solution which is
filtered through a sterilizing filter then filled into sterile
containers (e.g active and excipients dissolved in Water
for Injection)
May involve aseptic compounding of previously sterilized
components which is filled into sterile containers
May involve filling of previously sterilized powder
sterilized by dry heat/irradiation
produced from a sterile filtered solution which is then
aseptically crystallized and precipitated
requires more handling and manipulation with higher potential
for contamination during processing
19
Aseptic Processing
Preparation and Filtration of Solutions
Solutions to be sterile filtered prepared in a Grade C
environment
If not to be filtered, preparation should be prepared in
a Grade A environment with Grade B background (e.g.
ointments, creams, suspensions and emulsions)
Prepared solutions filtered through a sterile 0.22m (or
less) membrane filter into a previously sterilized
container
filters remove bacteria and moulds
do not remove all viruses or mycoplasmas
20
Aseptic Processing
Preparation and Filtration of Solutions (2)
consideration should be given to complementing
filtration process with some form of heat treatment
Double filter or second filter at point of fill advisable
Fitlers should not shed particles, asbestos containing
filters should not be used
Same filter should not be used for more than one day
unless validated
If bulk product is stored in sealed vessels, pressure
release outlets should have hydrophobic microbial
retentive air filters
21
Aseptic Processing
Preparation and Filtration of Solutions (3)
Time limits should be established for each phase of
processing, e.g.
maximum period between start of bulk product
compounding and sterilization (filtration)
maximum permitted holding time of bulk if held after
filtration prior to filling
product exposure on processing line
storage of sterilized containers/components
total time for product filtration to prevent organisms
from penetrating filter
maximum time for upstream filters used for clarification
or particle removal (can support microbial attachment)
22
Aseptic Processing
Preparation and Filtration of Solutions (4)
Filling of solution may be followed by lyophilization
(freeze drying)
stoppers partially seated, product transferred to
lyophilizer (Grade A/B conditions)
Release of air/nitrogen into lyophilizer chamber at
completion of process should be through sterilizing
filter
23
Aseptic Processing
Prefiltration Bioburden (natural microbial load)
Limits should be stated and testing should be carried
out on each batch
Frequency may be reduced after satisfactory history
is established
and biobuden testing performed on components
24
Aseptic Processing
Prefiltation Bioburden (2)
No defined maximum limit but the limit should not
exceed the validated retention capability of the filter
Bioburden controls should also be included in inprocess controls
particularly when product supports microbial growth
and/or manufacturing process involves use of culture
media
25
Aseptic Processing
Filter integrity
Filters of 0.22m or less should be used for filtration
of liquids and gasses (if applicable)
filters for gasses that may be used for purging or
overlaying of filled containers or to release vacuum in
lyphilization chamber
Aseptic Processing
Filter Validaton
Filter must be validated to demonstrate ability to
remove bacteria
most common method is to show that filter can retain a
microbiological challenge of 107 CFU of Brevundimonas
diminuta per cm2 of the filter surface
a bioburden isolate may be more appropriate for filter
retention studies than Brevundimonas diminuta
Challenge concentration is intended to provide a margin
of safety well beyond what would be expected in
production
preferably the microbial challenge is added to the fully
formulated product which is then passed through the
filter
27
Aseptic Processing
Filter validation (2)
if the product is bactericidal, product should be passed
through the filter first followed by modified product
containing the microbial challenge (after removing any
bactericidal activity remaining on the filter)
filter validation should be carried out under worst case
conditions e.g. maximum allowed filtration time and
maximum pressure
integrity testing specification for routine filtration
should correlate with that identified during filter
validation
28
Aseptic Processing
Equipment/container preparation and
sterilization
All equipment (including lyophilizers) and product
containers/closures should be sterilized using
validated cycles
same requirements apply for equipment sterilization that
apply to terminally sterilized product
particular attention to stoppers - should not be tightly
packed as may clump together and affect air removal
during vacuum stage of sterilization process
equipment wrapped and loaded to facilitate air removal
particular attention to filters, housings and tubing
29
Aseptic Processing
Equipment/container preparation and
sterilization (2)
CIP/SIP processes
particular attention to deadlegs - different orientation
requirements for CIP and SIP
Aseptic Processing
Equipment/container preparation and
sterilization (2)
31
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation
Not possible to define a sterility assurance level
for aseptic processing
Process is validated by simulating the
manufacturing process using microbiological
growth medium (media fill)
Process simulation includes formulation (compounding),
filtration and filling with suitable media using the same
processes involved in manufacture of the product
modifications must be made for different dosage formats
e.g. lyophilized products, ointments, sterile bulks, eye
drops filled into semi-transparent/opaque containers,
biological products
32
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (2)
Media fill program should include worst case
activities
Factors associated with longest permitted run (e.g.
operator fatigue)
Representative number, type, and complexity of
normal interventions, non-routine interventions
and events (e.g. maintenance, stoppages, etc)
Lyophilisation
Aseptic equipment assembly
33
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (3)
Worst case activities (cont)
No of personnel and their activities, shift changes,
breaks, gown changes
Representative number of aseptic additions (e.g.
charging containers, closures, sterile ingredients)
or transfers
Aseptic equipment connections/disconnections
Aseptic sample collections
Line speed and configuration
34
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (4)
Worst case activities (cont)
Weight checks
Container closure systems
Specific provisions in processing instructions
35
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (5)
Duration
Depends on type of operation
BFS, Isolator processes - sufficient time to include
manipulations and interventions
For conventional operations should include the total
filling time
Size
5000 - 10000 generally acceptable or batch size if <5000
For manually intensive processes larger numbers
should be filled
Lower numbers can be filled for isolators
36
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (6)
Frequency and Number
Three initial, consecutive per shift
Subsequently semi-annual per shift and process
All personnel should participate at least annually,
consistent with routine duties
Changes should be assessed and revalidation
carried out as required
Line Speed
Speed depends on type of process
37
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (7)
Environmental conditions
Representative of actual production conditions (no. of
personnel, activity levels etc) - no special precautions (not
including adjustment of HVAC)
if nitrogen used for overlaying/purging need to substitute with
air
Media
Anaerobic media should be considered under certain
circumstances
Should be tested for growth promoting properties (including
factory isolates)
38
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (8)
Incubation, Examination
In the range 20-35C.
If two temperatures are used, lower temperature first
Inspection by qualified personnel.
All integral units should be incubated. Should be
justification for any units not incubated.
Units removed (and not incubated) should be
consistent with routine practices (although incubation
would give information regarding risk of intervention)
Batch reconciliation
39
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (9)
Interpretation of Results
When filling fewer than 5000 units:
no contaminated units should be detected
One (1) contaminated unit is considered cause for
revalidation, following an investigation
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (10)
Interpretation of Results
Media fills should be observed by QC and
contaminated units reconcilable with time and
activity being simulated (Video may help)
Ideally - no contamination. Any contamination
should be investigated.
Any organisms isolated should be identified to
species level (genotypic identification)
Invalidation of a media fill run should be rare
41
Aseptic Processing
Process Validation (11)
Batch Record Review
Process and environmental control activities
should be included in batch records and reviewed
as part of batch release
42
Aseptic Processing
Additional issues specific to Isolator and
BFS Technologies
Isolators
Decontamination process requires a 4-6 log
reduction of appropriate Biological Indicator (BI)
Minimum 6 log reduction of BI if surface is to be
free of viable organisms
Significant focus on glove integrity - daily checks,
second pair of gloves inside isolator glove
Traditional aseptic vigilance should be maintained
43
Aseptic Processing
Blow-Fill-Seal (BFS)
Located in a Grade D environment
Critial zone should meet Grade A (microbiological)
requirements (particle count requirements may be
difficult to meet in operation)
Operators meet Grade C garment requirements
Validation of extrusion process should
demonstrate destruction of endotoxin and spore
challenges in the polymeric material
Final inspection should be capable of detecting
leakers
44
Aseptic Processing
Issues relating to Aseptic Bulk Processing
Applies to products which can not be filtered at point of
fill and require aseptic processing throughout entire
manufacturing process.
Entire aseptic process should be subject to process
simulation studies under worst case conditions
(maximum duration of "open" operations, maximum no
of operators)
Process simulations should incorporate storage and
transport of bulk.
Multiple uses of the same bulk with storage in between
should also be included in process simulations
Assurance of bulk vessel integrity for specified holding
times.
45
Aseptic Processing
Bulk Processing (2)
Process simulation for formulation stage should be
performed at least twice per year.
Cellular therapies, cell derived products etc
products released before results of sterility tests
known (also TPNs, radioactive preps, cytotoxics)
should be manufactured in a closed system
Additional testing
sterility testing of intermediates
microscopic examination (e.g. gram stain)
endotoxin testing
46
Useful Publications
47