POISONED BY MY NEIGHBOR FROM

HELL
PRESENTS

About Celeste Cirinna

Clerk, City of Montrose, Ia.

About Celeste Cirinna dba Executive Manager

City of Montrose, Lee County, Iowa
The next slide shows in the circled area Value is handwritten $40,880 Fee $ is blank. The issue date at
the top is 7-12-2004. Boatner had only noticed that this permit is invalid due to the fact that there no
signature of the builder as required by State of Iowa law. Clearly Building Administrator Holland did not
follow general procedure when issuing this permit.

Original Building Permit

Filed
at Montrose City Hall.
In the circled area Value is handwritten
$40,880 Fee $ is blank. The issue date at
the top is 7-12-2004. Complainant had only
noticed that this permit was invalid due to
no Builder's signature. Building
Administrator Holland was intentionally
negligent at least for his lack of oversight
and pre-approval of issuance of this permit
and every other issue on behalf of Mr.
Conlee.
The question is why did these City Officials
conspire to appease Mr. Conlees every
unlawful action? I believe some were
accomplices to the suspicious fire that
destroyed the existing home. Mark Holland
was the fire chief at that time.
3

Building Administrator Opts Out?

Due to the fact that Building Administrator Mark Holland,
being the only authority qualified to address Boatner's concerns to the
foreseeable adverse effects to her property refused that duty after
multiple requests from Boatner. He stated to witness Council member
Cathy Roberts Farnsworth that he had no intention of do his
appointed duty. Boatner was referred to contact Lee County
Extension Agent Robert Dodds. As a professional courtesy Mr. Dodds
wrote the following letter to Mayor Dinwiddie on Boatner's behalf.
Having never met Mr. Dodds, Boatner unaware Dodds was a
resident of Montrose and he points out 2 significant issues in which
standard procedure were not followed in reference to the building
permit issued by Building Admin Mark Holland for Mark Conlee's new
home as noted on the following slide.
There is another expert Government employee who lives
in the City of Montrose. His title is FEMA officer. His name is Steve
Cirinna. He is the husband of Celeste Cirinna. I did not attempt to
request his assistance due to the obvious conflict of interest. I did
on one occasion notice the reference manual was laying on the
counter at City Hall. Obviously someone had reviewed the
information. Evidence that the nuisance drainage was an
intentional act to cause adverse effects to Boatner property.
I contacted many outside agencies. All responded with the
same advice that I was previously educated about. They referred
me to the proper authority, City of Montrose Building Administrator
Mark Holland. Holland consistently refused his appointed duty.
Its is a publication provided by FEMA that details
No Adverse Impact and Common Law.

Original Building Permit On File At Montrose City Hall

$ Fee Paid is
Blank as noted
by Robert Dodd

Permit unsigned by builder, liability is t

he City of Montroses responsibility as no

Building Permit Altered From Original Document Filed At City

Hall

Document
Fraud

Unsigned by builder
as required by State
Law

After Mark Conlee was Elected to City Council The Status Changed,
Receipt Showing Date I Requested What I Knew Would be Forged Documents due to Conlee
and Hollands Behavior at the Meeting

Receipt dated 1-11-2007 Boatner for copy of original building permit on file for Mark Conlee's new home dated 7-122004 that proves Celeste Cirinna committed ethical violations and document fraud, a serious criminal offense in any
other County
Boatner anonymously contacted Lee County Attorney Michael Short by telephone requesting an investigation into
criminal charges. Mr. Short stated that he had a problem with the issues I explained to him.
Boatner arrived at his office shortly after. When the identity of the criminal was exposed he determined he had no
problem. He told Boatner that he would decide who gets prosecuted in Lee County. Michael Short participated in
violating Rights to Equal Protection of the Law

No Government Accountability for Fraud

The next slide shows evidence of document fraud. The sentence that is underlined with red is
yet another count of document fraud. There is no ordinance that states anything about
landscape fabric. During a meeting that Sally Fowler Sandquist, Helen Fowler, and I had with
Mayor Tony Scumbaito at that time. The main purpose of this meeting was to discuss the fact
that chemicals had been unlawfully applied to my property by the City of Montrose and had
washed downstream killing all living things on the properties of my neighbors Sandquist and
Fowler.. I was already well aware of the chemicals, my intention was to find out why my
nuisance abatement notice included a fraudulent ordinance. When I brought this subject up
and showed Mayor Scumbaito my copy of the abatement notice asking why my notice included
a fraudulent ordinance. Mayor Scumbaito had no answer. After a few uncomfortable moments
city clerk Celeste Cirinna admitted that she had falsified that ordinance up for me in particular.
Celeste Cirinna had committed the 3rd offense of document fraud. Standard procedure would
require Cirinna immediate termination and criminal charges for violating ethics and criminal
law. At the least administrative leave until an investigation had been completed. Cirinna has
never been reprimanded. Mayor Scumbaito resigned his position as Mayor of the City of
Montrose one year into his term. Council Member Jeff Junkins served Mayor Pro Tem the rest
of Scumbaitos term. Jeff Junkins is a fellow member of the Montrose Fire Dept. and a coworker of Mark Conlee at Climax Molybdenum Co.
8

Conspiracy Deprivation of Rights Under

Color of Law
Conspiracy Intent to Cause Financial
Harm
Document Fraud

Fraudulent Ordinance

Fraudulent
Ordinance

(Code of Iowa, Sec. 718.5)

1.09ALTERINGCODE. It is unlawful for any unauthorized person to change or amend by additions or deletions, any
part or portion of the Code of Ordinances, or to insert or delete pages, or portions thereof, or to alter or tamper with the Code
of Ordinances in any manner whatsoever which will cause the law of the City to be misrepresented thereby.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.3[2])
1.10STANDARDPENALTY.Unless another penalty is expressly provided by the Code of Ordinances for any particular
provision, section or chapter, any person failing to perform a duty, or obtain a license required by, or violating any provision
of the Code of Ordinances, or any rule or regulation adopted herein by reference shall be guilty of a simple misdemeanor
and, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or imprisonment not to exceed
thirty (30) days.
(Ord. 196 Feb. 06 Supp.)

1.11SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Code of Ordinances is adjudged invalid or
unconstitutional, such adjudication will not affect the validity of the Code of Ordinances as a whole or any section, provision
or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.

10

JULY 7, 2005
The Montrose City Council met for Regular Meeting at
7:00 p.m. on the 7TH day of July 2005. Council met at City
Hall, 102 S. 2nd St. pursuant to law with Mayor Ronald
Dinwiddie presiding and the following Council members
present: Brisby, Holland, Junkins, Roberts and Slater.

PAGE 225

MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING JULY 7, 2005, PAGE 5

Holland tells Cirinna to call the County Engineer about getting gravel on the roadside from the Cemetery out. Cirinna
says they have already been called and they are looking into it.
Holland and Junkins will get together to look at properties for the nuisance ordinance.
He says he has a letter from the State Ombudsmans office requesting copies of building permits. She stated
to him that someone at City Hall told her they could not help her.

11

Intent to Cause Financial Harm

As intended, I was unable to pay my utilities for the City water, sewer and garbage. The kindness of Pastor of Trinity
Methodist Church, Goldie Layman went to Montrose City Hall to pay on my past due account from her personal checking
account. The date of this action was I believe 2009, Pastor Layman would have the record of the written check. According
to the Pastor, Clerk Cirinna refused payment stating that any payment on my account had to come out of Boatners pocket.
Pastor Layman indicated to me that she was livid, I believe that was the term she used. Pastor Layman went to the bank
and cashed her personal check and came to my house so she could give me the cash and I could, without being properly
dressed, go in Montrose City Hall myself and pay cash on my account. I know that is an ethical violation. Personally it falls
under my moral law that I sentenced her to. Whipping Celeste Cirinnas ass if and when we happen to cross paths in the
future.
This concludes the summary offenses that Clerk Cirinna was involved in against me. The bigger fish are yet to be fried. My
character had been defamed since the beginning of this nightmare, they said I was crazy. This evidence is indisputable.
Conspiracy Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.
KNOWINGLY MADE FALSE STATEMENT. According a decision that determine there was no evidence to support further
investigation in a complaint I made to the Ombudsman. Cirinna stated to the investigator that she did not know what the
meeting with Mayor Scumbaito was about. Clearly she did know the reason, I was there was to find out who committed
document fraud on only my nuisance abatement notice. I also have a letter from the Iowa Ombudsman dated several
weeks after the meeting with Mayor Scumbaito. In this letter Celeste Cirinna knowingly made false statements. This
document is available and will be uploaded as requested.
A different time the Ombudsman called city hall requesting copies of the building permits and according to the public
record Cirinna told them that nobody could assist with that request.

12

Penalties for Actions of Celeste Cirinna, Executive Manager

City of Montrose, Ia
Iowa

http://www.ncsl.org/research/ethics/50-state-chart-criminal-penalties-for-public-corr.aspx

Giving false information on authorized receipts, returns, entries or certificates; falsifying public records or falsely
purporting something to be a public record(felonious misconduct in office)
CC 721.1
Class D felony
Max. imprisonment 5 years; max. fine $750-$7,500
Knowingly and intentionally violating ethics provisions found in Chapter 68B
Entering to a contract for more than authorized by law; failing to report receipt or expenditure of public funds;
requesting or receiving additional compensation for required job functions; using or permitting another to use state
property for private or political purpose; failing to perform any duty required; demanding contributions from public
employees (non-felonious misconduct in office)
Using public motor vehicles for political purposes
Misuse of public records, involves releasing public records or information for a greater fee than allowed by law
Interest in public contracts; unlawful interest in public contracts
EC 68B.34 CC 721.2 CC 721.4 CC 721.10 CC 721.11
Serious misdemeanor
Max. imprisonment 1 year; max. fine $250-$1,500

13