Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Maruti Suzuki
A Journey of over 25 years . . .
Turnover
Rs 30,119.7 Crore
Net Profit
Sales nos
Models
Joint ventures
No growth drivers
Low priority accorded to car production
High tax levels (15 % in 1984 to 66 % in 1991)
High import duty
Established in 1982
JV between Government of India (74%) and Suzuki Motor
Corporation (26%)
Objectives
Make a small, fuel efficient, environment friendly peoples
car
Modernize Indias car Industry and boost domestic
manufacturing
Open office
Uniform for employees
Common canteen
Quality circles & suggestion scheme, Kaizen, 3G, 5S, 3K
Y
L
P
P
U
S
CHAIN
N
E
M
E
G
MANA
T
Upstream
suppliers
Suppliers
Your
Company
Distribution
channels
11
Customers
12
Transportation
Decisions
Customer service levels, and geographic location play vital roles in such decisions.
Since transportation is more than 30 percent of the logistics costs, operating efficiently
makes good economic sense.
Development at Vendors
end
WHY?
Before Going Further We
Marutis
excellent response to the challenges it face from the Present Competitive Market
14
15
17
5S
5S Promotes:
Well laid out and
organized work areas
Good process flow
Safety
Standard Work
Sustain
Shine Standardize
Multi-Process
Operations
Visual
Controls
Total Productive
Maintenance
Pull
Production/
Kanban
Flexible
Employees
Jidoka
Leveling
Rapid
Changeover
20
3G
3G
3Gmeans
meansIn
Incase
caseofofan
anabnormality,
abnormality,all
allthe
the
concerned
concernedmembers
membersshould
shouldactually
actuallygo
gototothe
the
place
placewhere
wherethe
theproblem
problemhas
hasoccurred,
occurred,see
seethe
the
actual
actualthing
thing&&take
takerealistic
realisticaction
actiontotosolve
solvethe
the
problem
problem
GENCHI Actual Place
GENCHI Actual Place
GENBUTSU Actual Thing
GENBUTSU Actual Thing
GENJITSU Actually
GENJITSU Actually
21
3K
3K concept is What has been decided must
be followed exactly as per the standard
These concepts are displayed prominently at
work place across the company
Lean Manufacturing
[ MPS Maruti Production System]
What is Lean?
Lean is both:
24
AND...
Eliminate Waste
1
27
Production
control
Daily orders
End user/customer
MRP
Weekly schedule
Tuesday and
Thursday
Once a day
Daily shipment
schedule
Inventory
Machine OP1
C/T = 60 secs
C/O = 100 mins
3400 Uptime = 90%
Time avail = 435
2880 mins
minutes
60
Seconds
Machine OP2
C/T = 80 secs
C/O = 10 mins
140
Uptime = 95%
Time avail = 435
15
minutes mins
80
Seconds
Assembly
C/T = 40 secs
C/O = 2 mins
90
Uptime = 100%
Time avail = 435
60
minutes mins
40
Seconds
Test/dispatch
C/T = 220 secs
C/O = 2 mins
220 Uptime = 80%
Time avail = 435
4
720
mins
minutes
minutes
220
Seconds
Production
control
Daily orders
End user/customer
MRP
Daily schedule
Thrice a week
Once a day
Daily shipment
schedule
Machine OP1
C/T = 60 secs
C/O = 10 mins
1000 Uptime = 95%
Time avail = 535
1450 mins
minutes
60
Seconds
Machine OP2
C/T = 80 secs
C/O = 10 mins
50
Uptime = 95%
Time avail = 435
05
minutes mins
80
Seconds
Assembly
C/T = 40 secs
C/O = 2 mins
10
Uptime = 100%
Time avail = 435
10
minutes mins
40
Seconds
Test/dispatch
C/T = 220 secs
C/O = 2 mins
20
Uptime = 80%
Time avail = 435
1
80
mins
minutes
minutes
220
Seconds
29
Why Lean?
Add Value for the Customer
30
30
Why Lean?
Cost
pressures
Quality
pressures
Pressure
Competition
Profit
Cost
Selling Price
32
Customers Dictate
Selling Price
We Subtract
To Determine
Profit
33
Lean Manufacturing
System
Pillar 1 - Just-inTime
Pull Systems/Kanban
Point Of Use Storage
Quick Changeover/Setup
Reduction
Continuous Flow
Takt Time
34
35
Capacity Utilization
Production Lead Times (days)
60
50
Traditional
Manufacturing
40
30
20
JIT
Manufacturing
10
% Capacity
Utilization
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
36
Lean Manufacturing
System
Pillar 2 - Jidoka
Quality at source
Poka Yoke *
Andons
Effective problem solving
* Even if one customer out of one million has a
problem with his car the customers faith in the
company is destroyed. What is needed is a fool
proof system to give defect free products.
37
Jidoka
Autonomationclarification
( )
38
8 Wastes
Overproductio
n
Excess
inventory
Defects
Non-value
added
Non-value
processing
added
Waiting
Underutilized
Typically 95% of Total Lead Time people
is Non-Value
Excess motion
Added!!! And anything thatdoes
not add
Transportatio
value is a WASTE !!!n
39
Sea of Waste
Poor
Scheduling
Long
Transportation
Machine
Breakdown
Quality
Problems
Communication
Problems
Supplier
Delivery
Line
Balance
Lack of
Housekeeping
Long Setup
Time
Absenteeism
40
What is Kaizen?
KAI
(To modify, to
change)
ZEN
KAIZEN
better)
(Religious, holistic
approach)
=
+
(Think, make good, make
42
43
44
Mistake Proofing
Two types of Mistake Proofing devices
Control:
Active prevents
a mistake from occurring,
e.g. electrical outlets
Warning:
Passive warns
that a mistake has occurred,
eg buzzer for when
headlights left on in a car
45
25
50
75
Flexibility
Skill Enhancement
Visual Management
46
100
Inventory Management
Types of Inventories
Pipeline Inventories
ELEMENTS IN
MATERIAL
MANAGEMENT @
MSIL
48
SELECTION OF VENDORS
DEVELOPMENT OF COMPONENTS
TRIAL PRODUCTION
PACKING REQUIREMENT
SELECTION
OF VENDOR
50
DEVELOPME
NT OF PARTS
52
Development of Parts
Supplier
Supplier
Selection
Selection
Issuance
Issuance
LOC/LOI
LOC/LOI
MSIL
MSIL
&
of&
byof
by
Preparation
of
Preparation
of
Specification
Specification
meeting
record &
meeting
record &
Part Development
Part Chart
Development
activity
activity Chart
Constitution of
Constitution
Project
Teamof
Project
by
VendorTeam
&
by
Vendor
intimation
to&
intimation
to
MSIL
MSIL
Tech
Review
Tech
Meeting Review
with
Meeting
MSIL (if req.) with
MSIL (if req.)
Finalization of
allFinalization of
all
Specifications
Specifications
Periodic
Periodic
internal
internal
monitoring
of
monitoring
development of
development&
process
process
adherence
to&
adherence
to
part
part
development
development
activity
chart
Issue
of
Issue
of
Drawing
Drawing
/Specs/
/Specs/
Standards
etc.
Standards
etc.
by MSIL
by MSIL
Specification
Specification
Meeting
with
Meeting
with
MSIL to discuss
MSIL to discuss
about
MSIL
about
Requirements.MSIL
Requirements.
Joint
Joint
Development
Development
review
with
review
with
MSIL
before
MSIL
before
MSIL
MSIL
development
development
milestones.
milestones.
53
Development of Parts
Information of
Information
any
Delays/of
any
Delays/
Salvage
Plans
Salvage
Plans
to MSIL
to MSIL
Preparation of
Preparation of
Part
Part
Development
Development
Problem
history
Problem
history
by the vendor.
by the vendor.
54
TRIAL
PRODUCTION
55
PRODUCTION PREPARATION
Before Start of Mass Production, conduct PFMEA along with CFT.
Before Start of Mass Production, conduct PFMEA along with CFT.
Understand the accuracy Requirement of the Parts & ensure Process
Understand the accuracy Requirement of the Parts & ensure Process
Capabilities are achievable for meeting them
Capabilities are achievable for meeting them
Review the Past Quality Problems & establish Poka Yoke
Review the Past Quality Problems & establish Poka Yoke
Design & Plan The process Layout so as to minimize material
Design & Plan The process Layout so as to minimize material
movement, inventory Levels & wherever possible try to achieve
movement, inventory Levels & wherever possible try to achieve
Single Piece Flow.
Single Piece Flow.
Plan & Control the procurement of jigs, dies & machineries,
Plan & Control the procurement of jigs, dies & machineries,
equipment etc. to produce & deliver parts as per development
equipment etc. to produce & deliver parts as per development
activity chart.
activity chart.
Establish a detailed document system to communicate serious
Establish a detailed document system to communicate serious
Quality issues within the Company.
Quality issues within the Company.
56
N
O
Take Counter
Take Counter
Measures & Carry
YE
Measures & Carry
out PPVT again
S
out PPVT again
Conduct additional trial for 4 hrs to ensure consistency
Conduct additional trial for 4 hrs to ensure consistency
Calculate Process Capability for Parameters Decided in Spec Meeting
Calculate Process Capability for Parameters Decided in Spec Meeting
Submit PPVT Trial Report with countermeasures (if any) & Process Capability
Submit PPVT Trial Report with countermeasures
Capability
57
Report to MSIL (if any) & Process
Report to MSIL
ESTABLISHMENT OF OPERATION
STANDARDS
Prepare Operation Standards/ Work Instruction Sheets for all process
Prepare Operation Standards/ Work Instruction Sheets for all process
standards
standards
Establish a procedure for enactment, revision & control of operation
Establish a procedure for enactment, revision & control of operation
standards/ WIS
standards/ WIS
A
Indicate
inAthe standard if operation has any
item
Indicate
in the standard if operation has any
item
Review the standards whenever there is a Quality Feedback
Review the standards whenever there is a Quality Feedback
Establish Job set up verification Standards for die & tool changes &
Establish Job set up verification Standards for die & tool changes &
record the same
record the same
Display the sample in final inspection Area
Display the sample in final inspection Area
Nominate & Designate
Nominate & Designate
A
Put up
Put up
Operators/ Inspectors.
Operators/ Inspectors.
A stations of
display boards at processing & inspection
58
display boards atitems
processing
&
inspection
stations
of
& dispatch area
Parts,
Parts,
START OF MASS
PRODUCTION
59
Is Results
found
satisfactory
YE
S
Approval of FPP lot
Approval of FPP lot
by SQA.
by SQA.
60
61
INITIAL SUPPLY
CONTROL
62
YES
Is the
Result
Satisfactory
?
NO
Terminate ISC
Terminate ISC
64
PACKING
REQUIREMENTS
65
PACKING REQUIREMENTS
MSIL shall Decide the packing Specifications & send the same to the
MSIL shall Decide the packing Specifications & send the same to the
vendor.
vendor.
Vendor to submit the Packing sample to MSIL using the packing
Vendor to submit the Packing sample to MSIL using the packing
Guidelines provided by MSIL
Guidelines provided by MSIL
Satisfactor
y
Evaluation
of Packing
Samples by
MSIL
Not
Satisfactory
Lot control &
Traceability
67
Incase of RMAof
part affecting
item, record the details of
A
Incase of RM of
part affecting
item, record the details of
heat, code, date & shift of production
heat, code, date & shift of production
Practice FIFO () First-in First-out for all incoming, in process &
Practice FIFO () First-in First-out for all incoming, in process &
finished parts
finished parts
Address absence or inadequate identification & Traceability as a
Address absence or inadequate identification & Traceability as a
Failure mode in PFMEA.
Failure mode in PFMEA.
Ensure all requirements of MSIL for identification & Traceability
Ensure all requirements of MSIL for identification & Traceability
Maintain records for all 4M changes as per the prescribed format.
Maintain records for all 4M changes as per the prescribed format.
68
Vendor Rating
69
70
40
Warranty
%
Cost
35
VR
Delivery
Response &
Service
Development
10
Incoming
Quality
CPV
Rating
Defects
Rating
QPCR
Rating
4.4
Rejection
Rating
16
A
Vendor
Audit
10
16
CR
Rating
8 A
QPCR
1.6
Resp.Time
A
71
40
Amount of
Price Redn
Price Reduction
Cost
35
Delivery
10
5.2
12.2
% of Price
Redn
VR
Response &
Service
Development
10
Amount of
VAVE Saving
Cost Saving
thru VAVE
12.2
% of VAVE
Saving
Price Redn in %
Focus Models
5.2
10.6
72
40
M
E- Nagare Quantity Default 4
Cost
35
Delivery
10
Response &
Service
Development
10
VR
E- Nagare Time Default
2 A
73
HOW TO MEASURE
PERFORMANCE AT
VENDORS END &
FIND THE GAPS
74
1. DEFECTS AT MSIL
BETTER
4M ANALYSIS
A
Part :
Model :
SWIFT - DZIRE
Date :
28.04.2010
Defect :
Man
O
K
Qty : 1
WHY-1
ANSWER
WHY-2
ANSWER
WHY-3
ANSWER
ROOT
CAUSE
INSP could
not detect
Insp chkd
visually
without
using a bolt
COUNTER-MEASURES :
Machine
O
N
C/M
DEPLOYMENT
K IMPLEMENTATION & HORIZONTAL
G
WHY-2
O
K
WHY-1
Method
WHY-4
WHY-5
POKA YOKE
BETTER
A1
Q2
A2
Q3
A3
ROOT CAUSE
COUNTERMEASURE
BETTER
Audit Score
Achieved Max.
Achieved
Score
Score
1 Production Preparation
10
16
63%
13
46%
11
73%
12
19
63%
16
16
100%
6 Quality audit
15
15
100%
7 Supplier control
10
10
100%
100%
10
13
77%
10 Operation Standard
11
12
92%
100%
100%
100%
89%
11
11
100%
16 Statistical method
Prevention of missing process/ wrong
17
assembling
18 Control of non conforming product
17%
100%
83%
19 Storage of product
100%
20 First-in , First-out
40%
100%
22 Implementation of inspection
33%
168
209
80%
Total Score
Achieved
Audit Score
22
100%
21
73%
46% 63% 100%
100%
40% 33%
20
63%
19
100%
83%
100%
18
100%
17%
17
16
100%
8
77%
100%
89%
92%
100% 100%
15
14
10
13
100%
12
WEAK AREAS
11
4. QPCR (NOS.)
BETTER
6. VENDOR RANKING
BETTER
7. DI DEFAULTS
BETTER
8. TIME DEFAULTS
BETTER
BETTER
KAIZENS IMPLEMENTED
BETTER
(SPOTS/PERSON/SHIFT)
BETTER
6.63
6.26
6.01
6.31
6.35
6.30
6.13
5.97
6.05
5.93
5.84
6.30
6.14
BETTER
BETTER
POKA YOKE
ABSENTEEISM %
BETTER
MPS PROJECTS
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT ( > 40 %)
PROJECT 1 REINF COMP REAR DOOR HINGE RH / LH (SWIFT / DZIRE)
PROJECT 2 PANEL COMP. COWL TOP (SWIFT / DZIRE)
PROJECT 3 PANEL COMP. COWL UPPER (SWIFT / DZIRE)
Not
Possible
PROJECT : 1
TO REDUCE NAGARE
TIME & QUANTITY
DEFAULT
78
Project Team
TEAM FACILITATOR
P.K.SAHA
TEAM
LEADER
D.K.MISHRA
TEAM MEMBER
SANJAY
PADMAKAR
DK.AWASTI
SUBHASH
PRAMOD
KUMAR
79
b)
NO OF FAILURES
40
MSIL 2010-11
34
35 0.42Defau
30 lt/month
Project
started
25
20
15
18
10
5
0
5.6
Default/mo
nth
3
0
7
0
PERIOD
81
NO OF FAILURES
2500
483
Default/mont
h
106
Default /
month
2900
Proje
ct
starte
d
2000
1500
1268
MSIL 2010-11
1107
1000
400631
500 382
461480
201
0
20
PERIOD
82
Apr.
May.
June
July
Aug
Total
62
79
11
143
32
327
32
11
23
58
21
145
64
180
82
214
258
798
10
48
17
86
76
30
19
203
76
404
11
27
48
13
12
32
11
75
System breakdown
76
13
13
168
83
353
104
85
19
113
92
413
10
12
12
11
54
39
41
154
13
10
55
65
461
480
201
1107
631
2880
Total
18
16
14
12
10
10
8
6
4
2
0
Proje
ct
start
ed
3
0
37
E-Nagare Time
Default
E-Nagare
Quantity Default
Present
%
Status
Targ
Improve
(April'10et
ment
Aug'10) Nos.
576
100
34
100
Color - code
Model - Name
Car 800CC
Sky blue
Omni
Grey
Gypsy
White
Alto - A
Orange
Wagon - R - S
Yellow
Versa / ECCO - C
Royal blue
Ritz - N
Coffee
Zen - M
Pink
Subject :
MPS PROJECT
Date of
implimentation:24/11/10
BEFORE
Ref No:-
DEPT:
MOULD MAINT.
AFTER
APPROVED BY:
D.K Mishra
(IMPROVEMENT DONE)
1.MAN MOVEMENT
SAVING.
2.TROLLEY
MODIFICATION
3.SPACE SAVING
4.COMMONIZATION &
UNIFICATION
5.WEIGHT REDUCTION
6.ENERGY SAVING
7.YIELD
8.QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
9.WASTE REDUCTION
10.SPACE UTILIZATION
11.COST SAVING
12.5S
Date of
Ref No:implimentation:03/12/10
BEFORE
APPROVED BY:
DEPT:
MOULD MAINT.
D.K
Mishra
AFTER
(IMPROVEMENT
DONE)
1.MAN MOVEMENT
SAVING.
2.TROLLEY
MODIFICATION
3.SPACE SAVING
4.COMMONIZATION &
UNIFICATION
5.WEIGHT REDUCTION
6.ENERGY SAVING
7.YIELD
8.QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
9.WASTE REDUCTION
10.SPACE UTILIZATION
11.COST SAVING
12.5S
Date of
Ref No:implimentation:27/11/10
BEFORE
DEPT:
MOULD MAINT.
AFTER
APPROVED BY:
D.K Mishra
(IMPROVEMENT DONE)
1.MAN MOVEMENT
SAVING.
2.TROLLEY
MODIFICATION
3.SPACE SAVING
4.COMMONIZATION &
UNIFICATION
5.WEIGHT REDUCTION
6.ENERGY SAVING
7.YIELD
8.QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
9.WASTE REDUCTION
10.SPACE UTILIZATION
11.COST SAVING
12.5S
Problem : Model
wise trolley
storage
location not identified.
System - Breakdown
Action taken : New IT person recruited in the month of Nov.10.
Before
After
18
5
4
N
5
1
Rotational
PDCA
Target vs Monitoring:
Nagare Default.
S.No.Description
1
2
E-Nagare
Time Default
E-Nagare
Quantity
Default
Present Status
Targ Sep Oc Nov De
(April'10et
t. t
.
c
Aug'10) Nos.
576
34
20 3
0
MPS PROJECT # 5
1000T
PRESS
KAIZENS
STEP - 8
TEAM FORMATION
DATA COLLECTION
TARGET SETTING
STEP - 2
STEP - 3
STEP - 4
IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES
FOR TIME REDUCTION
VIDEOGRAPHY
STEP - 7
STEP - 6
STEP - 5
ACHIEVEMENT OF
RESULTS !
STANDARDIZATION
STEP - 10
STEP - 11
HORIZONTAL DEPLOYMENT
IN 800T & 500T LINE
STEP - 14
MONITORING OF RESULTS
STEP - 13
CURRENT
STATUS
TRAINING
STEP - 12
STEP - 1
S.
No.
Item
Per Day
Per Month
Per Year
1320 Min
( 22 Hrs )
33000 Min
( 550 Hrs )
396000 Min
( 6600 Hrs )
39 Min (13 X 3)
( 0.65 Hrs )
3%
3%
3%
Loss of Strokes
( @ Avg. Eff. SPM = 6.2)
242
6045
72540
STEP - 1
PLANT LAYOUT
INCOMING RM / BOP / CONSUMABLES
DIE STORAGE
500T & 800T PRESS LINE
WIP
INSPECTION
WELD LINE
WIP
INSPECTION
R/M STORAGE
AREA
DIE STORAGE
1000T PRESS LINE
WELD LINE
FG STORAGE AREA
PDI
INSPECTION
FG DESPATCH
STEP - 1
"LAST OK PIECE
TO
FIRST OK PIECE"
STEP - 2
THE TEAM
NAME
DEPARTMENT
RESPONSIBILITY
A. VIDYARTHI
G.M.
FACILITATOR
AMIT SANGWAN
QA
LEADER
R. GAHLAWAT
MAINTENANCE
MEMBER
P. KUKRETI
PRESS SHOP
MEMBER
S.P. RAJPUT
PRESS SHOP
MEMBER
VINOD DAHIYA
PRESS SHOP
MEMBER (G.E.T.)
DEEPAK SHARMA
MAINTENANCE
MEMBER (G.E.T.)
STEP - 3
DATA COLLECTION
STEP - 4
TARGET - SETTING
Activity
Before
(Jul Oct10)
Target
(Nov10)
% Improvement
13.4 Min
(805 secs)
9 Min
(540 secs)
33%
33% Improvement
Target
STEP - 5
ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION
INTERNAL
PERFORMED AFTER STOPPING THE PRESS
EXTERNAL
PERFORMED BEFORE STOPPING THE PRESS
PARALLEL
ACTIVITIES PERFORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY AFTER STOPPING THE
PRESS
STEP - 6
ACTIVITY
NO.
ACTIVITY
TYPE OF
ACTIVITY
PRECEDING
ACTIVITY
AVG.
TIME
(SEC)
External
120
External
15
External
30
Internal
Internal
Internal
20
Internal
BRING CLAMP NUT OPENING SPANNERS NEAR THE DIE FROM TOOL CRIB
Internal
30
Internal
40
10
Internal
40
11
Internal
10
12
Internal
11
20
13
Internal
12
10
14
Internal
13
15
15
Internal
14
40
16
Internal
15
15
17
Internal
16
40
18
Internal
17
19
Internal
18
30
20
Internal
19
STEP - 6
ACTIVITY
NO.
ACTIVITY
TYPE OF
ACTIVITY
PRECEDING
ACTIVITY
TIME (SEC)
21
Internal
20
60
22
Internal
21
23
Internal
22
120
24
Internal
23
25
MOVE UPPER DIE DOWN FOR ALIGNMENT OF UPPER AND LOWER DIE
Internal
23
26
MOVE UPPER DIE DOWN FOR ALIGNMENT OF UPPER AND LOWER DIE
Internal
24
27
Internal
26
40
28
Internal
27
29
Internal
28
60
30
Internal
29
31
Internal
30
32
PICK, MOVE AND PLACE THE BLANK FROM STACK TO BLANK HOLDER
Internal
31
33
Internal
32
34
Internal
33
35
INSPECTION FOR BOTTOMING MARK, NECKING, WRINKLES ETC. FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION
Internal
34
60
36
Internal
35
30
37
INSPECTION FOR BOTTOMING MARK, NECKING, WRINKLES ETC. FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION
Internal
36
60
970 SEC
(16.3 MIN)
805 SEC
(13.4 MIN)
STEP - 6
(15)
(30)
(12O)
(5)
6
(20)
5
(5)
7
(5)
(30)
10
11
(40)
(40)
(5)
12
(20)
13
(10)
14
(15)
15
(40)
16
(15)
17 - 32
(398)
33 - 37
(157)
INTERNAL
ACTIVITIES
ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED
FOR TIME REDUCTION
TITLE
PATHS
Type
TIME
(Secs)
Effect on
Die
Changeover time
1 2 3 33 37
Non-Critical
path
322 Sec
No
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 17 37
Critical Path
805 Sec
Yes
STEP - 7
ACTIVI
TY
NO.
KAIZEN IDEAS
ACTIVITY
AVG.
TIME
(SEC)
KAIZEN IDEA
KAIZEN
IDEA
No.
30
40
10
40
12
20
13
10
16
15
21
60
23
120
27
40
29
60
STEP - 8
KAIZEN # 1
CMLB
BEFORE
AFTER
SITUATION
SITUATION
PROBLEM
BENEFIT
STEP - 8
KAIZEN # 2
CMLB
BEFORE
AFTER
SITUATION
SITUATION
STEP - 8
KAIZEN # 3
CMLB
BEFORE
AFTER
SITUATION
SITUATION
PROBLEM
BENEFIT
STEP - 8
KAIZEN # 4
CMLB
BEFORE
AFTER
SITUATION
SITUATION
STEP - 8
KAIZEN # 5
CMLB
BEFORE
AFTER
SITUATION
SITUATION
STEP - 8
KAIZEN # 6
CMLB
BEFORE
AFTER
SITUATION
SITUATION
STEP - 7
AC
TIVI
TY
NO.
KAIZEN BENEFITS
AVG.
AVG.
TIME
TIME
TIME
SAVED
BEFOR AFTER
(SEC)
E (SEC) (SEC)
ACTIVITY
Kaizen Implemented
Ide
a
No.
30
25
40
15
25
10
40
15
25
20
20
10
10
15
15
60
30
30
120
60
60
40
20
20
60
30
30
16
MUDA ELIMINATION
(30 SEC)
(15 SEC)
(25 SEC)
STEP - 10
BEFORE
(12O)
(5)
A
B
(15)
(30)
5
(5)
6
(20)
7
(5)
(30)
10
11
(40)
(40)
(5)
13
12
(20)
(10)
14
(15)
15
(40)
17 - 32
(398)
16
(15)
33 - 37
(157)
PATH
Type
TIME (Sec)
1 2 3 33 37
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
17 37
Non-Critical Path
322 Sec
No
Critical Path
805 Sec
Yes
AFTER
1
(12O)
(5)
5
(5)
(15)
(30)
6
(20)
7
(5)
PATH
1 2 3 12 13 16 - - - 17 37
4 6 7 8 9 10 11
D
14 15 17 37
C
13
12
(20)
(5)
16
(15)
(10)
10
11
(15)
(15)
(5)
14
(15)
15
(40)
17 - 32
(258)
33 - 37
(157)
Type
TIME (Secs)
Non-Critical
367 Sec
No
Critical Path
545 Sec
Yes
STEP - 10
RESULTS
Activity
Before
(Jul Oct10)
Target
(Nov10)
Die change
over time
13.4 min
(805sec)
9 min
(540 sec)
After
% Improvement
(Nov Dec10)
9.1 min
(545 sec)
32%
32% Improvement
STEP - 10
MONITORING OF RESULTS
BEFORE
AFTER
STEP - 11
STANDARDIZATION
BENEFITS
S.
No.
Item
Per Day
Per Month
Per Year
1320 Min
( 22 Hrs )
33000 Min
( 550 Hrs )
396000 Min
( 6600 Hrs )
39 Min (13 X 3)
( 0.65 Hrs )
3%
3%
3%
Loss of Strokes
( @ Avg. SPM = 6.2)
242
6045
72540
27 Min
675 Min
8100 Min
Time Saved
12 Min
300 Min
3600 Min
74
1850
22200
19
475
5700
259
6475
77700
Thanks