Você está na página 1de 148

1

Click to edit Master title style

Maruti Suzuki
A Journey of over 25 years . . .

Overview of Indian Auto Industry

Click to edit Master title style

Domestic sales- approx 1.95 million (09-10)


Low car penetration

15 cars per 1000 population


Industry capacity building up to 4 million units by 2011-12
Liberalized regime

Almost all major international auto companies present


15 players in the market
Contribution to GDP-5%,

Click to edit Master title style

Maruti Suzuki Snapshot


Equity Structure

54.21% Suzuki, 45.79% with Public

Turnover

Rs 30,119.7 Crore

Net Profit

Rs. 2,497 Crore

Sales nos

10,18,365 units (FY-09-10)

Market Share (2009-10) 44.7% (Passenger vehicles)


Manpower

Over 7,600 employees in 4 plants

Models

14 models with over 150 variants

Joint ventures

20 joint ventures for components


4

Auto industry : 25 years ago

Click to edit Master title style

Stagnant market (40,000 cars a year)


Few players in the Indian auto industry
2 car models - Fiat and Ambassador

No growth drivers
Low priority accorded to car production
High tax levels (15 % in 1984 to 66 % in 1991)
High import duty

Limited component industry


Closed Economy

Click to edit Master title style

Inception of Maruti Suzuki

Established in 1982
JV between Government of India (74%) and Suzuki Motor

Corporation (26%)

Objectives
Make a small, fuel efficient, environment friendly peoples

car
Modernize Indias car Industry and boost domestic
manufacturing

Click to edit Master title style

Maruti Suzukis first steps

Set up the component industry

Facilitated 110 technical collaborations and joint ventures


Dealer and service network
New Management Practices

Open office
Uniform for employees
Common canteen
Quality circles & suggestion scheme, Kaizen, 3G, 5S, 3K

Click to edit Master title style

Maruti Suzuki today

Suzukis largest manufacturing facility outside Japan


Marutis contribution in Suzuki group (09-10)
Turnover~ 20%
Profit ~ 67%

Enroute to becoming R&D hub for SMC outside Japan

MD & CEO of MSIL is a Board member of SMC


8

Y
L
P
P
U
S
CHAIN
N
E
M
E
G
MANA
T

Supply Chain Management


A supply chain is a network of facilities and distribution options that performs the
functions of procurement of materials, transformation of these materials into
intermediate and finished products, and the distribution of these finished products to
customers.
Supply chains exist in both service and manufacturing organizations, although the
complexity of the chain may vary greatly from industry to industry and firm to firm.
Traditionally, marketing, distribution, planning, manufacturing, and
the purchasing organizations along the supply chain operated
independently. These organizations have their own objectives and
these are often conflicting.
Marketing's objective of high customer service and maximum sales
dollars conflict with manufacturing and distribution goals.
10

Typical Supply Chain

Integrated Supply chain

Upstream
suppliers

Suppliers

Your
Company

Distribution
channels

Information flow sharing

11

Customers

The typical benefits of an excellent supply chain

Reduction in total logistics costs as a percentage of revenue (material


acquisition, order management, inventory costs and finance/IT support)
Reduction in order-fulfillment lead time.
Reduction in inventory.
Improvement in meeting commitment dates.

12

Transportation
Decisions

Customer service levels, and geographic location play vital roles in such decisions.
Since transportation is more than 30 percent of the logistics costs, operating efficiently
makes good economic sense.

Shipment sizes (consolidated bulk shipments versus Lot-for-Lot), routing and


scheduling of equipment are key in effective management of the firm's transport strategy
13

Development at Vendors
end
WHY?
Before Going Further We

shall now discuss the Secret behind the

Marutis

excellent response to the challenges it face from the Present Competitive Market

by just improving the conditions at the vendors end.


The top Management at Maruti have always known the Secret that :

Vendors Development = Marutis Success


Therefore, Right from the inception, Maruti has always tried to improve the
condition at vendors end. Moreover the Best Practices at Maruti has been applied
to vendors through MPS & Lean Projects.

14

15

Best In-House Practice


Implemented At
Vendor's End
16

Best Practices - Manufacturing Quality

17

5S

What is & Why 5S ?


A place for everything necessary
and everything necessary in its
place, clean and ready for use Sort
Set in Order

5S Promotes:
Well laid out and
organized work areas
Good process flow
Safety
Standard Work

Sustain
Shine Standardize

This is the step where


we can most impact
the bottom line.
19

5S is the Foundation for Improvement


Standardized
Work
Quality

Multi-Process
Operations

Visual
Controls

Total Productive
Maintenance

Pull
Production/
Kanban

Flexible
Employees

Jidoka
Leveling

Rapid
Changeover
20

3G
3G
3Gmeans
meansIn
Incase
caseofofan
anabnormality,
abnormality,all
allthe
the
concerned
concernedmembers
membersshould
shouldactually
actuallygo
gototothe
the
place
placewhere
wherethe
theproblem
problemhas
hasoccurred,
occurred,see
seethe
the
actual
actualthing
thing&&take
takerealistic
realisticaction
actiontotosolve
solvethe
the
problem
problem
GENCHI Actual Place
GENCHI Actual Place
GENBUTSU Actual Thing
GENBUTSU Actual Thing
GENJITSU Actually
GENJITSU Actually
21

3K
3K concept is What has been decided must
be followed exactly as per the standard
These concepts are displayed prominently at
work place across the company

KIMERAARETA What has been decided


KIMERAARETA What has been decided
KIHON DORI Exactly as per Standard
KIHON DORI Exactly as per Standard
KICHIN TO MAMORU Must be Followed
KICHIN TO MAMORU Must be Followed
22

Lean Manufacturing
[ MPS Maruti Production System]

What is Lean?
Lean is both:

24

The Value Stream


Whenever there is a product
for a customer, there is a
Value Stream.
How do we use the Value
Stream?
See Value
Differentiate Value from Waste
Eliminate the Waste
Value Stream: all the actions currently required to bring a product or service
through the design flow (concept to launch) and production flow (raw material to
final product).
25

Value Viewed by the Customer


Value Added activity: transforms or

shapes raw material or information to meet


customer requirements.
Tests:
The customer must recognize the value (willing to pay for
it).
The product must physically change during the process.
The activity must be done right the first time.

Non Value Added activity: consumes

time, resources and/or space, but does not add


value.
Tests:
Activities that do not meet all of the three test rules.
Some non-value added work may be necessary.
26

Objectives of Value Stream


Mapping
E
E

Provide the means to see the material, process


and information flows.
Support the prioritization of continuous
improvement activities at both the value stream
and plant levels
Provide the basis for site plan development

AND...
Eliminate Waste
1

27

Simplified Current Value Stream Map


Example
3 month forecast

Production
control

Raw material supplier


Castings

Daily orders
End user/customer

MRP
Weekly schedule

Tuesday and
Thursday

Once a day

Daily shipment
schedule

Inventory
Machine OP1
C/T = 60 secs
C/O = 100 mins
3400 Uptime = 90%
Time avail = 435
2880 mins
minutes
60
Seconds

Machine OP2
C/T = 80 secs
C/O = 10 mins
140
Uptime = 95%
Time avail = 435
15
minutes mins
80
Seconds

Assembly
C/T = 40 secs
C/O = 2 mins
90
Uptime = 100%
Time avail = 435
60
minutes mins
40
Seconds

Test/dispatch
C/T = 220 secs
C/O = 2 mins
220 Uptime = 80%
Time avail = 435
4
720
mins
minutes
minutes
220
Seconds

Total production lead-time = 3679 minutes


Value added tim =
400 seconds
28

Simplified Future Value Stream Map


Example
3 month forecast

Production
control

Raw material supplier


Castings

Daily orders
End user/customer

MRP
Daily schedule

Thrice a week

Once a day

Daily shipment
schedule
Machine OP1
C/T = 60 secs
C/O = 10 mins
1000 Uptime = 95%
Time avail = 535
1450 mins
minutes
60
Seconds

Machine OP2
C/T = 80 secs
C/O = 10 mins
50
Uptime = 95%
Time avail = 435
05
minutes mins
80
Seconds

Assembly
C/T = 40 secs
C/O = 2 mins
10
Uptime = 100%
Time avail = 435
10
minutes mins
40
Seconds

Test/dispatch
C/T = 220 secs
C/O = 2 mins
20
Uptime = 80%
Time avail = 435
1
80
mins
minutes
minutes
220
Seconds

Total production lead-time = 1546minutes


Value added time =
400seconds

29

Why Lean?
Add Value for the Customer

30

30

Why Lean?
Cost

pressures

Quality

pressures

Pressure

for on-time delivery

Competition

due to global environment

Because its the right


thing to do!!!!!
31

Old Cost Model

Profit + Cost = Selling Price


By Adding
To
We get

Profit
Cost

Selling Price
32

New Cost Model

Selling Price - Cost = Profit

Customers Dictate

Selling Price

We Subtract
To Determine

Profit
33

Lean Manufacturing
System
Pillar 1 - Just-inTime
Pull Systems/Kanban
Point Of Use Storage
Quick Changeover/Setup
Reduction
Continuous Flow
Takt Time

34

Characteristics of a Lean Process


Flow: Processes run as continuously as
possible with a rapid cycle time and little
or no Muda.
Standard Work: The precise description of each
work activity specifying cycle time, takt time, the
work sequence of specific tasks, and the minimum
inventory of parts on hand needed to conduct the
activity.
We achieve Flow and Standard Work through the
elimination of Muda (waste).
Muda is non-value added activity i.e. any activity that
consumes resources without creating value for the
customer.

35

Capacity Utilization
Production Lead Times (days)
60
50

Traditional
Manufacturing

40
30
20

JIT
Manufacturing

10

% Capacity
Utilization

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
36

Lean Manufacturing
System

Pillar 2 - Jidoka

Quality at source
Poka Yoke *
Andons
Effective problem solving
* Even if one customer out of one million has a
problem with his car the customers faith in the
company is destroyed. What is needed is a fool
proof system to give defect free products.
37

Jidoka
Autonomationclarification

Automation vs. Autonomation


( )

( )

Labor Reduction vs. Quality Improvement


Increases technicality vs. Reduces technicality

38

Lean = Eliminating the


waste
Value added
5
%

8 Wastes

Overproductio
n
Excess
inventory
Defects
Non-value
added
Non-value
processing
added
Waiting
Underutilized
Typically 95% of Total Lead Time people
is Non-Value
Excess motion
Added!!! And anything thatdoes
not add
Transportatio
value is a WASTE !!!n
39

Inventory Hides Problems

Sea of Waste

Poor
Scheduling

Long
Transportation

Machine
Breakdown

Quality
Problems

Communication
Problems
Supplier
Delivery

Line
Balance

Lack of
Housekeeping

Long Setup
Time

Absenteeism

40

Eight Wastes - Definitions

Overproduction making more than needed


Transport excess moving of materials
Motion inefficient people movement
Waiting people utilization
Inventory stuff laying around (often a
symptom of another waste)
Over-Processing making to a higher quality
standard than expected by the customer
Defects/Correction Time spent fixing defects,
including defect that get thrown away and the time
make the product correctly
Underutilized People not dedicated to ValueAdded 100%, untapped human creativity
41

What is Kaizen?

KAI
(To modify, to
change)

ZEN

KAIZEN

better)

(Religious, holistic
approach)

=
+
(Think, make good, make

Make it easier by studying it, and making the improvement through


elimination of waste.

Kaizen are an improvement method that includes ALL EMPLOYEES

42

Principles of Mistake Proofing


Build Quality Into the Process!
Its easy for us to blame
the people who make mistakes
but we should be looking
closer at the way
we expect them to work.
(Standard work).

43

What is Mistake Proofing?


The use of process or design features to
prevent errors or their negative impact.
Also known as Poka Yoke, Japanese
slang for
avoiding inadvertent errors
Formalized by Shigeo Shingo
Features of Mistake Proofing:
Inexpensive.
Very effective.

44

Mistake Proofing
Two types of Mistake Proofing devices
Control:
Active prevents
a mistake from occurring,
e.g. electrical outlets
Warning:
Passive warns
that a mistake has occurred,
eg buzzer for when
headlights left on in a car
45

Results from Lean Manufacturing


Percentage of Benefits Achieved
0

25

50

75

Lead Time Reduction


Productivity Increase
WIP Reduction
Quality Improvement
Space Utilization

Flexibility

Skill Enhancement

Visual Management
46

100

Inventory Management
Types of Inventories
Pipeline Inventories

Inventories necessary to meet average


Demand during the Time Between
Successive Replenishments.
Inventories Created as a hedge against
Variability in demand for the inventory &
in the Replenishment Lead time.
Out of Date, stolen or deteriorated
inventories.
47

ELEMENTS IN
MATERIAL
MANAGEMENT @
MSIL

48

SELECTION OF VENDORS

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPONENTS
TRIAL PRODUCTION

SOP (START OF PRODUCTION)

INITIAL SUPPLY CONTROL

PACKING REQUIREMENT

LOT CONTROL & TRACEABILITY

SENDAI CHECK FOR QUALITY PERFORMANCE


49


SELECTION
OF VENDOR

50

VENDOR SELECTION PROCEDURE


Based on the Vendor Performance ,Supply Chain/ Engineering
selects the Vendor for New Part development/ Second source
A team of Supply Chain/ Engineering then visits & performs an
assessment
As per Marutis laid down criteria produced below
After MD approval, SC issues Letter of Intent to Vendor.
CRITERIA FOR VENDOR SELECTION
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Vendor's Past Problem on Quality, Cost & Delivery.


Vendor technological Capability in Designing, Manufacturing, Testing
Management of company wrt to professionalism, Clarity in Org structure.
Financial health
Tool making capability
Quality system in the Org
Proximity to enable JIT deliveries
Loyalty


DEVELOPME
NT OF PARTS

52

Development of Parts
Supplier
Supplier
Selection
Selection
Issuance
Issuance
LOC/LOI
LOC/LOI
MSIL
MSIL

&
of&
byof
by

Preparation
of
Preparation
of
Specification
Specification
meeting
record &
meeting
record &
Part Development
Part Chart
Development
activity
activity Chart

Constitution of
Constitution
Project
Teamof
Project
by
VendorTeam
&
by
Vendor
intimation
to&
intimation
to
MSIL
MSIL

Tech
Review
Tech
Meeting Review
with
Meeting
MSIL (if req.) with
MSIL (if req.)

Finalization of
allFinalization of
all
Specifications
Specifications
Periodic
Periodic
internal
internal
monitoring
of
monitoring
development of
development&
process
process
adherence
to&
adherence
to
part
part
development
development
activity
chart

Issue
of
Issue
of
Drawing
Drawing
/Specs/
/Specs/
Standards
etc.
Standards
etc.
by MSIL
by MSIL
Specification
Specification
Meeting
with
Meeting
with
MSIL to discuss
MSIL to discuss
about
MSIL
about
Requirements.MSIL
Requirements.
Joint
Joint
Development
Development
review
with
review
with
MSIL
before
MSIL
before
MSIL
MSIL
development
development
milestones.
milestones.
53

Development of Parts
Information of
Information
any
Delays/of
any
Delays/
Salvage
Plans
Salvage
Plans
to MSIL
to MSIL

Preparation of
Preparation of
Part
Part
Development
Development
Problem
history
Problem
history
by the vendor.
by the vendor.

Part Development Stages of New Model Development


at MSIL:
Design Proto Production Proto Mass Production Pilot
Production Start of Production

54


TRIAL
PRODUCTION

55

PRODUCTION PREPARATION
Before Start of Mass Production, conduct PFMEA along with CFT.
Before Start of Mass Production, conduct PFMEA along with CFT.
Understand the accuracy Requirement of the Parts & ensure Process
Understand the accuracy Requirement of the Parts & ensure Process
Capabilities are achievable for meeting them
Capabilities are achievable for meeting them
Review the Past Quality Problems & establish Poka Yoke
Review the Past Quality Problems & establish Poka Yoke
Design & Plan The process Layout so as to minimize material
Design & Plan The process Layout so as to minimize material
movement, inventory Levels & wherever possible try to achieve
movement, inventory Levels & wherever possible try to achieve
Single Piece Flow.
Single Piece Flow.
Plan & Control the procurement of jigs, dies & machineries,
Plan & Control the procurement of jigs, dies & machineries,
equipment etc. to produce & deliver parts as per development
equipment etc. to produce & deliver parts as per development
activity chart.
activity chart.
Establish a detailed document system to communicate serious
Establish a detailed document system to communicate serious
Quality issues within the Company.
Quality issues within the Company.
56

PEAK PRODUCTION VERIFICATION


TRIAL (PPVT)
Calculate PPVT Rate & Net Operating Time
Calculate PPVT Rate & Net Operating Time
Conduct PPVT (Generally for 2 hrs) using the same process
Conduct PPVT (Generally for 2 hrs) using the same process
conditions (tools/ dies/ machines/ RM/ Manpower etc.) with which
conditions (tools/ dies/ machines/ RM/ Manpower etc.) with which
Mass Production shall be carried out.
Mass Production shall be carried out.
Is it
Satisfacto
ry?

N
O

Take Counter
Take Counter
Measures & Carry
YE
Measures & Carry
out PPVT again
S
out PPVT again
Conduct additional trial for 4 hrs to ensure consistency
Conduct additional trial for 4 hrs to ensure consistency
Calculate Process Capability for Parameters Decided in Spec Meeting
Calculate Process Capability for Parameters Decided in Spec Meeting
Submit PPVT Trial Report with countermeasures (if any) & Process Capability
Submit PPVT Trial Report with countermeasures
Capability
57
Report to MSIL (if any) & Process
Report to MSIL

ESTABLISHMENT OF OPERATION
STANDARDS
Prepare Operation Standards/ Work Instruction Sheets for all process
Prepare Operation Standards/ Work Instruction Sheets for all process
standards
standards
Establish a procedure for enactment, revision & control of operation
Establish a procedure for enactment, revision & control of operation
standards/ WIS
standards/ WIS
A
Indicate
inAthe standard if operation has any
item
Indicate
in the standard if operation has any
item
Review the standards whenever there is a Quality Feedback
Review the standards whenever there is a Quality Feedback
Establish Job set up verification Standards for die & tool changes &
Establish Job set up verification Standards for die & tool changes &
record the same
record the same
Display the sample in final inspection Area
Display the sample in final inspection Area
Nominate & Designate
Nominate & Designate
A
Put up
Put up

Operators/ Inspectors.
Operators/ Inspectors.

A stations of
display boards at processing & inspection
58
display boards atitems
processing
&
inspection
stations
of
& dispatch area

Parts,
Parts,


START OF MASS
PRODUCTION

59

APPROVAL OF FIRST PRODUCTION


PARTS & SOP
Produce FPP lot with minimum sample size of 300 or as decided in
Produce FPP lot with minimum sample size of 300 or as decided in
specification meeting with MSIL
specification meeting with MSIL
Establish identification of FPP during internal production &
Establish identification of FPP during internal production &
Processing by means of suitable tagging
Processing by means of suitable tagging
Inspect all the Quality characteristics mentioned in the drawing &
Inspect all the Quality characteristics mentioned in the drawing &
MIS-P with sample size as discussed with MSIL.
MIS-P with sample size as discussed with MSIL.
Submit FPP lot with Relevant reports to MSIL with Proper FPP
Submit FPP lot with Relevant reports to MSIL with Proper FPP
marking on box/ bins/ Trolleys
marking on box/ bins/ Trolleys
Evaluation of FPP Lot by MSIL
Evaluation of FPP Lot by MSIL
N
O

Rejection of FPP Lot by


Rejection ofSQA
FPP Lot by
SQA
Carry out corrections/
CarryImprovements
out corrections/

Is Results
found
satisfactory

YE
S
Approval of FPP lot
Approval of FPP lot
by SQA.
by SQA.
60

61


INITIAL SUPPLY
CONTROL

62

INITIAL SUPPLY CONTROL


Establishment of documented procedures & Controlling Parameters
Establishment of documented procedures & Controlling Parameters
for initial Supply control(ISC) for a) New Product Change
b) 4M
for initial Supply control(ISC) for a) New Product Change
b) 4M
Condition Change
Condition Change
Fix the time period of ISC & the responsibility to declare the start &
Fix the time period of ISC & the responsibility to declare the start &
termination of ISC.
termination of ISC.
Establish special process control, lot control & Traceability
Establish special process control, lot control & Traceability
Provide clear identification & Display on the process/ line in shop
Provide clear identification & Display on the process/ line in shop
floor to ensure that ISC is being observed for the part in question.
floor to ensure that ISC is being observed for the part in question.
Conduct Sub Vendor audit if the change pertains to them.
Conduct Sub Vendor audit if the change pertains to them.
Record all the problems during ISC & take prompt countermeasures.
Record all the problems during ISC & take prompt countermeasures.
Check the effectiveness of counter Measures periodically.
Check the effectiveness of counter Measures periodically.
63

Carry Out Process Capability studies.


Carry Out Process Capability studies.

YES

Is the
Result
Satisfactory
?

NO

Terminate ISC
Terminate ISC

Extend ISC till all the criteria


Extend ISC till all the criteria
are met.
are met.
Reconfirm Process Capability & Report the results to MSIL (if
Reconfirm Process Capability & Report the results to MSIL (if
capabilities are not satisfactory, employ 100% checking till they are
capabilities are not satisfactory, employ 100% checking till they are
corrected.)
corrected.)
Depute a representative at MSIL (if decided by MSIL) to address
Depute a representative at MSIL (if decided by MSIL) to address
problem till ISC Completion.
problem till ISC Completion.

64


PACKING
REQUIREMENTS

65

PACKING REQUIREMENTS
MSIL shall Decide the packing Specifications & send the same to the
MSIL shall Decide the packing Specifications & send the same to the
vendor.
vendor.
Vendor to submit the Packing sample to MSIL using the packing
Vendor to submit the Packing sample to MSIL using the packing
Guidelines provided by MSIL
Guidelines provided by MSIL
Satisfactor
y

Start supplies in the


Start supplies in the
approved packing
approved packing
with ID tag marked
with ID tag marked
New Packing
New Packing

Evaluation
of Packing
Samples by
MSIL

Not
Satisfactory

Carry out modifications &


Carry out modifications &
resubmit the samples.
resubmit the samples.
66


Lot control &
Traceability

67

LOT CONTROL & TRACEABILITY


Establishment a documented system for identification & Traceability
Establishment a documented system for identification & Traceability
of Parts & Their inspection status.
of Parts & Their inspection status.
Establish batch code for all
Establish batch code for all

A , Functional & General parts.


, Functional & General parts.

Incase of RMAof
part affecting
item, record the details of
A
Incase of RM of
part affecting
item, record the details of
heat, code, date & shift of production
heat, code, date & shift of production
Practice FIFO () First-in First-out for all incoming, in process &
Practice FIFO () First-in First-out for all incoming, in process &
finished parts
finished parts
Address absence or inadequate identification & Traceability as a
Address absence or inadequate identification & Traceability as a
Failure mode in PFMEA.
Failure mode in PFMEA.
Ensure all requirements of MSIL for identification & Traceability
Ensure all requirements of MSIL for identification & Traceability
Maintain records for all 4M changes as per the prescribed format.
Maintain records for all 4M changes as per the prescribed format.
68

Vendor Rating

69

Objective of Vendor Rating


System for evaluation of vendors
Based on the objective data
compiled about the vendor
Used for defining the
Future Business Dealings
Share of Business
Vendor awards, &
Improvements

70

Vendor Rating System


Quality

40

Warranty

%
Cost

35

VR
Delivery
Response &
Service
Development

10

Incoming
Quality

CPV
Rating

Defects
Rating

QPCR
Rating

4.4

Rejection
Rating

16

A
Vendor
Audit

10

16

CR
Rating

8 A
QPCR
1.6
Resp.Time

A
71

Vendor Rating System


Quality

40

Amount of
Price Redn
Price Reduction

Cost

35

Delivery

10

5.2

12.2

% of Price
Redn

VR

Response &
Service

Development

10

Amount of
VAVE Saving
Cost Saving
thru VAVE

12.2

% of VAVE
Saving

Price Redn in %
Focus Models

5.2

10.6
72

Vendor Rating System


Quality

40

M
E- Nagare Quantity Default 4

Cost

35

Delivery

10

Response &
Service

Development

10

VR
E- Nagare Time Default

Trolley & Bin Condition

2 A

73

HOW TO MEASURE
PERFORMANCE AT
VENDORS END &
FIND THE GAPS

74

1. DEFECTS AT MSIL
BETTER

DEFECT TGT ACHIEVED


TARGET PROVIDED BY MSILM -

# 1 DEFECT AT MSIL (2010-11)


DEFECT DETAIL

4M ANALYSIS

A
Part :

REINF COMP RR DR HINGE -R

Model :

SWIFT - DZIRE

Date :

28.04.2010

Defect :

7/16 NUT WELDED INSTEAD OF M-10

Man

O
K

Qty : 1

WHY-1

Why 7/16 NUT WELDED INSTEAD OF M-10

ANSWER

7/16 QUALIFIED IN WELDING JIG

WHY-2

WHY 7/16 NUT QUALIFY IN JIG ?

ANSWER

LOCATING PIN COULD NOT DETECT

WHY-3

WHY LOCATING PIN DID NOT DETECT ?

ANSWER

CYLINDERICAL, UNTHREADED PIN UNSED

ROOT
CAUSE

UNTHREADED LOCATING PIN USED

INSP could
not detect

Insp chkd
visually
without
using a bolt

Insp std not


clear

Locating pin not


OK

COUNTER-MEASURES :

POKA-YOKE IN WELDING JIG BY USING THREADED PIN

100 % NUT INSPECTION WITH M-10 BOLT

INSP STD REVISED

STORAGE LOCATIONS CHANGED FOR M10 AND 7/16 NUT

IMPL DATE : 05.05.2010


HORIZONTAL DEPLOYMENT :

INSP STDS REVISED


STORAGE LOCATIONS OF M6 & M8 NUT ALSO CHANGED

WHY-WHY ANALYSIS: FLOW


WHY-3

Machine

7/16 Nut welded


instead of M-10

O
N
C/M
DEPLOYMENT
K IMPLEMENTATION & HORIZONTAL
G

WHY-WHY ANALYSIS: OCCURANCE

WHY-2

O
K

7/16 Nut welded


instead of M-10
Material

WHY-1

Method

WHY-4

WHY-5

POKA YOKE

SEPARATE BINS FOR STORAGE


TO PREVENT NUT MIXING

NEARBY STORAGE LOCATION


CAUSING NUT MIXING

THREADED PIN FOR WELDING


M10 NUT

2. REJECTION PPM AT MSIL

PART TROLLEY STORAGE LOCATION CHANGED AT MSILM

BETTER

PANEL FENDER APRON (ASTAR, Zn Coated) GOT WHITE


SPOTS DUE TO WATER DROPS
FROM AC DUCT AT MSILM MX

WHITE SPOTS ON PANEL FENDER APRON (Zn COATED) A


STAR
WHY WHY ANALYSIS
Q1

WHY? WHITE SPOT FORMATION AT MSILM

A1

WATER DROPS ON PART

Q2

WHY? WATER DROPS

A2

PART TROLLEYS STORED BELOW AC DUCT

Q3

WHY? PART STORED BELOW AC DUCT

A3

WRONG LOCATION SPECIFIED

ROOT CAUSE

WRONG PART / TROLLEY STORAGE LOCATION AT


MSILM

COUNTERMEASURE

PART STORAGE LOCATION CHANGED AT MSILM MX

BETTER

3. MSIL SYSTEM AUDIT PERFORMANCE

IMPROVEMENT TARGET: 14%, ACHIEVED: 7%

SYSTEM AUDIT MARKS (10 - 11)


Audit Points

12TH & 13TH JAN 11

Audit Score
Achieved Max.
Achieved
Score
Score

1 Production Preparation

10

16

63%

2 Initial Supply Control

13

46%

3 Initial Control- Changed Parts

11

73%

4 Preventive Measures for defects

12

19

63%

5 Education and Training

16

16

100%

6 Quality audit

15

15

100%

7 Supplier control

10

10

100%

8 Control of drawings and Engg Changes

100%

9 Inspection standard & Process Control Standard

10

13

77%

10 Operation Standard

11

12

92%

11 Observance of Operation Standard

100%

12 Role of Manager/ Supervisor

100%

13 Quality improvement of process

100%

14 Control of Manufacturing machine/ jig

89%

15 Control of Inspection equipment and Jig

11

11

100%

16 Statistical method
Prevention of missing process/ wrong
17
assembling
18 Control of non conforming product

17%

100%

83%

19 Storage of product

100%

20 First-in , First-out

40%

21 History management of A (Safety) parts

100%

22 Implementation of inspection

33%

168

209

80%

Total Score

Achieved

Audit Score
22

100%
21

73%
46% 63% 100%
100%
40% 33%
20

63%

19

100%

83%
100%
18

100%

17%

17

16

100%
8

77%

100%
89%
92%
100% 100%
15

14

10

13

100%
12

WEAK AREAS

C/M UNDER IMPLEMENTATION

11

4. QPCR (NOS.)
BETTER

ZERO QPCR RAISED IN 2010


TARGET PROVIDED BY MSILM -

5. WARRANTY FAILURES (NOS.)


BETTER

ZERO WARRANTY FAILURES IN 2010

6. VENDOR RANKING
BETTER

TARGET 10% IMPROVEMENT OVER 2009-10

7. DI DEFAULTS
BETTER

ZERO DI(QTY.) DEFAULTS IN 2010 - 11

8. TIME DEFAULTS
BETTER

CO-ORDINATION WITH MSIL TO BE IMPROVED

BETTER

KAIZENS IMPLEMENTED

IMPROVEMENT TGT: 50%, ACHIEVED: 62%


NOV 2010 CELEBRATED AS QUALITY MONTH
SPECIAL PRIZES FOR BEST SLOGAN, POSTER

(EFFECTIVE STROKES /MIN)

IMPROVEMENT TGT: 8%, ACHIEVED: 3%

BETTER

PRODUCTIVITY PRESS SHOP

(SPOTS/PERSON/SHIFT)

IMPROVEMENT TGT : 8%, ACHIEVED : 5%

BETTER

PRODUCTIVITY WELD SHOP

PRESS SHOP DOWNTIME


BETTER

(%AGE OF TOTAL AVAILABLE TIME)

6.63

6.26

6.01

6.31

6.35

6.30

6.13

5.97

6.05

5.93

5.84

REDUCTION TGT: 5%, ACHIEVED : 7%

6.30

6.14

WELD SHOP DOWNTIME

REDUCTION TGT: 20%, ACHIEVED : 14%

BETTER

(%AGE OF TOTAL AVAILABLE TIME)

SAFETY- CML BAWAL


BETTER

ZERO ACCIDENT IN 2010

SAFETY- CML BAWAL


BETTER

REDUCTION TGT: 50%, ACHIEVED: 66%

BETTER

POKA YOKE

IMPROVEMENT TGT : 150 (CUMM.), ACHIEVED : 153

ABSENTEEISM %
BETTER

< 5% ABSENTEEISM TGT IN 2010

MPS PROJECTS
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT ( > 40 %)
PROJECT 1 REINF COMP REAR DOOR HINGE RH / LH (SWIFT / DZIRE)
PROJECT 2 PANEL COMP. COWL TOP (SWIFT / DZIRE)
PROJECT 3 PANEL COMP. COWL UPPER (SWIFT / DZIRE)

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (>30 % BOP DEFECT REDN.)


PROJECT 4 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT BY 30% DEFECT REDUCTION IN BOP

PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT (DIE SET-UP TIME REDN.)


PROJECT 5 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT BY DIE SET-UP TIME REDN.

HOW TO MEET SCM IN INCREASING


MARKET SCENARIO?
The Market Size is Increasing, as the increase in Last
two Years has been about 27%.
Alternatives are :
Increase Productivity
Increase Capacities
Increase the number of Vendors for the same
Components
97

Not
Possible

Machino Plastics Ltd.

PROJECT : 1
TO REDUCE NAGARE
TIME & QUANTITY
DEFAULT

78

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Project Team

TEAM FACILITATOR

P.K.SAHA

TEAM
LEADER

D.K.MISHRA

TEAM MEMBER

SANJAY

PADMAKAR

DK.AWASTI

SUBHASH

PRAMOD
KUMAR

79

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Reason for project selection : a)

Excessive Nagare Time defaults.

b)

Poor performance in vendor ranking due to Nagare Quantity /


Time defaults.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Delivery (Quantity Default )

NO OF FAILURES

40

MSIL 2010-11
34

35 0.42Defau
30 lt/month

Project
started

25
20
15

18

10

5
0

5.6
Default/mo
nth

3
0

7
0

PERIOD
81

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Delivery (Time Default )


3500
3000

NO OF FAILURES

2500

483
Default/mont
h

106
Default /
month

2900

Proje
ct
starte
d

2000
1500

1268

MSIL 2010-11

1107

1000
400631
500 382
461480
201
0

20

PERIOD
82

Machino Plastics Ltd.


SNo.

Reason for time default

Apr.

May.

June

July

Aug

Total

Shortage of vehicle for supply

62

79

11

143

32

327

Dust problem in OE PDI

32

11

23

58

21

145

Time taken to convert the part


from wrong to ok trolley

64

180

82

214

258

798

Quality prob.at PDI.

10

48

17

86

Material not available

76

30

19

203

76

404

Material not available in system


stock.

11

27

48

Excess time taken to unload


the material at MUL

13

12

32

11

75

System breakdown

76

13

13

168

83

353

Manpower not come on time in


morning shift

104

85

19

113

92

413

10

Plan not adhere by disp.

12

12

Road jam due to havey trafic

11

54

39

41

154

13

E-nagare loading problem in


system

10

55

65

461

480

201

1107

631

2880

Total

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Month wise Nagare Time


default % 2010-11
17

18
16
14
12

10

10
8

6
4
2
0

Proje
ct
start
ed

3
0

April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

37

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Target Setting for Nagare


default.
S.N
Description
o.

E-Nagare Time
Default

E-Nagare
Quantity Default

Present
%
Status
Targ
Improve
(April'10et
ment
Aug'10) Nos.
576

100

34

100

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Reason wise Total number of default from


April to Aug.10

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Time taken to convert the part from wrong trolley


To OK trolley
Action taken : -

Trolley availability vs Requirement calculated and


New trolley added accordingly.
Model wise color coding done in all trolley for identification
ON line SPD packing started so that no trolley engage
for storage of SPD part.
Empty trolley pickup frequency from MSIL increased.
Part loading capacity per trolley increased.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Model wise trolley color code


S.NO.

Color - code

Model - Name

Car 800CC

Sky blue

Omni

Grey

Gypsy

White

Alto - A

Orange

Wagon - R - S

Yellow

Versa / ECCO - C

Royal blue

Ritz - N

Coffee

Zen - M

Pink

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Subject :

MPS PROJECT

Date of
implimentation:24/11/10

BEFORE

Ref No:-

DEPT:

MOULD MAINT.

AFTER

APPROVED BY:
D.K Mishra
(IMPROVEMENT DONE)
1.MAN MOVEMENT
SAVING.
2.TROLLEY
MODIFICATION
3.SPACE SAVING
4.COMMONIZATION &
UNIFICATION
5.WEIGHT REDUCTION
6.ENERGY SAVING
7.YIELD
8.QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
9.WASTE REDUCTION
10.SPACE UTILIZATION
11.COST SAVING
12.5S

Problem : Model wise no identification


Solution : With color coding.
mark on trolley.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Subject : MPS PROJECT

Date of
Ref No:implimentation:03/12/10

BEFORE

APPROVED BY:
DEPT:

MOULD MAINT.

D.K
Mishra

AFTER

(IMPROVEMENT

DONE)

1.MAN MOVEMENT
SAVING.
2.TROLLEY
MODIFICATION
3.SPACE SAVING
4.COMMONIZATION &
UNIFICATION
5.WEIGHT REDUCTION
6.ENERGY SAVING
7.YIELD
8.QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
9.WASTE REDUCTION
10.SPACE UTILIZATION
11.COST SAVING
12.5S

Problem: IPA Trolley for 12pcs


capacity

Solution: IPA Trolley increase


capacity 12~15pcs

Machino Plastics Ltd.


Subject : MPS PROJECT

Date of
Ref No:implimentation:27/11/10

BEFORE

DEPT:

MOULD MAINT.

AFTER

APPROVED BY:
D.K Mishra
(IMPROVEMENT DONE)
1.MAN MOVEMENT
SAVING.
2.TROLLEY
MODIFICATION
3.SPACE SAVING
4.COMMONIZATION &
UNIFICATION
5.WEIGHT REDUCTION
6.ENERGY SAVING
7.YIELD
8.QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
9.WASTE REDUCTION
10.SPACE UTILIZATION
11.COST SAVING
12.5S

Problem : Model

wise trolley

storage
location not identified.

Solution :Trolley wise storage Location identified.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Manpower not come in time


Action taken : In time monitoring and recording for all
associates started.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Material not available for dispatch


Action taken : -

Inventory norms fixed for all the items.


Minimum 8 ~ 10 Hours inventory maintain for all
the items.
Daily physical inventory of all the items started.
Start to prepare shift wise M/C planning and its
circulation to all concerns.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

System - Breakdown
Action taken : New IT person recruited in the month of Nov.10.

Implemented log book to record the IT related


problem observed along with the counter measure

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Shortages of vehicle for Nagare supply.

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Before

After

Time default (April to


Aug.10)

Time default (Sept.


to Dec.10)
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0

18

5
4

N
5
1

Rotational
PDCA

Machino Plastics Ltd.

Target vs Monitoring:
Nagare Default.
S.No.Description

1
2

E-Nagare
Time Default
E-Nagare
Quantity
Default

Present Status
Targ Sep Oc Nov De
(April'10et
t. t
.
c
Aug'10) Nos.

576

34

20 3
0

MPS PROJECT # 5

Die Change-Over time Reduction


on

1000T
PRESS

Project Schedule Start 15-Oct-10, Finish 15-Nov-10

DIE CHANGE OVER TIME REDUCTION


ACTIVITIES
PROJECT SELECTION
STEP - 1

KAIZENS
STEP - 8

TIME STUDY AFTER


STEP - 9

TEAM FORMATION

DATA COLLECTION

TARGET SETTING

STEP - 2

STEP - 3

STEP - 4

IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES
FOR TIME REDUCTION

TIME STUDY & ACTIVITY


SEQUENCING

VIDEOGRAPHY

STEP - 7

STEP - 6

STEP - 5

ACHIEVEMENT OF
RESULTS !

STANDARDIZATION

STEP - 10

STEP - 11

HORIZONTAL DEPLOYMENT
IN 800T & 500T LINE
STEP - 14

MONITORING OF RESULTS
STEP - 13

CURRENT
STATUS

TRAINING
STEP - 12

STEP - 1

WHY ? THIS PROJECT

S.
No.

Largest Capacity Press (1000T) in the Shop


Maximum Production Time Loss due to Die Change Over
Streamline die-change over process
Capacity improvement

Item

Per Day

Per Month

Per Year

1320 Min
( 22 Hrs )

33000 Min
( 550 Hrs )

396000 Min
( 6600 Hrs )

39 Min (13 X 3)
( 0.65 Hrs )

975 Min (39 X 25)


( 16.3 Hrs )

11700 Min (975 X 12)


( 195 Hrs )

Total Available Time

Die Changeover Time


(Time / Change Over X No. of
Changes)

Production Loss (%age)

3%

3%

3%

Loss of Strokes
( @ Avg. Eff. SPM = 6.2)

242

6045

72540

STEP - 1

PLANT LAYOUT
INCOMING RM / BOP / CONSUMABLES

Small Press Line (25T-200T: 11 Presses)

1000T Press Line (1000T-1, 400T-6)

TOOL & DIE


MAINTENANCE

500T Press Line (500T-1, 315T-3)

800T Press Line (800T-1, 400T-3)

DIE STORAGE
500T & 800T PRESS LINE

WIP
INSPECTION

WELD LINE

WIP
INSPECTION

R/M STORAGE AREA

R/M STORAGE
AREA

BOP STORAGE &


INSPECTION

DIE STORAGE
1000T PRESS LINE

WELD LINE

QA OFFICE & LAB

FG STORAGE AREA
PDI
INSPECTION
FG DESPATCH

1000 TON PRESS SELECTED FOR PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE

STEP - 1

DIE CHANGE OVER TIME

"LAST OK PIECE
TO
FIRST OK PIECE"

STEP - 2

THE TEAM

NAME

DEPARTMENT

RESPONSIBILITY

A. VIDYARTHI

G.M.

FACILITATOR

AMIT SANGWAN

QA

LEADER

R. GAHLAWAT

MAINTENANCE

MEMBER

P. KUKRETI

PRESS SHOP

MEMBER

S.P. RAJPUT

PRESS SHOP

MEMBER

VINOD DAHIYA

PRESS SHOP

MEMBER (G.E.T.)

DEEPAK SHARMA

MAINTENANCE

MEMBER (G.E.T.)

STEP - 3

DATA COLLECTION

Avg. Change-over time 13.4 Min

STEP - 4

TARGET - SETTING

Activity

Before
(Jul Oct10)

Target
(Nov10)

% Improvement

Die change over


time

13.4 Min
(805 secs)

9 Min
(540 secs)

33%

33% Improvement
Target

STEP - 5

ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION

INTERNAL
PERFORMED AFTER STOPPING THE PRESS

EXTERNAL
PERFORMED BEFORE STOPPING THE PRESS

PARALLEL
ACTIVITIES PERFORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY AFTER STOPPING THE
PRESS

VIDEOGRAPHY DONE FOR ANALYSIS

STEP - 6

TIME ANALYSIS : ACTIVITY-WISE BREAK UP BEFORE

ACTIVITY
NO.

ACTIVITY

TYPE OF
ACTIVITY

PRECEDING
ACTIVITY

AVG.
TIME
(SEC)

MOVING BLANKS FROM STORE TO THE PRESS

External

120

OPEN STACK COVER BY CUTTING STRIPS

External

15

MEASURE DIMENSIONS OF BLANK AS PER PCS / STD.

External

30

REMOVE LAST PIECE OF PREVIOUS LOT FROM LOWER DIE

Internal

ADJUST PRESS CONTROL FROM AUTO MODE TO INCHING MODE

Internal

BRING THE CUSHION DOWN

Internal

20

BRING UPPER DIE DOWN TO BDC TO MATCH WITH LOWER DIE

Internal

BRING CLAMP NUT OPENING SPANNERS NEAR THE DIE FROM TOOL CRIB

Internal

30

UNFASTEN THE CLAMPING BOLTS/NUTS OF UPPER DIE

Internal

40

10

UNFASTEN THE CLAMPING BOLTS/NUTS OF LOWER DIE

Internal

40

11

MOVE SLIDE TO TDC

Internal

10

12

MOVE SIDE GUARD UP

Internal

11

20

13

CLEAN RAILS OUTSIDE THE PRESS

Internal

12

10

14

UNCLAMP THE MOVING BOLSTER

Internal

13

15

15

MOVE MOVING BOLSTER OUT OF PRESS

Internal

14

40

16

CLEAN CUSHION PAD INSIDE PRESS MACHINE

Internal

15

15

17

MOVE THE OUTSIDE MB WITHIN PRESS

Internal

16

40

18

CLAMP MOVING BOLSTER INSIDE THE PRESS

Internal

17

19

ADJUST SLIDE UPTO 2 MM WITH UPPER DIE FOR CLAMPING

Internal

18

30

20

MOVE SLIDE DOWN TO BDC

Internal

19

STEP - 6

TIME ANALYSIS : ACTIVITY-WISE BREAK UP BEFORE

ACTIVITY
NO.

ACTIVITY

TYPE OF
ACTIVITY

PRECEDING
ACTIVITY

TIME (SEC)

21

TIGHTEN UPPER DIE BOLTS

Internal

20

60

22

MOVE SLIDE TO TDC

Internal

21

23

ADJUST CUSHION HEIGHT FROM CONTROL PANEL

Internal

22

120

24

MOVE CUSHION UP TO ACCOMMODATE BLANK

Internal

23

25

MOVE UPPER DIE DOWN FOR ALIGNMENT OF UPPER AND LOWER DIE

Internal

23

26

MOVE UPPER DIE DOWN FOR ALIGNMENT OF UPPER AND LOWER DIE

Internal

24

27

TIGHTEN CLAMPING BOLTS OF LOWER DIE

Internal

26

40

28

MOVE SLIDE UP TO TDC

Internal

27

29

ADJUST DIE HEIGHT AS PER PCS AND CLAY TEST

Internal

28

60

30

MOVE SLIDE UP TO TDC

Internal

29

31

ADJUST PRESS CONTROL TO AUTO MODE

Internal

30

32

PICK, MOVE AND PLACE THE BLANK FROM STACK TO BLANK HOLDER

Internal

31

33

PRESS PUSH BUTTONS TO OPERATE PRESS

Internal

32

34

PICK AND MOVE THE PRESSED PART FROM LOWER DIE

Internal

33

35

INSPECTION FOR BOTTOMING MARK, NECKING, WRINKLES ETC. FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION

Internal

34

60

36

RE-ADJUST CUSHION PRESSURE (IN CASE OF REJECTION) TO PRODUCE OK PART

Internal

35

30

37

INSPECTION FOR BOTTOMING MARK, NECKING, WRINKLES ETC. FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION

Internal

36

60

TOTAL ACTIVITY TIME


TOTAL INTERNAL ACTIVITY TIME

970 SEC
(16.3 MIN)
805 SEC
(13.4 MIN)

STEP - 6

ACTIVITY PATHS - BEFORE


EXTERNAL
ACTIVITIES

(15)

(30)

Parallel, Non-critical activities


Sequential, Critical activities

(12O)

(5)

6
(20)

5
(5)

7
(5)

(30)

10

11

(40)

(40)

(5)

12
(20)

13
(10)

14
(15)

15
(40)

16
(15)

17 - 32
(398)

33 - 37
(157)

INTERNAL
ACTIVITIES
ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED
FOR TIME REDUCTION

TITLE

PATHS

Type

TIME
(Secs)

Effect on
Die
Changeover time

1 2 3 33 37

Non-Critical
path

322 Sec

No

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 17 37

Critical Path

805 Sec

Yes

INTERNAL / EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED


SEQUENCE OF ACTIVITIES ESTABLISHED
CRITICAL PATH AND ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED

STEP - 7

ACTIVI
TY
NO.

KAIZEN IDEAS
ACTIVITY

AVG.
TIME
(SEC)

KAIZEN IDEA

KAIZEN
IDEA
No.

BRING CLAMP NUT OPENING SPANNERS


NEAR THE DIE FROM TOOL CRIB

30

ARRANGEMENT OF SPANNERS NEAR PRESS

UNFASTEN THE CLAMPING BOLTS/NUTS


OF UPPER DIE

40

PROVIDE ONE ASSOCIATE ON BOTH SIDES WITH 2


SPANNERS

10

UNFASTEN THE CLAMPING BOLTS/NUTS


OF LOWER DIE

40

PROVIDE ONE ASSOCIATE ON BOTH SIDES WITH 2


SPANNERS

12

MOVE SIDE GUARD UP

20

CONVERT INTERNAL TO EXTERNAL ACTIVITY

13

CLEAN RAILS OUTSIDE THE PRESS

10

CONVERT INTERNAL TO EXTERNAL ACTIVITY

16

CLEAN CUSHION PAD INSIDE PRESS


MACHINE

15

CONVERT INTERNAL TO PARALLEL ACTIVITY

21

TIGHTEN UPPER DIE BOLTS

60

PROVIDE ONE ASSOCIATE ON BOTH SIDES WITH 2


SPANNERS

23

ADJUST CUSHION HEIGHT FROM


CONTROL PANEL

120

USE HEIGHT GAUGE & DIGITAL READ OUT FOR


CUSHION HEIGHT

27

TIGHTEN CLAMPING BOLTS OF LOWER


DIE

40

PROVIDE ONE ASSOCIATE ON BOTH SIDES WITH 2


SPANNERS

29

ADJUST DIE HEIGHT AS PER PCS AND


CLAY TEST

60

USE HEIGHT GAUGE & DIGITAL READ OUT FOR DIE


HEIGHT

STEP - 8

KAIZEN # 1

CMLB

TITLE: DIE BOLT/NUT OPENING SPANNERS LOCATION FIXED ON 1000 T PRESS

BEFORE

AFTER

LOCATION AWAY FROM 1000T PRESS

SITUATION

SITUATION

CLAMPING NUT OPENING SPANNERS LOCATED


ATA DISTANCE OF APPROX. 15 METRES

CLAMPING NUT OPENING SPANNERS LOCATED


AT 1000T PRESS (1-2 MTR)

PROBLEM

BENEFIT

WASTAGE OF TIME IN MOVEMENT TO BRING


SPANNERS TO PRESS

MUDA OF MOVEMENT ELIMINATED

TIME SAVED: 25 SECONDS

STEP - 8

KAIZEN # 2

CMLB

TITLE: SIDE GUARD UP ACTIVITY (SEQUENCE CHANGE)

BEFORE

AFTER

SITUATION

SITUATION

SIDE GUARD UP ACTIVITY DURING DIE SET UP


(INTERNAL ACTIVITY)
PROBLEM

INCREASE IN DIE SET UP TIME AS ACTIVITY


PERFORMED DURING DIE SET UP

SIDE GUARD UP ACTIVITY BEFORE DIE SET UP


(INTERNAL EXTERNAL ACTIVITY)
BENEFIT

CHANGING INTERNAL ACTIVITY TO EXTERNAL


ACTIVITY

TIME SAVED: 20 SECONDS

STEP - 8

KAIZEN # 3

CMLB

TITLE: OUTSIDE RAILS CLEANING ACTIVITY (SEQUENCE CHANGE)

BEFORE

AFTER

OUTSIDE RAILS CLEANING DURING DIE SETUP

SITUATION

SITUATION

OUTSIDE RAILS CLEANING DURING DIE SET UP


(INTERNAL ACTIVITY)

OUTSIDE RAILS CLEANING BEFORE DIE SET UP


(INTERNAL EXTERNAL ACTIVITY)

PROBLEM

BENEFIT

INCREASE IN DIE SET UP TIME AS ACTIVITY


PERFORMED DURING DIE SET UP

CHANGING INTERNAL ACTIVITY TO EXTERNAL


ACTIVITY

TIME SAVED: 10 SECONDS

STEP - 8

KAIZEN # 4

CMLB

TITLE: CLEANING OF CUSHION PAD INSIDE THE MACHINE

BEFORE

AFTER

SITUATION

SITUATION

CLEANING OF CUSHION PAD DONE AFTER


MOVING BOLSTER IS MOVED OUT
(INTERNAL ACTIVITY)
PROBLEM

MORE DIE CHANGE OVER TIME

CLEANING IS DONE SIMULTANEOUSLY WHEN


MB IS MOVING OUT
(INTERNAL PARALLEL ACTIVITY)
BENEFIT

REDUCTION IN DIE CHANGE-OVER TIME

TIME SAVING: 15 SECONDS

STEP - 8

KAIZEN # 5

CMLB

TITLE: SETTING OF CUSHION & DIE HEIGHT

BEFORE

AFTER

MANUAL SETTING OF CUSHION & DIE HEIGHT

SITUATION

MANUAL SETTING OF CUSHION & DIE HEIGHT


PROBLEM

TIME CONSUMING ACTIVITY FOR REPEATED


ACTIVITY (HEIGHT ADJUSTMENT) TO SET
REQUIRED HEIGHT

SITUATION

CUSHION & DIE HEIGHT SETTING USING


HEIGHT GAUGE
BENEFIT

HEIGHT GAUGE & PROPER WORK


INSTRUCTIONS TO AVOID REPEATATION

TIME SAVED: 100 SECONDS

STEP - 8

KAIZEN # 6

CMLB

TITLE: OPENING OF UPPER & LOWER DIE CLAMPING NUTS

BEFORE

AFTER

ONE PERSON UNCLAMPING BOTH SIDE NUTS

SITUATION

ONE PERSON DOING UNCLAMPING OF DIES


(ONE SPANNER ONLY)
PROBLEM

MORE TIME FOR UNCLAMPING OF NUTS

SITUATION

TWO PERSONS DEPLOYED ON BOTH SIDE FOR


UNCLAMPING OF DIES (TWO SPANNERS MADE
AVAILABLE)
BENEFIT

WORK DISTRIBUTION FOR 50% REDUCTION IN


TIME FOR UNCLAMPING OF NUTS
TIME SAVING: 90 SECONDS

STEP - 7

AC
TIVI
TY
NO.

KAIZEN BENEFITS
AVG.
AVG.
TIME
TIME
TIME
SAVED
BEFOR AFTER
(SEC)
E (SEC) (SEC)

ACTIVITY

Kaizen Implemented

Ide
a
No.

BRING CLAMP NUT OPENING SPANNERS


NEAR DIE FROM TOOL CRIB

30

25

CLAMPING NUT OPENING SPANNERS LOCATED AT 1000T


PRESS

UNFASTEN CLAMPING BOLTS/NUTS OF


UPPER DIE

40

15

25

TWO PERSONS DEPLOYED ON BOTH SIDE FOR UNCLAMPING


OF DIES (TWO SPANNERS MADE AVAILABLE)

10

UNFASTEN CLAMPING BOLTS/NUTS OF


LOWER DIE

40

15

25

TWO PERSONS DEPLOYED ON BOTH SIDE FOR UNCLAMPING


OF DIES (TWO SPANNERS MADE AVAILABLE)

12 MOVE SIDE GUARD UP

20

20

SIDE GUARD UP ACTIVITY BEFORE DIE SET UP (INTERNAL TO


EXTERNAL ACTIVITY)

13 CLEAN RAILS OUTSIDE PRESS

10

10

OUTSIDE RAILS CLEANING BEFORE DIE SET UP (INTERNAL TO


EXTERNAL ACTIVITY)

15

15

CLEANING IS DONE SIMULTANEOUSLY WHEN MB IS MOVING


OUT(INTERNAL PARALLEL ACTIVITY)

60

30

30

TWO PERSONS DEPLOYED ON BOTH SIDE FOR UNCLAMPING


OF DIES (TWO SPANNERS MADE AVAILABLE)

120

60

60

CUSHION & DIE HEIGHT SETTING USING HEIGHT GAUGE

40

20

20

TWO PERSONS DEPLOYED ON BOTH SIDE FOR UNCLAMPING


OF DIES (TWO SPANNERS MADE AVAILABLE)

60

30

30

CUSHION & DIE HEIGHT SETTING USING HEIGHT GAUGE

16

CLEAN CUSHION PAD INSIDE PRESS


MACHINE

21 TIGHTEN UPPER DIE BOLTS


23

ADJUST CUSHION HEIGHT FROM


CONTROL PANEL

27 TIGHTEN CLAMPING BOLTS OF LOWER DIE


29

ADJUST DIE HEIGHT AS PER PCS AND


CLAY TEST

260 SECONDS SAVED

MUDA ELIMINATION

CHANGE INTERNAL TO EXTERNAL

(30 SEC)

CHANGE INTERNAL TO PARALLEL

(15 SEC)

BETTER MAN-POWER DEPLOYMENT (100 SEC)

(25 SEC)

STEP - 10

ACTIVITY PATHS BEFORE & AFTER

BEFORE

Parallel, Non-critical activities

(12O)

(5)

A
B

(15)

(30)

5
(5)

6
(20)

Sequential, Critical activities

7
(5)

(30)

10

11

(40)

(40)

(5)

13

12
(20)

(10)

14
(15)

15
(40)

17 - 32
(398)

16
(15)

33 - 37
(157)

PATH

Type

TIME (Sec)

Effect on Die Changeover time

1 2 3 33 37
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
17 37

Non-Critical Path

322 Sec

No

Critical Path

805 Sec

Yes

AFTER
1
(12O)

(5)

5
(5)

(15)

(30)

6
(20)

7
(5)

PATH
1 2 3 12 13 16 - - - 17 37
4 6 7 8 9 10 11
D
14 15 17 37
C

13

12
(20)

(5)

16
(15)

(10)

10

11

(15)

(15)

(5)

14
(15)

15
(40)

17 - 32
(258)

33 - 37
(157)

Type

TIME (Secs)

Effect on Die Change over


time

Non-Critical

367 Sec

No

Critical Path

545 Sec

Yes

STEP - 10

RESULTS

Activity

Before
(Jul Oct10)

Target
(Nov10)

Die change
over time

13.4 min
(805sec)

9 min
(540 sec)

After
% Improvement
(Nov Dec10)
9.1 min
(545 sec)

32%

32% Improvement

STEP - 10

MONITORING OF RESULTS

32% reduction achieved after


implementation from 15-Nov10

BEFORE

AFTER

WORK INSTRUCTIONS REVISED AND TRAINING IMPARTED

STEP - 11

STANDARDIZATION

BENEFITS
S.
No.

Item

Per Day

Per Month

Per Year

1320 Min
( 22 Hrs )

33000 Min
( 550 Hrs )

396000 Min
( 6600 Hrs )

39 Min (13 X 3)
( 0.65 Hrs )

975 Min (39 X 25)


( 16.3 Hrs )

11700 Min (975 X 12)


( 195 Hrs )

Total Available Time

Die Changeover Time Before


(Time / Change Over X No. of
Changes)

Production Loss (%age)

3%

3%

3%

Loss of Strokes
( @ Avg. SPM = 6.2)

242

6045

72540

Die change over time (After)


(545 Sec / 9.1 Min per chg)

27 Min

675 Min

8100 Min

Time Saved

12 Min

300 Min

3600 Min

Strokes increase due to time


saved @ 6.2 SPM

74

1850

22200

Extra Parts production due


to saving (4 strokes per part)

19

475

5700

Man-power cost saved @ 3.5


per stroke (INR)

259

6475

77700

Thanks

Você também pode gostar