Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Thesis Defense
Thesis Outline:
I.
Introduction
II.
Literature Review
III.
Research Methodology
IV.
V.
I. Introduction
-Land:
181,035 (2.5% of water)
-Population: >14.8
I. Introduction (Cont.)
Highest education farmer (50.5%-secondary school )
illiteracy rate for men 85% > women 71%
28% of PP live under poverty line
World trend tend to use chemical produce more output
Cambodia has used more than 3,200,000 liter per years
I. Introduction (Cont.)
MAFF & Gtv has not yet constitute organic law
-Sub Degree on 28th October, 1998
-Constructed Millennium Development Goal
-Rectangle Strategy
I. Introduction (Cont.)
ga
r
o
d
worl
ket
r
a
n ic m
1. Greece
2. Mexico
3. Kazakhstan
n
o
i
ill
m es
.5 tar
7
3 ec
h
ed
A eer
US on try
pi u n
co
63.8
nU
o
i
l
l
i
b
n
io
ill
m s
9 er
1. rm
fa
15.2
nU
o
i
l
l
i
b
99
9
1
s in
r
a
l
l
do
12
0
2
s in
r
a
l
l
do
uu
o
o
cc
4
4
1166
s
iriees
nnttr
I. Introduction (Cont.)
Research Objective
To identify the demographic characteristics and purchasing pattern
of organic consumer
To comprehend consumers knowledge about organic label and
organic term
To explore main factor affecting on consumers intention to
purchase organic vegetable
I. Introduction (Cont.)
The model and theory examine deeply on major issues leading
consumers intention to purchase organic goods as following :
ethical lifestyle
health consciousness
price perspective
food safety concern
product attribute
product availability
consumers trust.
10
11
(Ajzen,
1991)
(Fishbein &Ajzen,
2011)
12
13
Supporte
d & other
peers
also
eating
organic
vegetabl
e
Strong
intention
More likely
to engage
that
behavior
Product
Attribute
Affective
Conceptual Framework
Nutrition
Health
Concern
Food
Safety
Concern
Behavi
or
Attitud
e
Environmenta
l Concern
Animal
Welfare
Ethical
Lifestyle
Theory of
Planned
Behavior
Instrumen
t
Significant
Person
Price
Injunctiv
e
Subjective
Norms
Promotion
Society
Product
Availability
Notion
s
Intention
to
Purchase
Organic
Vegetable
Self
Philosophi
es
Behavior to
Purchase
Organic
Vegetable
Theory of
Reasoned
Action
Descriptiv
e
Easy &
difficult
Perceived
Behavior
Control
Socio-Economics
Research Hypothesis
17
Research hypotheses
Consumers concerns about health have a positive influence on the intention to purchase
organic vegetables.
H2
Consumer ethical issues have a positive significant impact on the intention to buy organic
vegetables.
H3
H4
Consumer concern about food safety has a positive influence on consumers' intention to
buy organic vegetables.
H5
Product attribute has a significant impact on the intention to buy organic vegetables.
H6
H7
Structure
questionnaire
IV. Research
Procedures
Market
Survey
Convenient
sampling
19
Z pq
n
2
e
(1.96) (0.5)(0.5)
n
385samples
2
0.05
20
d
e
us
ly r
r
a ste
l
u ni
p
i
o
P m
ad
&
o
p
s
e
r
y
l
b
i
ns
21
Table 3.2 Variables and measurements of supermarket and organic food shop
N0
Name
1 GENDER
Label
Gender
Age
Measure
Nominal
nd
a
d
e
&
s
i
y
v
l
e
e
r
s
i
s
c
a
STATUS
Status
e
r
w
p
n
s
n
o
e
i
l
o
i
s
b
s
r
a
r
e
i
r
v Member of household
ve
a
MEMBER
h
v
r
s
e
i
n
l
i
g
m
a
n
h
m
E
K
5
o
t
2
KIDS
e 15 years old living in your household?
te Are there anyrekidsaunder
r
a
l
s
n
e
h
tra
T
.
OLDPP
Are
there
any older people above 60 years old living in your household?
a
s
r
e
v
vice
EDUCATION
What is your highest education?
OCCUPATION
Nominal
INCOME
Ordinal
10 DISEASE
Nominal
11 HEARD
Nominal
12 KNOWLEDGE
Nominal
3
4
5.
6
AGE
Scale
Nominal
Scale
Nominal
Nominal
Ordinal
22
23
5
n
i
g
n
uri
s
a
e
em
r
e
w
s
t
n
e
em
t
a
t
s
30
e
l
a
c
s
likert
24
Respondents Age
Respondents Gender
15%
52%
49%
3%
18-30 Year
31-45 Year
46-64 Year
Male
82%
Average 27 Year
26
Respondents Occupation
Respondents Status
8%
23%
2%
69%
98%
Employment
Household
Single
Marriage
11% 1% 1% 4%
10%
Secondary school
High school
73%
9% 3% 16%
Primary school
11%
22%
Bachelor
Master or higher
0-149
451-600
39%
150-300
601-1000
301-450
Over 1000
28
Frequency
Organic Buyer
Non-Organic Buyer
Never-heard Organic
(N=456)
(n=214) 47%
(n=188) 41%
(n=54) 12%
Gender
(2)=11.314, p <.01**
Male
221
54.3%
37.6%
8.1%
Female
235
40.0%
44.7%
15.3%
Age
(8)=12.633, p >.05
18-25
238
47.9%
41.2%
10.9%
26-35
179
45.8%
44.1%
10.1%
36-45
25
36.0%
36.0%
28.0%
46-55
71.4%
14.3%
14.3%
56-64
57.1%
14.3%
28.6%
Status
(6)=13.674, p <.05*
Single
318
45.9%
43.4%
10.7%
Married
34
35.3%
50.0%
14.7%
103
54.4%
32.0%
13.6%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
Divorce
p-value
29
Frequency
(N=456)
Organic Buyer
(n=214)
Non-Organic Buyer
(n=188)
Never-heard Organic
(n=54)
Education
p-value
(10)=68.571, p <.001***
Iliteracy
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
Primary school
16.7%
0.0%
83.3%
Secondary school
19
26.3%
42.1%
31.6%
High school
47
51.1%
40.4%
8.5%
Bachelor
333
45.9%
43.8%
10.2%
Master or higher
48
64.6%
31.3%
4.2%
Occupation
(2)=6.929, p <.05*
Employment
435
47.6%
40.0%
12.4%
Unemployment
21
33.3%
66.7%
0.0%
Income (USD/Month)
(10)=23.390, p <.01**
0-149
75
38.7%
41.3%
20.0%
150-300
177
43.5%
49.7%
6.8%
301-450
98
51.0%
34.7%
14.3%
451-600
50
50.0%
36.0%
14.0%
30
2%
44%
56%
98%
Male
Female
Employment
Household
31
17%
4%
6%
26%
68%
79%
17-30
31-45
46-64
Single
Marriage
32
15%
1%
Primary school
2%
11%
Secondary school
High school
10%
Master or higher
451-600
36%
23%
150-300
301-450
12%
Bachelor
72%
6% 14%
0-149
601-1000
Over
1000
33
Frequency
Percentage
Mean (SD)
Always
32
15.0
Usually
13
Generally
40
Often
38
Sometimes
21
9.8
Rarely
54
25.2
Seldom
16
7.5
Total
214
Occasional consumer
100 4.07(1.889)
34
Frequency (n=214)
Organic Consumer
Regular Buyer (n=85)
Gender
Male
120
40.8%
59.2%
Female
94
38.3%
61.7%
18-25
114
41.2%
58.8%
26-35
82
34.1%
65.9%
36-45
55.6%
44.4%
46-55
80.0%
20.0%
56-64
25.0%
75.0%
Single
146
38.4%
61.6%
Married
12
50.0%
50.0%
56
41.1%
58.9%
Age
Status
35
Frequency
(n=214)
Organic Consumer
Occasional Buyer
Regular Buyer (n=85)
(n=129)
1
5
24
153
31
100.0%
60.0%
50.0%
35.3%
48.4%
0.0%
40.0%
50.0%
64.7%
51.6%
207
7
39.6%
42.9%
60.4%
57.1%
29
77
50
25
21
12
41.4%
41.6%
42.0%
32.0%
33.3%
41.7%
58.6%
58.4%
58.0%
68.0%
66.7%
58.3%
36
Percentage
46.10
Rice
25.50
Honey
9.10
Palm Product
10.50
Moringa Product
8.80
Are you satisfied with the range of organic vegetable in the shop?
Percentage
Yes
64.60
No
35.40
( (4)=9.490, p <0.05*)
37
Frequency (Percentage)
Price perception
Really high
Organic consumer
Non-organic consumer
12 (6%)
14 (7%)
86 (40%)
100 (53%)
105 (49%)
67 (36%)
Not high
10(5%)
7 (4%)
1 (1%)
0 (0%)
214 (100%)
188 (100%)
High
Reasonable
Total
38
29.6
28.7
13.4
13.1
21.8
13.3
6.6
39
Frequency
Non-Organic Buyer
Organic Byer
N=402
(n=188) 46%
(n=214) 54%
Gender
Gender
p-value
(1)= 5.694<0.05*
Male
203
44.1%
56.1%
Female
199
55.9%
43.9%
Knowledge Level
(2)= 13.315<0.01**
Littleaa
208
61.20%
43.50%
Someb
170
33.00%
50.40%
A lotc
24
5.80%
6.10%
Trust Level
Trust
177
36.7%
50.5%
Somehow Trust
193
56.4%
40.7%
Not trust
32
6.9%
8.9%
40
Correct (%)
86.4
91.6
85.5
83.2
41
Is it organic logo?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Count (%)
Count (%)
Count (%)
Count (%)
CEDAC
147 (68.9%)
67 (31.1%)
123 (83.6%)
24 (16.4%)
NAP
61 (28.4%)
153 (71.6%)
53 (86.4%)
8 (13.6%)
COrAA -Organic
COrAA -Chemical
57 (26.5%)
157 (73.5%)
53 (92.7%)
4 (7.3%)
28 (13.3%)
186 (86.7%)
24 (85.2%)
4 (14.8%)
42
Responses
Range of Media
Number
99
Percent
25.2%
Radio
87
22.1%
Newspaper
19
4.8%
Internet
67
17.0%
Friend
73
18.6%
Agency
23
5.9%
Word of mouth
25
6.4%
Total
393
100.0%
TV
1
3
2
3
43
Frequency
Percentage
Logo
70
32.7 %
53
24.8 %
Both
91
42.5 %
117
54.7 %
Another person
12
5.6 %
85
39.7 %
44
Fresh Market b
Supermarket c
Lemon
1.5
2.5
2.13
Cucumber
0.6
1.1
1.5
Green Melon
0.7
1.4
1.25
0.6
1.4
1.38
Bitter melon
0.7
1.6
1.68
1.3
2.5
0.5
0.9
2.5
1.2
1.75
Escaroles
0.8
1.75
Tomatoes
0.7
2.3
1.5
Carrot
Cabbage
Chinese cabbage
45
Table 4.18 Rotated component matrix for consumers intention toward seven factors
Variable Scale
Scree Plot
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
CM*
0.558
0.529
0.524
F1
0.8
0.611
0.588
F2
0.68
0.628
0.617
0.521
0.626
0.643
0.639
F3
0.76
0.673
0.666
0.601
0.523
0.507
0.415
0.596
46
F4
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
CM*
Bartlett
Test of Sophericity ((435)=4505.406, p <.0001)
0.817
KMO= 0.858>0.6
0.696
0.811
0.743
0.619
F5
0.558
0.689
0.639
0.681
0.558
0.667
0.569
0.625
0.592
F6
0.812
0.737
0.784
0.727
0.772
0.690
0.514
0.550
47
IV. Table
Results
and
Discussions
(Cont.)
4.18 Rotated component matrix for consumers intention toward seven factors
Variable Scale
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
CM*
F7
0.743
0.677
0.697
0.594
0.672
0.611
F8
0.826
0.778
0.802
0.684
0.774
0.701
0.589
0.548
Eigenvalues
7.549
2.61
2.147
1.564
1.337
1.275
1.148
1.109
25.163
8.7
7.156
5.213
4.456
4.249
3.827
3.697
25.163
5
33.863
3
41.018
4
46.232
3
50.688
4
54.937
4
58.764
3
62.461
4
Cronbachs
0.721
0.667
0.639
0.697
0.742
0.781
0.749
0.804
0.346
0.403
0.307
0.429
0.428
0.471
0.499
0.513
Inter-Item correlation
Note: Extraction method: principal component analysis with an orthogonal rotation (VARIMAX) *Communalities
48
Drivers
Mean
SD
IT
3.7388 0.64335
HC
3.9295 0.69893
0.479**
EL
3.4913 0.66643
0.438**
0.400**
PP
3.2587 0.79585
0.169**
0.103*
0.188**
FS
4.1356 0.69999
0.465**
0.452**
0.381**
0.279**
PA
3.3731 0.76150
0.329**
0.259**
0.356**
0.304**
0.315**
AC
3.7512 0.79520
0.452**
0.270**
0.305**
0.358**
0.461**
0.340**
CT
3.4938 0.71344
0.430**
0.308**
0.373**
0.173**
0.290**
0.406**
0.331**
Not >0.9 no
multicollinearity
-
Items
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
Std. Error
(Constant)
0.609
0.195
HC
0.213
0.041
EL
0.145
PP
Sig.
Beta
Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
VIF
0.0001
T>
0.3
0.716
1.396
3.315
0.001
0.712
1.404
-0.045
-1.062
0.289
0.820
1.219
0.044
0.152
3.186
0.002
0.636
1.572
0.029
0.038
0.034
0.765
0.445
0.723
1.383
AC
0.176
0.037
0.218
4.723
0.0001
0.684
1.461
CT
0.163
0.040
0.181
4.072
0.0001
0.738
1.356
3.120
0.002
0.231
5.129
0.044
0.150
-0.036
0.034
FS
0.140
PA
VIF <5
Unstandardized Coefficients
Beta
Std. Error
(Constant)
0.575
0.188
HC
0.217
0.041
EL
0.147
FS
Standardized Coefficients
Beta
Sig.
3.057
0.002
0.236
5.251
0.0001
0.043
0.153
3.429
0.001
0.137
0.043
0.149
3.146
0.002
AC
0.170
0.036
0.211
4.747
0.0001
CT
0.169
0.039
0.188
4.380
0.0001
Research hypotheses
Consumers concerns about health have a positive influence on the intention to purchase organic
Results
Accepted
vegetables.
H2
Consumer ethical issues have a positive significant impact on the intention to buy organic vegetables.
Accepted
H3
Rejected
H4
Consumer concern about food safety has a positive influence on consumers' intention to buy organic
Accepted
vegetables.
H5
Product attribute has a significant impact on the intention to buy organic vegetables.
Rejected
H6
Product availability has significant influence on consumers intention to buy organic vegetables
Accepted
H7
Accepted
52
V. Conclusions
1. Demographic characteristic and purchasing pattern analysis
There is positive signal for organic market in cambodia
Consumer was divided into three categories (organic, non-organic,
and never-heard organic consumer)
Gender, martial status, education, occupation, and income were
statically significant related with consumers behavior
Middle age men, high education, married with kid, secure job, and
better income are more propensity interested in buying organic food
Reason to buy is about health for them and their lovers
Reason not to buy is about lack of information of organic product.
53
V. Conclusions (Cont.)
2. Consumers knowledge and market analysis
Gender, organic knowledge, and trusts label were found relatively
statically significant related to consumers propensity to buy organic
vegetables.
More than half of men who had fair knowledge about organic vegetables,
and trusted on organic label were likely to purchase it
Organic vegetables certification could be divided into three classes
including organic vegetables sticking organic logo, sticking generic term
organic, and sticking organic logo and generic term
Organic consumers usually bought organic vegetables sticking with logo
and generic term organic. The decision making was made by their own
54
V. Conclusions (Cont.)
2. Consumers knowledge and market analysis
More than 92% of organic consumers recognized the organic
certification
However, organic knowledge is still limited since 85% of consumers
bought chemical free vegetables confused that it was organic
vegetables.
The cheapest vegetable price were available in fresh market while the
highest organic vegetable price existed in organic community market
and supermarket, because there was a limited variety of organic
vegetables, but sometime organic vegetable in supermarket had
higher price than organic community market and vice versa.
55
V. Conclusions (Cont.)
3. Consumers Intention analysis
Health consciousness is the most potential theme
Product availability and convenience also have significant influence on
their consumption
Consumers trust are commercial interest on organic goods
Ethical lifestyle and food safety concern are lease correlated with
intention to buy
Price has negative affect on their intention to buy
As such, organic goods are the premium goods for rich people only.
56
V. Recommendation
In term of policy maker, Cambodia Royal Government should
Constitute organic law as soon as possible to intervene the fake organic
product
Cooperate with organic organization to issue certification and logo
Broadcast further benefit information of organic vegetable via television, radio
and other agriculture fair
In term of market facilitator, marketers should
Stick organic logo together with generic term Organic on organic product
Collaborate with third party such as government and non-government
organization to certify product
Strengthen organic standard and control scheme of logo or labelling
57
V. Recommendation (Cont.)
Message about health benefit underneath the picture organic consumption
Cluster or place market placement nearby consumers for conveniences
Focus on future potential consumer such as youth male who hold
university degree and have fair income
In term of supplier, producers should
Respect organic standard strictly such as no use chemical pesticide.
In term of demander, consumers should
Support to buy organic product on the account of health benefit and
environmental friendly
Be aware of health hazard of consuming chemical food.
58
Acknowledgements
Thesis advisers:
Dr. Parichard Sangkumchaliang
Asst.Prof. Satit Aditto
Thesis Examination Committee:
Dr. Chanon Lapjit
Dr. Sutana Boonlua
59
Acknowledgements
60
61