Você está na página 1de 61

KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY

Thesis Defense

Consumers Awareness and Intention to Purchase Organic Vegetable


Products in Phnom Penh City, Cambodia

MR. SOTHEA KOUY ID: 5750300708


Date: March 25, 2016 (9:30-12:00)
Faculty: Agriculture
Advisor: Dr. Parichard Sangkumchaliang

Department: Agricultural Economics


Co-Advisor: Asst.Prof. Satit Aditto
1

CONSUMERS AWARENESS AND INTENTION TO PURCHASE


ORGANIC VEGETABLE PRODUCTS IN PHNOM PENH CITY,
CAMBODIA

Thesis Outline:
I.

Introduction

II.

Literature Review

III.

Research Methodology

IV.

Results and Discussions

V.

Conclusions and Recommendations

I. Introduction

Monsoon (80% of citizen concerned with


Agriculture)

-Land:
181,035 (2.5% of water)
-Population: >14.8

I. Introduction (Cont.)
Highest education farmer (50.5%-secondary school )
illiteracy rate for men 85% > women 71%
28% of PP live under poverty line
World trend tend to use chemical produce more output
Cambodia has used more than 3,200,000 liter per years

I. Introduction (Cont.)
MAFF & Gtv has not yet constitute organic law
-Sub Degree on 28th October, 1998
-Constructed Millennium Development Goal
-Rectangle Strategy

sub degree on 28th October


1998

I. Introduction (Cont.)

ga
r
o
d
worl

ket
r
a
n ic m

1. Greece
2. Mexico
3. Kazakhstan

n
o
i
ill
m es
.5 tar
7
3 ec
h

ed
A eer
US on try
pi u n
co

1. USA- 22,590 106


2. Germany- 7,040 106
3. France- 4,004 106
Largest Organic Market

63.8

nU
o
i
l
l
i
b

Increasing Organic land

n
io
ill
m s
9 er
1. rm
fa

15.2

nU
o
i
l
l
i
b

99
9
1
s in
r
a
l
l
do

12
0
2
s in
r
a
l
l
do

uu
o
o
cc
4
4
1166

(FiBl & IFOAM,


2014)

s
iriees
nnttr

I. Introduction (Cont.)
Research Objective
To identify the demographic characteristics and purchasing pattern
of organic consumer
To comprehend consumers knowledge about organic label and
organic term
To explore main factor affecting on consumers intention to
purchase organic vegetable

I. Introduction (Cont.)
The model and theory examine deeply on major issues leading
consumers intention to purchase organic goods as following :
ethical lifestyle
health consciousness
price perspective
food safety concern
product attribute
product availability
consumers trust.
10

II. Literature Review

11

(Ajzen,
1991)

(Fishbein &Ajzen,
2011)

Theory of Reasoned Action

12

13

Behavior attitude ( think & feel about


Capable &behavior)
confident
Affective attitude ( Is behavior enjoyable or not ?)
Instrumental attitude (Is behavior beneficial or
harmful ?)

Injunctive Norm ( others encourage the behavior)


Descriptive norm (others do the behavior as well
14

Eating organic good is enjoyable & believe to get


benefited

Supporte
d & other
peers
also
eating
organic
vegetabl
e

Strong
intention

More likely
to engage
that
behavior

Feel has ability to meet demand


15

Product
Attribute

Affective

Conceptual Framework

Nutrition
Health
Concern
Food
Safety
Concern

Behavi
or
Attitud
e

Environmenta
l Concern

Animal
Welfare
Ethical
Lifestyle

Theory of
Planned
Behavior

Instrumen
t

Significant
Person

Price

Injunctiv
e
Subjective
Norms

Promotion
Society
Product
Availability

Notion
s

Intention
to
Purchase
Organic
Vegetable

Self

Philosophi
es

Behavior to
Purchase
Organic
Vegetable

Theory of
Reasoned
Action

Descriptiv
e

Easy &
difficult

Perceived
Behavior
Control

Socio-Economics

Research Hypothesis

17

Summary of research hypotheses


Number
H1

Research hypotheses
Consumers concerns about health have a positive influence on the intention to purchase
organic vegetables.

H2

Consumer ethical issues have a positive significant impact on the intention to buy organic
vegetables.

H3

Price has significant impact on the intention to buy organic vegetable

H4

Consumer concern about food safety has a positive influence on consumers' intention to
buy organic vegetables.

H5

Product attribute has a significant impact on the intention to buy organic vegetables.

H6

Product availability has significant influence on consumers intention to buy organic


vegetables

H7

Trust has a positive impact on consumers intention to purchase organic vegetables.


18

III. Research Methodology


June 2015
till July 2015
456 sample
from
supermarkets

Structure
questionnaire

IV. Research
Procedures

Market
Survey

Convenient
sampling
19

III. Research Methodology (Cont.)


2

Z pq
n
2
e

(Ary, Jacobs, Razavieh, & Sorensen, 2006; Cochran, 1963)

n represents the respond of consumers- are the sample size


Z represents confident level at 95% correspond to a Z score equal 1.96 under
normal curve
e represents the level of precision or margin of error or confident interval of 5 %
p represent estimated proportion of an attribute or standard deviation that is
present in population equal 0.5 (maximum variability)
q equal 1-confident interval at 95% equal 0.5
2

(1.96) (0.5)(0.5)
n
385samples
2
0.05

20

d
e
us
ly r
r
a ste
l
u ni
p
i
o
P m
ad

&

o
p
s
e
r

y
l
b
i
ns

21

III. Research Methodology (Cont.)

Table 3.2 Variables and measurements of supermarket and organic food shop

N0
Name
1 GENDER

Label
Gender

Age

Measure
Nominal

nd
a
d
e
&
s
i
y
v
l
e
e
r
s
i
s
c
a
STATUS
Status
e
r
w
p
n
s
n
o
e
i
l
o
i
s
b
s
r
a
r
e
i
r
v Member of household
ve
a
MEMBER
h
v
r
s
e
i
n
l
i
g
m
a
n
h
m
E
K
5
o
t
2
KIDS
e 15 years old living in your household?
te Are there anyrekidsaunder
r
a
l
s
n
e
h
tra
T
.
OLDPP
Are
there
any older people above 60 years old living in your household?
a
s
r
e
v
vice
EDUCATION
What is your highest education?

OCCUPATION

What is your employment?

Nominal

INCOME

What is your approximate monthly personal income?

Ordinal

10 DISEASE

Have you or your family had serious disease?

Nominal

11 HEARD

Have you ever heard organic term?

Nominal

12 KNOWLEDGE

How well do you know about organic product?

Nominal

3
4
5.
6

AGE

Scale
Nominal
Scale
Nominal
Nominal
Ordinal

22

III. Research Methodology (Cont.)


3.1 Questionnaires
- one endogenous-intention to purchase (IT) (5 statements)
- seven exogenous variables
consumers ethical lifestyle (EL)-4 statements
health consciousness (HC)-3 statements
price perspective (PP)-3 statements
food safety concern (FS)-4 statements
product attribute (PA)-4 statements
product availability and convenient (AC)-3 statements
consumers trust (CT)-4 statements.

23

III. Research Methodology (Cont.)


Table 3.3 Statement of agreement of reason of purchasing about organic vegetable (41 items)

5
n
i
g
n
uri
s
a
e
em
r
e
w
s
t
n
e
em
t
a
t
s
30
e
l
a
c
s
likert

24

III. Research Methodology (Cont.)


To achieve this research, many vital Instruments were used
Questionnaires as primary data
Journals, books, & internet as secondary data
Data Analysis
Ms. Excel
SPSS 22
Reliability test, principal component analysis, bivariate
analysis, multiple regression analysis
Endnote X7 (assists in reference)
25

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


1. Demographic characteristic and purchasing pattern analysis
Table 4.1 Socio-demographic status of respondents

Respondents Age

Respondents Gender

15%
52%

49%

3%
18-30 Year
31-45 Year
46-64 Year

Male

82%

Average 27 Year

26

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


1. Demographic characteristic and purchasing pattern analysis
Table 4.1 Socio-demographic status of respondents

Respondents Occupation

Respondents Status
8%
23%

2%

69%
98%

Employment

Household

Single
Marriage

Married with Kids


27

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


1. Demographic characteristic and purchasing pattern analysis
Table 4.1 Socio-demographic status of respondents

Respondents Education Status

Respondents Monthly Income

Never been to school

11% 1% 1% 4%
10%

Secondary school
High school

73%

9% 3% 16%

Primary school

11%

22%

Bachelor
Master or higher

0-149
451-600

39%

150-300
601-1000

301-450
Over 1000

28

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.2 Organic consumer, non-organic consumer, and never heard organic consumers profile
Socio-Demographic

Frequency

Organic Buyer

Non-Organic Buyer

Never-heard Organic

(N=456)

(n=214) 47%

(n=188) 41%

(n=54) 12%

Gender

(2)=11.314, p <.01**

Male

221

54.3%

37.6%

8.1%

Female

235

40.0%

44.7%

15.3%

Age

(8)=12.633, p >.05

18-25

238

47.9%

41.2%

10.9%

26-35

179

45.8%

44.1%

10.1%

36-45

25

36.0%

36.0%

28.0%

46-55

71.4%

14.3%

14.3%

56-64

57.1%

14.3%

28.6%

Status

(6)=13.674, p <.05*

Single

318

45.9%

43.4%

10.7%

Married

34

35.3%

50.0%

14.7%

Married with kids

103

54.4%

32.0%

13.6%

0.0%

0.0%

100.0%

Divorce

p-value

29

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.2 Organic consumer, non-organic consumer, and never heard organic consumers profile
Socio-Demographic

Frequency
(N=456)

Organic Buyer
(n=214)

Non-Organic Buyer
(n=188)

Never-heard Organic
(n=54)

Education

p-value
(10)=68.571, p <.001***

Iliteracy

0.0%

0.0%

100.0%

Primary school

16.7%

0.0%

83.3%

Secondary school

19

26.3%

42.1%

31.6%

High school

47

51.1%

40.4%

8.5%

Bachelor

333

45.9%

43.8%

10.2%

Master or higher

48

64.6%

31.3%

4.2%

Occupation

(2)=6.929, p <.05*

Employment

435

47.6%

40.0%

12.4%

Unemployment

21

33.3%

66.7%

0.0%

Income (USD/Month)

(10)=23.390, p <.01**

0-149

75

38.7%

41.3%

20.0%

150-300

177

43.5%

49.7%

6.8%

301-450

98

51.0%

34.7%

14.3%

451-600

50

50.0%

36.0%

14.0%

30

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.3 Overall organic consumer profile
Organic Consumers Gender

Organic Consumers Occupation

2%
44%

56%
98%

Male

Female

Employment

Household
31

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.3 Overall organic consumer profile
Organic Consumers Age

17%

Organic Consumers Status

4%

6%
26%
68%

79%

17-30

31-45

46-64

Single

Married with Kids

Marriage
32

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.3 Overall organic consumer profile

Organic Consumers Education

15%

1%

Organic Consumers Monthly Income

Primary school

2%
11%

Secondary school
High school

10%

Master or higher

451-600

36%
23%

150-300
301-450

12%

Bachelor

72%

6% 14%

0-149

601-1000
Over
1000

33

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.6 Organic vegetable purchasing frequency
Buying Frequency

Frequency

Percentage

Mean (SD)

Always

32

15.0

Usually

13

Generally

40

Often

38

6.1 Regular/ heavy


consumer
18.7
were 40%
17.8

Sometimes

21

9.8

Rarely

54

25.2

Seldom

16

7.5

Total

214

Occasional consumer

100 4.07(1.889)
34

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.4. Regular and Occasional organic consumers profile
Socio-Demographic

Frequency (n=214)

Organic Consumer
Regular Buyer (n=85)

Occasional Buyer (n=129)

Gender
Male

120

40.8%

59.2%

Female

94

38.3%

61.7%

18-25

114

41.2%

58.8%

26-35

82

34.1%

65.9%

36-45

55.6%

44.4%

46-55

80.0%

20.0%

56-64

25.0%

75.0%

Single

146

38.4%

61.6%

Married

12

50.0%

50.0%

Married with kids

56

41.1%

58.9%

Age

Status

35

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.4. Regular and Occasional organic consumers profile
Socio-Demographic
Education
Primary school
Secondary school
High school
Bachelor
Master or higher
Occupation
Employment
Unemployment
Income (USD/Month)
0-149
150-300
301-450
451-600
601-1000
More than 1000

Frequency
(n=214)

Organic Consumer
Occasional Buyer
Regular Buyer (n=85)
(n=129)

1
5
24
153
31

100.0%
60.0%
50.0%
35.3%
48.4%

0.0%
40.0%
50.0%
64.7%
51.6%

207
7

39.6%
42.9%

60.4%
57.1%

29
77
50
25
21
12

41.4%
41.6%
42.0%
32.0%
33.3%
41.7%

58.6%
58.4%
58.0%
68.0%
66.7%
58.3%

36

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.5 Organic purchasing pattern and satisfaction status
Most frequently organic product which I buy is/are*

Percentage

Fresh vegetables and fruits

46.10

Rice

25.50

Honey

9.10

Palm Product

10.50

Moringa Product

8.80

Are you satisfied with the range of organic vegetable in the shop?

Percentage

Yes

64.60

No

35.40
( (4)=9.490, p <0.05*)
37

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.7 Price perception ratio between organic and non-organic consumer

Frequency (Percentage)
Price perception

Really high

Organic consumer

Non-organic consumer

12 (6%)

14 (7%)

86 (40%)

100 (53%)

105 (49%)

67 (36%)

Not high

10(5%)

7 (4%)

Really not high

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

214 (100%)

188 (100%)

High
Reasonable

Total

38

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.8 Reason to buy and not to buy organic product
Reason to buy organic vegetable

Reason not to buy organic vegetable


27.6
24.4
21.6

29.6

28.7

13.4

13.1

21.8
13.3
6.6
39

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


2. Consumers knowledge and market analysis
Table 4.9 Gender, organic knowledge level, and trust level statistics
Items

Frequency

Non-Organic Buyer

Organic Byer

N=402

(n=188) 46%

(n=214) 54%

Gender
Gender

p-value

(1)= 5.694<0.05*

Male

203

44.1%

56.1%

Female

199

55.9%

43.9%

Knowledge Level

(2)= 13.315<0.01**

Littleaa

208

61.20%

43.50%

Someb

170

33.00%

50.40%

A lotc

24

5.80%

6.10%

Trust Level

(2)= 9.949 <0.01**

Trust

177

36.7%

50.5%

Somehow Trust

193

56.4%

40.7%

Not trust

32

6.9%

8.9%
40

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.10: Organic knowledges statements
Statement

Correct (%)

Organic products do not carry pesticide residues


Organic farming is good for the environment and health

86.4
91.6

Organic farming is growth without using chemical sustain

85.5

Organic farming is used only by compost and animal manure

83.2

41

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.12 Consumers awareness about logo
Logos

Have you ever seen this logo?

Is it organic logo?

Yes

No

Yes

No

Count (%)

Count (%)

Count (%)

Count (%)

CEDAC

147 (68.9%)

67 (31.1%)

123 (83.6%)

24 (16.4%)

NAP

61 (28.4%)

153 (71.6%)

53 (86.4%)

8 (13.6%)

COrAA -Organic
COrAA -Chemical

57 (26.5%)

157 (73.5%)

53 (92.7%)

4 (7.3%)

28 (13.3%)

186 (86.7%)

24 (85.2%)

4 (14.8%)

42

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.13 Organic mass media broadcasting
Media

Responses

Range of Media

Number
99

Percent
25.2%

Radio

87

22.1%

Newspaper

19

4.8%

Internet

67

17.0%

Friend

73

18.6%

Agency

23

5.9%

Word of mouth

25

6.4%

Total

393

100.0%

TV

1
3
2
3

43

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.14 Factor influence to buy and buying behavior
Items

Frequency

Percentage

Logo

70

32.7 %

Generic term organic

53

24.8 %

Both

91

42.5 %

117

54.7 %

Another person

12

5.6 %

Self and other

85

39.7 %

Factor influence to buy

Buying behavior based on


Self

44

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.15 Vegetable Price observation in USD per kilogram on July 01, 2015
Item USD per kilogram

Fresh Market b

Supermarket c

Organic community market d

Lemon

1.5

2.5

2.13

Cucumber

0.6

1.1

1.5

Green Melon

0.7

1.4

1.25

white Chinese radish

0.6

1.4

1.38

Bitter melon

0.7

1.6

1.68

1.3

2.5

0.5

0.9

2.5

1.2

1.75

Escaroles

0.8

1.75

Tomatoes

0.7

2.3

1.5

Carrot
Cabbage
Chinese cabbage

45

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


3. Consumers Intention analysis

Table 4.18 Rotated component matrix for consumers intention toward seven factors
Variable Scale

VARIMAX rotated loading

Scree Plot

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

CM*

I would buy if I it is more nutritious

PCA with 30 variables, Varimax rotation was0.746


executed
0.746
0.625

I would buy if it is more convenient to get...


I intend to in the next fortnight for my lover

0.558
0.529

I would buy if the price is the same others...

0.524

Intention to purchase (IT)

F1

I would buy if it is environmental friendly...

Health Consciousness (HC)

0.8

0.611
0.588

F2

I care about cholesterol and fat

0.68

I am very self-conscious about my health

0.628

I reflect on my health a lot

0.617

Ethical lifestyle (EL)

According to Rule of Thumb,


456 sample provide a good
reliable factor

0.521

0.626
0.643
0.639

F3

I would pay extra for more environment

0.76

0.673

I dont choose products and brands which

0.666

0.601

I buy environmental friendly non-food


I buy goods or service from charity retail

0.523
0.507

0.415
0.596
46

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.18 Rotated component matrix for consumers intention toward seven factors
Variable Scale

VARIMAX rotated loading


F1

Price perception (PP)

F4

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

CM*

Bartlett
Test of Sophericity ((435)=4505.406, p <.0001)

0.817
KMO= 0.858>0.6

0.696

Only consumer with higher income can

0.811

0.743

Organic vegetables price are high

0.619

Organic vegetable is beyond my budget

Food safety concern (FS)

F5

Range 0.4 -0.7, >


o.5 was desirable

0.558

I am very concerned about the amount of

0.689

0.639

I am concerned about how food is processes

0.681

0.558

Nowadays most foods contain residues

0.667

0.569

It frighten me to think that much of the

0.625

0.592

Product attribute ( PA)

F6

Color is important for organic vegetable

0.812

0.737

Fresh products is important for organic

0.784

0.727

Appearance is important for organic

0.772

0.690

Tasty and delicious is important for orga

0.514

0.550
47

IV. Table
Results
and
Discussions
(Cont.)
4.18 Rotated component matrix for consumers intention toward seven factors
Variable Scale

VARIMAX rotated loading


F1

Product availability & convenient (AC)

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

CM*

F7

Organic vegetables are only available in

0.743

0.677

The stores that I frequently shop do not .

0.697

0.594

It is difficult to buy organic vegetables.

0.672

0.611

Consumers trust (CT)


I trust the local producers of organic.
I trust that those selling organic food are
I trust the information on organic veget

F8

(0.6-0.8) >0.5 acceptably reliable


& valid

I trust on organic logo rather than none

0.826

0.778

0.802

0.684

0.774

0.701

0.589

0.548

Eigenvalues

7.549

2.61

2.147

1.564

1.337

1.275

1.148

1.109

Variance explained (%)

25.163

8.7

7.156

5.213

4.456

4.249

3.827

3.697

Cumulative variance (%)


Number of items (n=30)

25.163
5

33.863
3

41.018
4

46.232
3

50.688
4

54.937
4

58.764
3

62.461
4

Cronbachs

0.721

0.667

0.639

0.697

0.742

0.781

0.749

0.804

0.346

0.403

0.307

0.429

0.428

0.471

0.499

0.513

Inter-Item correlation
Note: Extraction method: principal component analysis with an orthogonal rotation (VARIMAX) *Communalities
48

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.19 Descriptive statistics and bivariate pearson correlation coefficient matrix
N0.

Drivers

Mean

SD

>0.3 positive moderate


correlation
-

IT

3.7388 0.64335

HC

3.9295 0.69893

0.479**

EL

3.4913 0.66643

0.438**

0.400**

PP

3.2587 0.79585

0.169**

0.103*

0.188**

FS

4.1356 0.69999

0.465**

0.452**

0.381**

0.279**

PA

3.3731 0.76150

0.329**

0.259**

0.356**

0.304**

0.315**

AC

3.7512 0.79520

0.452**

0.270**

0.305**

0.358**

0.461**

0.340**

CT

3.4938 0.71344

0.430**

0.308**

0.373**

0.173**

0.290**

0.406**

0.331**

Not >0.9 no
multicollinearity
-

Note: ** indicates that correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)


* indicates that correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
49

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.20 Coefficients on the factors effect on consumers intention and collinearity statistics

Items

Unstandardized

Standardized

Coefficients

Coefficients

Std. Error

(Constant)

0.609

0.195

HC

0.213

0.041

EL

0.145

PP

Sig.

Beta

Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance

VIF

0.0001

T>
0.3
0.716

1.396

3.315

0.001

0.712

1.404

-0.045

-1.062

0.289

0.820

1.219

0.044

0.152

3.186

0.002

0.636

1.572

0.029

0.038

0.034

0.765

0.445

0.723

1.383

AC

0.176

0.037

0.218

4.723

0.0001

0.684

1.461

CT

0.163

0.040

0.181

4.072

0.0001

0.738

1.356

3.120

0.002

0.231

5.129

0.044

0.150

-0.036

0.034

FS

0.140

PA

VIF <5

R=0.653, R Square = 0.427, Durbin-Watson = 1.725, F (7, 394) = 41.941, p<0.0001


50

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


Table 4.21 Finalized coefficients on the factors effect on consumers intention
Item

Unstandardized Coefficients
Beta

Std. Error

(Constant)

0.575

0.188

HC

0.217

0.041

EL

0.147

FS

Standardized Coefficients
Beta

Sig.

3.057

0.002

0.236

5.251

0.0001

0.043

0.153

3.429

0.001

0.137

0.043

0.149

3.146

0.002

AC

0.170

0.036

0.211

4.747

0.0001

CT

0.169

0.039

0.188

4.380

0.0001

R=0.652, R Square = 0.425, Durbin-Watson = 1. 733, (F (5, 396) = 58.502, p<0.0001)

Durbin-Watson (1.5-2.5), no correlation between independent


variable
51

IV. Results and Discussions (Cont.)


IT= 0.575+ 0.217 HC + 0.147 EL + 0.137 FS + 0.170 AC + 0.169 CT
Table 4.22 Summary of research hypotheses
Number
H1

Research hypotheses
Consumers concerns about health have a positive influence on the intention to purchase organic

Results
Accepted

vegetables.
H2

Consumer ethical issues have a positive significant impact on the intention to buy organic vegetables.

Accepted

H3

Price has significant impact on the intention to buy organic

Rejected

H4

Consumer concern about food safety has a positive influence on consumers' intention to buy organic

Accepted

vegetables.
H5

Product attribute has a significant impact on the intention to buy organic vegetables.

Rejected

H6

Product availability has significant influence on consumers intention to buy organic vegetables

Accepted

H7

Trust has a positive impact on consumers intention to purchase organic vegetables.

Accepted
52

V. Conclusions
1. Demographic characteristic and purchasing pattern analysis
There is positive signal for organic market in cambodia
Consumer was divided into three categories (organic, non-organic,
and never-heard organic consumer)
Gender, martial status, education, occupation, and income were
statically significant related with consumers behavior
Middle age men, high education, married with kid, secure job, and
better income are more propensity interested in buying organic food
Reason to buy is about health for them and their lovers
Reason not to buy is about lack of information of organic product.
53

V. Conclusions (Cont.)
2. Consumers knowledge and market analysis
Gender, organic knowledge, and trusts label were found relatively
statically significant related to consumers propensity to buy organic
vegetables.
More than half of men who had fair knowledge about organic vegetables,
and trusted on organic label were likely to purchase it
Organic vegetables certification could be divided into three classes
including organic vegetables sticking organic logo, sticking generic term
organic, and sticking organic logo and generic term
Organic consumers usually bought organic vegetables sticking with logo
and generic term organic. The decision making was made by their own
54

V. Conclusions (Cont.)
2. Consumers knowledge and market analysis
More than 92% of organic consumers recognized the organic
certification
However, organic knowledge is still limited since 85% of consumers
bought chemical free vegetables confused that it was organic
vegetables.
The cheapest vegetable price were available in fresh market while the
highest organic vegetable price existed in organic community market
and supermarket, because there was a limited variety of organic
vegetables, but sometime organic vegetable in supermarket had
higher price than organic community market and vice versa.
55

V. Conclusions (Cont.)
3. Consumers Intention analysis
Health consciousness is the most potential theme
Product availability and convenience also have significant influence on
their consumption
Consumers trust are commercial interest on organic goods
Ethical lifestyle and food safety concern are lease correlated with
intention to buy
Price has negative affect on their intention to buy
As such, organic goods are the premium goods for rich people only.
56

V. Recommendation
In term of policy maker, Cambodia Royal Government should
Constitute organic law as soon as possible to intervene the fake organic
product
Cooperate with organic organization to issue certification and logo
Broadcast further benefit information of organic vegetable via television, radio
and other agriculture fair
In term of market facilitator, marketers should
Stick organic logo together with generic term Organic on organic product
Collaborate with third party such as government and non-government
organization to certify product
Strengthen organic standard and control scheme of logo or labelling
57

V. Recommendation (Cont.)
Message about health benefit underneath the picture organic consumption
Cluster or place market placement nearby consumers for conveniences
Focus on future potential consumer such as youth male who hold
university degree and have fair income
In term of supplier, producers should
Respect organic standard strictly such as no use chemical pesticide.
In term of demander, consumers should
Support to buy organic product on the account of health benefit and
environmental friendly
Be aware of health hazard of consuming chemical food.
58

Acknowledgements
Thesis advisers:
Dr. Parichard Sangkumchaliang
Asst.Prof. Satit Aditto
Thesis Examination Committee:
Dr. Chanon Lapjit
Dr. Sutana Boonlua

59

Acknowledgements
60

THANK YOU FOR YOUR


ATTENTION

61

Você também pode gostar