Você está na página 1de 9

A&D High Tech Project

Team 2:
Yusuf Akkoca
Tom Bloom
Karen Delton
Shweta Hire
Eric Johnson
David Mahzonni

Project Priority
Main priority is completion
time
May until Mid November to
complete;
about 6 months

Projected Completion
Time
322 Days to Complete
With Deployment at
11/14/2003 and 100%
resource usage.

Costs Labor & Capital


Total costs $3,846,782
Hardware costs $98,500
Labor costs $3,748,282

Critical Path

Potential of on Time Completion

High potential for Failure

Risks & Mitigation


FAILURE MODES &
EFFECTS ANALYSIS
WORKSHEET

Process / Product:

Hardware Compatibility Issues


Software Compatibility Issues ERP
Availability of Resources

WHAT

WHEN

Item/ Process Step

Potential Failure Mode

Technical Infrastructure

Potential Effect(s) of Failure

FMEA Date (Original):

Sev
erit
y

WHY

Potential Cause(s) of Failure

Delay in Project because of the


7
need to order new hardware

Constant changes & updates


with hardware & drivers

Oc
cur
ren
ce Mitigation Controls

Testing

Unsuccessful system test scripts

Unable to proceed with testing


3
until test scripts are revised

Failure to gather correct testing


requirements during Test
5
Planning Phase.

Deployment

Deployment from test


environment to production
unsuccessful

Time needed to troubleshoot


and resolve issues

Incomplete / inaccurate test


plan

Check to ensure latest drivers


are installed

Det
ecti
on
2

Have formal review and sign-off


on test plans with individuals
4
that have multiple expertise.
Have formal review and sign-off
on test plans with individuals
3
that have multiple expertise.
Evaluate project plan to ensure
2
proper resource allocation

Scope Creep & Last Minute Changes


Project Management

Inappropriate Resource Leveling

Detailed Design

Delay or failure of the project

Time delays caused by new


planning, design, and rework
efforts

Inefficient resource allocations 6


Key Stakeholders were not
included during requirements
phases
Retirement, new job, personal
emergency
Individual Strengths and
Expertise not identified

42

60
84
96
98

Have a back-up for each critical


5
task

105

Develop a RACI Matrix

120

Loss of key resource(s)

Left without an expert

Project Management

Inappropriate Work Assignments

People are not working in areas


5
of their expertise

Software Requirements

Delays in attempting to correct


9
issues

Inadequate planning

Verify all software requirements


with key stakeholders, gather 4
formal sign-off

144

Test Planning

Failure to consider end to end


testing

Incomplete test plans

Test Plan designer did not have


a full understanding of the
4
system

Ensure Test Planner is involved


6
with design from the beginning

192

Inefficient workflow

Poor quality of code

Peer Reviews

216

Development & Unit Test

RPN

Develop a through stakeholder


2
analysis

Enforce a strict change control process

Project Management

Software Requirements

Design shortcuts taken to meet


deadline

Does not meet customer needs 9

Designer does not understand


5
workflow / Inefficient Design

System Requirements

Gathering Inaccurate
Requirements

Delays due to Scope Change

Making Assumptions, rather


than verifying information

Ensure communication
between designer and key
7
stakeholders
Hold requirement walkthroughs
with all key stakeholders
7
(business & technical), gather
formal sign-off

315

567

Scope Changes / Change


Control
Develop a Strict Change control
Process.
Only approve changes deemed
critical, other will be added to a
Phase 2.

Thank you!

Você também pode gostar