Você está na página 1de 7

MONMOUTH INC.

Case
M&A Analysis

Submitted by Group-6
Abhay -3A||Angsuman-12A|| Ishan-22A||Anjan-9C
Monmouth Inc-About the Company

Company
Background
Leading producer of engines and compressors
Major consumers & clients: Oil & Gas industries
Operates in a cyclical market
based on nature of machine and equipment sales
Sought stable firm to be included in their portfolio
Diversify portfolio through acquisitions
Sales breakdown
Share price: $24
Industrial market: 25%, Consumer market: 75%
Looking to expand in the industrial market
Acquisition parameters
Industry should be one in which Monmouth could become a major player
Management wanted to have leadership in a few distinct areas
Fairly stable industry with a broad market for products and a product line of- small ticket items
To eliminate companies having undue profit dependencies
Acquire only leading companies in their respective market segments

3
Monmouth Inc-Previous Acquisition

DESSEX RULE
KROLL ELECTRIC
Worlds largest manufacturer of
Worlds leading supplier of soldering tools in
measuring rules and tapes
Industrial, Electronic & Consumer markets
Acquisition rationale
Acquisition rationale
Quality product line
High quality product line and production
Good distribution network (15,000
capacity in England, Germany & Mexico
retail hardware stores in US

KEANE CORPORATION

Highly profitable; suffering due to


mismanagement
Acquisition rationale
High quality measuring and fastening line

4
Robertson Tool Company-Overview

Poor sales and profit performance

Dwindling
Projected 2% growth against industry growth rate of 6% Performance

Low percentage of outstanding stock held by family & management

Largest domestic manufacturer of cutting and edge hand tools


Good
Acquisition
Leader in its two product areas
Target
because
Distribution network involving 2100 wholesalers, extending to 15,000 retail outlets

5
Takeover Attempt by Simmons

2000: Simmons, a wide ranging conglomerate with interests in electrical


equipment's, tools, nonferrous metals and rubber products purchased
44,000 Robertson shares

March, 2003: Simmons informed Robertson management of its plan to


tender immediately for 437,000 of Robertsons 584,000 outstanding
shares at $42 per share in cash. The $42 per share represented a $12
premium. This eventually became the first opportunity for Monmouth.

April, 2003: An agreement was reached with NDP Corporation, a firm


with major interest in publishing and replacement and original automotive
equipment, to do a merger. The offer was a 5:1 common stock swap.

As Simmons was concerned about the devaluation after NDP-Robertson


merger announcement, Simmons wanted it to come together with
Monmouth and this translated as the second opportunity for Monmouth.

5
Potential Benefits From Acquisition-
ManMouth
CONCLUSION

Reduction of COGS Opportunity for


Simmons As per the calculations the
Effort to sell every market segment
results in manufacturing In Robertson-Monmouth acquirer should extend the
inefficiency & ballooning inventories merger, Simmons could
convert its shares into
offer to Robertson as the
Estimate to reduce COGS from
69% to 65% of sales
common stock of company is Undervalued
Monmouth

Redistribution of market segments to achieve


Reduction in SG&A expenses
better earnings
To be managed by unifying sales
75% Industrial and 25% Consumer pattern would
force of hand tool lines and
change to 50% Consumer, 50% Industrial
advertising
Sales increases could be expected from Robertsons
Drop down from 22% to 19% of
pulling more Monmouth product in the industrial
sales
markets

6
THANK YOU!!!

Você também pode gostar