Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Geomorphology
Objectives
Learn basic concepts of sediment transport
and fluvial geomorphology
Understand sediment budgets (sources,
sinks, pathways for sediment)
Discuss infrastructure and ecosystem
response
1
Sediment Transport and
Geomorphology in Planning Steps
Characterize Physical Attributes of
Existing conditions
Reference conditions
Future w/o project conditions
Alternatives
3
Too Much/Too Little Sediment
Problems with too much sediment
Raised flood profiles
Reduced underwater light
Decreased capacity of hydraulic structures
Problems with too little sediment
Incision (channel lowering)
Delta loss
Scour at hydraulic structures
4
Sediment Size
Clay < 0.004 mm
Silt 0.004 - 0.0625 mm
Sand 0.0625 - 2 mm
Gravel > 2mm
5
Descriptions of Sediment Load
Ability to Measure Mode of Transport
Location in River
6
Suspended Load Curves
(based on measured SS)
Suspended
sediment
can be measured
using
samplers
A plot of
suspended
sediment load
versus
water discharge.
Note
order of magnitude
variation.
Suspended Sediment Load (tons/day) = Sediment Concentration (mg/L) * Water Discharge (cfs) * .0027
7
X
Bed Load Vs
Y M A B
G
H
F E D C K X
9
Lanes Balance says that sediment discharge and sediment
grain size tend to balance against water discharge and slope
10
Sources, Sinks, Pathways
Rio Puerco, NM
Source
Sources
Bed Sink
Banks (Bluffs)
Ravines & Gullys
Watershed
12
Sources, Sinks, Pathways
The capacity of a stream to transport sediment depends on
hydraulic properties of the stream channel and sediment properties
slope
velocity grain size distribution
channel geometry cohesiveness
roughness
sink
13
Sediment Budgets, Watershed Scale
Whitewater River Sediment Budget,
NRCS, 1965 to 1994
Sources of sediment estimated by AGNPs model
Sinks determined by historic survey comparison
Headwaters
Sediment Load
To Mississippi River
24
15
Suspended Sediment Concentration (SSC)
is Different than Total Suspended Solids
(TSS)
SSC sampling: Iso-kinetic sampling where the velocity and concentration in the
sampler intake is equal to the velocity and concentration in the surrounding water is required to
ensure sediment samples that represent the true sediment load.
See USGS protocols by Edwards and Glyssen (1999)
and Davis (2005)
A TSS analysis entails withdrawal of an aliquot (or part) of the original sample for subsequent
analysis. (SM 2540-D). It is OK to use if the sediments are fine sediments, but dont use if coarse
sediments are in the sample.
Fluvial Geomorphology
landscape formation
by streams
18
Watershed and Channel Alteration
will change H&H Causing
Geomorphic Responses Including:
Channel incision
Channel plugging
Land loss along channels
Gullying
Floodplain deposition
19
Geomorphic Responses may
Affect:
Infrastructure: Bridges, FRM
Human uses: Drinking water, recreation,
agriculture
Aquatic Habitat
Commercial Navigation
Water Quality: Underwater light,
nutrients, contaminants
20
Thalweg Data for WRR
1170
1120
1020
Changes in:
970 Decrease
per mile
0 to 30 1.4'
30 to 40 2.5'
40 to 50 4.6'
920
50 to 60 7.0'
60 to 80 5.9'
Channel geometry
80 to 90 3.4'
870
2003/2006
Slope
820
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Project Reach River Mile Ecosystem Restoration
Gauge
450,000
South Branch WRR
Sediment transport
250,000
Geomorphic processes
200,000
150,000
Channel Capacity
100,000
50,000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Rive r M ile
60
20
0
0 20 40 60
River Mile 21
80 100 120
Time-Scales
Annual geomorphic changes like sand bar
migration, bank erosion, point bar building
occur due to seasonal high flows
Long-Term geomorphic change like incision
or delta building or loss might be natural or
anthropogenic.
Climate variation, watershed development,
channelization, dams, urbanization affect
geomorphic change at both scales.
22
Use Multiple Tools for Sediment
Transport and Geomorphological Analysis
Field Investigations
Existing conditions substrate, bankfull conditions, vegetation,
discussion with local experts
Surveys:
Cross sections, profiles, sediment cores
Analytical Techniques
Numerical Models:
Watershed models
River models
Aerial photo comparisons
Change from Historic conditions
Sediment Budgets
Specific Stage Discharge Analysis
23
Erosion of a
River Bend
Source Sink
25
River Meandering and
Effects of 0.2 % Chance
Flood
26
Geomorphic Response to
Watershed Development
Floodplain Deposition, Channel Incision
730.0
ELEVATION
725.0
720.0
715.0
710.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
-100
STATION
1939 1994
27
Highway 61 Bridge
Canadian Pacific RR Bridge
New Mouth of
Whitewater River
28
Culvert Outlet Failure
29
Channelization
Sediment Deposition,
Loss of Capacity
30
Geomorphic Response to Raised Water Levels
In Lower Pool 8
31
Bridges
Usually footings are deep enough to
handle a certain amount of scour.
Changed hydrological conditions
(climate variation, land use change) or
changed hydraulic conditions (dam
removal, debris) can create greater
scour levels
32
Lafayette Bridge: 1969 Rising Flood
695
690
685
680 Pier 9
Elevation (ft)
675
670
27700
665
660
655
650
645
5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700
Station (ft)
33
Lafayette Bridge: 1969 Rising Flood
695
690
685
680 Pier 9
Elevation (ft)
675
27700
670
665 71800
660
655
650
645
5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700
Station (ft)
34
Lafayette Bridge: 1969 Rising Flood
Summary of Rising Flood
695
690
685
Pier 9
680
Elevation (ft)
675 27700
670 71800
665 157000
660
655
650
645
5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700
Station (ft)
35
Lafayette Bridge: 1969 Falling Flood
695
690
685
680
Pier 9
Elevation (ft)
675
670
157000
665
660
655
650
645
5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700
Station (ft)
36
Lafayette Bridge: 1969 Falling Flood
695
690
685
680 Pier 9
Elevation (ft)
675
157000
670
665 105000
660
655
650
645
5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700
Station (ft)
37
Lafayette Bridge: 1969 Falling Flood
Summary of Falling Flood
695
690
685
Pier 9
680
Elevation (ft)
675 157000
670 105000
665 18800
660
655
650
645
5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700
Station (ft)
38
Bridge 87015
TH 212 over Minnesota
River Overflow Abutment
Fill and Approach Panel
Lost
40
Long Lake Water Control
Structure after 2001 Flood
41
~ The End ~
42