Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Core competencies
Third Place
Neighborhood coffee shop
Failed Ventures
Joe magazine
Caf Starbucks
Circadia
Losing focus
Hear Music
Akeelah and the Bee
Closing down stores
Value of Objectives
Specific
Objectives Communications
Planning &
Decision Making
Measurement
& Evaluation
Characteristics of Objectives
Specific
Attainable Measurable
Realistic Quantifiable
Measurable Results
Marketing vs. Communications Objectives
Marketing Communications
Objectives Objectives
Technology
Competition
The
Advertising economy
& promotion
Product
quality
Distribution
Price
Where Sales Objectives are Appropriate
Where Sales Objectives are Appropriate
Which of the following statements about
communications objectives is true?
A) Sales goals are easily translated into
communications objectives.
B) It can be difficult to determine the relationship
between communications objectives and
sales performance.
C) Communications objectives cannot serve
as operational guidelines for planning,
executing, and evaluating promotional
programs.
D) Marketing managers often do not recognize
the value of setting communications objectives.
IMC perspective Geico
Increases in Advertising
Sell via internet & direct sales
In 2005, increased advertising expenditures 75% to $403
million
In 2006, spent twice as much as nearest competitor
Also spent in more places
Increases in Sales
5.8% new customer acquisition (2.1% is industry average)
91% ad message recognition
Only brand to have double digit market share growth
13.1%
From Awareness to Action
Point of purchase
Conative Purchase Retail store ads, deals
Realm of motives. Last-chance offers
Ads stimulate or Price appeals
direct desires Conviction Testimonials
Knowledge Announcements
Descriptive copy
Cognitive Classified ads, slogans,
Realm of thoughts. Jingles, skywriting
Ads provide
Awareness Teaser campaigns
information and facts
Creating an Image
Communications Effects Pyramid
5% Use
20% Trial
25% Preference
40% Liking
70% Knowledge/Comprehension
90% Awareness
The DAGMAR Approach
Define Awareness
Advertising
Goals for Comprehension
Measuring Conviction
Advertising
Results Action
Characteristics of Objectives
Concrete, Well-defined
measurable tasks audience
Benchmark Specified
measures time period
Pros and Cons of DAGMAR
Pros Cons
Focus on communications Relies heavily on the
objectives response hierarchy
Better understanding of
Practicality and cost
goals and objectives
Ads
Acting on Consumers
Utilizing a Variety of Media
San Diego Zoo Protect Endangered Species
Sponsorship Direct
Underwriting Marketing
Sales Internet
Promotions
In marginal analysis, all of the following should be
considered except:
A) Sales
B) Fixed costs of advertising
C) Advertising expenditures and other
variable costs
D) Gross margin
E) Net worth
Establishing a Budget
Budget Adjustments
Incremental Sales
Initial Spending
High Spending
Middle Level
Little Effect
Little Effect
High Effect
Range A Range B Range C
Advertising Expenditures Advertising Expenditures
Factors Influencing Advertising Budgets
Product Product
durability price
Purchase
Differentiation frequency
Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Budgeting
Top-Down Budgeting Methods
Affordable
Method
Return on Arbitrary
Top
Investment Allocation
Management
Competitive Percentage
Parity of Sales
Well known brand name products do not receive
incremental advantages from increased dollar
expenditures on advertising. Once the ad hits the
market, subsequent budget increases result in little or
no incremental gains. This is best explained by:
A) Arbitrary allocation
B) The objective and task method
C) Competitive parity
D) An S-shaped response
E) Rapidly diminishing returns
Object and Task Method
Isolate objectives
Monitor
Reevaluate objectives
Payout Planning
Quantitative Models
Allocating to IMC Elements
Share of Voice Effect
Share of Voice
Decreasefind a
High
Competitors
Increase to defend
defensible niche
Low High
Your Share of Market
Economies of Scale
Proposition I
Larger firms can support their brands with lower relative
advertising costs than smaller firms.
Proposition II
The leading brand in a product group enjoys lower
advertising costs per sales dollar than do other brands.
Proposition III
There is a static relationship between advertising costs
per dollar of sales and the size of the advertiser.