LOAD FLOW AND TRANSIENT

STABILITY ANALYSIS BY
USING ETAP
 PROJECT MEMBERS:
HARI HARA SUBRAMANIAN D (9811006008)
SURESH KUMAR S
(9811006028)
KARTHIKEYAN R
(9811006037)
Final year EEE, KLU.

GUIDE NAME:
MR.S.KALIMUTHU KUMAR
API/EEE, KLU
 To analyze the load flow study of 9 bus and 37 bus
system
 To analyze the transient stability of 9bus and 37
bus system
 To compensate the voltage limit by using capacitor
bank
 To analyze the reliability margin of 37 bus system
 Load flow analysis:
Load-flow studies are performed to
determine the steady-state operation of an
electric power system. It calculates the voltage
drop on each feeder, the voltage at each bus, and
the power flow in all branch and feeder circuits.
 Transient stability:
 It is ability of power system to retain its
steady state condition after subjected to
large disturbances such as occurrence of
fault or sudden outage of a line etc…
 Transient stability analysis is to
investigate the system dynamic response
and stability limits of a power system
before during and after system changes or
disturbances.
Gauss-Seidel method
Newton Raphson method

Fast Decoupled method

 Advanced monitoring, simulation, & control
 Predict system response to operator actions
 Fast, optimal, & intelligent load shedding & restoration
 System optimization & automation
 Demand-Side Management
 Intelligent one-line diagrams
 Multi-dimensional database
 Time domain event playback with simulation capability
 Integrated alarm, warning, & acknowledgement
 Pirmilinary:
The 9 bus and 37 bus system
load flow and transient stability
was analyzed. That one line
diagram and results are given
below.
 Result of 9bus
system is…..
 Branch Losses Summary Report:


 CKT / Branch Connected Bus Info. From-To Bus Flow To-From Bus Flow Losses % Bus Voltage
Vd
 ============ ========================= ================== ==================
================= ============= % drop
 ID From Bus ID To Bus ID MW Mvar MW Mvar kW kvar From To in Vmag
 ------------ ------------ ------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------ ------ -------
 T 1 Bus1 Bus4 151.886 -72.728 -151.870 87.831 15.1 15102.2 104.00 108.35
4.35
 T2 Bus2 Bus7 163.000 50.000 -162.988 -37.682 12.3 12318.1 121.45 119.16
2.29
 T3 Bus3 Bus9 85.000 50.000 -84.996 -46.223 3.8 3777.0 122.84 120.51 2.32
 Line 1 Bus4 Bus5 86.335 -29.372 -85.670 14.239 665.9 -15132.6 108.35 109.27
0.92
 Line 2 Bus4 Bus6 65.535 -58.459 -64.562 43.903 972.6 -14556.1 108.35 110.94
2.60
 Line 3 Bus5 Bus7 -64.576 -74.326 66.536 43.650 1960.4 -30676.3 109.27 119.16
9.89
 Line 4 Bus6 Bus9 -43.387 -79.886 45.045 38.414 1657.9 -41472.3 110.94 120.51
9.57
 Line6 Bus7 Bus8 96.452 -5.968 -95.893 -11.259 558.2 -17227.4 119.16 118.34
0.82
 SUMMARY OF TOTAL GENERATION, LOADING & Demand:

 MW Mvar MVA % PF
 ========= ========= ========= ==============
 Swing Bus(es): 151.886 -72.728 168.400 90.2 Leading
 Generators: 248.000 100.000 267.402 92.7 Lagging
 Total Demand: 399.886 27.272 400.814 99.8 Lagging
 ………… ………………………………………………………………………..
 Total Motor Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.0 Lagging
 Total Static Load: 393.865 143.553

 Apparent Losses: 6.020 -116.282
 System Mismatch: 0.000 0.000
 Number of Iterations = 3
 Then we goes
to 37bus system…
 Result of 37
bus system is….
 CKT / Branch Connected Bus Info. From-To Bus Flow To-From Bus Flow Losses % Bus Voltage Vd
 ============ ========================= ================== ================== ================= ============= %
drop
 ID From Bus ID To Bus ID MW Mvar MW Mvar kW kvar From To in Vmag
 ------------ ------------ ------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------ ------ -------
 T24 Bus12 Bus25 9.320 4.741 -9.317 -4.654 2.5 86.8 93.87 93.50 0.37
 T25 Bus12 Bus25 9.320 4.741 -9.317 -4.654 2.5 86.8 93.87 93.50 0.37
 Line29 Bus13 Bus17 1.224 0.515 -1.224 -0.509 0.0 6.0 93.87 93.37 0.50
 Line30 Bus13 Bus17 1.224 0.515 -1.224 -0.509 0.0 6.0 93.87 93.37 0.50
 T12 Bus13 Bus26 9.507 4.279 -9.492 -4.194 14.7 85.1 93.87 93.44 0.43
 T26 Bus13 Bus26 9.507 4.279 -9.492 -4.194 14.7 85.1 93.87 93.44 0.43
 T27 Bus13 Bus26 9.507 4.279 -9.492 -4.194 14.7 85.1 93.87 93.44 0.43
 Line31 Bus14 Bus15 0.896 0.368 -0.896 -0.373 0.0 -5.1 93.13 92.77 0.37
 T13 Bus18 Bus19 10.153 4.576 -10.137 -4.479 16.8 97.1 93.87 93.41 0.46
 T28 Bus18 Bus19 10.153 4.576 -10.137 -4.479 16.8 97.1 93.87 93.41 0.46
 T29 Bus18 Bus19 10.153 4.576 -10.137 -4.479 16.8 97.1 93.87 93.41 0.46
 T14 Bus5 Bus9 74.644 41.594 -74.492 -34.294 151.8 7300.2 100.00 95.97 4.03
 Bus29 0.000 0.000 100.00 97.91 2.09
 T15 Bus5 Bus9 74.644 41.594 -74.492 -34.294 151.8 7300.2 100.00 95.97 4.03
 Bus30 0.000 0.000 100.00 97.91 2.09
 T16 Bus4 Bus10 205.866 124.476 -204.663 -66.614 1203.0 57862.8 100.00 89.47 10.53
 Bus35 0.000 0.000 100.00 94.11 5.89
 T17 Bus4 Bus10 205.866 124.476 -204.663 -66.614 1203.0 57862.8 100.00 89.47 10.53
 Bus36 0.000 0.000 100.00 94.11 5.89
 T18 Bus4 Bus10 205.866 124.476 -204.663 -66.614 1203.0 57862.8 100.00 89.47 10.53
 Bus37 0.000 0.000 100.00 94.11 5.89
 SUMMARY OF TOTAL GENERATION, LOADING & DEMAND
 ---------------------------------------------

 MW Mvar MVA % PF
 ========= ========= ========= ==============

 Swing Bus(es): 565.645 430.226 710.668 79.6 Lagging

 Generators: 1082.000 463.652 1177.157 91.9 Lagging

 Total Demand: 1647.645 893.879 1874.501 87.9 Lagging

 --------- --------- --------- --------------
 Total Motor Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.0 Lagging

 Total Static Load: 1637.445 691.376

 Apparent Losses: 10.200 202.503

System Mismatch: 0.000 0.000

Number of Iterations = 2
 We are successfully analyzed the 9 bus and
37 bus system load flow study and transient
stability by using ETAP. Next we planned to
insert the capacitor bank and try to
compensate the voltage.
s.no period Work plan
1 Jan (1st and 2nd Analyze the power flow of 37 bus system
week)
2 Jan(3nd week) Study the concept of transient stability
3 Jan (4rd week) Analyze the transient stability of 9 bus system

4 Feb (1st , 2nd Analyze the transient stability of 37 bus

week) system
5 Feb ( 3rd , 4th Study the concept of using capacitor bank
week)
6 March (1st week) Insert the capacitor bank with 37 bus system
7 March (2nd ,3rd Study and analyze the reliability of 37 bus
week) system

8 March (4th week) Report preparation

9 April Paper preparation for IEEE conference.
1. Load flow analysis and relaiabilityevaluvation
of 220 kvkerala power system by
Dr.j.abduljaleel,shabna.s.sInternational
journal of engineering and innovative
technology(IJEIT)Volume 3,issue 2,AUGUST
2013

2. Power System Analysis, Hadisaadat, McGraw

Hill International editions.
3. Development of constrained-Genetic
Algorithm load flow method,
K.P.Wong,A.Li,M.Y.Law,IEE,1997.