Director Centre for Energy Environment and Productivity (CEEP) www.ceep.co.in tallkumar@gmail.com Resource Flows in Cast Iron Foundry Air pollution in Foundry • Depends on metal type, the furnace type and the molding technology used • Nonferrous foundries and steel foundries may produce hazardous waste because of the lead, zinc, cadmium and other metal present in the waste. • Cupola furnaces produce more air pollution than induction furnaces due to coke use and sand castings produce more solid waste than permanent molds because of the sand fines that cannot be reused. • Cupola, reverberatory and electric arc furnaces may emit particulate matter, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, small quantities of chloride and fluoride compounds, and metallic fumes from the condensation of volatilised metal and metal oxides. • Induction furnaces and crucible furnaces emit relatively small amounts of particulate matter, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide • Air emissions come from the binder systems used in mold making, the vapors from metal melting and airborne sand used in the pouring and shakeout steps. • Pouring and cooling steps contribute about 16% of the total organic and semi-volatile wastes from foundries • Organic air emissions come largely from unreacted components of resins, solvents and catalysts Solid Waste in Foundry • Solid waste makes up a large portion of the pollution from foundries. One- quarter to one ton of solid waste per one ton of castings is expected • The waste comes from sand, slag, emissions control dust and spent refractories • Molding and core sand make up 66-88% of the total waste from ferrous foundries • Green foundry sand is routinely reused. After the sand is removed from the metal piece, it can easily be remolded. However, sand fines develop with reuse. These particles are too small to be effective in molds and have to be removed and often landfilled. • Sand that is chemically bound to make cores or shell molds is more difficult to reuse effectively and may be landfilled after a single use. • Sand wastes from brass and bronze foundries pose further waste problems as they are often hazardous. Lead, copper, nickel, and zinc may be found in the sand in sufficient levels to require further treatment before disposal. If metal levels are sufficent, recovery methods may be employed • Finished metal pieces are often cleaned in abrasion cleaning systems. The abrasive cleaners and the sand they remove from the metal pieces contribute to solid waste. Grinding wheels and floor sweepings also add solid waste. These wastes are collected and usually landfilled. Emission Factors (particulates) for Uncontrolled Furnaces Emission Factors for Fugitive Particulates from Grey Iron Foundries Slag Wastes • Slag waste is often very complex chemically and contains a variety of contaminants from the scrap metals. • Common components include metal oxides, melted refractories, sand, and coke ash (if coke is used). • Fluxes may also be added to help remove the slag from the furnace. • Slag may be hazardous if it contains lead, cadmium, or chromium from steel or nonferrous metals melting. • Iron foundry slag may be highly reactive if calcium carbide is used to desulfurize the iron. • Special handling is required for highly reactive waste. Cleaner Production What is Cleaner Production & what are its Benefits?
• Cleaner Production focuses on eliminating waste and
inefficiency at their source, rather than finding ‘end-of- pipe’ solutions once the wastes have been generated. • It involves rethinking conventional methods to achieve ‘smarter’ production processes and products to achieve sustainable production. • In adopting the Cleaner Production approach, try to consider how wastes can be avoided in the first place rather than focusing on how to manage or treat them once they have been generated. • Waste avoidance and reduction should be considered as the first options. • Once all avoidance and reduction options have been eliminated, then options for on-site reuse and recycling can be considered. • Only as a last resort should treatment and disposal options be considered. Some cleaner production practices • Beneficial reuse of industry byproducts, particularly sand, baghouse dust and shotblast; • On-site and off-site sand reclamation and reuse; • Energy efficiency programs (eg. covering ladles, energy management and production scheduling, ensuring equipment is turned off when not in use, capturing waste heat from the furnaces and heat treatment processes); • Increasing on-site recovery and reuse of metals including shotblast, machining fines and baghouse dust metals; • Better segregation of shotblast from sand to increase reclamation; • Conversion of baghouse dust to slag to reduce disposal costs or increase beneficial reuse options; • Regenerating machine cutting oils; • Investigation of new resin systems; • Changing energy sources (e.g. grid power to bagasse, propane to natural gas, diesel to electricity); and • Improving layout and housekeeping practices. The Cleaner Production Hierarchy Benefit 1: Saving money • Cleaner Production can save money; money which would have otherwise been spent on wasted resources, waste treatment, disposal and compliance costs. • Cleaner Production strategies typically cost less than treatment and disposal (so called ‘end-of-pipe’) technologies. • Complying with the emission limits established by government through on-site treatment can be a significant cost; may require specialist knowledge and attention, and generally provide no profit for the organisation. • Many strategies, such as general housekeeping and process improvements can be implemented at low cost and can have immediate benefits, up to 30% in some cases. • Substantial process modifications or technology changes will require capital investment, however numerous case studies demonstrate that pay-back periods can be as little as months to 2 years. Benefit 2: Preventing pollution • Pollution prevention by reducing energy, water and resource consumption and minimising waste is at the core of Cleaner Production. • With the emphasis on reducing waste at the source rather than controlling pollution after it has been generated with ‘end-of- the-pipe’ solutions, many pollution problems can be eliminated. Benefit 3: Complying with environmental legislation • Working toward Cleaner Production will greatly assist in complying with stricter environmental legislation, bringing the benefits of reduced liability, reduced regulation, reduced monitoring costs, potentially reduced licensing charges and better control over your business. • Environmental regulations and standards are becoming tighter and more comprehensive and this trend is expected to continue in the future. Contents of a Cleaner Production Plan CLEANER PRODUCTION IDEAS
1. Improving Housekeeping Practices
2. Selecting Alternative Inputs 3. Improving Metal Yields 4. Improving Energy Efficiency 5. Minimising Foundry By-products 6. Production Planning and Improvement. A Typical Sand Casting Process 1. Improving Housekeeping Practices • Is the state of general housekeeping affecting the flow of work or causing spills? • Are materials and chemical supplies being stored appropriately to minimise the risk of damage or waste? • Can just-in-time purchasing practices be implemented to reduce the cost of inventory management and avoid waste from out-of-date materials (e.g. resins, catalysts and paints)? • Can preventive maintenance be use to optimise the efficiency of major equipment and ancillary systems (e.g. furnaces, natural gas leaks etc.)? • Can we improve staff training programs to increase awareness about Cleaner Production or to provide skill that increase operator efficiency? • Can we provide incentives (financial and non-financial) to increase participation in Cleaner Production? Examples • Workshop Tidiness • Preventive Maintenance – Compressed Air – Fuel oil/N.Gas – Water • Inventory Control • Staff Training 2. Selecting Alternative Inputs • Can we work with scrap suppliers to improve the quality of the charge material to avoid contamination? • Can we alter the metals and alloys that we use to improve casting quality? • Can we improve our materials testing procedures to improve product quality and reduce waste? • Can we improve sand quality to improve the dimensional accuracy of the cast? • Can we change the type of binders and other additives to improve cast quality, increase reuse options, improve environmental performance etc? • Can we change the type of refractory material used in the process? • Can we change from solvent based coating systems to water-based systems? • Can we alter the pattern or die materials to improve process performance? • Are there any new consumables (e.g. risers, sleeves etc.) that will improve casting efficiency? • Can we change the type of energy used in the process to improve efficiency and environmental performance (e.g. natural gas etc.)? Examples • Alternative Mould Coatings • Replacing solvent (alcohol, acetone and trichloroethylene) paints with non solvent paints – Water-based systems • Water-based Shell for Investment Casting – solvent-based shell mould systems to acrylic systems • Improved Pattern Materials • electroless nickel coatings on shell mould patterns – are reported to improve surface quality and increase the life of the pattern by 250–300%. • Improved Riser Materials – Non-fibrous, non-sand-based sleeves are reported to provide greater dimensional accuracy and strength, low gas evolution and more uniform insulating or exothermic properties • Alternative Energy Sources • Oil by natural gas where available 3. Improving Metal Yields • How many tonnes of metal do we melt for each tonne of usable castings? • What are the major areas of loss (e.g. melt losses, spilt metal, pigged metal, runners and risers, reject castings, or grinding losses)? • Can any of these areas of metal loss be reduced by: – minimising metal spills, over- or under pours thorough precision pouring techniques? – redesigning the gating system to make it more efficient? – using casting simulation technology to improve cast design and solidification properties? – working with our customers to redesign the casting to reduce it’s weight or improve its casting characteristics? – minimising grinding losses or even eliminate some fettling operations from the foundry? – using metal filtering, direct pouring techniques or other methods to minimise inclusions in the metal? • Can we redesign, optimise or change the casting process used to increase the metal yield? Typical yields Excess metal • Gating systems (i.e. runners, risers and sprues) are often large, and sometimes larger than the actual product cavity. • Wall thicknesses are sometimes overspecified to compensate for porosity and other metal quality problems. • The number of units produced is often over- specified to compensate for reject products and customer returns. • All this means that, for every tonne of metal sold, around 2 tonnes are melted Disadvantages of excess metal • energy used in melting and holding the metal; • capital costs for unnecessary metal handling capacity • increased fettling costs; • unnecessary metal collection and sorting time; • increased maintenance of equipment; • lost time that could be used for value adding activities; and • customer relations issues. Metal Mass Balance of a Typical Foundry 4. Improving Energy Efficiency • Have we undertaken a recent detailed assessment of energy efficiency in the foundry? • Can we benefit from implementing an energy monitoring program to manage energy use for either the whole foundry or for major equipment such as furnaces? • Can we optimise the efficiency of our metal melting and holding processes (e.g. · change technology, better insulation, use protective covers over the melt; put a cover on the pouring ladle)? • Can we optimise the efficiency of the ancillary services in the operation? • Can we benefit from investing in automatic energy control systems to shut down equipment when not in use? • Can we develop greater staff awareness of energy efficiency and run an effective ‘switch-off’ program? • Can we improve the ladles and refractory materials used in the furnaces and to improve energy efficiency? • Can we recover energy from any sources for reuse elsewhere in the foundry? • Can we benefit from investing in energy efficient equipment and up-grading old equipment (e.g. lighting, ladle preheating, sand reclamation, furnaces etc.)? Typical Energy Demand — Iron Foundry 5. Minimising Foundry By-Products • Have we calculated the full cost of by-products to the company (including purchasing, processing, disposing and compliance costs)? • Do we effectively segregate our by-product streams to improve internal and external reuse options and reduce the cost of disposal? • Do we have an effective strategy in place to minimise each major waste stream? • Can we improve the casting design process to minimise sand use (e.g. better flask utilisation)? • Are there other areas of the operation we can improve to minimise sand waste (e.g. minimise spills)? • Can we implement computer aided sand mixing systems to minimise sand and binder use? • Do we regularly investigate and trial new binder systems? • Can we improve the efficiency of our sand reclamation system? • Can we minimise other foundry by-products or reduce the demand for consumables? • Once by-products have been minimised as much as possible, are there any beneficial reuse options that minimise the cost of managing the material? Breakdown of By-Product Streams in a Typical Queensland Ferrous Foundry Beneficial Reuse Options for Foundry Byproducts Beneficial Reuse Options for Foundry Byproducts (contd.) 6. Production Planning and Improvement • Do we have an effective Environmental Management System that is integrated with our other business systems? • Can we improve the layout or streamline the process to improve the efficiency of the operation? • Can we use production simulation technology to help redesign our processes? • Can we utilise any computer aided technologies in the foundry (e.g. rapid prototyping, rapid tooling, casting simulation)? • Can we benefit from undertaking a cost / benefit analyses of different casting systems for part of all of the products or for new markets (e.g. Investment, permanent mould, die, lost foam and vacuum casting)? • Can we develop a capability in another casting process for some of our products (or for new markets)? • Can we improve our communication systems (e.g. electronic data interchange, the Internet) to reduce our lead times, increase the efficiency of the process and offer better customer services? • Can we improve scheduling and materials tracking systems? • Can we develop / improve smart controls and sensors for automatic supervision? • Can we use / improve computer aided design tools to integrate concept design, prototyping, pattern making and moulding?