Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
• Gynaecological laparoscopy
• Dangers of peritoneal insufflation of CO2
“Though laparoscopy offers advantages to both patients and
surgeon it involves considerable alteration in respiratory
and cardiovascular homeostasis and should not be
regarded as yet another minor investigation”
Hodgson, McClelland and Newton 1970
Anaesthetic techniques
Haemodynamic
• head up versus head down position
• bradycardia
• blood loss
• visceral traction
• gas embolus: early versus late
Pathophysiological effects
Respiratory: Hypercapnoea
• Head down, spontaneous respiration
• CO2 absorption
• Compromised diaphragm function with raised
IAP
• Pneumothorax
Pathophysiological effects
CO2 pneumoperitoneum (Safran and Orlando AJS 1994)
• .. gasless technique provided inferior exposure and the operation took longer,
… value in high-risk patients with cardiorespiratory disease? (Vezakis et al.
1999, Johnson and Sibert 1997)
• .. using thoracic epidural: no clinically important differences in cardiovascular
and systemic response were observed between patients undergoing CO2 or
gasless laparoscopy for colonic disease (Schulze et al. 1999).
• .. compromised surgical exposure and thus increased technical difficulty.
Patients realised no benefits from its use in terms of postoperative discomfort
or return to activity (Goldberg and Maurer 1997)
• .. gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in more uneventful and faster
immediate and late postoperative recovery than conventional carbon dioxide
pneumoperitoneum (Koivusalo et al 1996, 1997).
Pathophysiological effects
Gasless versus CO2 pneumoperitoneum
Conclusion
• Most studies have shown decreased surgical
access and increased conversion rates
• Cardiorespiratory benefits are limited in most
studies
• Side effects are similar overall
• Need a meta-analysis/more studies
Studies of laparoscopic vs open procedures
Conclusion