Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Yes 95 58.25 64
No 5 43.75 36
Total 100
100 95
Openion of Respondents (%)
90
80
70 64
60 56.25
Yes
50 43.75
36 No
40
30
20
10 5
0
Advertising General Overall
Segment
Q.2 Do you think the government has been successful in controlling the consumption
of tobacco & liquor by imposing a ban on Tobacco & Liquor advertising
80
70
Number of Respondents (%)
70 64 65
60
50
36 Yes
40 35
30 No
30
20
10
0
Advertising General Overall
Segment
Q.5 Are you aware of the phenomenon of Surrogate
Advertising (as mentioned above)
Responses Advertising General Overall
Familiar and 75 25 35
aware of concept
Not familiar but 5 8.75 8
aware
Not familiar not 20 66.25 57
aware
Total 100
160
Percentage of Respondents (%)
140
120 Overall, 35 Overall, 57
Overall
100
General, 25
80
60 General
General, 66.25
40 Advertising, 75
20 Overall, 8
General, 8.75 Advertising, 20 Advertising
0 Advertising, 5
Familiar & Aware Not Familiar but Not Familiar & Not
of Concept Aware of Concept Aware of Concept
Familiarity & Awareness
Q.3 Which one of the following do you consume?
In order to be able to analyze the feedback of the people constituting the
sample it was important to know there preference for tobacco & liquor
Response Advertsing segment general Overall
None 75 11.75 24
Total 100
80 75
70 63.75
Consumption Pattern of Respondents
60
52
50 Tobacco & Liquor
Tobacco Only
40
Liquor Only
(%)
30 24
22.5 None
20
20
10 10 11.25
10 5 2.5 4
0
Advertis ing General Overall
Segm ent
95% of the respondents in the Advertising segment
emphasize that a ban on liquor & tobacco advertising is
required. This is a surprising revelation from the horses
mouth.
The success of the government in imposing the ban is
evident from the fact that 65 % of the total respondents
have firmly said No, when asked if the government was
successful in imposing the ban on liquor & tobacco
advertising.
As compared 52% of the respondent who consume only
liquor, only 4% of the respondents consume tobacco
alone.
This shows that there is not truth in the fact that those who
drink alcohol & also consume tobacco. This also supported by
the fact that only 20% of the respondents consume both
tobacco & liquor.
The effectiveness of the surrogate adds is eminent from the
finding that 46% of respondents accept that it reminds them of
the core product. Another 38% of respondents feel surrogate
advertising encourages them to consume tobacco & liquor.
As many 57% of the respondents were not aware of both the
term surrogate advertising & the concept. This shows that
ignorance is bliss, though here it’s a bliss for the tobacco &
liquor manufacturer
Making transparent laws banning surrogate
advertisements for different products under a single brand
names, by amending the Trade Marks Act, for instance;
Providing teeth to the Advertising Standards Council of
India to enable it take action against false and misleading
advertisements, and keep a close vigil over clever evasion
of the law;
Asking the electronic and print media to adhere to the
advertisement codes and not encourage surrogate
advertisements;
Calling on the ASCI address complaints received from
consumers against surrogate advertisements and take
appropriate actions immediately;
Creating a consumer awareness programme to help people
understand the negative impact of surrogate advertisements;
Adopting strict laws to penalize those companies featuring
surrogate advertisements without any real existence of the
product; and
Requiring advertising agencies to have full knowledge of the
products under the same brand for which they are promoting
advertisements, and taking legal actions against those agencies
which design surrogate advertisements.
Health warnings A single health warning (“Cigarette smoking
is injurious to health” or “Drinking liquor is injurious to
health”) is mandatory on packets and any advertisement.