Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Quality Assurance
Estefania S. de Guzman
Philippine Normal University
Assessment
The process of gathering, interpreting
and using information about students
Educational decisions (grading)
Feedback (monitoring)
Instructional effectiveness and curricular
adequacy (evaluation)
Policy (decision making)
Responsibilities of Teachers in the
Assessment Process: STANDARDS
Choosing
Developing
Administering, Scoring and
Interpreting Results
Using
Grading
Communicating
Recognizing
Quality Assurance in a School
Context
Quality suggests attainment of
standards/levels of performance by
the students in a particular domain.
Domains:
Classroom
School
National
Quality Assurance in a School
Context: QUALITY
Classroom
What do you expect the students to be
able to attain/perform/demonstrate at
the end of an instructional unit?
Quality Assurance in a School
Context: QUALITY
School
What is the attainment of students in our
school?
How effective are the intervention
programs we implemented this year?
Quality Assurance in a School
Context: QUALITY
National
What is the overall performance of
students this year?
How does it compare with last year?
Quality Assurance in a School
Context
Assurance suggests
guarantee/evidence/certainty
How do you gather evidences of students
being able to
attain/perform/demonstrate the
expected learning outcomes?
Requirements to Use Assessment
for Quality Assurance
Clear and appropriate learning targets
Clear procedure and criteria for
judging
Appropriate assessment methods
Matching learning targets and
methods
Utilization of Test Results
Absolute performance – based on
given standards of performance
Paper-pencil test
What score must a student get to pass the
test?
Mastery criterion
What score or level must a student get to
show mastery?
Utilization of Test Results:
Absolute Performance
Suggested Tools:
Computation of percentage score
Students’ skills profile
Mastery: 75% and above
Partial mastery: 50-70%
Non mastery: 49% and below
Performance Based Testing
What are the attributes of an
acceptable response to an
assessment task?
What do I expect to see if this task is
done excellently? Acceptably? Poorly?
Use of exemplars or anchors
Utilization of Test Results
Relative performance – based on
the average performance of the group
Utilization of Test Results:
Relative Performance
Suggested Tools:
Sorting the test papers to know how a
student ranks in class
Group statistics
Group subtest profile
Use of derived scores
Percentile marks
Standard scores
Grouping of scores
Use of norms
Utilization of Test Results:
Relative Performance
Approaches
To determine instructional gains
(curricular effectiveness)
As a group: pretest-posttest comparison
By item: Sensitivity to Instruction (SI)
SI = pposttest – ppretest
Utilization of Test Results:
Relative Performance
Sensitivity Index (SI)– proportion
of students answering the item
correctly in the posttest
SI = pposttest – ppretest
Proportion (p) – number of
students answering an item correctly
(f) over the number of students who
took the test (n).
p = f/n
Utilization of Test Results:
Relative Performance
Interpretation of SI
The higher the SI, of the difference, the
greater is the instructional gain.
The greater the bulk of items with
negative, or low SI, the more reasons
there are for reviewing instruction.
Utilization of Test Results:
Relative Performance
Approaches
To determine progress over time
Class profile
Individual student profile
Thank you very much.