Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Presented by:
Albebson L. Lim
Image Source: M.Burford from R.M. Kudela et al., Harmful Algal Blooms, 2015.
PHYTOPLANKTON
• Autotrophic components of the plankton community
Biological Factors:
• Competition
• Predation
• Natural succession
Anthropogenic Factors:
• Nutrient Pollution
• Alteration of water circulation dynamics
• Ballast waters
OBJECTIVES
• To determine the global distribution pattern of phytoplankton diversity and HABS occurrence
• To know how nutrient ratio affects the community structure of target organisms
Hallegraef, 2010
Nutrient Ratios Dictate phytoplankton/HABS Community
Legend:
1975 - 1986
1987 - 1999
Post - 1999
B D
A – 1975 – 1982
B – 1982 – 1986
C – 1987 – 1995
D - post - 1995
Gilbert, et al., 2013
Food Web Changes
Synechococcus
Alexandrium catenella
Skeletonema costatum
Hallegraef, 1993
Summary and Conclusions
• According to comparative data, blooms mostly occur on sites where phytoplankton diversity
is high. Increasing bloom events are also observed when plotted in a temporal scale.
• Nutrient pollution causes blooms to occur but the dynamics of the marine environment
should be considered to determine the location of the bloom.
• N:P ratio dictates the shifts in the growth of phytoplankton and algae. Changes in the food
web dynamics and community structure are expected because of this.
• Toxins involved in blooms are very diverse and vary within species.
• Bloom events would disrupt the normal diversity of an environment by producing “dead”
zones. After the bloom, succession of the organisms would happen.
References
Anderson, D., Gilbert, P. and Bucholdr, J. 2002. Harmful algal booms and eutrophication: Nutient sources,
composition, and conseqieces. Estuarues. 25. 704 -726.
Collos, Y. Bec, B., Jauzein, C., Abadie, E., Laugier, T., Lautier, J., Pastoureaud, A., Souchu, P., and Vaquer, A. 2008.
Oligotrophication and emergence of picocyanobacteria and a toxic dinoflagellate in Thau Lagoon, Southern France.
Journal of Sea Research. 61. 68 – 75.
Gilbert, P., Fullerton, D., Burkholder, J., Cornwell, J., and Kana, T. 2013. Ecological stoichiometry, biogeochemical
cycling, invasive species and aquatic food webs: San Francisco Estuary and Comparative Systems. Reviews in
Fisheries Science. 19. 358 – 417.
Handy, S., Demir, E., Hutchins, D., Protune, K., Whereat, E., Hare, C., Rose, J., Warner, M., Farestad, M. Cary, S., and
Coyne, K. 2008. Using quantitive real – time PCR to study competition and community dyamics among Delaware
Island bays harmful algae in field an laboraory studies. Harmful Algae. 7. 599 – 613.
Hallegraeff, G. 2010. Ocean climate change, Phytoplankton community respsonses and harmful algal blooms: A
formidable predictive challenge. J. Phycol. 46. 220 – 225.
Hallengraeff, G. 1993. A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia. 32. 79 – 99.
Heil, C.A., Revilla, M., Glibert, P., and Murasko, S. 2007. Nutrient quality drives differential phytoplankton community
composition on the southwest Florida shelf. Limnol Oceanogr. 52. 1067 – 1078.
References
Igatiades, L.m and Gotsis, O. 2010. A Review of toxins and harmful algae in Greek Coastal Waters. Toxins. 2.
1019 – 1937.
Kudela, R.M., et al. 2015. Harmful Algal loomes. A scientific summary for Policy makers. IOC/UNESCO.
(IOF/INF – 13120.)
Peperzak, L. 2003. Climate change and harmful algal blooms in the North Sea. Acts oecolagica. 24. 139 – 144.
Tilman, D. 1977. Resource competition between planktonic algae: An experimental and theoretical approach.
1977. 58. 338 – 348.