Você está na página 1de 75

Bus 411

DAY 9

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall 1


Agenda

 Assignment #3 due
 Assignment #4 will be assigned next class
 Templates available in WebCT
 Discussion on Mid-term
 Before or after Spring Break?
 Finish Discussion about Strategies
 Start Discussion on Strategy Analysis and
choice

Ch 6 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies

Cost Leadership Strategies

Differentiation Strategies

Focus Strategies

Ch 6 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies

Cost Leadership
In conjunction with differentiation
Economies or diseconomies of
scale
Capacity utilization achieved
Linkages w/ suppliers & distributors

Ch 6 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies

Low Cost Producer Advantage

Many price-sensitive buyers


Few ways of achieving differentiation
Buyers not sensitive to brand
differences
Large # of buyers w/bargaining power

Ch 6 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies
Differentiation

Greater product flexibility


Greater compatibility
Improved service
Greater convenience
More features

Ch 6 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies

Focus

Industry segment of sufficient size


Good growth potential
Not crucial to success of major competitors

Ch 6 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Joint Venture/Partnering -

 Two or more companies form a temporary


partnership or consortium for purpose of
capitalizing on some opportunity.

Ch 6 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Cooperative Arrangements -

 R&D partnerships
 Cross-distribution agreements
 Cross-licensing agreements
 Cross-manufacturing agreements
 Joint-bidding consortia

Ch 6 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Why Joint Ventures Fail -

 Managers who must collaborate daily; not


involved in developing the venture
 Benefits the company not the customers
 Not supported equally by both partners
 May begin to compete with one of the
partners

Ch 6 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Joint Ventures
Guidelines --
Synergies between private and publicly held
Domestic with foreign firm, local management can
reduce risk
Complementary distinctive competencies
Resources & risks where project is highly profitable
(e.g. Alaska Pipeline)
Two or more smaller firms competing w/larger firm
Need to introduce new technology quickly

Ch 6 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Mergers & Acquisitions
 Provide improved capacity utilization
 Better use of existing sales force
 Reduce managerial staff
 Gain economies of scale
 Smooth out seasonal trends in sales
 Gain new technology
 Access to new suppliers, distributors, customers,
products, creditors

Ch 6 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Recent Mergers

Acquiring Firm Acquired Firm


IBM Rational Software Corp
Yahoo Inktomi Corp
U.S. Steel National Steel Corp
Pfizer Pharmacia
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Montana Mills
Oracle People Soft
Palm Handspring
Nike Converse

Ch 6 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
First Mover Advantages

 Benefits a firm may achieve by entering a


new market or developing a new product or
service prior to rival firms.

Ch 6 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
First Mover Advantages
Potential Advantages

 Securing access to rare resources


 Gaining new knowledge of key factors &
issues
 Carving out market share
 Easy to defend position & costly for rival
firms to overtake

Ch 6 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Outsourcing
Business-process outsourcing
(BPO)

 Companies taking over the functional


operations of other firms

Ch 6 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Outsourcing

Benefits

 Less expensive
 Allows firm to focus on core business
 Enables firm to provide better services

Ch 6 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 6
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David

PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch 6 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline

The Nature of Strategy & Choice

A Comprehensive
Strategy-Formulation Framework

The Input Stage

Ch 6 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

The Matching Stage

The Decision Stage

Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice

Ch 6 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

The Politics of Strategy Choice

Governance Issues

Ch 6 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

To acquire or not to acquire, that is the


question –
Robert J. Terry

Life is full of lousy options --


General P.X. Kelley

Ch 6 -22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Nature of Strategy Analysis & Choice

-- Establishing long-term objectives


-- Generating alternative strategies
-- Selecting strategies to pursue
-- Best alternative - achieve mission & objectives

Ch 6 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Alternative Strategies Derive From --

 Vision
 Mission
 Objectives
 External audit
 Internal audit
 Past successful strategies

Ch 6 -24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Generating Alternatives --

Participation in generating alternative


strategies should be as broad as
possible

Ch 6 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Comprehensive Strategy-Formulation
Framework

Stage 1:
The Input Stage

Stage 2: Stage 3:
The Matching Stage The Decision Stage

Ch 6 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
Internal Factor Evaluation
Matrix (IFE)

Stage 1: External Factor Evaluation


The Input Stage Matrix (EFE)

Competitive Profile Matrix


(CPM)

Ch 6 -27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 1: The Input Stage

Basic input information for the matching &


decision stage matrices
Requires strategists to quantify subjectivity
early in the process
Good intuitive judgment always needed

Ch 6 -28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage

Match between organization’s internal


resources & skills and the opportunities & risks
created by its external factors

Ch 6 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage

SWOT Matrix

Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats

Ch 6 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix

Four Types of Strategies

Strengths-Opportunities (SO)
Weaknesses-Opportunities (WO)
Strengths-Threats (ST)
Weaknesses-Threats (WT)

Ch 6 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SO Strategies

Strengths
Weaknesses Use a firm’s
internal strengths
Opportunities
to take advantage
Threats SO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT

Ch 6 -33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
WO Strategies

Strengths
Weaknesses Improving internal
weaknesses by
Opportunities
taking advantage
Threats WO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT

Ch 6 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
ST Strategies

Strengths Use a firm’s


Weaknesses strengths
Opportunities to avoid or
Threats ST reduce the impact
Strategies of external
threats
SWOT

Ch 6 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
WT Strategies

Defensive tactics
Strengths aimed at reducing
Weaknesses internal
Opportunities weaknesses &
Threats WT avoiding
Strategies environmental
threats
SWOT

Ch 6 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix

Developing the SWOT

List firm’s key internal Strengths


List firm’s key internal Weaknesses
List firm’s key external Opportunities
List firm’s key external Threats

Ch 6 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix
Leave Blank Strengths – S Weaknesses – W

List Strengths List Weaknesses

Opportunities – O SO Strategies WO Strategies


Use strengths to take Overcoming weaknesses by
List Opportunities advantage of taking advantage of
opportunities opportunities

Threats – T ST Strategies WT Strategies


Use strengths to avoid Minimize weaknesses and
List Threats threats avoid threats

Ch 6 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Matching Key Factors to Formulate Alternative Strategies

Key Internal Factor Key External Factor Resultant Strategy

20% annual growth in


Excess working capacity
+ the cell phone industry = Acquire Cellfone, Inc.
(strength)
(opportunity)

Exit of two major foreign Pursue horizontal integration


Insufficient capacity
+ competitors form the = by buying competitor's
(weakness)
industry (opportunity) facilities

Decreasing numbers of Develop new products for


Strong R&D (strength) + =
young adults (threat) older adults

Develop a new
Poor employee morale Strong union
+ = employee benefits
(weakness) activity (threat) package

Ch 6 -39
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix
Strategic Position & Action Evaluation Matrix

Aggressive
Conservative
Defensive
Competitive

Ch 6 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix

Two Internal Dimensions


Financial Strength (FS)
Competitive Advantage (CA)
Two External Dimensions
Environmental Stability (ES)
Industry Strength (IS)

Ch 6 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position

Financial Strength (FS) Environmental Stability (ES)

Technological changes
Return on investment
Rate of inflation
Leverage
Demand variability
Liquidity
Price range of competing products
Working capital
Barriers to entry
Cash flow
Competitive pressure
Price elasticity of demand
Ease of exit from market
Risk involved in business

Ch 6 -43
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position

Competitive Advantage CA Industry Strength (IS)

Market share Growth potential


Product quality Profit potential
Product life cycle Financial stability
Customer loyalty Technological know-how
Competition’s capacity utilization Resource utilization
Technological know-how Ease of entry into market
Control over suppliers & distributors Productivity, capacity utilization

Ch 6 -44
SPACE Matrix
FS
Conservative Aggressive
+6
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1

CA IS
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6

-2
-3

-4
-5
Defensive Competitive
-6
ES Ch 6 -45
The steps to develop a SPACE
Matrix:
 Select a set of variables to define financial strength (FS), competitive advantage (CA),
environmental stability (ES), and industry strength (IS).
 Table 6-2 provides Good examples
 Assign a numerical value ranging from 1 (worst) to 6 (best) for the variables that make
up the FS and IS dimensions. Assign a number between –1 (best) to –6 (worst) for
variables that make up the ES and CA dimensions. On the FS and CA axes, make
comparison to competitors. On the IS and ES axes, make comparison to other
industries.
 Compute an average score for FS, CA, IS, and ES by summing the values given to the
variables and dividing by the number of variables included in each dimension.
 Plot the average scores for FS, IS, ES, and CA on the appropriate axis in the SPACE
Matrix.
 Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot the resultant point on X. Add the two scores
on the y-axis and plot the resultant point on Y. Plot the intersection of the new xy point.
 Draw a directional vector from the origin of the SPACE matrix through the new
intersection point. This vector reveals the type of strategies recommended for the
organization.
 Aggressive
 Competitive
 Defensive
 Conservative
 Lets try with Data in table 6-3

Ch 6 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Boston Consulting Group Matrix


Enhances multi-divisional firm in formulating
strategies
Autonomous divisions = business portfolio
Divisions may compete in different industries
Focus on market-share position & industry
growth rate

Ch 6 -48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Relative Market Share Position

Ratio of a division’s own market share in an


industry to the market share held by the largest
rival firm in that industry.

Ch 6 -49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
 Data required
 Relative market Share for each Division
 Horizontal axis
 Compare to leading firm (1 means you are the leading firm)
 Industry growth pattern
 Vertical axis
 Percentage of Corporate Revenues generated by division
 Size of circle
 Percentage of Corporate Profits generated by division
 Size of pie slice

Ch 6 -50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High Medium Low
1.0 .50 0.0

High
+20
Stars Question Marks
II I
Medium
0

Cash Cows Dogs


III IV
a S yrt s udnI

Low
-20
Ch 6 -51
BCG Matrix

Question Marks
Low relative market share – compete in high-
growth industry
Cash needs are high
Case generation is low

Decision to strengthen (intensive strategies) or


divest

Ch 6 -52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Stars
High relative market share and high growth rate
Best long-run opportunities for growth & profitability

Substantial investment to maintain or


strengthen dominant position
Integration strategies, intensive strategies, joint
ventures

Ch 6 -53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Cash Cows
High relative market share, competes in low-
growth industry
Generate cash in excess of their needs
Milked for other purposes

Maintain strong position as long as possible


Product development, concentric diversification
If weakens—retrenchment or divestiture

Ch 6 -54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Dogs

Low relative market share & compete in slow or


no market growth
Weak internal & external position

Liquidation, divestiture, retrenchment

Ch 6 -55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -56
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IE Matrix
 The IE Matrix positions an organization’s various
divisions in a nine-cell display illustrated in Figure 6-
10.
 The IE Matrix is similar to the BCG Matrix in that
both tools involve plotting organization divisions in a
schematic diagram; this is why they are called
portfolio matrices.
 Differences between the IE Matrix and the BCG
Matrix
 Axes are different.
 IE Matrix requires more information about divisions than
BCG.
 Strategic implications of each matrix are different.
Ch 6 -57
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IE Matrix
IFE Scores
Strong Average Weak
3-4 2-2.99 1-1.99

I II III
High
3-4

IV V VI
Scores

Medium
EFE

2-2.99

VII VIII IX
Low
1-1.99

Ch 6 -58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Tool for formulating alternative strategies


Based on two dimensions
Competitive position
Market growth

Ch 6 -60
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
RAPID MARKET GROWTH
Quadrant II Quadrant I
1. Market development 1. Market development
2. Market penetration 2. Market penetration
3. Product development 3. Product development
4. Horizontal integration 4. Forward integration
5. Divestiture 5. Backward integration
6. Liquidation 6. Horizontal integration
WEAK 7. Concentric diversification
STRONG
COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE
POSITION Quadrant III Quadrant IV
POSITION
1. Retrenchment 1. Concentric diversification
2. Concentric diversification 2. Horizontal diversification
3. Horizontal diversification 3. Conglomerate
4. Conglomerate diversification
diversification 4. Joint ventures
5. Liquidation
SLOW MARKET GROWTH
Ch 6 -61
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant I

Excellent strategic position


Concentration on current markets/products
Take risks aggressively when necessary

Ch 6 -62
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant II

Evaluate present approach


How to improve competitiveness
Rapid market growth requires intensive strategy

Ch 6 -63
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant III

Compete in slow-growth industries


Weak competitive position
Drastic changes quickly
Cost & asset reduction (retrenchment)

Ch 6 -64
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant IV

Strong competitive position


Slow-growth industry
Diversification to more promising growth areas

Ch 6 -65
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework

Quantitative Strategic
Stage 3:
Planning Matrix
The Decision Stage
(QSPM)

Ch 6 -66
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM

Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix

Technique designed to determine the relative


attractiveness of feasible alternative actions

Ch 6 -67
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM Strategic Alternatives
Key External Factors Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
Economy
Political/Legal/Governmental
Social/Cultural/Demographic/
Environmental
Technological
Competitive
Key Internal Factors
Management
Marketing
Finance/Accounting
Production/Operations
Research and Development
Computer Information
Systems

Ch 6 -68
QSPM

Limitations

Requires intuitive judgments & educated


assumptions
Only as good as the prerequisite inputs

Ch 6 -69
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM

Advantages

Sets of strategies considered simultaneously or


sequentially
Integration of pertinent external & internal
factors in the decision making process

Ch 6 -70
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Cultural Aspects of Strategy
Choice

Organization Culture

Successful strategies depend on the degree of


consistency with the firm’s culture

Ch 6 -71
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice

Politics in Organizations

Management hierarchy
Career aspirations
Allocation of scarce resources

Ch 6 -72
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice

Political tactics for strategists

Equifinality
Satisfying
Generalization
Higher-order issues
Political access on important issues

Ch 6 -73
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Governance Issues

Board of Directors Roles & Responsibilities

Control & oversight over management


Adherence to legal prescriptions
Consideration of stakeholder interests
 Advancement of stockholder rights

Ch 6 -74
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Corporate Governance Issues

Business Week’s “principles of good governance”

1. No more than 2 directors current or former company executives


2. No directors do business with the company
3. Audit, compensation, and nominating committees made up
of outside directors
4. Each director attends at lest 75% of all meetings
5. Audit committee meets at least four times a year
6. CEO is not also the Chairperson of the Board
7. Shareholders have considerable power and information to
choose & replace directors
8. Stock options are considered a corporate expense
9. No interlocking directorships

Ch 6 -75
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall

Você também pode gostar