Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DAY 9
Assignment #3 due
Assignment #4 will be assigned next class
Templates available in WebCT
Discussion on Mid-term
Before or after Spring Break?
Finish Discussion about Strategies
Start Discussion on Strategy Analysis and
choice
Ch 6 -2
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies
Differentiation Strategies
Focus Strategies
Ch 6 -3
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies
Cost Leadership
In conjunction with differentiation
Economies or diseconomies of
scale
Capacity utilization achieved
Linkages w/ suppliers & distributors
Ch 6 -4
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies
Ch 6 -5
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies
Differentiation
Ch 6 -6
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Generic Strategies
Focus
Ch 6 -7
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Joint Venture/Partnering -
Ch 6 -8
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Cooperative Arrangements -
R&D partnerships
Cross-distribution agreements
Cross-licensing agreements
Cross-manufacturing agreements
Joint-bidding consortia
Ch 6 -9
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Why Joint Ventures Fail -
Ch 6 -10
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Joint Ventures
Guidelines --
Synergies between private and publicly held
Domestic with foreign firm, local management can
reduce risk
Complementary distinctive competencies
Resources & risks where project is highly profitable
(e.g. Alaska Pipeline)
Two or more smaller firms competing w/larger firm
Need to introduce new technology quickly
Ch 6 -11
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Means for Achieving Strategies
Mergers & Acquisitions
Provide improved capacity utilization
Better use of existing sales force
Reduce managerial staff
Gain economies of scale
Smooth out seasonal trends in sales
Gain new technology
Access to new suppliers, distributors, customers,
products, creditors
Ch 6 -12
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Recent Mergers
Ch 6 -13
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
First Mover Advantages
Ch 6 -14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
First Mover Advantages
Potential Advantages
Ch 6 -15
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Outsourcing
Business-process outsourcing
(BPO)
Ch 6 -16
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Outsourcing
Benefits
Less expensive
Allows firm to focus on core business
Enables firm to provide better services
Ch 6 -17
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter 6
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
10th Edition
Fred David
PowerPoint Slides by
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College
Ch 6 -18
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline
A Comprehensive
Strategy-Formulation Framework
Ch 6 -19
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)
Ch 6 -20
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)
Governance Issues
Ch 6 -21
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Ch 6 -22
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Ch 6 -23
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Alternative Strategies Derive From --
Vision
Mission
Objectives
External audit
Internal audit
Past successful strategies
Ch 6 -24
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Generating Alternatives --
Ch 6 -25
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Comprehensive Strategy-Formulation
Framework
Stage 1:
The Input Stage
Stage 2: Stage 3:
The Matching Stage The Decision Stage
Ch 6 -26
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
Internal Factor Evaluation
Matrix (IFE)
Ch 6 -27
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 1: The Input Stage
Ch 6 -28
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix
SPACE Matrix
IE Matrix
Ch 6 -29
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage
Ch 6 -30
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage
SWOT Matrix
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Ch 6 -31
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix
Strengths-Opportunities (SO)
Weaknesses-Opportunities (WO)
Strengths-Threats (ST)
Weaknesses-Threats (WT)
Ch 6 -32
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SO Strategies
Strengths
Weaknesses Use a firm’s
internal strengths
Opportunities
to take advantage
Threats SO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT
Ch 6 -33
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
WO Strategies
Strengths
Weaknesses Improving internal
weaknesses by
Opportunities
taking advantage
Threats WO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT
Ch 6 -34
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
ST Strategies
Ch 6 -35
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
WT Strategies
Defensive tactics
Strengths aimed at reducing
Weaknesses internal
Opportunities weaknesses &
Threats WT avoiding
Strategies environmental
threats
SWOT
Ch 6 -36
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix
Ch 6 -37
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix
Leave Blank Strengths – S Weaknesses – W
Ch 6 -38
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Matching Key Factors to Formulate Alternative Strategies
Develop a new
Poor employee morale Strong union
+ = employee benefits
(weakness) activity (threat) package
Ch 6 -39
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix
SPACE Matrix
IE Matrix
Ch 6 -40
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix
Strategic Position & Action Evaluation Matrix
Aggressive
Conservative
Defensive
Competitive
Ch 6 -41
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix
Ch 6 -42
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position
Technological changes
Return on investment
Rate of inflation
Leverage
Demand variability
Liquidity
Price range of competing products
Working capital
Barriers to entry
Cash flow
Competitive pressure
Price elasticity of demand
Ease of exit from market
Risk involved in business
Ch 6 -43
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position
Ch 6 -44
SPACE Matrix
FS
Conservative Aggressive
+6
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1
CA IS
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6
-2
-3
-4
-5
Defensive Competitive
-6
ES Ch 6 -45
The steps to develop a SPACE
Matrix:
Select a set of variables to define financial strength (FS), competitive advantage (CA),
environmental stability (ES), and industry strength (IS).
Table 6-2 provides Good examples
Assign a numerical value ranging from 1 (worst) to 6 (best) for the variables that make
up the FS and IS dimensions. Assign a number between –1 (best) to –6 (worst) for
variables that make up the ES and CA dimensions. On the FS and CA axes, make
comparison to competitors. On the IS and ES axes, make comparison to other
industries.
Compute an average score for FS, CA, IS, and ES by summing the values given to the
variables and dividing by the number of variables included in each dimension.
Plot the average scores for FS, IS, ES, and CA on the appropriate axis in the SPACE
Matrix.
Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot the resultant point on X. Add the two scores
on the y-axis and plot the resultant point on Y. Plot the intersection of the new xy point.
Draw a directional vector from the origin of the SPACE matrix through the new
intersection point. This vector reveals the type of strategies recommended for the
organization.
Aggressive
Competitive
Defensive
Conservative
Lets try with Data in table 6-3
Ch 6 -46
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix
SPACE Matrix
IE Matrix
Ch 6 -47
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Ch 6 -48
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Ch 6 -49
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Data required
Relative market Share for each Division
Horizontal axis
Compare to leading firm (1 means you are the leading firm)
Industry growth pattern
Vertical axis
Percentage of Corporate Revenues generated by division
Size of circle
Percentage of Corporate Profits generated by division
Size of pie slice
Ch 6 -50
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High Medium Low
1.0 .50 0.0
High
+20
Stars Question Marks
II I
Medium
0
Low
-20
Ch 6 -51
BCG Matrix
Question Marks
Low relative market share – compete in high-
growth industry
Cash needs are high
Case generation is low
Ch 6 -52
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Stars
High relative market share and high growth rate
Best long-run opportunities for growth & profitability
Ch 6 -53
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Cash Cows
High relative market share, competes in low-
growth industry
Generate cash in excess of their needs
Milked for other purposes
Ch 6 -54
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Dogs
Ch 6 -55
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix
SPACE Matrix
IE Matrix
Ch 6 -56
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IE Matrix
The IE Matrix positions an organization’s various
divisions in a nine-cell display illustrated in Figure 6-
10.
The IE Matrix is similar to the BCG Matrix in that
both tools involve plotting organization divisions in a
schematic diagram; this is why they are called
portfolio matrices.
Differences between the IE Matrix and the BCG
Matrix
Axes are different.
IE Matrix requires more information about divisions than
BCG.
Strategic implications of each matrix are different.
Ch 6 -57
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
IE Matrix
IFE Scores
Strong Average Weak
3-4 2-2.99 1-1.99
I II III
High
3-4
IV V VI
Scores
Medium
EFE
2-2.99
VII VIII IX
Low
1-1.99
Ch 6 -58
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix
SPACE Matrix
IE Matrix
Ch 6 -59
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix
Ch 6 -60
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
RAPID MARKET GROWTH
Quadrant II Quadrant I
1. Market development 1. Market development
2. Market penetration 2. Market penetration
3. Product development 3. Product development
4. Horizontal integration 4. Forward integration
5. Divestiture 5. Backward integration
6. Liquidation 6. Horizontal integration
WEAK 7. Concentric diversification
STRONG
COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE
POSITION Quadrant III Quadrant IV
POSITION
1. Retrenchment 1. Concentric diversification
2. Concentric diversification 2. Horizontal diversification
3. Horizontal diversification 3. Conglomerate
4. Conglomerate diversification
diversification 4. Joint ventures
5. Liquidation
SLOW MARKET GROWTH
Ch 6 -61
Grand Strategy Matrix
Quadrant I
Ch 6 -62
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix
Quadrant II
Ch 6 -63
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix
Quadrant III
Ch 6 -64
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix
Quadrant IV
Ch 6 -65
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
Quantitative Strategic
Stage 3:
Planning Matrix
The Decision Stage
(QSPM)
Ch 6 -66
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM
Ch 6 -67
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM Strategic Alternatives
Key External Factors Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
Economy
Political/Legal/Governmental
Social/Cultural/Demographic/
Environmental
Technological
Competitive
Key Internal Factors
Management
Marketing
Finance/Accounting
Production/Operations
Research and Development
Computer Information
Systems
Ch 6 -68
QSPM
Limitations
Ch 6 -69
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
QSPM
Advantages
Ch 6 -70
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Cultural Aspects of Strategy
Choice
Organization Culture
Ch 6 -71
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice
Politics in Organizations
Management hierarchy
Career aspirations
Allocation of scarce resources
Ch 6 -72
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice
Equifinality
Satisfying
Generalization
Higher-order issues
Political access on important issues
Ch 6 -73
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Governance Issues
Ch 6 -74
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Corporate Governance Issues
Ch 6 -75
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall