IMRAD FORMAT

OLD FORMAT NEW FORMAT

Chapter 1 Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION
• Background of the Study • Background of the Study
• Review of Related Literature
• Theoretical/Conceptual
Framework > Definitions
> Frameworks
• Statement of the Problem > Issues
• Hypothesis > Variables
• Significance of the Study • Theoretical Framework
•

• Conceptual Framework
• Scope and Limitation • Statement of the Problem
Definition of Terms • Significance of the Study
 OLD FORMAT NEW FORMAT
Chapter 2 Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES METHOD
• Research Design
• Review of Related Literature
Foreign Literature • Participants and Sampling
Technique
Local Literature.
• Research Instruments
• Review of Related Studies
• Data Gathering Procedure
Foreign Studies
• Data Analysis/Statistical Treatment
Local Studies
• Synthesis of the Reviewed
Literature and Studies
 OLD FORMAT NEW FORMAT
Chapter 3 Chapter 3
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY RESULTS
• Method of Research • Presentation of Tables of SOP1
• Presentation of Tables for SOP2
• Respondents/Participants
• Presentation of Tables for SOP3
of the Study
.
• Research Instruments .
• Data Gathering .
Procedures .
• Statistical Tools / .
Treatment of Data • Presentation of Tables for SOP#
 OLD FORMAT
NEW FORMAT
Chapter 4 Chapter 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF
DATA DISCUSSION
• Results of SOP#1 • Summary of Findings
• Tabular Presentation
• Analysis and Interpretation of
• Implications/Conclusions
SOP#1 • Limitations
• SOP #2…
• Tabular Presentation
• Recommendations
• Analysis and Interpretation of
SOP#2
• SOP #3..
• SOP#4….
• SOP#5..
 OLD FORMAT NEW FORMAT
Chapter 5
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

• Summary of the Findings

• Conclusion/s
• Recommendation/s
old new
Statement of the Problem
This research aimed to investigate the public perception on the effectiveness of Graphic Health Warnings.
It seeks to answer the following questions:
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of
1. Age
2. Sex?

2. What is the level of awareness of the respondents to Graphic Health Warnings if categorized based on
2.1 Risk Perceptions
2.2 Self-Efficacy Beliefs
2.3 Response Efficacy Beliefs

3. Is there any significant relationship between the respondents’ level of awareness to Graphic Health
Warnings and their Demographic Profile?
4. Based on the findings, what is/are the effective graphic health campaign warnings for cigarette users?

Hypothesis
There is no significant relationship between the respondents’ level of awareness to Graphic Health
Warnings and their Demographic Profile.
old
Theoretical Framework

The researchers came up with the idea of using the concept of Berlo’s SMCR Model of Communication and The

Lasswell Formula combined to perceive the perception of the Criminology Students of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng

Marikina on the effectiveness of Graphic Health Warnings.

Source Message Channel Receiver

Figure 1: Berlo’s SMCR Model of Communication

The model of David Berlo represents a communication process that occurs as a SOURCE drafts messages based on

one's communication skills, attitudes, knowledge, and social and cultural system. These MESSAGES are transmitted along

CHANNELS, which can include sight, hearing, touch, smell, and taste. A RECEIVER interprets messages based on the

individual's communication skills, attitudes, knowledge, and social and cultural system (Suresh, 2003).
new
Theoretical Framework

The researchers came up with the idea of using the concept of Berlo’s SMCR Model of Communication and The

Lasswell Formula combined to perceive the perception of the Criminology Students of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng

Marikina on the effectiveness of Graphic Health Warnings.

Source Message Channel Receiver

Figure 1: Berlo’s SMCR Model of Communication

The model of David Berlo represents a communication process that occurs as a SOURCE drafts messages based on

one's communication skills, attitudes, knowledge, and social and cultural system. These MESSAGES are transmitted along

CHANNELS, which can include sight, hearing, touch, smell, and taste. A RECEIVER interprets messages based on the

individual's communication skills, attitudes, knowledge, and social and cultural system (Suresh, 2003).
 new
Conceptual Framework

This study focused on the effectiveness of Graphic Health Warnings to the students of Pamantasan ng Lungsod

ng Marikina, SSS Campus.

SOURCE/ MESSAGE CHANNEL EFFECT

COMMUNICATOR
Department of
Health
Health-effects of Cigarette Packs Students’
&
smoking. Perception
The Researchers

Figure 3: Research Paradigm of the Study based on Berlo’s Model of Communication

This figure illustrates the process on how this research works. The SOURCE or the COMMUNICATOR is the

Department of Health which is the main advocate of spreading the MESSAGE of the law and The Researcher for

conducting this study. The CHANNEL used by the researchers is the cigarette pack itself since it include the warning

labels, while the RECEIVER is the public for getting their perception as the EFFECT.
old Table 1.1
Frequency and Percent Distribution of the Respondents
According to Age
AGE FREQUENCY PERCENT (%)

Below 25 years old 9 18

26-30 13 26
31-35 5 10
36-40 9 18
41-45 7 14
46 and above 7 14
TOTAL 50 100

Mean = 34 Years Old

Standard Deviation = 8.53
old
Table 1.1 shows that majority (54%) of the respondents were 35 years old and
below. The age bracket with the greatest frequency of 13 was “26-30” years old, “
composed of about 26% of the group while 9, or 18% were even younger than 25 years
old making an aggregate of 44%.
This implies that two out of every five respondents were young. Only three out
of 10 respondents had ages beyond 40 years old……….
The average age of the respondents was 34, with a standard deviation of 8.53. The
relatively large standard deviation indicates that many respondents spread out to ages
lower than and higher than 34. This implies that the age of the respondents varied from
each bracket, that is the group was non-contemporary in terms of age.
new SAMPLE TABLE PRESENTATION
Chapter 3

RESULTS

Table 1. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Sex

Sex F PERCENTAGE
Male 68 34%
Female 132 66%
Total 200 100%

Majority of the respondents are female comprising the 66% of the total sample acquired. Also 34%
of the sample population are males.
new SAMPLE TABLE PRESENTATION
Chapter 3

RESULTS

Table 2. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Age

Age F PERCENTAGE
25-30 years old 76 38%
31-36 years old 95 48%
More than 36 year old 29 14%
Total 200 100%

Most of the respondents are in the age bracket of 31-36 years old as reflected by the 48% of the
sample respondents. It is followed then by the respondents under the age bracket of 25-30 representing the
36% of the total respondents. Few of the respondents belong to the bracket of more than 36 years old that
comprises the 14% f the sample respondents.
new SAMPLE TABLE PRESENTATION
Chapter 3

RESULTS

Table 3. Perception of the respondents on the potency of teacher trainings on professional development and
work attitudes in terms of Classroom Management

Classroom Management WM Verbal Rank

Interpretation
Motivation of Students’ interest * 3.59 Very Potent 1
Model Self-regulation strategies ** 3.14 Potent 4
Use clear classroom discipline plan 3.22 Potent 2
Send home notes to report problem 3.20 Potent 3
Average Weighted Mean 3.29 Potent

* Item that got the first consideration of the respondents

** Item that got the last consideration of the respondents
new Chapter 3

RESULTS

Table 4. Significant Correlation between the potency of teacher trainings on professional development and work
attitudes and respondents demographic profile in terms of Sex

Source r-value r2 ‘p Verbal Decision

Interpretation

Instructional Abilities / Male 0.838 0.702 0.162 Not Significant Accept Ho

Instructional Abilities / Female * 0.994 0.988 0.006 Significant Reject Ho
Classroom Management /Male 0.318 0.101 0.662 Not Significant Accept Ho
Classroom Management / Female * 0.996 0.992 0.004 Significant Reject Ho
Interpersonal Relationship / Male 0.660 0.436 0.340 Not Significant Accept Ho
Interpersonal Relationship / Female * 0.993 0.986 0.007 Significant Reject Ho
Work Attitude / Male * 0.959 0.902 0.041 Significant Reject Ho
Work Attitude / Female 0.972 0.760 0.128 Not Significant Accept Ho

* Items showing significant correlations between variables

 Chapter 4
new
DISCUSSIONS
Conclusions
Based on the findings, the researchers drew the following conclusions:
that on the Instructional Abilities, the training was potent in the application of
new teaching pedagogy learned from the training such as……..(cite the
item)…(discuss and relate on chapter 1 literature and studies) .
The basic concept of learning is the main viewpoint in the Cognitive
Learning Theory. The theory had been used to explain mental processes as they
are influence by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors…
On the Classroom Management aspect, the training was potent in the
motivation of pupils’ interests……(cite the item, discuss and relate
literature/studies….
On the Work Values aspect, the training was potent…………
 Chapter 4
new
DISCUSSIONS
Recommendations
Teachers should continue the enhancement of one’s competency on the
potent aspect through active participation in different various trainings.
Specifically on the following facets:
1. Continuous enrichment on the competency of instructional abilities,
specifically on the application of new teaching pedagogy learned from the
training.
2. Continuous enrichment of competency on classroom management
specifically on the motivation of the students…….
3. Continuous enrichment work values on job performance……
4. Continuous improvement of oneself on interpersonal relationship……
 GENERAL FORMATTING GUIDELINES
(APA 6TH EDITION)
• The following general guidelines apply throughout the manuscript on bond
paper size 8 ½ x 11.
• SPACING:
- double-space throughout the paper, except entries in some tables and
appendices.
- entries in table may be single or double; prime consideration is
readability.
- double-space on all entries in the Reference Sections. No additional
space between entries.
- Spacing between subsections or subheadings w/in a chapter should at
least be double spaced, but may be triple or quadruple for added clarity.
 GENERAL FORMATTING GUIDELINES
(APA 6TH EDITION)
• FONT:
- Use 12-size Times New Romans font throughout the paper, including
entries in tables.
• MARGINS:
- Use a 1.25 –inch margin for the Left side; 1-inch for all other sides of the
page.
• INDENTION:
- Paragraph indented. Equivalent to 1 tab.
• PAGINATION:
- ALL page number are placed at the UPPER RIGHT CORNER of each page.
- Page 1 begins in Chapter 1 (INTRODUCTION) but is not numbered.
- Lower-case Roman numerals are used for the Preliminaries (front materials)
 GENERAL FORMATTING GUIDELINES
(APA 6TH EDITION)
• HEADINGS & SUBHEADINGS:
- Level 1 heading: CHAPTER TITLES are printed in boldface, uppercase
and centered on the top of the page.
- Level 2 heading: ( Statement of the Problem) Bold, flushed to the left.
- Level 3 heading: ( Cognitive Learning Theory. Skinner (1953))
bold, indented, followed by a period.
- Level 4 heading: ( Personality Traits. ) Italicized, indented, lower case
except for the first letter, end with a period.
COGNITVE AND NON-COGNITIVE FACTORS THAT AFFECTS THE TEACHING PERFORMANCE OF
THE FACULTY OF CASEC_PLMAR AY:2017-18

5 single space
A Thesis
Presented to
the Communication Arts Program
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Marikina

5 single space
In Partial Fulfilment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Bachelor of Arts in Communication

5 single space
Gina Cole
Nadia Cole
Christina Ehan
Cindy Ilao
Andy Lim

2018
 APPROVAL SHEET
The Faculty of the Communication Arts Program of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Marikina approves and accepts the thesis
entitled:

COGNITVE AND NON-COGNITIVE FACTORS THAT AFFECTS THE TEACHING PERFORMANCE OF THE FACULTY OF
CASEC_PLMAR AY:2017-18

submitted by Gina Cole, Nadia Cole, Cristina Ehan, Cindy Ilao and Andy Lim, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
Bachelor of Arts in Communication dated October 10, 2018.
________________________
Adviser
Panel of Examiner
____________________ _____________________ ______________________ _______________________
Member Member Member Member
____________________
Chairman

_______________________
(Program Head)
______________________
(Dean)