Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Subho Basu
PART OF CURRICULAM OF
4th SEMESTER ,MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY IN
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Khruschov, M.M., 1957 has shown the relationship of rate of wear between abraded
material and abrasive material are dependent on their hardness ratio.
Rabinowicz, E., 1980 shown in the abrasive wear of metal wear coefficient varies
between a range, depending on the contact conditions and material parameters.
• Gouging abrasion (the removal of large volumes of material per event from the
wear surface)
• High-stress grinding abrasion (i.e., the abrasive particle is crushed during the
wear interaction)
• Low-stress scratching abrasion (i.e., the abrasive particle remains intact as it
moves freely across wear surface)
• Erosion (low-stress scratching)
• Erosion-corrosion (low-stress scratching abrasion in a corrosive environment)
Maximum Allowable Suspended Load > Bucket Weight + Material density x Bucket
volume+ Maximum Wear Package Weight + safety allowances
iii) assuming K, FN, H all are constant for this particular situation with FN
being the digging force, we obtain
dV/dt = K (FN/H). dA/dt…
Now dV/dt = Wear rate , dA/dt= Bucket Surface Velocity
Total bucket travel per hour = nRβ, n= No. of cycles per hour
R= Avg. Radius of bucket rotation. ‘β’ is the angular travel of bucket per
cycle.
dA/dt = nRβ
Rate of volume loss=│dV/dt│max = nRβ K (FN/H)
MWPW /ρ│dV/dt│max=MWPW/ { ρnRβ K (FN/H)}= gi= Service
Hour of wear package
-If Ki nominal variation is ignored for a particular steel –earth abrasive wear
process
We find that t1H1 =t2H2
for equal slide length traversed under equal force. Hence with the increase
in Hardness in choosing material the wear rate is reduced proportionately to
the change of material Hardness.
Reduction in wear package weight = ρ ( t1-t2) X length X Width
6. Smooth surface for contact with abrasive material and shape as per
bucket shape.
- Plates laid continuously and in a uniform sequence to keep smooth surface
at contact . All over wear zone.
IWP= ti.ρ.{(2π- Ө-φ).r +BD}. (WBUCKET + WINBUCKET)+ 4 {∆AFD-∆ABO+ (π/2 - Ө) r2 /2}- ρti
WINBUCKET{(π- Ө-φ).r +BD}/(j+1)ti + ρti WBUCKET{(π- Ө-φ).r +BD}/(j+1)ti +{2 x AF x FD -
4ρti {∆AFD-∆ABO+(π/2 - Ө) r2 /2}-4.w.ti}+0.5 (αti)2 Lw ρalloy
Cutting of Wear Plates into Wear Bars as per drawing ….Nos. Applicable Applicable
Removal of old wear plate i.e. 50% outside area
……sq.m. Not Applicable Applicable
of both side wall L.H.& R.H.
Installation of new wear plate i.e. 100% outside area
…….sq.m. Applicable Applicable
of both side wall L.H. & R.H.
Removal of 100% old wear plate from both side
…….sq.m. Not Applicable Applicable
inner wall L.H. & R.H. .
Installation of 100% new wear plate in both
…….sq.m. Applicable Applicable
side inner wall L.H. & R.H.
Removal of old wear plate from 75% area of
…….sq.m. Not Applicable Applicable
curved plate inner Area
Installation of new wear plate in 75% area of
…….sq.m. Applicable Applicable
Curved plate inner area
Removal of bottom wear plate, Curved plate outer …….sq.m. Not Applicable Applicable
Installation of bottom wear plate, Curved plate outer …….sq.m. Applicable Applicable
Even in wear zones , the wear is not uniform. Finite element Method can be
applied to optimize variation of wear plate and pattern across proposed
layout.
Thank you.