INCEPTION REPORT

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND PRIORITIZED INVESTMENT PLAN

FOR CRITICAL ASSETS IN DHAKA
(URP/RAJUK/S-04)
 - Technical Approach & Methodology
- Introduction
- Training And Capacity Development
- Scope of Work & Inventory
- Long Term Investment Plan
- Project Execution
-Coordination,
- Situation Analysis & Outline State
- Risk Analysis & Management,
- Project Deliverables
- Data Validations
- Key Professionals
- Work Plan
- Organogram
- Projection For Next Six Months
- Project Execution, Oversight & Dissemination
- Needs Assessment & Data Required
- Inception Activities
- Challenges & Important Outcomes of The
Meetings
- Project Inventory

OUTLINE
 INTRODUCTION

SCOPE OF WORK & INVENTORY

PROJECT EXECUTION

SITUATION ANALYSIS
& OUTLINE STATE
 • Urban centers are growing fast and haphazardly which necessitates to have a realistic
understanding on the nature, severity and consequences of likely damage due to an
earthquake.
• Up on request of GOB for earthquake risk mitigation to The Global Facility for Disaster
Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), World Bank funded to undertake Technical Assistance
projects entitled "Bangladesh Urban Earthquake Resilience Project (BUERP): Phase1(2012-
2014) and Phase 2 (2014-2015)".
• The present project ,”Consultancy Services for Vulnerability Assessment and Prioritized
Investment Plan for Critical Assets in Dhaka” contracted on 28th of October 2018, with Joint
Venture (JV) formed by NKY-PROTEK YAPI-SHELTECH is an out come of BUERP.

INTRODUCTION
 • State-of-the-art methodologies with advanced tools and a strong participatory procedures
are ensured for accomplishment of assignments, simultaneously improving the capacity of
the experts and stakeholders to assess and mitigate the disaster risk.
• The activities envisioned within this project have been organized in three main stages, as
recommended by the terms of reference:
• Stage 1 - Data Preparation and collection: of existing studies, datasets and models of Greater
Dhaka for evaluation and formation of Project Working Group (PWG) and a Project Oversight
Committee (POC) to contribute and supervise various activities.
• Stage 2 - Survey for vulnerability and risk assessment: To develop detailed methodology for
survey of critical public structures for prioritizing retrofitting and rehabilitation investments.
• Stage 3 - Design of long term vulnerability reduction investment for Dhaka: involves
development of retrofit and rehabilitation methods

SCOPE OF WORK & INVENTORY

 • Building will be assessed in details, analyzed, designed and cost estimated for decisions of
- detailed retrofit design , and
- extensively deficient not amenable to retrofit will be marked for
demolition.
• Infrastructure & Lifelines will be assessed through preliminary analyses and kept within
feasibility context by expert opinion cost & time estimates.
- No detailed design or plans for such systems.
- Retrofit and improvement proposals will be made
• Assessment and mitigation of the critical structure involves a three-phased approach:
Phase 1 – Initial investigation and screening,
Phase 2 – Detailed investigation and conceptual retrofit design and costing of
alternatives
Phase 3 – Final design and production of design documents

PROJECT EXECUTION
 Three-phased approach for assessment and mitigation of structures:

PROJECT EXECUTION
 • Bangladesh is located close to boundary of two active plates: the Indian plate and the
Eurasian plate in the east and north.
• Several major active faults, e.g. the northern extension of subduction fault and the
Dauki Fault, are inferred in Bangladesh.
• Major fault is less than 60 km from Dhaka.
• Dhaka is ranked among the 20 cities most vulnerable to earthquake in the world
• Dhaka have 15 million people and one of the fastest growing cities.
• Dhaka is built partly on Madhupur terrace and partly on surrounding low-lying
floodplains.
• The subsurface geological materials of Dhaka are divided into six lithological units
(Filling sand, Filling clay, Holocene sand, Holocene clay, Plio-Pleistocene sand and Plio-
Pleistocene clay.

SITUATION ANALYSIS & OUTLINE STATE

SITUATION ANALYSIS & OUTLINE STATE
SITUATION ANALYSIS & OUTLINE STATE
 NATURE OF THREATS
● Buildings Damage : During an earthquake at 7.5 Mw originated from Madhupur fault, about 166,570
buildings will be moderately damaged. This is about 51.00 % of the total number of buildings in the city.
It is estimated that about 75,218 buildings that will be damaged beyond repair.
● Collateral Hazards: There might be several hazards due to earthquake which may affect structures as
well as may cause damage to human life and increase economic losses. These collateral hazards
include fire, debris generations etc.
● Fire Following Earthquake : Model predicts that during an earthquake of 7.5 Mw originated from
Madhupur Fault, there will be 920 ignitions that will burn about 4.12 sq. mi of displacing about 701,134
people and burn about 1,577 (millions of dollars) of building value.
● Debris Generation : During an earthquake of 7.5 Mw originated from Madhpur Fault a total of
30,599.00 million tons of debris will be generated. Out of this, Brick/Wood comprises 22% of the total,
with the remainder being Reinforced Concrete/Steel, which is equivalent to 1,223,960,000 truckloads
(@25 tons/truck) to remove.

SITUATION ANALYSIS & OUTLINE STATE (NATURE OF HAZARDS)

 HAZARD ASSESSMENTS
Cyclone and Storm Surge Hazard : The global distribution of cyclones shows that only 1% of
all the cyclones that form every year strike Bangladesh, but, unfortunately, the fatalities they
cause are 53% of the whole world.

SITUATION ANALYSIS & OUTLINE STATE (HAZARD ASSESSMENT)

 HAZARD ASSESSMENTS
 Flood Hazard
• This river systems drain a total area of about 1.72 million square kilometers in India,
China, Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh.
• Only 8% of this area lies within Bangladesh.
• As a result in an unpredictable manner it has too much or too little water having no
control and causes channel shifting, bank erosion, salinization of the coastal belt
and destabilization of environmental, & ecological balance.
• Example of July 2004 event, when the Megna river peaked, and Jamuna and
Padma rivers burst their banks affecting 36 million people, and 38% of the whole
area of the country was flooded for nearly 55 days.

SITUATION ANALYSIS & OUTLINE STATE (HAZARD ASSESSMENT)

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 3 13 48
STAGES TASK DELIVERABLES

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 STAGE TASK

DELIVERABLE
ID-1: Evaluation Criteria, Technical
Specifications for Sub-Tasks
ID-2: Evaluation of the Experts and Result-
Based Matrix

STAGE 1 Evaluation and ID-3: Preparation of the Organogram

Preparation & Data Designing of the D 1: Final Inception Report
Collection PWG & POC

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 STAGE TASK DELIVERABLE
ID-4: Situation Analysis Interim Report

ID-5: Data Collection Report

ID-6: List of All Critical Assets

ID-7: Urban Profile and Characteristics
STAGE 1 Report
Preparation & Data ID-8: Analysis of Outcomes
Collection
D 2: Needs Assessment Report
D 3: Complete Database of All Critical
Data Collection and Assets *
Documentation MD 1: Comprehensive Situation Analysis
Report

* GIS Database will be uploaded into

GEODASH
PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 STAGE TASK DELIVERABLE
ID-9: Prepare Preliminary Assessment
Report
ID-10: Analysis on the data sets and
activities
D 4: Develop a state-of art methodology
D 5: Prioritization Methodology for
STAGE 2 Development of a Seismically Vulnerable Public Buildings
Survey for Structural detailed methodology
Vulnerability & framework of survey D 6: Preparation of unified and integrated
Assessment and assessment studies analysis methodology

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 STAGE TASK DELIVERABLE
ID-11: Report on Proceedings of the
workshops
ID-12: Report on outcomes of the findings

D 7: Analysis of the outcomes and

framework plan report
STAGE 2
Survey for Structural
Vulnerability
Assessment

Validation of the
Methodology

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
D 8: Report on the outcomes of the RVA

MD 2: Individual Reports within RVA (Part 1)

MD 3: Individual Reports within RVA (Part 2)

Physical Survey and Risk
& Vulnerability D 9: Final Assessment Report
Assessment
MD 4: Individual Reports within PEA (Part 1)

STAGE 2
MD 5: Individual Reports within PEA (Part 2)
Survey for Structural
Vulnerability
D 10: Preliminary Design Report
Assessment
D 11: General Material Test Report
MD 6: Individual Reports within DEA (Part 1)

MD 7: Individual Reports within DEA (Part 2)

D 12: Final Design Report and Drawings

D 13: Tender Documents

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
ID-13: Report on Proceedings of the
Workshops
ID-14: Report on Outcomes of the
Findings
D 14: Analysis of the outcomes and the
framework plan

STAGE 2
Survey for Structural
Vulnerability
Assessment

Finalization of outputs
and cross-referencing
of final results and
Validation

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
ID-15: GIS Database
ID-16: Risk Communication Methodology
and Report

Creation of a historical ID-17: Independent Peer Review Report

calibration & validation
database ID-18: Update of Dhaka City Risk Profile
and Atlas
STAGE 2 D 15: Full Documentation
Survey for Structural
Vulnerability
Assessment

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
ID-19: Report of Prioritization and
mitigation strategies
ID-20: Report for Proceedings and
Development of outcomes of the consultations
detailed methodology
and framework of
survey and assessment
studies
STAGE 3:
Vulnerability
Reduction Investment
Plan & Urban
Resilience Strategy

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
ID-21: Develop Report on Risk Reduction
and Rehabilitation including
contingency planning and framework of
long term objectives

STAGE 3:
Vulnerability
Reduction Investment
Plan & Urban
Resilience Strategy Development of
options for risk
reduction and for
achieving long term
urban resilience in
Dhaka

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
D 16: Draft the Dhaka Urban Resilience
Strategy with the vision statement,
specific objectives

Development of an
draft Dhaka Urban
Resilience Strategy
STAGE 3:
Vulnerability
Reduction Investment
Plan & Urban
Resilience Strategy

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
D 17: Investment Report for the activities
to be carried out ın phase wise for short,
medium and long term objectives
ıdentified
D 18: Investment Plan and objective
report for buy-in process

STAGE 3:
Vulnerability
Reduction Investment
Plan & Urban Development of
Resilience Strategy investment programs,
projects and activities
for vulnerability
reduction of essential
facilities to reflect
Urban Resilience
Strategy

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
D 19: Report on Implementation
Mechanisms, Monitoring and Evaluation
Development of Mechanisms and Mainstreaming
Implementation Mechanisms and validation
Mechanisms,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Mechanisms
and Mainstreaming
STAGE 3: Mechanisms and
Vulnerability validation
Reduction Investment
Plan & Urban
Resilience Strategy

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
 DELIVERABLE
STAGE TASK
MD 8: Final Consultancy Report

STAGE 3:
Vulnerability
Reduction Investment
Plan & Urban
Resilience Strategy

Full documentation

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
PROJECT DELIVERABLES
KEY PROFESSIONALS

ORGANOGRAM
 The consultants include a core team as well as both national and international support staff.

KEY PROFESSIONALS
 TEAM
LEADER

PROJECT
Admin & HR
MANAGER

VULNERABILI
SEISMIC PRINCIPAL Senior Eng.
TY & RISK
HAZARD STRUCTURAL (Project
ASSESSMENT
EXPERT EXPERT Control)
EXPERT

VULNERABILI Quantity
SEISMIC Sr. Structural
TY & RISK Surveyors Document
HAZARD Design
ASSESSMENT (Prepare Control
EXPERT Eng.(Int)
EXPERT tender files)

Sr. Eng Sr. Structural Foundation/ Foundation/

Architect Electromec
Senior Eng. Senior Eng. Senior Eng (Statutory GIS Expert Design Eng. Geotechnic Geotechnic
(Nat) h. Eng (Nat)
Approvals) (Nat) al Eng. (Nat) al Eng. (Nat)

Field Survey Field Survey Field survey

Teams Teams teams

ORGANOGRAM
 PROJECT EXECUTION, OVERSIGHT &
DISSEMINATION

NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND DATA REQUIRED

INCEPTION ACTIVITIES
 Project Working Group Stakeholder Conferences
• Project Working Group (PWG) will be PWG & POC Meetings will be used as
formed by technical & project forums of dissemination and following
management staff of PIU and other forms of communication employed:
stakeholder organizations to reflect the • Workshop
past experience from earlier projects and • Seminar
updates on developments from user • Conference
perspective.

Project Oversight Committee Reporting & Publicizing

• Project Oversight Committee (POC) will be • Reports will be prepared in a unified
formed from systems managers and and structured format which is tailor
decision makers of the stakeholder groups made for the project by the JV.
as well as governmental organization • JV will run its internal quality assurance
representatives of ministry scale. system to enable high quality of
• POC’s influence within public services information production.
organization matrix and leverage on
public bodies, will allow rapid acceptance
of the project and enable smooth
coordination of site contacts, inspections
and testing.

PROJECT EXECUTION, OVERSIGHT & DISSEMINATION

 • List of the Critical Facilities to be assessed under the scope

• PWG and POC

• Digitization and characterization of exposure data

• Preparation of GIS database

• Existing Building Vulnerability Assessment & Geotechnical

Reports conducted for Dhaka

• The data should come through the proper channel, verified

and official.

NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND DATA REQUIRED

 KICK OFF
MEETING
The kick-off meeting with
URP team members was
held in the URP Project
Director’s office on 30
October 2018.

INCEPTION ACTIVITIES
 PROJECT
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCEPT
WORKSHOP

INCEPTION ACTIVITIES
 SITE
VISIT

INCEPTION ACTIVITIES
CHALLENGES AND IMPORTANT OUTCOMES
OF THE MEETINGS

PROJECT INVENTORY

TECHNICAL APPROACH
AND METHODOLOGY
 Duration
• The duration of 36 months is sufficient enough to carry out all the activities
Data Validation and Security
• PIU is expected to assist our JV for establishment of the PWG and POC.
• The responsibilities of PWG along with the core team of JC in Dhaka will be validation of these data.
Lack of Technical Capacity
• One of the aims of the project outcomes is capacity building and training of the national staff on the
outcomes of the project.
• A successful project should have sustainability and resiliency so that we expect the technical teams of
PIU and relevant stakeholder be part of the project and have close cooperation with our experts in
the ground.
• We do as well believe that international workshops to see best practices has crucial importance so
that we hereby state our readiness to provide a workshop in Turkey for Bangladesh stakeholders and
PIU to show best practices especially ISMEP Project.

CHALLENGES AND IMPORTANT OUTCOMES OF THE MEETINGS

 Facility Summary

Facility Area (m2) Facility Number

School and College 2,888,746.246 1088

Hospital 1,148,978.42 250
Air Port 244,890.69 1
Police Station 150,713.10 130
Madrasa 330,550.32 117
BUET 184,918.28 1
RAJUK 23,766.93 2
Bangladesh Bank 103,488.74 1

Total Floor Area 5,076,052.73 1590

TOTAL NUMBER OF
3968
STRUCTURES

PROJECT INVENTORY
 SEISMIC
RISK ASSESSMENT SAFETY PLANNING CONSCIOUSNESS
INTRODUCTION

2000 FACILITIES IN
DHAKA
COST EFFECTIVE
MITIGATION
STRATEGIES
ASSESS & STRENGTHEN

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

 BUILDING
STRUCTURES

PEA DEA RETROFIT

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT

NON-BUILDING
EXPERT OPINION

STRUCTURES
PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT
RVA

STRATEGIES
COST ESTIMATION

MULTI-HAZARD TYPICAL REMIDIFICATION

VULNERABILITY RATING DRAWINGS

DATABASE AND
FEASIBILITY REPORT

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

 PROJECT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (POC)
PROJECT WORKING GROUP (PWG)

INTEGRATED COORDINATION
REVIEW AND COMMENTS ON ALL OF POLICY DECISIONS AND
OUTPUTS THEIR DISSEMINATION

ENABLE WIDESPREAD
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INPUT ON SUPPORT TO THE JV
DESIGN AND RETROFIT PRACTICES OPERATIONS WITHIN THEIR
ORGANIZATIONS

PROVIDE SPECIALISTS HELP

PROVIDE SPECIALISTS HELP

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

 The vulnerability assessment process we propose five stages:
• Level 0 survey (preparation and data collection stage)
• Level 1/2/3 survey (structural vulnerability assessment)
• LEVEL 4 survey (design of long term vulnerability reduction investment plan)

OBJECTIVES OF THE LEVEL 1 SURVEY

VALIDATE THE "LEVEL 0 PRE-SURVEY" FACILITY DATABASE

RAPIDLY ASSESS THE STRUCTURAL AND NON-STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY CRITICAL

INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES WITHIN THE SCOPE (UP TO 5000 STRUCTURES)

IDENTIFY FACILITIES THAT WARRANT OPTIONAL "LEVEL 2 DETAILED SURVEYS" OR

"LEVEL 3 STRUCTURAL AUDITS"

PRIORITIZE FACILITIES THAT REQUIRE RELOCATION OR RECONSTRUCTION

IMPROVE THE LONG-TERM DISASTER RISK REDUCTION ACTIVITIES ACROSS THE DHAKA
REGION

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

 KEY ELEMENTS OF THE LEVEL 1 SURVEY

DETERMINING BUILDING TYPOLOGY & VULNERABILITY LEVELS

CRITICAL INDICATORS (SOIL PROFILE, SEISMIC ZONING, SITE SPECIFIC AND COLLATERAL HAZARDS, THE
PHYSICAL CONDITION OF STRUCTURES, ETC.)

VULNERABILITY SCORING AND RANKING SYSTEM

SURVEY FORM (INCLUDES CRITICAL INDICATORS OF STRUCTURAL AND NON-STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY)

MOBILE SURVEY DEVICE

DATA GOVERNANCE

PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS FOR CRITICAL STRUCTURES

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

 • Rapid Visual Screening (R.V.S.) process will be carried out by two methodologies suggested by
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and Turkish Method.
• R.V.S. provides a procedure to identify record and rank buildings that are potentially seismically
hazardous.
• This screening methodology is a one-page form, which combines a description of a building, its
layout and occupancy, and a rapid structural evaluation related to its seismic hazard.
• Its principal purpose is to identify-
• Older buildings designed and constructed before the adoption of adequate seismic
design and detailing requirements
• Buildings on soft or poor soils
• Buildings having performance characteristics that negatively influence their seismic
response.

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

 Rapid Visual Assessment (RVA) Methodology
Preliminary ENGINEERING assessment (PEA) Methodology
Detailed ENGINEERING Assessment (DEA) Methodology

WILL BE PRESENTED IN DETAIL IN THE NEXT MEETING STAGES

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

 TRAINING AND CAPACITY
DEVELOPMENT

LONG TERM INVESTMENT PLAN

 JV has already developed the Training Program Implementation Report aiming to train RAJUK’s
town-planning professionals and related specialists on following topics:

Vulnerability Assessment

Hazard And Risk Assessment

Urban Resilience

Disaster Risk Management

Detailed Engineering Analysis

Urban Flood Management And Disaster Risk Mitigation

Earthquake Resistant Rural Construction

TRAINING AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

 The ultimate goal of this engagement is the design of US
$1 billion of prioritized assets to be strengthened,
including critical facilities, water systems, gas systems
and the road network.

The strengthening of these assets would be financed by

future Urban Resilience Investment Program (URIP)
phases.

LONG TERM INVESTMENT PLAN

 COORDINATION

RISK ANALYSIS & MANAGEMENT

DATA VALIDATIONS
 GUARANTEEING
TO THE CLIENT TO
MONITORING OF
SUPERVISE THE IN-
IN-PROGRESS
PROGRESS
ACTIVITIES
INITIATIVE
CONSTANTLY

ENSURING THE
NECESSARY
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE TO
THE CLIENT

COORDINATION BETWEEN THE CONSULTANT AND THE CLIENT

 IDENTIFYING THE
ASSESSING THE
GENERAL AND
ENTITY OF THESE
SPECIFIC AREAS
RISKS TO DEFINE
OF PROJECT
THEIR PRIORITY
RISKS

DEFINING THE
ASSIGNING
ACTIONS
RESPONSIBILITY
CARRIED OUT
FOR THESE
FOR THE
ACTIONS TO THE
MITIGATION
COMPONENTS
AND/OR
OF THE PROJECT
ELIMINATION OF
TEAM
THE RISKS

RISK ANALYSIS & MANAGEMENT

 • Source system loop back verification
• Ongoing source-to-source verification
• Data-Issue tracking
• Data certification
• Statistics collection
• Workflow management
DATA VALIDATIONS
WORK PLAN
  The duration of 36 months is sufficient enough to carry out all the activities within the
responsibility of our JV in accordance with ToR.
 During the kick off meetings and bilateral meetings with PIU a specific request was made
if a fast track of the activities would be possible.
 Duration can be reduced to 30 months if-
● Required data & the list of the buildings shall be immediately provided.
● The duration for the approval of the reports from the PIU/WB shall be limited to 10days.
● The additional staff/individual consultants/sub-contractors may require and the
consultant will provide as required without extra charge.
● Facilitation from PIU for getting necessary approval from the relevant building authorities
to be able to conduct RVA/PEA/DEA studies.
● With the work plan provided we’ve aimed to have a deliverable/financial progress of at
least 40% by July 2019 and 75% by July 2020 while we have aimed to complete project
by June 2021.
WORK PLAN
 The duration of the 36 months cannot be reduced to 18 months with the understanding of following
terms-
A. The duration for the approval of reports from PIU side is too long.
B. Immense Financial resources required.
C. Additional staff required for which additional management such as visa, accommodations,
office required.
D. PEA works can not start without finishing RVA works totally.
E. Not practical to run DEA without finishing more than 80% of PEA and make decisions about
clustering buildings for next step.
F. Develop road map & framework not practical before completion of the tasks and analysis.
G. Based on Critical Path Method (CPM) there are too many activities which related to each
other and must set as Finish-Start tasks.
H. There are too many parallel activities which are in CPM and monitoring of them is
impossible.
I. Weather and environmental aspects.
J. There are too many lag, lean and floating time which can extend time more than 18
months.

WORK PLAN
 The duration of the 36 months cannot be reduced to 18 months with the understanding of following
terms-
A. The duration for the approval of reports from PIU side is too long.
B. Immense Financial resources required.
C. Additional staff required for which additional management such as visa, accommodations,
office required.
D. PEA works can not start without finishing RVA works totally.
E. Not practical to run DEA without finishing more than 80% of PEA and make decisions about
clustering buildings for next step.
F. Develop road map & framework not practical before completion of the tasks and analysis.
G. Based on Critical Path Method (CPM) there are too many activities which related to each
other and must set as Finish-Start tasks.
H. There are too many parallel activities which are in CPM and monitoring of them is
impossible.
I. Weather and environmental aspects.
J. There are too many lag, lean and floating time which can extend time more than 18
months.

WORK PLAN
 The duration of the 36 months cannot be reduced to 18 months with the understanding of following
terms:
a. This is not useful to start PEA without finishing totally RVA and make decisions about
clustering buildings for next step.
b. This is not practical to run DEA without finishing more than 80% of PEA and make decisions
about clustering buildings for next step.
c. This so practical to write Road Map about Investment after all tasks finish and all analysis
complete.
d. Based on Critical Path Method (CPM) there are too many activities which related to each
other and must set as Finish-Start tasks.
e. There are too many parallel activities which are in CPM and monitoring of them is
impossible.
f. Weather and environmental aspects is this WBS is really affect all activities.
g. By adding more teams of RVA there is no benefit to run in this time.
h. There are too many lag, lean and floating time which can extend time more than 18
months.

WORK PLAN
 PROJECTION FOR NEXT SIX MONTHS
Situation analysis report
RVA phase 1
Rva Phase 2
PEA PHASE 1

WORK PLAN
REVISED WORK PLAN
REVISED WORK PLAN
REVISED WORK PLAN
THANK YOU
EVERYONE