Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INDIVIDUAL
PEER TUTORIAL RESULTS
PROGRAM CONTROLLED
GROUP RESULTS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
DIFFEERENT FACTORS
COMPREHENSION OF
STUDENT
FAMILY BACKGROUND
The researcher first secured an approval from the Teacher- In charge of DAKNHS
When approval was given, the researcher conducted an interview to the
mathematics teacher as well as the learners, and conducted the pre-test and give a
two week session in preparation for the post-test.
Data collected were then analyzed comparing the results through averaging.
STATISTICAL TOOL
Mean was used to get the average of the pre-test results and post-test results.
Simple random sampling was use to select potential students for the research.Who where
students selected for the study are members of a seven grades classroom in which the
investigator was already working to complete required lab hours for a practical research.
Students were recruited based on their average solving level with the assistance of the classroom
teacher to identify the solving level of the students.
CHAPTER IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
OF THE DATA
• Throughout this study, the effect of peer tutoring on student achievement was examined. In order
to investigate the implication,20 seven grade students engaged in solving problem orally and
giving a recap of each to the investigator. Each student was on the same average solving level.
During the study, one set of students participated in a peer tutoring activity which consisted of
solving a problem together, actively discussing and talking about the problem as they solve. The
other set of students solved the same problem on their own. At the conclusion of each students
solving, each of the twenty students individually gave a recap of the problem to the investigator.
The student completed this procedure a total of four times over a two week period. The solving
accuracies were then examined in order to determine the effectiveness of the peer tutoring
activity. The research question consideration during this study was, “Does one –on-one peer
tutoring have an effect on student academic achievement; specifically, solving accuracy as a
measure solving problem?”
ANALYSIS OF THE DATA
• The data was scored and analyzed using the statistical tool and assigned a numeral score based
on the number of ideas recalled from each problem. The scores over the month period were
examined and graphed to determine whether there was any differences between the first set of
students involved in peer tutoring and the another sets individually-working students. Each
student’s score was also averaged in order to compare the mean scores of the students involved
in peer tutoring as an effective teaching strategy. It has also provide support for teaching peer
tutoring strategies in methods classes preparing future solving teacher.
RESULTS
Over the course of two weeks, first set of students involved in the peer tutoring activity had higher
solving accuracies than the set of students who worked individually.
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Category1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
student a student b student c student d student e student f student g student h student i student j
student k student l student m student n student o student p student q student r student s student t
The students who were involved in peer tutoring were identified as student A to J. The students
who worked individually were identified as student k to student U. The graphs of the students’
scores over the two week period are above in Category 1. each students’ individual scores over the
two week period are shown below in category 2.
30
Solving
25
20
15
10
0
Ave.(PT) Ave.(N/PT)
Student A Student B Student C Student D Student E Student F Student G
Student H Student I Student J Student K Student L Student M Student N
Student O Student Q Student R Student S Student T Student U
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to examine the research question, ‘’Does one-on-one
peer tutoring have an effect on student academic achievement; specially, solving
accuracy as a measure of solving mathematics problem?
” The results showed students who participated in peer tutoring have higher average
scores than students who worked individually and did not engaged in peer tutoring.
The results indicate the positive impact to peer tutoring has on student academic
achievement.
Student involved in peer tutoring also demonstrated improve in cooperation skills
with peers and an increased motivation to engage in solving problem.
Given these results, it is recommended that classroom teachers implement peer
tutoring into their daily classroom instruction as much as possible.
It is also recommended to teach peer tutoring instructional methods to pre-service
teachers in order to foster highly effective instructional strategies.
Kourea et al. (2007) also gives support for integrating peer tutoring into teachers’ pre-
service training in stating, ‘’ Guiding pre-service teachers in structuring peer tutoring
providing appropriate training, and monitoring and evaluating their progress will
ultimately increase the likelihood of their continued use of such strategies throughout
their teaching career” (p.106).
This study did contain limitations due to the low number of students involved in the
research and the short time span in which the research was conducted.
In respects to future research regarding peer tutoring, it is recommended to examine
the effectiveness of peer tutoring on a longer class-wide scale, involving an increased
number of students.
Additionally, it is recommended to observe peer tutoring’s effectiveness over the
duration of an entire school year in order to examine its longer-term effects.
It is recommended to inspect peer tutoring’s .
Throughout this study, the students involved in peer tutoring had higher average
solving accuracy scores, supporting numerous research which has also shown peer
tutoring to increase student academic achievement (Dineen,Clark, & Risley, 1977;
Greenwood, 1997; Harris & Sherman, 1973; Kamps,Barbetta, Loenard,& Delquadri,
1994; Kourea, Cartledge, & Musti-Rao, 2007; Olmscheid, 1999; Pigott, Fantuzzo, &
Clement, 1986; Simmons, Fuchs, Hodge, & Mathes, 1994; Topping, 2005).
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The average of the students who did not undergone the Program is (181.5).and the
average of student who undergone the peer tutorial program is (232.75). As peer of
the result, we have seen a huge difference of (51.25) and so we concluded that having
a Peer Tutorial Program is a big help to the students specially those who were having a
hard time in mathematics. For the math club department we strongly recommend to
develop a plan were student to student interact with each other through Peer Tutoring
Program.
REFERENCESS
Id-vivo & Sourceid=chrome-mobile & ie = UTF-8
Griffiths, Housten and Lazenbatt,(1995),Bound,(1988).
Miller and Kholer (1993). Olmschied, 1999, p.3.
Deneen, Clark, & Kisley, 1977; Kamps, Baretta, Leonard, & Del quadre, 1994;
Kourea, Cartledge, & Musti –Rao, 2007; Olmshied, 1999; Pigott, Fantuzzo, &
Clement, 1986; Simmons, Fuchs, Hodge, & Mathes, 1994; Topping, 2005, Fitz-
Gibbon 1988, Miller, Topping, & Thurston, 2010, Elbaum, Vaughn, Hughes, and
Moody(1999). Schisler et al., p. 135, Brewer, Ried, & Rhine, 2003, p. 113,
Webb, 1988, Leslie & Caldwell, 2006.