Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CONTENTS
Overview of 5G
Differences Between 5G and 4G Network Planning
NR Bands and deployment
Overview of 5G
Differences Between 5G and 4G Network Planning
NR Bands and deployment
Key 5G elements
Triangle Scenario-5G(5G used cases)
eMBB
mMTC URLLC
54Ghz
R15 R15
R15 NSA R16 …
SA Late Drop
Standard
Network E2E
Device
Smartphone
3GPP Standard Milestones and 5G RAN Roadmap
2017 2018 2019 2020
17-12 18-03 18-06 18-09 18-12
Rel.15 Rel.16
(5G Phase 1, focus on eMBB) (5G Phase 2, focus on mMTC & uRLLC)
Global
Launch
Small scale commercialization
5G RAN2.0 (NSA) GA(2018.Q4)
Massive commercialization
5G RAN2.1 (SA)
GA(TBD)
From Single Band to Multi-Band Optimization Required in 5G Era
Dense Urban Urban Suburban Rural
10ms 5G NR
E2E Latency
0.12m Break Distance
Transmission
50Mbps UL Live Video
For HD FoV Uploading DL Remote Control
Application Scenario
Architecture
• NSA & SA
Architecture
S1-C S1-U S1-C S1-U S1-U S1-C S1-U S1-U NG-C NG-U NG-U NG-C NG-U
NG-C NG-U NG-C NG-U NG-U NG-C NG-U NG-U NG-C NG-U
CP Anchor UP Split
5G architecture:
5G architecture includes NSA and SA, both Share the Same Ecosystem.
As the early deployment architecture of 5G, NSA focuses on the eMBB scenario, reusing the current EPC and LTE as the
anchor, which enables the quick introduction of 5G NR. Most operators choose NSA as the early deployment of 5G. SA is
the 5G target architecture, which support 5G full scenarios, 5G New Core is required to support network slicing
New Radio (NR) release 15&16
NR Release 15 (Dec 2017) select features NR Release 16 (Dec 2017) select features
Standards based Cloud architecture Shared spectrum operation
5 Gbps peak DL throughput, increasing to 50 Gpbslater 5 GHz unlicensed spectrum operation based on
current LTEapproaches such as
Massive MIMO and Beamforming
Licensed Assisted Access (LAA)
Dual connectivity (LTE and NR) LTE-WLAN link Aggregation (LWA)
Error correction with low-density parity code (LDPC) LTE-WLAN Radio Level Integration with IPSec
Tunnel (LWIP) and
Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communications (URLLC) RAN Controlled LTEWireless LAN Interworking
Numerology support (RCLWI)
Non stand-alone (NSA) and Stand alone (SA) Other features still to be defined
Any band; low, mid, high
Carrier aggregation for multiple NRcarrier
FDD and TDD in NR
Dynamic co-existence with LTEin the samechannels
Flexible Numerology
Subcarrier spacing 15 30 6 120
(KHz)
Spectrum < 6 GHz < 6 GHz < 6….> 20 GHz >20 GHz
Max Bandwidth (MHz) 50 100 200 400
Symbol Duration (μs) 66.7 33.3 16.7 8.33
Nominal cyclic prefix (μs) 4.7 2.3 1.2 0.59
Scheduling interval (ms) 0.5 0.25 0.125 0.625
TTI 1 ms 0.2 ms
NDLsymb . NRB DL
. N RB. slots/frame . frames/sec . nb carriers
Formula Maximum symbols / second sc
64T64R/32T32R
Horizontal Beamforming Vertical Beamforming
××××××××
××××××××
××××××××
××××××××
×××××××× 5G
×××××××× LTE Narrow
××××××××
××××××××
Wide Beam-forming
×××××××× Beam
××××××××
××××××××
××××××××
• Narrow beam by massive dipoles • More precise beam & scanned area
• Beamforming for BCH, SCH, CSI-RS to improve • Higher user SINR and Better interference control
common channel coverage
3D-Shaping is the Most Important Tech to Improve Vertical Coverage
RSRP
8~20dB
BS [dB] RSRP Gain
3.5GHz -90
Floor 9
& 2.6GHz -95
Floor 7 -100
-105
Floor 5
-110
-115
Floor 3
-120
Floor 1 -125
-130
-135 Point
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
CPE in Floor 1, 3, 5, 7, 9
RSRP 3.5GHz RSRP 2.6GHz
• The 5G network is constructed through the upgrade on the live network. Therefore, fully consider existing sites when
planning 5G networks.
Key Procedures of 5G Network Planning
5G network planning inherits the excellent experience of 4G/3G network planning. The 5G network planning
process is similar to that of 4G/3G.
Differences Between 4G and 5G Network Planning and Challenges
of 5G Network Planning
New bands New air interface New services New architecture New scenarios
The requirements of higher The traditional network planning eMBB -> Connectivity of 5G network planning has shifted The application scenarios of 5G
frequency bands and higher method needs to be changed to Everything from "network-centric coverage are far beyond the traditional
planning simulation accuracy. meet requirements of Massive and capacity planning" to "cloud- communication scenarios:
MIMO and Flexible Duplex. eMBB: AR/VR based and user-centric
C-band/mmWave(millimeter- WTTx: B2H map experience planning.“ IoT (Internet of Things )
Wave) propagation model Massive MIMO(MM) Backhaul: inner-band and Low-altitude coverage
3GPP model MM coverage/capacity outer-band NSA/SA IoV(Internet of Vehicles )
Rayce (Huawei Self- simulation modeling mMTC: power NFV: network slicing planning …
developed ray-tracing model) Scenario-based MM beam consumption/standby time UDN: site/topology planning
Penetration loss, Foliage loss, design uRLLC: delay and reliability D2D: resources and
rain attenuation, and oxygen Azimuth and downtilt interference
attenuation planning in the MM UCNC: dynamic topology
High-precision 3D modeling architecture
High-precision ray-tracing Dynamic TDD/uplink and
model downlink bandwidth asymmetry:
5G spectrum policy, dynamic TDD timeslot allocation
spectrum planning, and uplink Avoiding uplink and
and downlink decoupling(Trial) downlink interference
NR Bands and deployment
5G NR Frequency Definition (3GPP TS 38.104 )
3GPP R15 New define 5G NR Frequency: 5G NR Reuse exists Frequency:
NR Band Frequency Range Duplex Mode NR Band Frequency Range-UL Frequency Range-DL Duplex Mode