SUB TEAM

AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

Item 14
Specific Examinations

October 2016

1
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

Introduction
• The following specific examination questions have
been taken from papers provided to staff to address
NCR’s raised during the review of the suppliers
examinations.
• The specific questions cover PT, MT, RT & UT at
Level 2
• This is a Litmus test for determining whether a
specific exam question is “look-up” or requires an
understanding of the requirement.

2
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

Expectation
• Each heading shows the method being
addressed
• Look at each method and question then ask
yourself “Is this question look up or does it
require an understanding of the specification /
procedure to address this?
• Look at it from the point of view “If I gave the
examination and specification / procedure to
any one outside NDT would they be able to
pass the examination?”

3
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/1 Question
• What is the minimum UV intensity at the
inspection surface?
a) 1000 micro watts per cm2
b) 1500 micro watts per cm2
c) 1200 micro watts per cm2
d) 800 micro watts per cm2

4
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/1 Question
• When performing the UV intensity control
check, the measured intensity at the inspection
surface was recorded as 1050 micro watts per
sq cm. Is this measurement sufficient to allow
inspection of parts? If not, what course of action
is necessary?

5
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/1 Question
• If the TAM Panel is found to have fluorescence
present after cleaning, you reprocess the panel
with the ultrasonic cleaner. If it can not be
cleaned or if it is corroded or chipped, it must
be replaced.
a) True
b) False - why?

6
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/1 Question
• If dwell times are exceeded, and components
are reprocessed with a dwell time of 30
minutes, is this acceptable?
a) Yes
b) No - why?

7
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/1 Question
• During the inspection of a casting, part number
1234567, under UV light it is noted that there is
penetrant bleed out on a machined portion of
the casting. After carrying out a wipe off
technique the bleed out is found to be caused
by porosity, which has been opened to the
surface. The porosity is confined to a 1 inch
square area and the maximum size of any pore
is 0.002 inches. The total number of pores is
15.
• Is this casting acceptable or reject to
8
acceptance criteria ABC123? And why?
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/2 Question
• After demagnetizing parts, how must you
determine that the parts have been successfully
demagnetized?
a) By placing a magnet on the part.
b) By using a gauss meter.
c) Careful observation for clinging magnetic
particles.1.0 – 4.0

9
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/2 Question
• After parts have been inspected, the following
steps shall be taken:
a) Parts shall be cleaned and corrosion
protection applied.
b) Parts shall be demagnetized, thoroughly dried,
and corrosion protection applied.
c) Parts shall be demagnetized, cleaned, and
corrosion protection applied

10
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/2 Question
• External poles, which are too strong to permit
good inspection of a part, are more likely to
result when using:
a) Circular magnetization.
b) Longitudinal magnetization.
c) Polarized magnetization.
d) Residual magnetization.

11
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/3 Question
• The inspection of a solid rolling plane or slightly
curved of carbon fibre by ultrasonic method and
simple transmission technique, the transducers
will be placed?
a) Parallel to the ultrasonic beam allowing a
deviation from ± 5%,
b) Perpendicular to the surface of the piece.
c) Perpendicular to the reflector plate allowing a
deviation from ± 5%,
d) Parallel to the reflector plate.

12
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/3 Question
• An ultrasonic procedure is a written documents
of detail instructions of test that must be
approved by?
a) The quality engineering responsible.
b) By a Level III in the test technique.
c) By a Level II in the test technique.
d) None of the above.

13
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/3 Question
• Choose the true statement of Level 1 personnel
from following.
a) They can perform and direct NDT in
accordance with written instructions.
b) They can adjust NDT instruments.
c) They can calibrate NDT instruments.
d) They have a responsibility to select NDT
method or NDT technique.

14
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/3 Question
• In the inspections with reflective plate technique
of components for Airbus España the
delimitation of the indications in accordance
with rule I+D-E-282 will be performed with?
a) echo-pulse technique
b) Marking the piece with indelible pencil
c) (a) and (b) are correct
d) None of the above are correct

15
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/4 Question
• The following statements about film holders are
correct except?
a) Film holders shall be light proof.
b) Film holders may be free of flaws as long as
the quality level of the radiograph meets the
requirements.
c) Film holders shall be checked for damage.
d) If the film holder results in light leakage the
radiograph is to be discarded.

16
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/4 Question
• For single film viewing, the acceptable range of
film density shall be ( ) in the area of interest
when the maximum allowable film density is
4.6?
a) 1.0 – 4.0
b) 1.5 – 4.6
c) 1.5 – 4.0
d) 2.0 – 4.6

17
 SUB TEAM
AUDITOR
GROUPS – FEB 2012
CONFERENCE

AC7114/4 Question
• Which of the following are a common eddy
current reference standard?
a) Conductivity standards
b) Tube discontinuity standards
c) Hole discontinuity standards
d) All of the above

18