TIGA ARTI „TOTAL‟DALAM TPM

 Total Efektifitas
 Total Sistem Perawatan
 Maintenance Prevention (MP)
 Maintainability Improvement (MI)
 Preventive Maintenance (PM)
 Total Partisipasi Seluruh
Karyawan
1.01-TPM Intro- 15/20
R1
 TPM, PRODUCTIVE &
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
TPM PRODUCTIVE
MAINTENANC
PREVENTIVE
MAINTENANC
E E

Efisiensi

Total Sistem Perawatan

(MP-MI-PM)

Perawatan Mandiri

1.01-TPM Intro- 16/20

R1
 SASARAN TPM

Zero ABCD:
• Accident
• Breakdown
• Crisis
• Defect

1.01-TPM Intro- 17/20

R1
 8 PILLAR TPM
Peningkatan lapangan dan pengembangan hubungan manusia dan mesin yang optimal

Peningkatan MP design Quality TPM di Sistem yang

Focused Perawatan Perawatan aman dan
Ketrampilan and early Maintenance Support dan
Improvement Mandiri Terrencana
Operator dan equipment (Hinshitsu Administrasi ramah
(Kobetsu Kaizen) (Jishu Hozen) (Keikaku Hozen)
Perawatan management Hozen) (Office TPM) lingkungan

Sasaran
•Operator •Mensupport
yang •Ketrampilan •Mesin yang handal, kegiatan
•Zero breakdown memahami •Kegiatan TPM
operator dan mudah dijalankan
mesinnya perawatan •Zero Product Kegiatan •Zero Accident
perawatan dan mudah dirawat
dengan Defect
•Zero product yang Perawatan di
•Operator biaya Support dan •Zero Pollution
defect lebih tinggi •Operasi yang stabil
yang perhatian memadai Admin
setelah instalasi
pada mesinnya

Peserta

•Tim Produksi •Operator •Produksi, design •QA/QC •Support •Maintenance

Tim
Perawatan, •Tim Operator engineers •GA
Perawatan
engineering •Perawatan •Staf Perawatan •Perawatan •Admin •Lingkungan

1.01-TPM Intro- 18/20

R1
 CONTOH-CONTOH EFEKTIFITAS TPM (1)
(Pemenang PM Award)
Kelompok Efektifitas TPM
 Labor productivity increased:
140% (Company M) 150% (Company F)
P  Value added per person increased:
147% (Company A) 117% (Company
(Productivity) AS)
 Rate of operation increased:
17% (68%  85%) (Company T)
 Breakdowns reduced:
 Defects in process
98% (1,000  20 reduced:
cases/mo.) (Company TK)
Q 90% (1.0%  0.1%) (Company MS)
 Defect reduced:
(Quality)
70% (0.23%  0.08%) (Company T)

 Claims from clients reduced:

50% (Company MS) 50% (Company F) 25% (Company NZ)
 Reduction in manpower:
C 90% (Company TS) 30% (Company C)
 Reduction in maintenance costs:
(Cost) 15% (Company TK) 30% (Company F) 25% (Company NZ)
 Energy conserved:
30% (Company C)

1.01-TPM Intro- 19/20

R1
 CONTOH-CONTOH EFEKTIFITAS TPM (2)
(Pemenang PM Award)

Kelompok Efektifitas TPM

D  Stock reduced (by days):

50% (11 days  5 days) (Company T)
(Deli
very)  Inventory turnover increased:
200% (3  6 times/mo.) (Company C)
S  Zero accidents
(Safety) (Company M)

M  Increase in improvement ideas submitted:

230% increase (36,8/person  83.6/person) (Company N)
(Morale)
 200% (2 
Small group meetings increased:
4 meetings/mo.) (Company C)

E  Zero pollution
(Environment) (Every company)

1.01-TPM Intro- 20/20

R1