Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Dr Pinar Canga
International
Sources of Law
Today’s Lecture
Article 9 –
Article 7 – Article 8 – Article 10 – Article 11 – Article 12 –
conscience
retroactivity privacy expression association marriage
and religion
The Nature of
the Problem: He has a clear claim that his Article 8 ECHR rights – the right to privacy – have
Malone v
been breached:
Metropolitan
Police BUT: there is no way to enforce this – nothing unlawful has occurred as a matter
of domestic (English and Welsh) law.
Commissioner
[1979] Ch 344 Megarry VC: "I have already held that, if such tapping can be carried out
without committing any breach of the law, it requires no authorisation by
statute or common law; it can lawfully be done simply because there is nothing
to make it unlawful.”
• The UK’s obligations under
the ECHR are monitored by
the Council of Europe.
• The ECtHR ultimately
determines whether the
ECHR has been breached.
Individuals can bring cases
when domestic remedies
exhausted.
• Malone v United Kingdom rules
that the UK had indeed
breached Article 8.
• The UK changed the law (to
Mr Malone goes to be continued in LL1001 …)
Strasbourg
The Human Rights Act 1998: rights are
coming home
• Wouldn’t it be easier if Mr Malone’s argument could have just been
dealt with in the High Court?
• The Human Rights Act 1998: ‘bringing rights home’
• Litigants can still bring cases to the ECtHR once domestic remedies
have been exhausted (e.g. they lose in the UK Supreme Court),
assuming the ECtHR rules that their case is admissible.
• Recent examples: Austin v UK (‘kettling’ during protests); Gillan &
Quinton v UK (stop and search powers)
Basic provisions of the HRA 1998 (we do this
in far more depth in Public Law)
• Section 2: UK courts must take into account the case law of the
ECtHR.
• Section 3: so far as is possible, UK courts must interpret domestic
legislation so that it is compatible with the ECHR.
• Section 4: if that is not possible, courts may declare the legislation
incompatible with the ECHR. The law remains in force.
• Section 6: it is unlawful for a ‘public authority’ to act contrary to the
ECHR.
For and against the Human Rights Act?
For Against
• Effective incorporation of • Does Section 3 give the judiciary too
international obligations into UK law much power? Does it undermine
Parliament’s intentions?
• Section 2 allows UK courts to diverge
from ECtHR if appropriate • The scope of human rights protections
should be decided by elected
• Section 3 prevents cases going to politicians, not judges
ECtHR • Distrust of ‘European’ as opposed to
• Section 4 ultimately preserves ‘British’ human rights laws
Parliamentary sovereignty • Human rights laws can frustrate
executive actions especially in
• ‘Which of these rights, I ask, would immigration or security cases
we wish to discard?’ – Lord Bingham
What about
other • For Treaty law, the general ‘monist’ and ‘dualist’
rules apply.
international • BUT: there are certain rules of ‘customary’
international law which are part of UK law.
treaties, or • Increasingly global perspective of the legal system:
international Pinochet case (2000)
law?
• Do not confuse the European
Union with the European
Convention on Human Rights
or the Council of Europe.
• What does the EU do?
• Competences are set out in
Treaty on European Union and
Treaty on the Functioning of
the European Union
• ‘The Internal Market’: free
movement of goods, workers,
capital, services
• Limited common foreign and
security policy
• International trade
agreements
Types of EU Law
Council of Ministers:
European Court of Justice:
European Council: one of the primary legislative
Ultimate arbiter of the
heads of state/government bodies, the elected ministers
meaning of EU law e.g. via
meet every six months of each state meet in their
preliminary rulings
policy areas
Key EU institutions
What happens after Brexit?