Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Modelamiento Numérico en
Taludes de Roca
Javier Vallejos
Noviembre 2019
Required model size to minimize the influence from artificial boundaries (Sjӧberg, 1999)
(Hoek, 2012)
(Hoek, 2012)
• Modelo conceptual
• Modelo conceptual
• Modelo conceptual
c n tan
c tan
n
SRF SRF SRF
1
trial SRF c
c
atan 1 tan
trial SRF
3. El valor critico del factor es el máximo valor del SRF en el cual se logra la
convergencia en el análisis de esfuerzos. Si el SRF es mayor que el valor
critico, el modelo es inestable.
SRF=1.20
SRF=1.00
SRF=1.09
SRF=1.14
SRF=1.16
SRF=1.17
SRF=1.40
c = 4.2
5
4.6
4.4 kPa
kPa
4.3
3.6
f = 25.0˚
30˚
27.5˚
26.3˚
25.9˚
21.4˚
SRF
SRF=1.16
c = 4.4 kPa
f = 26.3˚
Finite difference analysis result using total unbalanced force magnitude as a stability indicator. (Dawson et al., 1999)
Non-converging models
Finite element analysis (PHASE2) result using maximum displacement as a stability indicator. (Diederichs et al., 2007)
Diploma de Postítulo en Geomecánica Aplicada al Diseño Minero
Método de reducción de resistencia al corte (SRF): modelo discreto/discontinuo
3DEC results of SSR analysis for composite model. Vertical lines bound the range of (SRF)
based on two possible failure criteria. Each point is averaged over several stochastic
simulations. (Diederichs et al., 2007)
SSR applied to toppling analysis using discontinuous deformation analysis. The critical SRF fro inter-block
friction and cohesion for this analyses is 1.24 (Diederichs et al., 2007)