Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Influence
Progress
GNH INDICATORS
Measurement
Influence
Policy Making
GNH POLICY SCREENING TOOLS
Policy Making
Represented by heterogeneous
panel to conduct policy review
1. Corruption
Will increase the Do not know the Will not have any Will decrease the
opportunity for effects on corruption appreciable effects on opportunity for
corruption corruption corruption
1 2 3 4
2. Trust
Will decrease the Do not know the Will not have any Will increase the
degree of trust effects on the degree appreciable effects on degree of trust
between people and of trust between the degree of trust between people and
government officials people and between people and government officials
government officials government officials
1 2 3 4
3. Economic security
Will result in a net Do not know the Will no not have any Will probably result in
decrease in economic differential effects on appreciable effects on a net increase in
security within the economic security economic security economic security
population within the population within the population within the population
1 2 3 4
4. Pollution
Will increase the Do not know the Will not have any Will decrease the
amount of pollution or effects on pollution or effect on pollution or amount of pollution or
degradation of the air, degradation of the air, degradation of the air, degradation of the air,
land or water land or water land or water n land or water
1 2 3 4
5. Leisure time
Will decrease Do not know the Will not have any Will increase
opportunities to spend effects on appreciable effects on opportunities to spend
time with family and opportunities to spend opportunities to spend time with family and
friends time with family and time with family and friends
friends friends
1 2 3 4
GNH Indices 18.02.2008 8/79
GNH Policy Screening Tools
6. Stress
Will increase levels Do not know the Will not have any Will decrease levels
of stress in the effects on levels of appreciable effects on of stress in the
population stress in the levels of stress in the population
population population
1 2 3 4
7. Culture
Will decrease the Do not know the
Will have no effect on Will increase
opportunity for people effect on opportunity
opportunity to learn opportunity to learn
to learn about or to learn about or
about or participate in about or participate in
participate in cultural participate in cultural
cultural practices and cultural practices and
practices and practices and
traditions traditions.
traditions traditions
1 2 3 4
8. Social support
Will decrease the Do not know the Will increase the
Will have no effect on
amount of social effect on the amount amount of social
amount of social
support available to of social support support available to
support available in
people in time of available in time of people in time of
time of needs
need. needs need.
1 2 3 4
GNH Indices 18.02.2008 9/79
GNH Policy Screening Tools
Life satisfaction
Survey question:
On a scale of one to ten, I consider
myself
Not a very Very happy
happy person person
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Happiness Happiness
Subjective happiness
Subjective happiness (scale
(scale 1-10)1-10) Causal factors for happiness
66
0 20 40 60 80
Percent
44 43
20
33 25 20 17 16 11
15
Financial security
Percent
Good family
10
Good health
Resources for farm production
Access to basic facilities
5
Personal development/education
Faith and spiritual pursuits
Employment and job satisfaction
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Good governance and welfare system
1%
40
5%
13%
Percent
Satisfied
30
Dissatisfied
10
Don't know
41%
0
3%
5% 1%
5%
Satisfied 10%
Fairly satisfied Normal well-being
Not very satisfied Some mental distress
34% 56% Dissatisfied Severe mental distress
Don't know
85%
Suicide Stress
Consideration of suicide ever Perception of stress
Perception of stress
before in lifetime during last year
Consideration of suicide ever before
4% 16% 19%
Very stressful
Somewhat stressful
Yes 23% Not very stressful
No Not at all stressful
42%
96%
Spirituality
Subjective level of spirituality
Spirituality
1%
3%
Very
36% Moderately
Not very
60% Not at all
Emotional experience
Negative emotions
Survey question:
During the past two weeks, how often have you experienced the following
emotions?
Anger Sadness Pride Envy
Often Often Often Often Often Often Often Often
Sometimes
Sometimes Sometimes
Sometimes Sometimes
Sometimes Sometimes
Sometimes
Emotional experience
Positive emotions
Survey question:
During the past two weeks, how often have you experienced the following
emotions?
Calmness Contentment Generosity
Often Often Often Often Often Often
Forgiveness Empathy/Compassion
Often Often Often Often
1% 3%
2% 17% 16%
31%
Not important Always
Important Sometimes
Very important Never
Don't know No such event
81% 51%
3% 4%
Percent
40
7%
24 More concerned
Stayed the same
20
9
5 3 3 Less concerned
Don't know
0
on
e ys ys ys y s
ow
N da da da da kn
1-
5 12 0 0 n'
t 85%
6- -2 >2 o
13 D
Astrologer Storytelling
Consultation of tsip for specific Storytelling to children
occasions
Consultation of astrologer Storytelling to children
Yes Yes
No No
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent Percent
Etiquette
Proper observation and practice of
Driglam Namzha by the youth today
Driglam Namzha practiced by youth
8%
Yes
32% No
60% Don't know
5% 4% 5%
16%
18%
Satisfied
Satisfied Neither nor
Neither nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied Don't know
73%
79%
77%
86%
15%
College degree 35%
47% Post graduation studies Yes
Lower qualification No
38%
65%
Traditional knowledge
Ability to recite any
Ability to recite any traditional lozey
traditional lozey
9%
7%
>2-3 full
15% At least 1 set
Parts of a few lozey
69% None at all
Traditional skills
Percentage of citizens having
basic skills in Zorig Chusum
Zorig chusum skills
30 Weaving
14 Painting
16 Carpentry
4 Carving
1 Sculpture
2 Casting
2 Blacksmithing
16 Bamboo works
0
12
Gold-/Silversmithing
13 Embroidery
1 Masonry
5 Leather works
Paper making
0 10 20 30
Percent
5% 1%
17% 23% 3%
Satisfied
Excellent/Very good Fairly satisfied
Good Not very satisfied
Fair/Poor 34% 56% Dissatisfied
Don't know
60%
5%6%
22% Underweight
Healthy weight
Overweight
Obese
67%
Smoking Alcohol
Current smoking Frequency of alcohol consumption in the
Smoking frequency
past 12 months
3% Frequency of alcohol consumption
1%
16% Daily Everyday 10
Occasionally 3-4 times a week 11
>1 year ago Twice a week 5
Never Once a week 4
79% 2-3 times a month 7
Once a month 4
Less than once a month 9
Never 50
0 20 40 60
Percent
10% 4%
7%
32% Hospital 25% 35%
BHU <0.5 hours
9% 0.5-1 hour
Tsip
Lama 1-3 hours
Choep >3 hours
Other
20%
22% 35%
Health system
QualityQuality
of medical staff
of medical staff
7%
6%
15% Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Don't know
73%
Volunteering Socializing
Volunteer hours in the past year Socializing with friends in the last
Volunteer hours month Socializing with friends
59
60
20 40 60
Percent
37
27 22
13
40
Percent
0
0 k th th th w
ee on on on o
rw kn
20
m m t m 't
9
12 10 10 pe a a
as on
es es nc
e
n
l D
tim tim O ti
w w No
Fe Fe
0
Life-work balance
Balance between paid work, unpaid work, and free
time (Percent of all activities
Life-work balance during an average day)
Life-work balance
4% 1%
5% Work
1%
7% 1%34%
1%
4% Personal care (incl. sleeping)
5%
7% 34% Sports/leisure/media
Social/cultural activities
Religious activities
47% Education/learining
47% Community participation
21%
30%
Common Trust
3%
Not common Distrust
55%
Don't know Don't know
15% 75%
20%
38% Independent
Trust 48% Not independent
9% Distrust
Don't know
Don't know
71% 14%
60
Percent 47
40
30%
Yes 21
20
No 11 9 8
3
70%
0
ne ys ys ys ys ow
No da da da da kn
5 12 0 0 t
1- -2 >2 n'
6- 13 Do
Yes 61 Yes 45
No 28 No 30
0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80
Percent Percent
Very strong 73
35%
Somewhat strong 22 Always safe
47%
Usually safe
Weak 3
Rarely safe
Don't know 2
0 20 40 60 80 19%
Percent
3% No 3
Neutral 5
Yes
No
Yes 92
97% 0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent
Trust Trust
Sense of trust in other
General trust people SenseSense
of trust in neighbours
of trust for neighbors
2%
4% 12%
25% Trust most of them
34%
People can be trusted Trust some of them
Need to be careful Trust a few of them
28%
Don't know Trust none of them
Don't know
71%
25%
Waste Waste
Increased production of waste Waste disposal during last 12 months
compared to previous year Waste disposal
Increased production of waste
73
Composting and burning
26
6% Municipal garbage pickup
14 Taken to landfill
Yes
8 Dumped in forest
No 6 Dumped on open land
42% 52%
Don't know 3 Dumped in rivers/streams
Other
7
0 20 40 60 80
Percent
1% 2%
11% 7%
Satisfied Satisfied
Not satisfied Not satisfied
Don't know Don't know
89% 91%
Soil conditions
Unusual flooding during the past
five years
Unusual flooding in past five years
5% 13%
Yes
No
Don't know
83%
Financial security
Debt to cash income ratio
Debt ratio to income Prospective change of financial
situation in next two years
No debt 78
Debt <50% of income 6
Prospective change of financial situaton
Debt 50-100% of income 7
12%
Debt 101-200% of income 5
4%
Debt >200% of income 4 Get better
Stay the same
0 20 40 60 80 56% Get worse
28%
Percent Don't know
60
3% 43
Percent
36
40
20
Yes 11 10
No
0
om om om om
s/r o s/r o s/r o s/r o
on on on on
97% ers ers ers ers
p p p p
1 2 3 >3
0- 1- 2-
Neither 8 Increased 55
Both 50 Decreased 12
0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80
Percent Percent
Acres planted
Change in planted acres
Number of acres planted
Increased 11
Decreased 13
Not applicable 10
0 20 40 60 80
Percent
Composite
Index
GNH INDEX
Alternatively,
xCI = w1xC1+w2xC2+…+wnxCn = wC·xC/n
Weighted mean, where weights are based on some system of preference.
Survey question:
Do you practice meditation
Distribution coefficient
1
.2 .4 .6 .8
.2 .4 .6 .8
D=0.29 D=0.83
0
0
0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1
Percent of population Percent of population
GNH Indices 18.02.2008 62/79
CLUSTER INDICES
Income 0.50
Ecology Perceived local air quality 0.93 0.93 0.86
Perceived local water quality 0.89 0.89 0.79
Perceived local land degradation 0.78 0.78 0.61
0.76
Health Life expectancy 0.69 N/A 0.69
Healthy days 0.83 0.84 0.70
Body Mass Index 0.79 0.81 0.64
0.68
Subjective happiness
Subjective happiness
Subjective happiness(scale
(scale 1-10)
1-10)
20
15
Percent
10
5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Happiness score
Rescaled Distribution
mean coefficient
1. Compassion 2. Calmness
3. Frustration 4. Selfishness
Rescaled Distribution
mean coefficient
Indicators Compassion
= 0.63 × 0.76 = 0.48
Calmness
= 0.55 × 0.72 = 0.40
Frustration
= 0.67 × 0.79 = 0.53
Selfishness
= 0.86 × 0.87 = 0.75
Rescaled Distribution
mean coefficient
Indicators Self-reported
spirituality = 0.84 × 0.88 = 0.74
Frequency of
praying = 0.67 × 0.71 = 0.48
Frequency of
meditation = 0.10 × 0.11 = 0.01
Consideration of
karma = 0.80 × 0.84 = 0.67
Rescaled Distribution
Indicators mean coefficient
Importance of traditions
= 0.90 × 0.91 = 0.82
Frequency of attending
cultural/social activities = 0.34 × 0.69 = 0.23
Rescaled Distribution
mean coefficient
Freedom of speech
= 0.67 × 0.67 = 0.45
Right to form
association = 0.72 × 0.77 = 0.55
Rescaled Distribution
mean coefficient
Trust in courts
= 0.88 × 0.88 = 0.77
Trust in media
= 0.95 × 0.95 = 0.90
Trust in neighbours
= 0.61 × 0.68 = 0.41
All 14.4%
1. The members of your family
really care about each other Most 23.6%
2. You wish you were not part of About half 9.2%
your family A few 29.3%
3. Members of your family argue None 23.6%
too much
* with whom you had contact
4. You feel like a stranger in your
in the past month
family
5. You have enough time to spend
3. Help available in time of
with your family
need
6. There is a lot of understanding
in your family Most of the time 53.8%
7. Your family is a real source of
Some of the time 39.2%
comfort
None of the time 7.0%
Rescaled Distribution
Indicators mean coefficient
* data from Bhutan National Human * data from Bhutan National Human
Development Report 2005 Development Report 2005
3. Applicability of education to
daily life
Agree 84.4%
Neutral 12.7%
Disagree 2.9%
Rescaled Distribution
Indicators mean coefficient
Adult literacy
= 0.54 N/A = 0.54
Combined primary,
secondary, tertiary enrolment = 0.63 N/A = 0.63
Applicability of education
to daily life = 0.91 × 0.91 = 0.83
Income*
Purchasing Power
Parity 2,060 USD
Rescaled
mean (logged)
No 77.5%
Yes 22.5%
Rescaled Distribution
mean coefficient
Perceived local
water quality = 0.89 × 0.89 = 0.79
Underweight 6.5%
Overweight 21.7%
Obese 4.5%
Rescaled Distribution
mean coefficient
Healthy days
= 0.83 × 0.84 = 0.70
Composite
Index
SAMPLE GNH INDEX = 7.04
GNH Index
2
Spirituality
Income
1.5
Trust
1
.5
Cultural
resilience
0
and people
• Providing indicators to sectors to guide development
• Allocating resources in accordance with the targets and GNH
screening tools