Você está na página 1de 63

COLD FORMED STEEL SECTIONS - II

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
1
COLD FORMED STEEL SECTIONS

 Introduction
 Design of axially compressed columns
Flexural Torsional buckling
Design for Combined bending and compression
Design of Tension members
 Design on the basis of testing
 Empirical methods
 Conclusion

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
2
INTRODUCTION
• Diversity of cold formed steel shapes and multiplicity
of purposes makes it a complex product

• Design of columns for axial compression,


compression combined with bending and flexural-
torsional buckling are discussed.

• Design procedures using prototype tests or empirical


rules are discussed in summary form.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
3
Axially Compressed Columns
• local buckling under compressive loading is an
extremely important feature.
• a compressed plate element with an edge free to
deflect does not perform as satisfactorily as a
similar element supported along the two opposite
edges
• determination of effective area (Aeff) is the first
• step in analysing column behavior
the ultimate load (or squash load) of a short strut is
Pc s = Aeff . fyd = Q. A. fyd

Q = the ratio of the effective area to the total area of cross section
at yield stress
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –
IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
4
Axially Compressed Columns - 2

In long column with doubly - symmetric cross


section, the failure load depends on Euler buckling
resistance and the imperfections present .

The failure load is ,

Pc 
1
2
  P   1   P
cs EY    Pcs   1    PEY  2
 4 Pcs  PEY 
 e  e
where   0.002   20  , for  20
 ry  ry
 

 0 , for e  20
ry

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
5
Axially Compressed Columns - 3

Q = 1.0
1.0

Q = 0 .9
Q = 0 .8
Q = 0 .7
pc / fy Q = 0 .6
Q = 0 .5
Q = 0 .4
Q = 0 .3

20 40 80 120 160 200


e / ry

Column Strength (non- dimensional) for different


Q factors

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
6
Axially Compressed Columns - 4

• Effective Shift of Loading axis

Effective section
Load point Load point neutral axis
Neutral e
axis s

A B A B

a) Channel section (b) The move of the neutral axis (due to plate
loaded through its buckling) causes an eccentricity es and a
centroid
consequent moment P. es . This would
cause an additional compression on

flange
Effective shift in the AB axis in an axially
loading
compressed column

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
7
Axially Compressed Columns - 5

• If a section is not doubly symmetric and has a


large reduction of effective widths of elements,
then the effective section may be changed
position of centroid. This would induce bending
on an initially concentrically loaded section
• The ultimate load is evaluated by allowing for the
interaction of bending and compression using
the equation
Pc  M c
Pult 
M c  Pc .es

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
8
Axially Compressed Columns - 6

• Torsional - Flexural Buckling

• Singly symmetric columns may fail either


a) by Euler buckling about an axis perpendicular
to the line of symmetry
b) by a combination of bending about the axis of
symmetry and a twist
• Purely torsional and purely flexural failure does
not occur in a general case.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
9
Axially Compressed Columns - 7

Position after
Flexural -
Torsional
buckling

Axis of symmetry  v

Original Shear centre


position

Column displacements during Flexural - Torsional buckling

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
10
Axially Compressed Columns - 8

• For sections with at least one axis of symmetry


(say x - axis) and subjected to flexural torsional
buckling , BS5950, Part 5 suggests that the
torsional flexural buckling load (in Newtons) of a
column , PTF

PTF 
1 

 PEX  PT    PEX  PT  2  4  PEX PT
2 
 1
2


where  2 EI x
PEX = 2
e

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
11
Axially Compressed Columns - 9

Torsional buckling load of a column ( in Newtons),


PT , given by

1  2 2
 E Γ 
PT   GJ  
r02  2 
 e 
2
 x0 
 is a constant given by   1   
 r0 

ro = polar radius of gyration about the shear centre

r0   rx2  ry2  x02  1


2

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
12
Axially Compressed Columns - 10

x0 is the distance from shear centre to the


centroid measured along the x axis (mm)
 J St Venants' Torsion constant (mm4)
bt3
= 
3
 warping constant for all section.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
13
Axially Compressed Columns - 11

• Torsion Behaviour

• Cold formed sections are mainly formed with


"open" sections and do not have high resistance
to torsion.
• The total torsion may be regarded as being made
up of two effects

        -St. Venant's Torsion or Pure Torsion


     -Warping torsion.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
14
Axially Compressed Columns - 12

• St.Venant's torsion produces shear stresses.


• Warping torsion produces in-plane bending of the
elements of a cross section.

• Cold formed sections they have very little resistance


to St. Venant's Torsion
• Short beams with ends restrained exhibit high
resistance to warping torsion
• The resistance to warping torsion becomes low for
long beams with ends restrained

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
15
Combined Bending and Compression
• Compression members subjected to bending will have
to be designed considering the effects of interaction

• The following checks are suggested for members


which have at least one axis of symmetry:

(i) the local capacity at points of greatest


bending moment and axial load and

(ii) an overall buckling check.


 

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
16
Combined Bending and Compression- 2

• Local Capacity Check


Fc Mx My
   1
Pcs M cx M cy

Fc = applied axial load


Pcs = short strut capacity defined by Aeff.Pyd
Mx , M y = applied bending moments about x and y axis
Mcx = Moment resistance of the beam about x axis
in the absence of Fc and My
Mcy = Moment resistance of the beam about y axis
in the absence of Fc and Mx.
  ©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –
IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
17
Combined Bending and Compression- 3

• Overall buckling check


For members not subject to lateral buckling, the
relationship to be satisfied is
Fc Mx My
  1
Pc  F   F 
Cbx  M cx  1  c  Cby  M cy  1  c 
 PEX   PEY 
For beams subject to lateral buckling, the following
relationship should be satisfied
  Fc Mx My
  1
Pc Mb  F 
Cby  M cy  1  c 
 PEY 

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
18
Combined Bending and Compression- 4

where  
Pc = axial buckling resistance in the absence
of moments
PEX, PEY = flexural buckling load in compression
for bending about the x- axis and for
bending about the y-axis respectively.
Cbx, Cby = Cb factors for moment variation about x
and y axis respectively.
Mb = lateral buckling resistance moment
about the x axis.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
19
Tension Members
• a member connected in such a way as to eliminate
any moments due to connection eccentricity, may
be designed as a simple tension member
• The tensile capacity of a member (Pt) is evaluated
from
Pt = Ae . P y
• When a member is subjected to both combined
bending and axial tension, the capacity of the
member should be ascertained as
Ft Mx My
   1
Pt M cx M cy

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
20
Tension Members - 2

Mx
 1
M cx
My
 1
M cy

where Ft = applied load 


Pt = tensile capacity
 
.
 

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
21
Design on the basis of Testing
• large variety of shapes and complex interactions make
it uneconomical to design members and systems
completely on theoretical basis
• ensure that the test set up reflects the in-service
conditions as accurately as possible.
• testing is probably the only realistic method of
assessing the strength and characteristics of
connections.
• there is a possibility that the tests giving misleading
information.
• testing by an independent agency is widely accepted
• the manufacturers provide load/span tables

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
22
Empirical Methods
• members such as Z purlins are sometimes
designed by time-tested empirical rules
• empirical rules are employed when
- theoretical analysis may be impractical or not justified
- prototype test data are not available
B

 B/5

Z Purlins t  L /45 

 L /60 

Z Purlins

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
23
Empirical Methods - 2
Empirical design rules for Z sections (BS 5950, Part 5 )

- overall depth should be greater than 100 t and not


less than L /45.
- overall width of compression flange / thickness
ratio should be less than 35
- Lip width should be greater than B /5

- Section Modulus ( W in kN and L in mm )

for simply supported purlins

for continuous or semi rigidly jointed purlins

WL
-

 cm 3
1400
       WL
 cm 3
1800

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
24
The net allowable wind uplift in a direction normal
to roof when purlins are restrained is taken as 50%
of the (dead + imposed) load.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
25
CONCLUSION
• A detailed discussion of design of elements made from
cold rolled steel
• The most striking benefits of all forms of light steel
framing are
 speed of construction
 ease of handling
 savings in site supervision
 elimination of wastage in site
 elimination of shrinkage and movement of cracks
 greater environmental acceptability
 less weather dependency
 high acoustic performance
 high degree of thermal insulation

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
26
Section Properties Calculation
PROBLEM 1

Analysis of effective section under compression

To illustrate the evaluation of reduced section


properties of a section under axial compression.
 
Section: 200  80  25  4.0 mm
 
Using mid-line dimensions for simplicity. Internal
radius of the corners is 1.5 t.
 
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –
IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
27
Effective breadth of web ( flat element )

h = B 2 / B1 = 60 / 180 = 0.33
76 60
15
4

200

180
196

6 mm
23 25

Mid-line 800
dimension Exact dimension

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
28
1.8 h
K1  7   1.43 h 3
0.15  h

1.8  0.33
 7   1.43  0.33 3
0.15  0.33

= 5.71

pcr = 185000 K1 ( t / b )2

= 521.7 N / mm2

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
29
f cr 240
  0.4  0.123
p cr   m 521.7  1.15

0.2
beff   f cr  
4
  1  14   0.35  
b    p cr   m   

 
0.2
  1  14 
4
0.4  0.35  0.983
 
or beff = 0.983  180 = 176.94 mm

Effective width of flanges ( flat element )

K2 = K1 h2 ( t1 / t2 )2

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
30
K2 = K1 h2 ( t1 / t2 )2

= K1 h2 (  t1 = t2 )

= 5.71  0.332 = 0.633 or 4 (minimum)

= 4
pcr = 185000  4  ( 4 / 60 )2 = 3289 N /mm2
fc 240
  0.063  0.123
p cr   m 3289  1.15

beff
 1
b

beff = 60 mm
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –
IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
31
Effective width of lips ( flat element)

K = 0.425 ( conservative for unstiffened elements)

pcr = 185000  0.425  ( 4 / 15 )2 = 5591 N /mm2

fc 240
  0.04  0.123
p cr   m 5591  1.15

beff
= 1
b
beff = 15 mm

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
32
Effective section in mid-line dimension

As the corners are fully effective, they may be included


into the effective width of the flat elements to establish
the effective section.
76 76

96.5
196

96.5
23 23

Gross Reduced
section section

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
33
The calculation for the area of gross section is tabulated
below:

Ai (mm2)
Lips 2 * 23 * 4 184
Flanges 2 * 76 * 4 608
Web 196 * 4 784
Total 1576

The area of the gross section, A = 1576 mm2

The calculation of the area of the reduced section is


tabulated below:

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
34
Ai (mm2)
Lips 2 * 15 * 4 = 120
Corners 4 * 45* 6 = 182.4
Flanges 2 * 60 * 4 = 480
Web 176 * 94 * 4 = 707.8
Total 1490.2

The area of the effective section , Aeff = 1490.2 mm2

Therefore, the factor defining the effectiveness of the


section under compression

Aeff 1490
Q    0.95
A 1576

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
35
The compressive strength of the member

= Q A fy / m

= 0.95  1576  240 / 1.15

= 313 kN

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
36
PROBLEM 2
ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVE SECTION UNDER BENDING

To illustrate the evaluation of the effective section modulus


of a section in bending.

We use section : 220  65  2.0 mm Z28 Generic lipped


Channel (from "Building Design using Cold Formed Steel
Sections", Worked Examples to BS 5950: Part 5, SCI
Publication P125)

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
37
Only the compression flange is subject to local
buckling.

Using mid-line dimensions for simplicity. Internal


radius of the corners is 1.5t.
55.08
63
10.04

210.08
220
218

15
14
65
Mid-line
Exact dimension
dimension

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
38
Thickness of steel(ignoring galvanizing),
t = 2 - 0.04 = 1.96 mm
Internal radius of the corners
= 1.5  2 = 3 mm

Limiting stress for stiffened web in bending


 D fy

p0   1.13  0.0019  py

 t 280 

and py = 280 / 1.15 = 243.5 N / mm2

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
39
 220 280  280
p0   1.13  0.0019  
 1.96 280  1.15
= 223.2 N / mm2

which is equal to the maximum stress in the compression


flange, i.e., fc = 223.2 N / mm2

Effective width of compression flange

h = B 2 / B1 = 3.8

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
40
1.4 h
K1  5.4   0.02 h 3
0.6  h
1.4  3.8
 5.4   0.02  3.8 3
0.6  3.8
= 3.08 or 4 ( minimum) = 4
2
 1.96 
pcr  185000  4     937 N / mm 2
 55.08 
fc 223.2
  0.24  0.123
pcr 937
0.2
beff   fc 
4

  1  14   0.35    0.998
b   pcr  

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
41
beff = 0.99  55 = 54.5

Effective section in mid-line dimension:

The equivalent length of the corners is 2.0  2.0 = 4 mm

The effective width of the compression flange = 54.5 + 2  4


= 62.5

31.2 31.2

y
218

Neutral axis of
Gross section
reduced section
14
63

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
42
The calculation of the effective section modulus is
tabulated as below:
Elements Ai yi(mm) Ai yi(mm3) Ig + Ai yi2
(mm2) (mm4)
Top lip 27.44 102 2799 448 + 285498
Compression 122.5 109 13352.5 39.2 + 1455422.5
flange
Web 427.3 0 0 1692171.2 + 0
Tension 123.5 -109 -13459.3 39.5 + 1467064
flange
Bottom lip 27.4 -102 -2799 448 + 285498
Total 728.2 -106.8 5186628.4

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
43
The vertical shift of the neutral axis is

 106 .8
y    0.15 mm
728.2
The second moment of area of the effective section is

Ixr = ( 5186628.4 + 728.2  0.152 )  10-4

= 518.7 cm4 at p0 = 223.2 N / mm2

or =
223.2  1.15
518.7   475.5 cm 4
at py = 280 / 1.15 N / mm2 280

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
44
The effective section modulus is,

475.5
Z xr   43.56 cm 3
 109  0.15
10

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
45
PROBLEM 3
Design a two span continuous beam of span 4.5 m subject to a
UDL of 4kN/m as shown in Fig.1.
6.5 kN/m

RA 4.5 m RB 4.5 m RC

Factored load on each span = 6.5  4.5 = 29.3 kN

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
46
Bending Moment

Two spans - 0.125 One span loaded


loaded 4 kN/m

4.5 m 4.5 m
1.25 0.375
0.375
0.625 -0.063
0.438

Coefficients for Reactions

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
47
Maximum hogging moment = 0.125  29.3  4.5 = 16.5 kNm

Maximum sagging moment = 0.096  29.3  4.5 = 12.7 kNm

Shear Force

Two spans loaded : RA = 0.375  29.3 = 11 kN

RB = 1.25  29.3 = 36.6 kN

One span loaded : RA = 0.438  29.3 = 12.8 kN

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
48
 Maximum reaction at end support, Fw,max = 12.8 kN

Maximum shear force , Fv,ma = 29.3 - 11 = 18.3 kN

Try 180  50  25  4 mm Double section ( placed back


to back)

180

6 mm
255
50 50

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
49
Material Properties : E = 205 kN/mm2
py = 240 / 1.15
= 208.7 N/mm2

Section Properties : t = 4.0 mm


D = 180 mm
ryy = 17.8 mm
Ixx = 2  518  104 mm4
Zxx = 115.1  103 mm3

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
50
Only the compression flange is subject to local buckling

Limiting stress for stiffened web in bending

 D fy 
p0   1.13  0.0019  py
 t 280 
and py = 240 / 1.15 = 208.7 N / mm2

 180 240 
p0   1.13  0.0019    208.7
 4 280 
= 219.3 N / mm2

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
51
which is equal to the maximum stress in the compression
flange, i.e.,

fc = 219.3 N / mm2

Effective width of compression flange

h = B2 / B1 = 160 / 30 = 5.3

1.4 h
K1  5.4   0.02 h 3
0.6  h
1.4  5.3 = 4
= 1.1 or 4 (minimum)
 5.4   0.02  5.33
0.6  5.3

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
52
2
 4 
pcr  185000  4     13155 N / mm 2
 30 

fc 219.3
  0.017  0.123
pcr 13155

beff
= 1
b
beff = 30 mm

i.e. the full section is effective in bending

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
53
Ixr = 2  518  104 mm4
Zxr = 115.1  103 mm3

Moment Resistance

The compression flange is fully restrained over the


sagging moment region but it is unrestrained over the
hogging moment region, that is, over the internal
support.

However unrestrained length is very short and lateral


torsional buckling is not critical.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
54
The moment resistance of the restrained beam is:
Mcx= Zxr py

= 115.1  103 ( 240 / 1.15) 10-6 = 24 kNm > 16.5 kNm

O.K

Shear Resistance

Shear yield strength,

pv = 0.6 py = 0.6  240 /1.15 = 125.2 N/mm2

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
55
2 2
 1000 t   1000  4 
Shear buckling strength, qcr =  =  
 D   180 

= 493.8 N/mm2
Maximum shear force, Fv,max = 18.3 kN

Shear area = 180  4 = 720 mm2

Average shear stress fv = 18.3  10 3


< 2 q cr
 25.4 N / mm
720
O.K

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
56
Web crushing at end supports

Check the limits of the formulae

D 180
  45  200  O.K
t 4
r 6
  1.5  6  O.K
t 4

At the end supports, the bearing length, N is 50 mm


(taking conservatively as the flange width of a single
section)

For c=0, N/ t = 50 / 4 = 12.5 and restrained section .

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
57
C is the distance from the end of the beam to the load or
reaction.

Use
Pw  2  t C7
2
f
γm
y
 8.8  1.11 N
t

D
C7  1  t
750
45
 1   1.06
750
Pw  2  4 2  1.06 
240
1.15
 8.8  1.11 
12.5 10 3

 89.8 kN  RA   12.8 kN   O.K

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
58
Web Crushing at internal support

At the internal support, the bearing length, N, is 100mm


(taken as the flange width of a double section)

For c > 1.5D, N / t = 100 / 4 = 25 and restrained


section.

Pw  2
t C5 C6
fy
γm
 13.2  1.63 N
t

fy 240
k   0.92
228  γm 1.15  228

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
59
C5 = ( 1.49 - 0.53 k ) = 1.49 - 0.53  0.92
= 1.0 > 0.6

C6 = ( 0.88 - 0.12 m )

m = t / 1.9 = 4 / 1.9 = 2.1

C6 = 0.88 - 0.12  2.1 = 0.63

 Pw  2  4 2  1  0.63 
240
1.15

13.2  1.63 
25 10 3

= 89.8 kN > RB ( = 36 kN)

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
60
Deflection Check

3
A coefficient of 384 is used to take in account of
unequal loading on a double span. Total unfactored
imposed load is used for deflection calculation.
3 W L3
 max 
384 E I av

I xx  I xr 1036  1036
I av    1036  10 4 mm 4
2 2
W = 29.3 / 1.5 = 19.5 kN

3 19.5  10 3  45003
 max   6.53mm
384 205  10 3  1036  10 4

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
61
Deflection limit = L / 360 for imposed load

= 4500 / 360 = 12.5 mm > 6.53 mm


O.K

 In the double span construction :

Use double section 180  50  25  4.0 mm lipped


channel placed back to back.

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
62
THANK YOU

©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures –


IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
63

Você também pode gostar