Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Bone Augmentation
• For dental implants to be successful, the jawbone
must have enough bone to support them. You may
not have enough bone because of tooth loss from
periodontal (gum) disease, injury or trauma, or a
developmental defect. If your jaw is too short (up
and down), too narrow (side to side), or both, you
will need a procedure to add bone to your jaw before
implants can be placed.
• Bone augmentation is a term that is used to
describe a variety of procedures that are used to
"build" bone so that dental implants can be
placed. These procedures typically involve
grafting (adding) bone or bonelike materials to
the jaw, and waiting for the grafted material to
fuse with the existing bone over several months.
• There are several different procedures that can
be used for bone augmentation. The dentist will
select a procedure depending on the type,
location and number of implants to be used. If it
needs a bone graft, it is important that the
patient and the dentist discuss all of the options
available.
• After a bone-augmentation procedure, the
dentists usually wait 6 to 12 months before
placing implants, although some dentists may
place them sooner.
Where Does the Bone Come From?
• Most bone-augmentation procedures involve the use of bone
grafts. The best material for a bone graft is our own bone,
which most likely will come from our chin or ramus (the back
part of the lower jaw). If the oral surgeon cannot get enough
bone from these areas, he may need to get bone from the hip
or shin bone (tibia) instead. The hip is considered to be a
better source because the hip bone has a lot of marrow (soft
tissue within the bone), which contains bone-forming cells.
• If the patient don't like the idea of having bone removed from
their body to be placed in their jaw, there are other options
available. The dentist can use materials made from the bone of
human cadavers or cows. There are also synthetic materials
that can be used for bone grafting. While most dentists prefer
using a person's own bone, possibly in combination with other
materials. The dentist and the patient should discuss their
options and their risks and benefits before any procedures are
done.
A Typical Bone-Augmentation
Procedure
osteogenesis. This procedure originally was used for lengthening the bones of patients
with abnormally short legs. It now has been adapted for use in the mouth. A surgeon
makes cuts in your jawbone to separate a piece of bone from the rest of the jaw. A
titanium device inserted into the jaw with pins or screws holds the piece of bone apart
from the rest of the jawbone. Over time, the space between the piece of bone and the
jawbone is widened slightly by unscrewing the device, and the area between the pieces
gradually fills in with bone. "Distraction" refers to the process of separating the two
pieces of bone, and "osteogenesis" refers to the forming of new bone. Distraction
osteogenesis is used more often to make the jawbone taller, but it can be used to
increase the bone in any direction. The procedure is becoming more common.
Nerve Repositioning
• A nerve called the inferior alveolar nerve runs through the
lower jaw. This nerve gives feeling to the lower lip and chin. In
patients who have lost significant amounts of lower jawbone,
it may not be possible to place implants without damaging this
nerve. To address this problem, an oral surgeon can drill a
small window in the bone and move the nerve to one side. The
implants then can be placed through the bony canal
previously filled by the nerve. This technique is not used very
often because it is possible to damage the nerve just by
moving it.
Case Report
• A 53-year-old female patient came to the Clinic
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Ribeirão
Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo,
Brazil, complaining of impairment of her
masticatory function associated with the
instability of the mandibular complete denture.
• The clinical exam revealed edentulism in both
arches, while the mandibular arch presented severe
reabsorption resulting in denture instability and
chronic trauma to the oral mucosa. The
radiographic exam showed a mandibular atrophy
class VI, according Cawood and Howell (12), that
made unpredictable any rehabilitation based on
osseointegrated implants.
• Figure 1. Panoramic radiograph exhibiting a
class VI Cawood and Howell (18) mandibular
resorption.
The treatment plan proposed consisted of 3 steps:
months later, these implants were exposed to the oral cav-ity using abutment
healings preserving the keratinized gingiva, and 3 weeks after that the patient
was referred to the prosthesist. Twelve months after the installation of the final