Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Setting
performance
Taking corrective standards
Communicating
standards
standards
Discussing Measuring
results standards
Comparing
standards
Methods of Performance Appraisal
- + - - -
B B + + -
+ - - +
+ - + + - -
C +
- + C +
Graphic or Linear Rating Scales
Attitude
0 5 10 15
20
No Careless: Interested Enthusiastic Enthusiastic
interest In-different in work: about job & opinions &
In work: Instructions Accepts fellow- advice
consistent opinions & workers sought by
complaine advice of others
rDecisiveness others
0 5 10 15 20
Criteria Rating
•Always regular
•Inform in advance for delay
•Never regular
•Remain absent
•Neither regular nor irregular
Forced Distribution Method
No.
of
10% 20% 40% 20% 10%
employee
s Poor Below Average Good Excellent
average
Staff Appraisal
Name . . . . . . . Job Title . . . . . . .
Department . . . . . . . . . . . . Date of Review . . . . . . .
Age . . . . . .. . Years in present job
Section I Appraisal Of Performance
Note to Appraiser
1.Appraisal must cover the period of the preceding 12 months
2.Consideration to every function & responsibility of the job
3.An objective factual assessment of an employee’s improvement or
deterioration
Leadership ^ ^
Communication ^ ^
Interpersonal skills ^ ^
Decision making ^ ^ ^
Technical skills ^ ^ ^
Motivation ^ ^ ^
Mgmt. By Objective (MBO) Process
Health (WCH)
Issues in Appraisal System
Formal and Informal
What methods?
Whose performance?
APPRAISAL
When to evaluate? Who are the raters?
DESIGN
What problems?
What to evaluate?
How to solve?
Constan
t check
induces
employ
ee to
perfor
m
better
Advantages
Disadvantages
Prepared By:
Richard B. Macwan &
Kuldipsinh A. Jadeja