Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
State Anambra Edo Niger Bayelsa Ebonyi Kwara Plateau Lagos Abia Nassarawa Taraba
Annual MT Produced (x1000) 627 545 535 459 435 425 345 300 265 248 111
Mean Yield (MT/HA) 11.8 12.1 7.3 15.3 15 14.2 12.8 12 16.9 9.9 9.3
Rank 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
WEAKNESSES The major constraints identified as affecting the production of cassava in Nigeria are: Land Tenure: Insecure land tenure may hamper the development of large-scale mechanized farming. Fragmentation of Cassava Farms: The ineffective Land Tenure system makes access adequate large farmland difficult, and in turn prevents large mechanized cultivation. Non-Mechanized Cassava Production, Harvesting, Processing and Preservation: Apart from a few hired tractors, cassava farming is generally done with crude farm implements. These constraints in planting and harvesting are, according to Nweke (2004), caused by the cost of mechanized machinery processing (peelers and dryers), resulting in low quality end products. Low Yields and Low Starch Content of Common Cassava Varieties: The current cassava production yield is not high enough to compete with other crops within Nigeria (e.g. maize), or with cassava products from other countries (e.g. Thailand). Poor Infrastructures: Infrastructure weaknesses throughout the country and in particular in rural areas adversely affect the cassava industry. The roads are bad and transportation costs of moving the cassava is high. Electricity and water are in short supply and communication links are also very poor. High Transportation Costs: Cassava is highly perishable with a shelf life of 2-3 days. Once harvested, it must be either consumed immediately or processed into more stable product forms. Urgent transportation needs mean higher transportation costs. In view of its limited shelf life, cassava processing should occur close to the production areas. Fluctuation in Market Prices: With informal marketing channels and poor information flow, cassava farmers are often unable to process the harvested roots and sell these at very low prices to middlemen who can reach the processors. Additionally, the supply of cassava greatly influences market prices - When cassava is scarce and the prices high, farmers increase production. The subsequent oversupply then lowers the market price and farmers plant less cassava, which results in fluctuating price cycles of approximately two to three years (Nweke et al, 1994; Ezedinma et al, 2005a). High Raw Material Costs: Inputs and other expenses make the cost of fresh cassava roots expensive and uncompetitive against competing countries. High Inputs Costs: High transportation costs increases the cost of fertilizers and other inputs. High Energy Costs: Poor public utilities like electricity, mean reliance on generator and diesel, increasing the total energy costs. Lack of Social Capital: Relationships within the Nigerian society are usually characterized by distrust. This short- term perspective often impedes lasting business relationships.
OPPORTUNITIES Government Policy: The present Governments protective duties on competing cassava imports and the mandated 10% use of cassava flour create an enabling cassava industry. Urbanization creates a demand for value added cassava products in the internal markets, especially in the bakery industries following the mandatory 10% inclusion of high quality cassava flour. Regional Markets: Seasonal opportunities exist in the regional markets for staple quality food products. By-products: Markets for by-products and wastes create opportunities for more integrated cassava systems. Production of Modified Starches: Processing starch into high value modified starches such as dextrin, offers further opportunities for domestic substitution and will position Nigeria as a key supplier in the regional market. Lowering Cassava Prices: Lower cassava tuber costs mean lower cost of food in Nigeria. The added benefit is that it makes the cassava industry more competitive. Rural Employment: In view of the high transportation costs and the limited shelf life, initial cassava processing should occur near production areas, and along with the expected employment opportunities in the petroleum business following the introduction of E10, will improve rural employment. Vertical Integration: New organizational arrangements within the food chain (e.g. clustering system, sales of intermediate cassava products to medium & large scale drying centers) offer opportunities for smaller farmers/processors to link to growth markets. Economies of Scale: Business opportunities exist for improved transportation services that take advantage of growing internal and regional trade in cassava products. Technology Development: Building a strong cassava processing industry will stimulate technology development. Savings in Foreign Exchange: Import substitution will reduce imports of products such as cornstarch and wheat flour, and will reduce the need to buy foreign exchange.
THREATS Smuggling: Building a strong industrial cassava sector requires at least a temporary set of tariffs on competing products. Such tariffs are only effective if smuggling will be prevented. A similar situation exists in the textile sector. Globalization of the International Market: Nigeria cassava products will face competition through increased imports of competitively priced cassava products. Temporary Gluts: A glut occurs when the prices are so low that farmers choose not to harvest their roots. It is generally a location specific problem that fuels price fluctuations. Unpredictable Changes in Government Policy: Through adequate governmental policies, cassava postharvest capacity can be developed. Should the reverse occur or following inconsistent implementation and lack of transparency, the industry will remain ineffective. HIV/AIDS: While HIV/AIDS is not yet a major problem in the country, the threat for the immediate future is likely to affect the availability of labor. Domestic Maize Prices: Domestic maize competes with cassava, as many industrial cassava products can also be made from maize. Pastoralist Clash: Clashes between cassava farmers and trespassing pastoralists may affect the supply of fresh roots. Poaching on Cassava Farms: Inadequate farm security results in theft. Corruption: Extortion and unnecessary roadblock delays increase the cost of doing business, as the drivers give bribes to avoid the cassava spoiling on route.
CASSAVA PROCESSING
In spite of its economic weakness, Sub-Saharan Africa is now developing small-scale, low cost cassava processing technologies that enable farmers produce high quality cassava-based staple foods. These technologies allow farmers add value to a perceived famine reserve crop by producing a higher quality product, allowing them expand sales in their existing markets and the creation of new market opportunities. Conversely, in Asia and Latin America, the industry employ state of the art processing technologies for their industrial production of starch, ethanol, cassava flour and animal feed (cassava pellets). These regions have also developed a viable subcontract processing market where large farms employ smaller firms normally at the farm gate level, to provide them with intermediary products like cassava chips.
SECONDARY PROCESSING
Processed Foods Bullions Textile Industry Pharmaceuticals Dextrin Paper & Wood Other modified Starches
Soups, sauces, sausages Garment Pills, capsules & syrups Furniture Other industries
Nigerian cassava production is by far the largest in the world; a third more than production in Brazil and almost double the production of Indonesia and Thailand.
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in Rome (FAO, 2004a) estimated 2002 cassava production in Nigeria to be approximately 34 million tonnes. Comparing the output of various crops in Nigeria, cassava production ranks first, followed by yam production at 27 million tonnes in 2002, sorghum at 7 million tonnes, millet at 6 million tonnes and rice at 5 million tonnes (FAO, 2004a).
By zone, the North Central zone produced over 7 million tonnes of cassava a year (1999 to 2002). South South produces over 6 million tonnes a year while the South West and South East produce just less than 6 million tonnes a year. The North West and North East are small by comparison at 2 and 0.14 million tonnes respectively (Table in next slide). On a per capita basis, North Central is the highest producing state at .72 tonnes/per person in 2002, followed by South East (.56), South South (.47), South West (.34), North West (.10) and North East (.01). National per capita production of cassava is .32 tonne/per person. Benue and Kogi state in the North Central Zone are the largest producers of cassava (IITA, 2004). Cross River, Akwa Ibom, Rivers and Delta dominate state cassava production in the South South. Ogun, Ondo and Oyo dominate in the South West and Enugu and Imo dominate production in the South East. Kaduna alone in the North West is comparable in output to many of the states in the southern regions at almost 2 million tonnes a year with very little currently produced, in the North East.
2000
4,993,380 6,268,114 5,384,130 2,435,211 7,116,920 165,344 26,363,099
2001
5,663,614 6,533,944 5,542,412 2,395,543 7,243,970 141,533 27,521,016
2002
5,883,805 6,321,674 5,846,310 2,340,000 7,405,640 140,620 27,938,049
Region South West South South South East North West North Central North East Average
Crops Millet Guinea Corn /Sorghum Groundnuts Beans Yams Cotton Maize Cassava Rice Melon Cocoyam Oil palm tree
2003/04 3,832.76 3,952.81 2,158.15 2,154.72 2,084.72 285.45 3,134.66 2,499.80 1,389.13 494.50 288.74 -
2004/05 3,835.58 3,956.71 2,152.96 2,153.51 2,060.80 307.37 3,209.20 2,570.25 1,454.57 532.52 296.81 -
2005/06 4,428.18 4,597.56 2,265.30 2,153.49 2,165.75 301.43 3,791.95 2,790.00 1,590.37 530.65 315.47 -
2006/07 4,270.00 4,578.00 1,666.00 3,098.00 1,696.00 222.00 4,670.00 2,659.00 1,526.00 200.00 513.00 -
2007/08 3,827.61 4,113.68 2,336.40 2,364.89 2,651.03 261.80 3,175.92 2,983.60 1,680.76 503.91 421.86 1,165.80
CHIPS
Chips are dried small regular shaped cassava product.
FLOUR
There are many processes used for producing cassava flour. They may involve all or some of the following unit operations- peeling of the roots (day of harvesting), washing, slicing or grating, pressing (immediately), Granulation, drying (sun or mechanical), milling, sieving, and storage. The flours produced have different properties and are used for various purposes.
FUFU Fufu is a fermented wet-paste from cassava and it is ranked next to garri as an indigenous food of most Nigerians in the South. The fermented cassava paste remained a common source of producing the cooked form of fufu until lately when the idea of dried fufu flour came into being. Apart from ease of preparation into the consumable form, dried fufu has the added advantages of having longer shelf life, convenience of storage and less bulky. When cooked, fufu is creamy/white smooth textured product. It is eaten as a main meal with soup or stew. When properly stored it has a shelf life of six months or more. GARRI Garri is a creamy-white, granular flour with a slightly fermented flavor and slightly sour taste. It is produced from cassava roots and eaten as a main meal with soup or stew. It is consumed as a drink with sugar and milk. When properly stored it has a shelf life of six months or more.
PELLETS
Production of pellets involves pressing chips, in an extruder, through a large die. The heat and moisture in chips helps in the formulation of a pellet shaped product.
226.93 131.16 192.37 284.42 239.74 220.53 213.76 136.13 168.59 56.47 123.16 148.16 162.06 136.43 166.91 324.17 345.50 356.13 409.15