Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
14-4
14-5
Risk Assessment
In theory, risk assessment is a scientific process leading to an objective, quantitative measure of the risks posed by any substance. The EPA and other agencies make a series of precautionary assumptions based on the fear that scientific data might understate risks to human health. Risks are often overstated to ensure that public health is protected with a margin of safety.
14-6
Hazard Assessment
Hazard assessment establishes a link between a substance and human disease. Animal testing is one method, with problems: Scientists rely heavily on strains of rats and mice genetically disposed to high rates of tumor production. In animals exposed to large amounts of a chemical, tumors can arise from tissue irritation rather than carcinogenesis. Animal physiology can be so different from humans that disease processes are unique.
14-7
14-8
Dose-Response Assessment
A dose-response assessment is a quantitative estimate of how toxic a substance is to humans or animals at increasing levels of exposures. For most chemicals, regulators use extrapolation from high doses to predict the effects on human populations at much lower doses. Linear-dose response rate The EPA makes the precautionary assumption that risk estimates should be based on the linear curve. Industry favors the use of sublinear and threshold models that support less regulation.
14-9
Exposure Assessment
Exposure assessment is the study of how much of a substance humans absorb through inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption. To make exposure assessments, researchers measure activities that bring individuals in contact with toxic substances. Regulators present their estimates as a distribution of individual exposures.
14-10
Risk Characterization
Risk characterization is an overall conclusion about the dangers of a substance. It is a detailed, written narrative describing the scientific evidence, including areas of ambiguity. Risk characterizations are built on scientific calculations of toxicity, potency, and exposure. The precision of risk characterizations are limited.
14-11
Risk Management
Control options
These are alternative methods for reducing most risks.
Legal considerations
Many environmental laws are specific about risk reduction required and methods of achieving it.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-benefit analysis is the systematic calculation and comparison of the costs and benefits of a proposed action. Cost calculations typically include such factors as:
Enforcement costs Capital and compliance costs to industry Potential job losses and inflation Reduced productivity such as lowered crop yields or the costs of substitution for a banned substance
14-13
14-14
Cost-benefit approaches compromise ecosystems deserving absolute, not conditional, protection. Benefits and costs of a program often fall to separate parties.
14-16
14-17
Command-and-Control Regulation
One cause of high pollution-abatement costs is heavy reliance on command-and-control regulation. Advantages
It enforces predictable and uniform standards. There is great equity in applying the same rules to all firms in an industry. It produces abatements and it comforts the public to know that the EPA is watching and regulating.
However, this approach can be inefficient and increase costs without commensurate increases in benefits.
14-18
Information disclosure
14-19
Voluntary Regulation
Another way that regulation is made more flexible is the voluntary program. When a company signs up for a voluntary program, there are often reporting requirements, but no enforcement actions are taken for failure to meet goals. Company motives for participating: Companies believe more regulation is imminent and want to prepare control strategies now. Nonregulatory pressures for companies to be environmentally responsible.
14-20
14-21
Concluding Observations
This chapter looked more deeply into the methods of regulations. New, more flexible, market-based approaches can be used to achieve environment-preserving goals. Much progress has been made in protecting both ecosystems and human health. The sum of regulatory activity and voluntary business action has been inadequate to avert climate change.
14-22