Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Alternative Approaches
to Valuation
Introduction to Valuation
Valuation critical in M&As
• Aids evaluation of acquisition candidates
• Helps to set goals and benchmarks
Framework essential to discipline valuation
estimates
• Comparables (Companies, Transactions)
• Discounted Cash Flow (Spreadsheet, Formula)
• Use of multiple methods offers differing
perspectives
Valuation should be guided by a business
economics analysis of the firm and its
environment
Chapter 9-2
Comparables Approaches
Comparables Analysis
• Use companies (or transactions) comparable in:
– Size and products
– Recent trends and future prospects
• Key ratios calculated for each company
• Key ratios are averaged for group
• Average ratios applied to absolute data for
company of interest
• Applying ratios yields indicated market values
• Valuation judgments are made
Chapter 9-3
Comparables Approaches
Advantages of comparables
• Common sense approach
• Marketplace transactions are used
• Widely used in legal cases, fairness evaluation,
etc.
• Allows valuation of private firms
Limitations
• May be difficult to find companies comparable
by key criteria
• Ratios may differ widely for comparables
• Different ratios may give widely different
results
Chapter 9-4
Comparable Transactions Example
Valuation based on companies involved
in similar merger transaction
May be difficult to find truly similar
transactions within relevant time period
Illustration of comparable transactions
for Exxon Mobil merger
• Average ratios suggest value of $56.8B
for Mobil (deal was for $71.4B)
• May not take into account synergies and
other unique factors
Chapter 9-5
Comparable Transactions Example
Comparable Transaction Ratios
Amoco Texaco Conoco Average
Total Paid/Sales 1.38 0.77 0.37 0.84
Total Paid/Book 3.00 2.79 2.29 2.69
Total Paid/Net Income 22.46 15.46 7.60 15.18
Premium Paid, % Target 22.3% 17.7% 0.0% 13.3%
Premium Paid, % Combined 7.7% 6.3% 0.0% 4.7%
Chapter 9-6
Comparable Transactions Example
Application of Valuation Ratios to Mobil
(Dollar Amounts in Billions)
Average Value of
Mobil Transaction Multiple Equity
LTM Sales $63.0 0.84 $53.0
Book Value $19.0 2.69 $51.2
LTM Net Income $2.9 15.18 $43.8
Market Value Target* $58.7 13.3% $66.5
Market Value Combined** $233.7 4.7% $69.6
Average = $56.8
* Value of equity = market value target x (1 + average premium paid, % target)
** Value of equity = market value combined x (1 + average premium paid, % combined)
- market value buyer
Chapter 9-7
Comparable Transactions Example
Previous results similar to those of advisory
investment banks
Comparables often fail to arrive at definitive
values – companies differ in:
• Revenue growth rates
• Growth of cash flows
• Riskiness (beta)
• Stage in the life cycle of industry or firm
• Competitive pressures
• Opportunities for expansion
• All of the above are difficult to assign a ratio
for appropriate comparable valuation
Chapter 9-8
Capital Budgeting Decisions
Process of planning expenditures whose
returns extend over a period of time
An acquisition is fundamentally a capital
budgeting problem: negative NPV
mergers do not make sense (usually)
n CFt n It
NPVo = ∑ −∑ where :
t =1 (1 + k ) t =1 (1 + k )
t t
Present Value of Incemental Cash Flows S Current Stock Price $40 million
Chapter 9-11
DCF Spreadsheet Methodology
Procedure
• Historical data for elements of financial
statements are presented for 5 to 10 years
• Financial analysis is performed to determine
ratios and patters
• Analysis of business economics of industry
• Based on analysis, relevant cash flows are
forecast
• Cash flows are then discounted to obtain
present values
• These present values are summed to arrive at an
Net Present Value (NPV)
Chapter 9-12
DCF Spreadsheet Methodology
Advantages
• Spreadsheets allow great flexibility in
projections
• Expresses calculations in recognizable financial
statements
Disadvantages
• Projected numbers may create the illusion that
they are “actual” numbers
• May have a disconnect between business logic
and projections
• Complexity of spreadsheets may obscure
important driving factors
Chapter 9-13
DCF Spreadsheet Methodology
Example: Basic Valuation of a Target
1 2 3 Terminal
1 Before-tax cash flows (Xt) 240 288 346 346
2 Less: Taxes at 40% (T) 96 115 138 138
3 After-tax cash flows [Xt(1-T)] 144 173 207 207
4 Less: Investments (It) 120 144 173 0
5 Free cash flows [Xt(1-T)-It] 24 29 35 207
Chapter 9-14
Cost of Capital
Cost of equity
• Yield on equity must be greater than bond yield
(usually by 3 to 5 percent)
• Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is most
widely used
– Required return=risk return+risk component
Cost of equity = R f + β ( Rm − R f )
– Rf = risk free rate = usually return on long-
term US government bonds
– Rm-Rf = market equity premium = usually
long-term market return less risk free rate
– Beta = measures return on stock vs. market
return Chapter 9-15
Cost of Capital
Cost of debt
• Should be calculated on after-tax basis to
reflect deductibility of interest payments
• After-tax cost of debt = kb(1-T)
– T = corporate tax rate
– kb = pre-tax cost of debt
• Determining before tax-cost of debt
– Weighted average of yield to maturity of
publicly traded bonds
– Find bond rating of firm and associated yield
Chapter 9-16
Cost of Capital
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
• First, determine the appropriate capital structure
of firm
– Should consider book ratios, market value
ratios, and industry comparables
– Target financing proportions should reflect
best judgment of firm’s financial structure in
the future
• Apply financing proportions (B/V, S/V) to cost
of equity (ks) and cost of debt (kb[1-T])
• WACC = k = kb(1-T)(B/V)+ks(S/V)
Chapter 9-17
Capital Structure
A critical element in WACC
The use of debt
• Interest deductibility encourages debt financing
• But high debt levels increase risk of financial
distress, cause higher bond ratings, and increase
cost of debt
Leverage and the firm’s beta
• High leverage increases firm’s levered beta
• Equation calculates target leverage ratio (B/S)
based on a target levered beta (ße), starting from
the firm’s unlevered equity beta (ßu) (business risk
of firm) B(1 − T )
• β e = β u 1 +
S Chapter 9-18
Capital Structure
Figure 9.1
Effects of Bankruptcy Costs and Taxes on the Cost of Capital
Percent
k e with bankruptcy costs
(1-T )k b
B
S
Optimal Capital Structure Chapter 9-19
Formula Methodology
Formula method is simply a compact
expression of spreadsheet method
• Both use discounted cash flow analysis
• Formula approach helps focus on underlying
drivers of valuation
Key variables and relationships
• Revenues (Rt) – basic driver of firm value
• Growth rate (g) – rate of change in revenues
• Net operating income margin (m) – revenues
less COGS, selling, general and administrative
expenses, depreciation expenses
• Actual tax rate (T)
Chapter 9-20
Formula Methodology
Key variables and relationships
• Investment (It) – change in total capital
(working capital and fixed assets) over previous
period (as a ratio of revenues)
• Number of periods of supernormal growth (n) –
period when firm expects to maintain a
competitive advantage
• Cost of capital (k) – based on determination of
appropriate WACC
• Best judgment may be that terminal period
variables will differ from supernormal period
values
Chapter 9-21
Formula Methodology
Formulas for Free Cash Flow Valuation of a Firm
No growth:
R0 [m(1 −T )]
V0 = for k >0
k
Constant growth:
R0 (1 +g ) [m(1 −T ) −I ]
V0 = for k >0
k −g
n
(1 +g ) t R0 (1 +g ) n [m(1 −T )]
V0 = R0 [m(1 −T ) −I ] ∑ +
t =1 (1 +k ) t
k (1 +k ) n
n
(1 +g s ) t R0 (1 +g s ) n [m(1 −T ) −I c ] (1 +g c )
V0 = R0 [m(1 −T ) −I s ] ∑ + ⋅
t =1 (1 +k ) t
(1 + k ) n
( k −g c ) Chapter 9-22
Formula Methodology
Sensitivity analysis
• Easily executed using formula methods
• Can check range of alternative
possibilities
Variable Valuation effect of increasing
g +
I –
m +
k –
n +
T – Chapter 9-23
Formula Methodology
Limitations of the formula approach
• Less flexibility in reflecting forecasts for
individual years
• Calculations use financial statement data not
directly shown in the formulas
• More difficult to pinpoint calculation errors
than the spreadsheet approach
• In many cases, the second term or terminal
value will represent the bulk of a firm’s
valuation – practitioners must be careful with
assumptions impacting this term
Chapter 9-24