Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Corrections after review done by Janne Kaasalainen (COO RA GERD BSC RRM&L3 RRM Dev FI)
Approved by Sebastian Lasek Update according to the final Implementation Specification (v.1.0-1) Update with minor changes before enabling Update according to open points from enabling in Espoo (Oct 2008)
2.1
2.2 2.3
11.07.2008
13.10.2008 25.11.2008
The basic BSC S14 software release will be compatible with Talk Family DF7 BTS
software release
BSC SW release S13 will be the last compatible software level for the former Nokia
InSite BTS SW, so no support of BSS14 is foreseen
BSS
BSC
DX200 Platform
Release
BSS14
S14
CX7.0
CXM7.0
BTS InSite
NetAct
SGSN
MSC
RAN
MS
Release
EP3.0
OSS5.2
DFCA overview
DFCA gives remarkable Capacity and Performance Gains, mainly due to: Interference control and Specific frequency plan on the fly @ the TSL level optimal from all
connections perspective Serving every connection with only required C/I to maintain a specific QoS
DFCA
TRX 1 TRX 2 TRX 3 TRX 4 BCCH
Cyclic FH over individually selected frequency lists and MAIOs for each connection
Accurate interference control (C/I estimations) Each connection is assigned with the most suitable radio channel (MA list, MAIO, TSL)
BSS synchronisation BSC information exchange Cyclic frequency hopping DFCA Algorithm uses comprehensive statistical data for channel selection process: Real time information Near real time information Non real time information DFCA algorithm assigns the radio channel for each individual connection with: Mobile Allocation (MA) Mobile Allocation Index Offset (MAIO) Radio Timeslot (TSL) Training Sequence Code (TSC) Power level in uplink and downlink BSC with DFCA Algorithm BSC-BSC Link
Goal is to provide a radio channel with sufficient C/I that depends on the type of the connection (i.e. meet different QoS requirements for FR, HR, AMR)
C
I
I
BTS12 BCCH 115 BSIC 22
C
BTS1 BCCH 74 BSIC 30
C C I
Missed update 0 --Status ok ---
Calculate BIM scaling factor Pick TSL, MA and MAIO Incoming DL&UL CIR estimation + TX pwr setting
Outgoing DL&UL CIR estimation Determine CIR difference for this TSL, MA and MAIO
All checked
Yes
No
Block
Determine TSC
The BIM scaling factor is used to correct the statistical C/I values of BIM tables to better correspond the users actual situation The scaling factor is mainly affected by the distance of the user from the serving BTS
Reported C/I 8 dB 12 dB 12 dB 15 dB 19 dB 20 dB
BIM C/I 4 dB 7 dB 9 dB 11 dB 15 dB 15 dB
C/I 4 dB 5 dB 3 dB 4 dB 4 dB 5 dB 4 dB
1. Determine if co- or adjacent channel is being used in the cells listed in incoming BIM by using the DFCA tables
2. Calculate the real C/I caused by each of the ongoing interfering connections.
For the directly measured neighbouring cells the measured C/I is used For the unmeasured ones the incoming BIM value is used scaled with the BIM scaling factor In case of adjacent channel interference +18 dB offset is used The power reductions in the interfering connections are taken into account when the real C/I is determined
4 dB 7 dB 9 dB 10 dB 11 dB 11 dB 14 dB 15 dB 15 dB
102, 36
18 dB
Adj Co Co Co Adj Co
32 dB
14 dB
14 dB
20 dB
14 dB
2 dB
25 dB 18 dB 37 dB
14 dB 14 dB 14 dB
7 dB 0 dB 19 dB
26 dB
14 dB
8 dB
3. The most restrictive C/I is identified (18 dB in this case) The initial DL power reduction is determined so that as a result the connection will be operating in it's C/I target 4. The C/I difference after power reduction is calculated and the lowest C/I difference is stored
MS Measurement report
BCCH, BSIC C/I
DL pwr reduction 18 dB - 14 dB = 4 dB
8 dB 12 dB 12 dB 15 dB 19 dB 20 dB
Incoming DL
Outgoing DL
1. Determine if co- or adjacent channel is being used in the cells listed in outgoing interference BIM by using the DFCA tables 2. Calculate the real C/I caused by each of the ongoing interfering connections.
The incoming UL C/I estimations are always based on the statistical C/I values presented in the outgoing interference BIM table and scaled with the BIM scaling factor.
6 dB 8 dB Adj 40 dB 14 dB 26 dB 9 dB Co 13 dB 14 dB -1 dB 10 dB 14 dB 14 dB 14 dB 30 dB 3 dB 7 dB
-1
Outgo. DL
Outgo. UL MIN
14 dB 14 dB
26 dB 20 dB
The power reductions in the interfering connections are taken into account when the real C/I is determined DL Measurement report
3. The most restrictive C/I is identified (13 dB in this case) The initial UL power reduction is determined so that as a result the connection will be operating in it's C/I target
BCCH, BSIC
C/I
UL pwr reduction
13 dB - 14 dB = 0 dB*
10 dB 0 dB 10 dB 0 dB 2 dB 4 dB 10 dB
4. The C/I difference after power reduction is calculated and the lowest C/I difference is stored
MIN C/I diff DFCA RR table Incom. DL 0 Incom. UL -1 Outgo. DL -2 Outgo. UL MIN DFCA adj.-channel lookup table
1. Interfered connections and interference type as determined in incoming UL interference check 2. Calculate the real C/I caused to each of the interfered ongoing connections.
If the C/I caused by cell 100,01 can be determined from measurement reports in DFCA RR table then the measured C/I is used For the unmeasured ones the outgoing BIM value is used scaled with the BIM scaling factor of the interfered connection In case of adjacent channel interference +18 dB offset is used
6 dB 8 dB Adj 27 dB 14 dB 13 dB 9 dB Co 19 dB 20 dB -1 dB 10 dB 16 dB 14 dB 14 dB 20 dB -2 dB 4 dB
16 dB 14 dB
26 dB 9 dB
DL pwr BIM scaling Measured C/I for cell 100,01 C/I target reduction factor
The power reductions in the interfering connections as well as in the DL of the serving connection are taken into account when the real C/I is determined
DL Measurement report
BCCH, BSIC C/I
3. The calculated C/I is then compared to the C/I target and a C/I difference is calculated. The lowest C/I difference is stored
8 dB 12 dB 12 dB 15 dB 19 dB 20 dB
6 dB 0 dB 8 dB 10 dB 8 dB
+3 +6 +10 -2 +7
11 dB 15 dB
108, 12 102, 36
0 dB 4 dB
+4 +3
16 dB not measured 14 dB
20 dB
1. Interfered connections and interference type as determined in incoming DL interference check 2. Calculate the real C/I caused by each of the ongoing interfering connections.
The statistical C/I from the incoming BIM table is used and scaled with the connection specific BIM scaling factor that is listed in DFCA RR table In case of adjacent channel interference +18 dB offset is used
102, 23 114, 52 104, 12 115, 30 101, 52 116, 32 103, 06 108, 12 111, 43 102, 36
4 dB Adj 15 dB 14 dB 7 dB 9 dB Co 14 dB 14 dB 10 dB 11 dB 11 dB Co 9 dB 14 dB 14 dB Co 20 dB 20 dB 15 dB Adj 41 dB 16 dB 15 dB 18 dB Co 11 dB 14 dB 18 +3 +0 - 10 = 11
Incom. UL - 1 0 dB
Outgo. DL - 2
Outgo. UL MIN
-5 -5
-5 dB 0 dB 25 dB
-3 dB
The UL power reductions in the interfering connections as well as in the UL of the serving connection are taken into account when the real C/I is determined
DL Measurement report
BCCH, BSIC C/I
10 dB 2 dB 0 dB 0 dB 4 dB 10 dB
+3 +7 -2 +6 +4 +3
14 dB 14 dB 14 dB 20 dB 16 dB 14 dB
3. The calculated C/I is then compared to the C/I target and a C/I difference is calculated. The lowest C/I difference measures the quality of the evaluated DFCA assignment
8 dB 12 dB 12 dB 15 dB 19 dB 20 dB
The minimum C/I differences of all calculated channel possibilities are examined and the channels with 0 or higher C/I difference are possible candidates for assignment
If all C/I differences are negative, then the channels where soft blocking limit has not been broken are possible candidates for assignment
BCCH
CS, PS, SDCCH, DTM
Regular DFCA
CS
DFCA
Outside the busy hour, spectrum is wasted because it can not be dynamically
refarmed to the DFCA layer
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
BCCH Band
DFCA Band
Regular Band
2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 5 7 9 11 EFL (%) DFCA DFCA-3 DFCA-6 RF 1/1 RF 1/1-3 RF 1/1-6 13 15 17 19
45% DCR improvement 15% DCR improvement REFERENCE
With 3 spots (17% of the frequencies) carved to make room for Regular TRXs, DFCA improvement in terms of DCR (at the same traffic volume) drops from 45% to only 15%
Feature Details
Regular DFCA
CS
In BSS 14.0 PS on DFCA TRX SDCCH on DFCA TRX No need for regular TRX
BCCH
CS, PS, SDCCH, DTM
DFCA
Modifications: DMAL handling TRP & BFG modification PS allowed in DFCA TRX (allowed in PCU2 only) - DFCA use the same algorithm as currently to assign frequency for PS territory however: Entirely based on BIM entries, i.e. DL Measurement Reports (MR) are
not used All TSLs belonging to the territory are assumed to be in use all the time No Initial Power Reductions Introduces new parameters GRPS C/I targets (CIGP) GPRS soft-blocking C/I threshold (SBGP)
SDCCH allowed in DFCA TRX DTM allowed in DFCA TRX Pre-emption is allowed on DFCA TRX. Pre-emption is started with existing rules except that proper candidate can be searched from regular and also DFCA TRX (no need for ranking due to C/I). Two different hopping modes are not allowed in one BTS
ASS CMD on BCCH only -> 1 I-frame ASS CMD on DFCA -> 2-3 I-frame Shorter ASS CMD better accessibility
Since operators using TRP=1 disagreed to change their policy it was requested
to have with DFCA the option to prefer TCH from BCCH TRX Moreover with BSS14.0 there is no need for regular TRX thus no need to prefer TCH allocations between regular and BCCH TRXs
Search started from DFCA TRX for AMR users and from BCCH TRX for non-AMR users
BFG parameter for preferring GPRS area between BCCH TRX and non-BCCH
TRXs within regular TRXs was changed to prefer GPRS area between BCCH TRX and DFCA TRX (when DFCA TRX is configured for PS use in BTS). GPRS area is preferred according to BFG parameter: no_pr_c = 0 No preference for GPRS area. yes_c = 1 GPRS area allocated primarily from the
BCCH TRX.
no_c
=2
City 1
55 km
wide apart, it is not allowed to allocate different frequency schemes between the cities, although those cities do not interfere each other at all. On the other hand, in some networks, sometimes it may be necessary to allocate different frequency bands in different cities. The DFCA feature in any BSC has no knowledge about interfering DMALs if the frequency allocation rules are not followed.
The same disadvantage may appear also in a case of frequency plan change in a network when the old plan have 'conflicting' DMALs against the new plan. The root cause for the frequency allocation rules with DFCA is derived from the nature of cyclic frequency hopping. DFCA can estimate interference only if DMALs are defined in a regular manner, and interfering timeslot collisions are constant between DMALs. DMALs of different lengths would lead to pseudorandom collision probability and to cope with such irregular DMAL plan would multiply the complexity of DFCA interference estimation algorithm.
New DFCA MA list Usage parameter indicates if the DFCA MA list can be used for CS or/and PS. Restrictions: Only one DFCA MA list that is used for PS use can be attached to BCCH BTS.
Attaching DFCA MA lists to non-BCCH BTSs is not limited by usage and up to 32 DFCA MA lists can be attached.
2)
3) 4)
5)
6)
8)
9)
If all TSLs cannot be upgraded due to C/I soft blocking (SBGP) or because theres CS connection in own segment C/I blocking TSL is marked as planned GPRS territory and it is also marked as reserved channel in RR table. Forced intra cell handover is started to move CS connection in own segment to use different MA MAIO TSL combination and so allowing next TSL to be upgraded for GPRS use.
TSL 5 is the candidate for GPRS territory upgrade If C/I for this TSL is below softblocking threshold GPRS territory is not upgraded TSL 5 is marked as the planned GPRS territory. This causes that new connections avoid to allocate TSL 5 (in serving cell and surrounding cells) with the wanted frequency parameters. Only one TSL can be market as the planned at time, to avoid reserving unnecessarily frequencies. After 5 sec. (the default value of upgrade guard time) upgrade is tried again. Now it is possible that quality already allows the upgrade. If the wanted TSL, MA, MAIO combination is reserved in own cell then intra cell handover is performed (for neighbouring cells no intracell HO; only marking and waiting is done).
Forced handover is started for CS connection if it is using the TSL that is wanted for GPRS upgrade .
If C/I for this TSL is above softblocking threshold, forced HO due to GPRS is performed
Once the TSL 4 is freed DFCA allocates the same MAIO, MA and TSC as for the other TSLs within GPRS territory and performs upgrade
With DFCA forced handover is also triggered in a situation when the same MA MAIO TSL that is needed for GPRS upgrade is used for CS connection on another DFCA hopping TRX.
In case of Downlink Dual Carrier DFCA allocates channel in the same way as in case of territory upgarde to new TRX
3)
All static SDCCH resources from BCCH TRX are used before SDCCH allocations are made for DFCA TRX. When all static SDCCH channels on BCCH TRX are occupied, search continues from DFCA TRXs. DFCA makes C/I calculation for every static SDCCH TSL that is not completely full on DFCA TRX(s). Hopping parameters are selected with the current DFCA algorithm when the first SDCCH subchannel is allocated in the SDCCH TSL. For the need of DFCA algorithm new parameters are introduced
When all configured SDCCH channels are used, RRM can reconfigure free TCH TSL on DFCA TRX for SDCCH use When selecting TSL for dynamic SDCCH on DFCA, TRX with least SDCCH TSLs configured is preferred. Existing rules with maximum amount of SDCCH channels on TRX are appliedd ie. :
2 SDCCH TSLs (16 SDCCH subchannels) per TRX 3 SDCCH TSLS on BCCH TRX and 4 on non BCCH, with "Increased Dynamic SDCCH capacity" feature (BSS12 ED2.1)
Then MA, MAIO allowed for CS use and TSL with best C/I is selected. TSC is also selected.
When DTM connection is for DFCA TRX, DFCA PS hopping parameters (that was selected for GPRS territory on GPRS DFCA TRX) are used When DTM CS connection is setup or released, PS connection is reestablished and therefore C/I is recalculated for that connection using CS value in setup and PS value in release for C/I target, C/I soft blocking is not checked. If DTM CS connection is at the border of a GPRS territory and territory is downgraded, there is a special situation where DTM CS connection on GPRS territory changes to CS connection. CS connection continues using already defined hopping parameters (even if they are for PS only use) for that connection.
Description
Soft Blocking C/I GPRS (dfcaGprsConnection_softBlockingCi), this parameter sets the minimum acceptable C/I value for GPRS and EGPRS data connections. Special value -20 is used to deactivate soft blocking due to C/I.
Soft Blocking C/I SDCCH= -20 object: unit: range: default: BSC dB -20..43 (step 1) -20
Soft Blocking C/I SDCCH (dfcaSdcchConnection_softBlockingCi)) , this parameter sets the minimum acceptable C/I value for SDCCH connections. Special value -20 is used to deactivate soft blocking due to C/I.
The values of above parameters shall be equal to or lower than the corresponding C/I target values.
Description
C/I target for GPRS (dfcaGPRSConnection_ciTarget) , this parameter sets the target C/I value for GPRS and EGPRS data connections. When territory is upgraded for GPRS, RRM uses C/I target for GPRS parameters.
C/I target SDCCH=14 object: unit: range: default: BSC dB 0..63 (step 1) 14
C/I target for SDCCH (dfcaSDCCHConnection_ciTarget) , this parameter sets the target C/I value for SDCCH connections on DFCA layer.
The values of above parameters shall be equal to or greather than the corresponding C/I softblocking values.
Description
DFCA MA List Group ID (dfcaMAListGroupId) , this parameter indicates group id of DFCA MA list so that frequencies can be reused on DFCA MA lists of different groups. This way different sets of DFCA MA lists can be done for locations with different need that are apart from each other.
DFCA MA List usage (dfcaMAListUsage) , this parameter indicates the usage of DFCA MA list that can be defined for CS use, PS use or CS and PS use.
Grouping is implemented for DFCA MA lists. Group id is defined for each DFCA MA list and adjacent frequencies will be searched only from DFCA MA lists within the same group id. Same frequency can be reused in different DFCA MAL groups, but can exist only once within group. Only one DFCA MA list that is used for PS use can be attached to BCCH BTS. When upgrading from older release without group id or if feature state of the license SDCCH and PS Data Channels on DFCA TRX is OFF, for all DFCA MA lists group id must be automatically set to 1 and DFCA MA List usage to CS and PS.
Description
Prefer BCCH Frequency GPRS (preferBCCHfreqGPRS2), this parameter defines whether the DFCA TRX or other TRXs is preferred in GPRS channel allocation. 0 (no prioritisation is determined between TRXs), 1 (GPRS channels are allocated primarily from the non DFCA TRX), 2 (GPRS channels are allocated primarily from DFCA TRX) TRX Priority In TCH Allocation (trxPriorityInTchAlloc) , this parameter defines whether DFCA or non-DFCA TRX is preferred in TCH channel allocation. 0 = search started from DFCA layer but if there is no measurement results allocation starts from BCCH TRX 1 = search started from non DFCA layer 2 = search started from DFCA layer 3 = Search started from DFCA layer for AMR users and from regular layer for non-AMR users
When PS and SDCCH are allowed for DFCA TRX there is no more reason to configure extra non DFCA TRXs. Without changing functionality of those parameters those parameters are useless with DFCA, as currently parameters works only between BCCH TRX and extra regular TRXs. When PS is allowed for DFCA TRX it is also possible that operators want to prefer DFCA or BCCH TRX either for data or speech. These parameters makes possible to define priority between BCCH TRX and rest of the TRXs in the BTS. Some cases it is reasonable to prefer BCCH TRX for speech e.g. for EFR users as BCCH TRX quality is more constant, it does not change so much according to the load of the network, where as AMR can better adapt to the quality change of non BCCH TRXs, with the link adaptation.
All existing C/I related counters for DFCA measurements: DFCA C/I target DL/UL (-15..+20) incoming DL/UL C/I relative to C/I target Most interfered C/I target UL/DL (-15..+20) - outgoing worst interfered DL/UL(C/I
relative to C/I target
were enhanced with the new connection types: SDCCH PS data Analogous measurements for SAIC capable MSs were enhanced as well
Soft Block DFCA assignments due to C/N Primary DFCA algorithm attempts Secondary DFCA algorithm attempts
were enhanced with the new connection types: SDCCH PS data Analogous measurements for SAIC capable MSs were enhanced as well
Activation/ deactivation
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
2)
Expected benefits
SNIR [dB]
MCS-1 DBS-11
DBS-5 DBS-12
DBS-6
DBS-7
DBS-8
DBS-9
DBS-10
DFCA offers better quality and therefore throughput is higher. This implies shorter LLC delay reduction and lower TBF blocking (due to faster transmison PDCHs are occupiated shorter)
Improved FER
Improvement
RFH
DFCA PS
DFCA PS CoChannel
Much less FR
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 7,5 12,0
Improvement
23,0
RFH
DFCA PS
DFCA PS CoChannel
RFH
DFCA PS
DFCA PS CoChannel
15
10 5
DFCA Co Channel is a variation where all intra cell co-channels are reallocated prior to any upgrades. The alternative is to leave them there (if any) and do not allow the upgrade to take place. The former causes a bit more HO overhead, the latter makes upgrades harder to happen
7,5
12,0
20,0
23,0
RFH
DFCA PS CoChannel
Less TSLs
20
2,50 2,00 1,50 1,00 0,50 0,00 7,5 12,0 14,0 17,0 20,0
23,0
DFCA_voice DFCA_mixed
Extra gain
7,5
12,0
14,0
17,0
20,0
23,0
DFCA layer bandwidth 12 freqs Assumed traffic model Signalling traffic per user # of TSL for signalling # of TSL for PS TCH traffic per user PS users penetration HR penetration avg PS traffic per user in BH http model ftp model ftp penetration http penetration 4.0 3 (2 for SDCCH) 8 (4 on BCCH and 4 on reg LY) 25.0 30 100 200.0 5/50/0 1/4700/0 40 60 % % mErl % % bps mErl
On reg LY EFL=16,7% ->8 Erl On DFCA EFL=28,5% ->27,36 Erl BCCH -> 1 TRX -> 1 voice trunks Reg -> 1 TRX -> 4 voice trunks (4 Erl for voice) DFCA -> 3 TRX -> 48 voice trunks Traffic = 1Erl + 4 Erl + 27,36 Erl = 32,36Erl ->1294 users Assuming 30% PS users ->388 PS users average PDCH throughput = 35.8 kbps (result comes from C/I distribution for certain load and freq reuse) from PS capacity calculation: Avg throughput for http =69 kbps = 8,625 kB/s Avg throughput for ftp = 100 kbps = 12,5 kB/s
DFCA layer bandwidth 19 freqs Assumed traffic model Signalling traffic per user # of TSL for signalling # of TSL for PS TCH traffic per user PS users penetration HR penetration avg PS traffic per user in BH http model ftp model ftp penetration http penetration 4.0 3 (2 for SDCCH) 8 (4 on BCCH and 4 on reg LY) 25.0 30 100 200.0 5/50/0 1/4700/0 40 60 % % mErl % % bps mErl
Traffic from softblocking = 44,56 but to reduce # of TRX we are limited by hardblocking
DFCA reduces number of needed TRXs while the quality of PS service (in
terms of average throughput) is even better The same capacity was achieved with the lower number of needed hardware (TRXs) It would be possible (instead of reducing # of TRX) to increase number of served users. In this way higher capacity with the same number of site counts could be achieved
on regular EFL=16,7% ->7 Erl on DFCA EFL=28,5% ->27,36 Erl on BCCH 5 Erl BCCH -> 1 TRX -> 5 voice trunks regular -> 1 TRX -> 7 voice trunks DFCA -> 3 TRX -> 48 voice trunks Traffic = Erlang on 60 trunks at 2%= 39,36 Erl ->1574 users
BCCH -> 1 TRX -> 5 trunks DFCA -> 4 TRX -> 64 trunks Traffic = Erlang on 69 trunks at 2%
= 48,56 Erl ->1942 users Here there is hardblocking limitation however with 1 TRX less we are still able to serve ~ 100 users more then with regular layer
Results - BSS14 scenario 2 (with reduced #of TRXs): BCCH -> 1 TRX -> 5 trunks DFCA -> 3 TRX -> 48 trunks Traffic = Erlang on 53 trunks at 2% = 41,1 Erl ->1644 users
1600
1400
1644
BSS 12
6,2 MhZ 12 freqs 7 hopping freqs 12 freqs Assumed traffic model 8 mErl 4 (3 for SDCCH) 25 mErl 100%
BSS 12 ED2.1
6,2 Mhz 12 freqs no need for regular LY 19 freqs 8 mErl 4 (3 for SDCCH) 25 mErl 100%
Results
max traffic on BCCH LY max EFL (max traffic) on regular LY max EFL (max traffic) on DFCA LY # of voice trunks on BCCH LY # of voice trunks on regular LY # of voice trunks on DFCA LY Total traffic / # of users
BSS 12
5 Erl 16,7% -> 7 Erl 28,5% -> 27,36Erl 5 trunks (on 1 TRX) 7 trunks (on 1 TRX) 48 trunks (on 3 TRXs) 39.36 Erl / 1574 users
BSS 12 ED2.1
4 Erl N/A 29,32% - > 44,56 Erl 4 trunks (on 1 TRX) N/A 64 trunks (on 4 TRXs) 48.56 Erl / 1924 users
Assuming 8 mErl/user of SDCCH traffic dynamic SDCCH allows to avoid regular TRX and in this way to serve more users. There is no need for SDCCH on DFCA.
BSS 12 ED2.1
6,2 MhZ 12 freqs 7 hopping freqs 12 freqs Assumed traffic model 11 mErl 5 (4 for SDCCH) 25 mErl 100%
BSS 14
6,2 Mhz 12 freqs no need for regular LY 19 freqs 11 mErl 5 (4 for SDCCH) 25 mErl 100%
Results
max traffic on BCCH LY max EFL (max traffic) on regular LY max EFL (max traffic) on DFCA LY # of voice trunks on BCCH LY # of voice trunks on regular LY # of voice trunks on DFCA LY Total traffic / # of users
BSS 12 ED2.1
4 Erl 16,7% -> 7 Erl 28,5% -> 27,36Erl 4 trunks (on 1 TRX) 7 trunks (on 1 TRX) 48 trunks (on 3 TRXs) 38.36 Erl / 1534 users
BSS 14
4 Erl N/A 29,32% - > 44,56 Erl 4 trunks (on 1 TRX) N/A 64 trunks (on 4 TRXs) 47.56 Erl / 1902 users
Assuming 11 mErl/user of SDCCH traffic dynamic SDCCH does not allow to avoid regular TRX. In this scenario only SDCCH on DFCA TRX feature allows to avoid regular layer.
How to measure
KPI: DL ACK RLC data share MCS-n, (rlc_24) DL UNACK RLC data share MCS-n, (rlc_25) KPI: Volume Weighted LLC Throughput (llc_3a) KPIs: Average DL TBF Duration (tbf_6c)
Better quality TSLs means, higher MCS what gives higher throughput; all together causes shorter transmission delay
In order to be able to observe expected benefits fair comparison is needed eg. PS on hopping with certain number of hoppers shall be compared with PS on DFCA with the same amount of freqs. (assuming the same CS & PS load)
How to measure
SDCCH Access Probability (SDR_1a)
KPI:
RxQual
Backup slides
MA encoding
In psw_territory_upgrade_s message PCU receives the DFCA hopping data (MA list, MAIO and TSC) to be included in the PS Immediate Assignment message. The MA list in BCCH BTS is always the MA list that is broadcasted in SI13 message (or in PSI14 message if that is used). So in this case indirect MA list coding method is used. In case that there is in a non BCCH band a BTS with DFCA PS TRX that have DFCA MA list that includes only one frequency, PCU can use the fixed frequency definitions to assign MS to the non BCCH band BTS. This makes possibly to use non BCCH band also for immediate assignments with DFCA
Backup slides
MA encoding
PS Assignment message
In the PS Assignment messages PCU uses the hopping data received in the psw_territory_upgrade_s message. The hopping data in the psw_territory_upgrade_s message includes frequency list for GPRS hopping, MAIO and TSC for the GPRS TRX. In the BCCH BTS the MA list is always the list that is broadcasted in SI13 message or in PSI14 and hence indirect MA list coding must be used. In non BCCH BTS the MA list is different than the broadcasted MA list and can be different also in every TRX, in this case PCU must use direct coding 2 .
Backup slides
Frequency parameters IE