Você está na página 1de 37

Form Districts

Article XIII of Dallas Development Code

Oak Cliff Community Meeting November 16, 2011

Purpose and Intent


Establish standard zoning to encourage walkable, mixed use development consistent with the forwardDallas! Vision Provide a tool kit of zoning options to suit a variety of locations and a range of densities Strike a balance between flexibility and predictability to reduce the need for planned development districts
2

Conventional Zoning..
Former Sams Club on Park Lane West Village

..makes this easy

..makes this difficult

Existing Mixed Use (MU) Zoning


Allows a great deal of land use flexibility

Rarely results in walkable developments


Rarely results in mixed use developments

No predictability in building form

Development Examples in Suburban Style Strip MU Zoning Shopping Center


Auto-oriented Trade Center

Auto-oriented Hotel Tower

Mixed Use Development

Desired Development Character


Buildings pulled up to the sidewalk Pedestrian-scaled lighting On-street parking

Shading structures

UrbanAdvantage

Active frontage with street facing entrances

Wide sidewalks

Outdoor dining

Street trees and planters

Desired Development Character

Walkable Urban Form


Strong emphasis on walkable urban form along primary street frontages
Active ground floor Building entrance on street frontage Building frontage on street and parking setback Pedestrian friendly streetscapes

Conventional Zoning
Land Use is the Focus
Form

Management

Use

New Approach
Makes Building Form the Focus

Management

Use

Form

10

Hierarchy of Zoning Tools


Form Districts: A palette of district options that can be applied flexibly to suit a range of situations Development Types: define permitted development in each district primarily in terms of building form and site planning requirements Land Uses: Simplified categories of uses are permitted according to development type

11

Form Districts
3 Base Districts
Walkable Mixed Use (WMU): Allows a mix of uses in a walkable format Walkable Residential (WR): Allows a range of housing types in a walkable format Residential Transition (RTN): Provides for a transition in scale and intensity near single family neighborhoods

12

Form Districts
3 Overlay Districts
Height Map Overlay: provides for custom height adjustments to suit specific contexts Shopfront Overlay: allows/mandates vertical mix of uses on well defined frontages Parking Management Overlay: allows greater flexibility in meeting parking requirements

13

Hypothetical Example
Existing Single Family Walkable Mixed Use / Walkable Residential District Residential Transition District Shopfront Overlay Height Map Overlay

Street A Street B

14

Parking Management Overlay


Shared parking structure allows for greater development on adjacent sites

DART Station

Parking Management Overlay enables greater flexibility in meeting parking requirements


15

Development Types

16

Mixed Use Shopfront

17

Mixed Use Shopfront

18

Mixed Use Shopfront

19

Single Story Shopfront

20

General Commercial

21

Apartment

22

Stacked Townhouse

23

Manor House

24

Civic Development Types


Civic Building
Places of Worship, Schools, Public Buildings

Open Space Lot


Parks, Open Space, Squares, Plazas

25

Open Space
Public open space standards
Public square

Green
Plaza Neighborhood Park Tot Lot Community Garden Greenbelt Landscaped Median
26

Open Space

27

Minor Street Standards


New palette of minor streets options Emphasizes on-street parking, pedestrian amenities and slower traffic speeds

28

Streetscape Standards

29

Range of Densities
Walkable Mixed Use and Walkable Residential districts come is a range of intensities:
Low: 3 story 5 story Medium: 8 story 12 story High: 20 story 40 story /Custom maximum with Height Map overlay
30

Maximum Heights

31

Minimum Heights

32

Residential Proximity Slope


Automatic protection for residential uses from height above 26 feet in adjacent developments

SF or MF
33

Land Uses

34

Land Uses

35

Generous Parking Reductions


Reduced requirements derived from Urban land Institute (ULI) ULI shared parking model codified for calculating parking requirements Up to 50% additional parking reduction:
25% for transit proximity 50% for affordable housing near transit 25% for below grade office parking 25% for employee transportation demand management 5% for tree preservation (1 space per tree) 2% for increased pedestrian amenities

On street parking counts towards off street requirement


36

Questions

37

Você também pode gostar