Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
FMS Architecture
System Architecture
Main elements:
Flight Management Computer(s) Control Display Unit Navigation Display Navigation sensor (mix)
Additional elements
Update sensors (DME/GPS/IRS) Navigation database
3
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
Fly-by turn
FMS-friendly, but requires significant freedom to start and end the turn
Fly-over turn
Unstable intercept next leg Requires long stabilisation distance
10
EUROCONTROL
11
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
EUROCONTROL
14
EUROCONTROL
AIRCRFAFT Owner
Aircraft owner responsible for:
nav database contract airline policy data timely loading current data assurance of integrity critical RNAV data (requirement for RNAV) pilot training/checking procedures for RNAV communication via the database supplier
15
EUROCONTROL
AIRCRAFT Manufacturer
Aircraft manufacturer
End responsibility for subcontractors (avionica manufacturers) Involvement in modification of software and hardware of any system in the aircraft Additional aircraft performance data added to the database disk
16
EUROCONTROL
FMC Manufacturer
FMC manufacturer responsible for:
data translation ARINC 424 into FMC language compatibility with all FMCs (all update versions) Quality assurance process FMC software updates
17
EUROCONTROL
DATABASE Supplier
Database supplier responsible for:
conversion source data into ARINC 424 language verification of coding quality assurance (ED 76 compliant for RNAV) communication/verification with sources of the data
18
EUROCONTROL
19
EUROCONTROL
Capacity aspect
ATC reaction to navigation surprises : >>>> increase of separation minima
Economical aspect
Noise abatement
20
EUROCONTROL
RF leg emerging
21
EUROCONTROL
General
History: ICAO RGCSP>>RNP Concept Four parameters to control the safety of the total system Many changes in definition over the years Now also used for sensor specific systems Responsibility for adherence rests with the user
22
EUROCONTROL
ACCURACY (1)
Accuracy
The degree of conformance between the estimated, measured, or desired position and/or the velocity of a platform at a given time, and its true position or velocity. Where the system is
23
EUROCONTROL
ACCURACY (2)
Position Update Components
DME old/new (provides radio update position) and/or GPS/GLONASS (provides satellite update position) (Augmentation techniques emerging) and additionally -if any IRS(-es) (provides reference position), time related ANP/EPU/EPE warning system (in case of RNP)
24
EUROCONTROL
INTEGRITY (1)
Integrity The ability of a system to provide timely warnings to users when the system should not be used for navigation Trusting the system that it is where it says it is
25
EUROCONTROL
INTEGRITY (2)
Integrity level to prevent a catastrophic failure condition less than 1*10E-9 per flight hour (JAR 25-1309) Integrity trough (position) error detection and identification Contrary to accuracy, integrity is not measurable
26
EUROCONTROL
INTEGRITY (3)
Difficult for complex systems Even more difficult for highly software driven systems Integrity increased by multiple independent system design and crosschecking between independent systems Independency through dissimilar design of multiple systems ?
E.g. independency of DME station selection
27
EUROCONTROL
AVAILABILITY (1)
Availability An indication of the ability of the system to provide usable service within the specified coverage area Its there or its not there
28
EUROCONTROL
AVAILABILITY (2)
Covers the risk of a lack of guidance at the start of the operation Risk mitigation through multi sensor design Provisions available to give timely alarm in case of loss of navigation Provisions to remain within a specified RNP level (RNP requirement only)
29
EUROCONTROL
30
EUROCONTROL
RAIM hole checks for the intended route Continuity increased by multiple system design (back-up) Continuity controlled through multi-sensor system design
31
EUROCONTROL
WGS 84 (1)
Need for accurate data in WGS 84
WGS 84 technically not required for ground based updating systems, however.. Implementation of WGS 84 is also a matter of increased accuracy and quality control Position determination of FMS without GNSS sensor is relative to the ground station
32
EUROCONTROL
WGS 84 (2)
Problems may occur when station with a different reference datum is used Large deviations however should be filtered out by the FMC update algorithm Small differences could be accepted by the system>>Map shift GNSS sensored systems:
WGS 84 datum is absolutely a requirement
33
EUROCONTROL
TOOLS (1)
Need for appropriate tools
RNAV procedure design: coding complexity decreased Pressure for complexity in route design (noise driven) Noise abatement routes over-complex compared to conventional design Thorough testing required
34
EUROCONTROL
TOOLS (2)
Expert judgement for complex routes Lap-top testing Flight simulator check
Maximum and minimum T/O weight Maximum wind in strength and direction
EUROCONTROL
ADVISES
In principle, adhere to the minimum distance between way points tables of PANS-OPS Cater for maximum assumed wind speed Cater for different wind directions Apply sufficient distance for first way point after DER Use TF coding as much as possible Apply Fly-over as alternative but... use DF after Fly-over coding, airspace permitting Cater for delayed turns Check flight paths with different FMCs Use S.I. PDT as initial check
36
EUROCONTROL
37