Você está na página 1de 160

QCC & 7 Quality Control Tools For Problem Solvings

Plan

Do

Check

Act

MODULE 1 UNDERSTANDING QC CIRCLE

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Overview
What are Quality Circles? How Do Quality Circles Work? How Can They be Used in an Organization?

Plan

Do

Check

Act

What is a Quality Circle?


Voluntary groups of employees who work on similar tasks or share an area of responsibility They agree to meet on a regular basis to discuss & solve problems related to work. They operate on the principle that employee participation in decision-making and problemdecisionproblemsolving improves the quality of work
Plan Do Check Act

How Do Quality Circles Work?


Characteristics Volunteers Set Rules and Priorities Decisions made by Consensus Use of organized approaches to Problem-Solving
Plan Do Check Act

How Do Quality Circles Work?


All members of a Circle need to receive training Members need to be empowered Members need to have the support of Senior Management

Plan

Do

Check

Act

How Can They be Used in an Organization?



Plan

Increase Productivity Improve Quality Boost Employee Morale Increase in employee quality consciousness Problem prevention becomes habitual Promotion of employee motivation Improvement in the human relations More effective company communication
Do Check Act

How Can They be Used in an Organization?


Plan

More active job involvement Utilization of problem solving capabilities Contribution to personnel development Encouragement of teamwork Improvement of work environment Development of safety awareness Control and improvement of quality Productivity improvement Increased job security
Do Check Act

Problems with Quality Circles


Inadequate Training Unsure of Purpose Not truly Voluntary Lack of Management Interest Quality Circles are not really empowered to make decisions.
Do Check Act

Plan

MODULE 2 DATA COLLECTION


Plan Do Check Act

CATEGORIES OF DATA
Primary Data Secondary Data

Plan

Do

Check

Act

PRIMARY DATA
The data, which are collected from the units or individual respondents directly for the purpose of certain study or information. Example: If an experiment is conducted to know the effect of fertilizer doses on the yield OR the effect of a drug on the patients, the observation taken on each plot or patient constitute the primary data.
Plan Do Check Act

SECONDARY DATA
The data, which had been collected by certain people or agency, and statistically treated. Now the information contained in it is used again from records, processed and statistically analyzed to extract some information for other purpose.
Plan Do Check Act

SECONDARY DATA
Example: Secondary data is obtained from year books, census report, survey reports, official reports or reported experimental findings.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

ANALYSIS OF DATA
One of the most important objectives is to process the observed data and transform it to a form most suitable for decision making.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

DATA PROCESSING
Before tabulation of primary data, it should be edited for:
Plan

Completeness Consistency Accuracy Homogeneity


Do Check Act

ANALYSIS OF DATA The measures of central tendency and dispersion are parts of data analysis along with the estimation and testing of hypothesis:
Plan

Mean Median Mode Standard deviation


Do Check Act

ANALYSIS OF DATA The data: 4,5,5,4,8,4,3,7.

Mean Median Mode Standard deviation Range


Plan Do Check Act

ANALYSIS OF DATA The data: 4,5,5,4,8,4,3,7. Mean = 4+5+5+4+8+4+3+7 8 Mean = 40/8 = 5 Median = 3,4,4,4,5,5,7,8 ( Select Two centered Data) Median = ( 4+5)/2 = 4.5 Mode
Plan Do Check

 

= 3,4,4,4,5,5,7,8 = 4 (Most Frequently Occurring Number)


Act

ANALYSIS OF DATA The data: 4,5,5,4,8,4,3,7. Standard deviation = 1.69


(X-Bar X)2 = ( n 1)

Range = Max Min =83=5


Plan Do Check Act

P Value = 0.1377 Data is Normal Median =4.5 This tool is given free

Mean = 5

Range = 5

Mode = 4

STD Dev=1.69

Plan

Do

Check

Act

MODULE 3
The Basic 7 Quality Tools

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The Basic 7 Quality Tools.


Ishikawa believed that 90% of all quality problems could be solved through the use of the 7 tools listed below:


Plan

Frequency Diagrams ( Histograms ) Cause and Effect (Ishikawa) Diagrams Check Sheets Pareto diagrams Flowcharts Scatter Diagrams Control Charts
Do Check Act

Where did the Basic Seven come from?


Kaoru Ishikawa Known for Democratizing Statistics The Basic Seven Tools made statistical analysis less complicated for the average person Good Visual Aids make statistical and quality control more comprehensible.
Plan Do Check Act

Fishbone Diagrams
No statistics involved Maps out a process/problem Makes improvement easier Looks like a Fish Skeleton
Plan Do Check Act

Fishbone Diagrams
Area A
4 1 2 3 5 6

Area B
1 2 3

4 5 6

Possible Causes
4 5 6 3 2 1 6 3 5 2 4 1

PROBLEM (EFFECT)

Area C
Plan Do Check

Area D
Act

Fishbone Diagrams
Step 1 - Identify the Problem Step 2 - Draw spine and bones Step 3 - Identify different areas where problems may arise from Step 4 - Identify what these specific causes could be Step 5 Use the finished diagram to brainstorm solutions to the main problems.
Plan Do Check Act

Fishbone Diagrams
Machines
Solder Gun
Size

Manpower
Skill Training

Heat sink

Physical limits

Power Source

Bad Solder Joints


Technique
Manual

Terminals Flux Stripping Solder Wire Gauge

Methods
Plan Do Check

Materials
Act

In the above example, Ive added some causes and some common categories know as the 4 Ms Machines, Manpower, Methods and Materials. How do we arrive at the possible causes? The best (and most common) method is brainstorming. This generates a large number of ideas in a short period of time. Once the diagram is complete, then we can continue with the evaluation. We obviously can not tackle all the problems at once because there are too many and besides some will have such small effects that they will not be worth bothering about.
Plan Do Check Act

Fishbone Diagrams
Machines
Solder Gun
Size

Manpower
Skill Training

Heat sink

Physical limits

Power Source

Bad Solder Joints


Technique
Manual

Terminals Flux Stripping Solder Wire Gauge

Methods
Plan Do Check

Materials
Act

Fishbone On thisDiagrams the causes have been diagram, three of highlighted.


These are thought to be the most important, and the ones to tackle. WHY? There are a number of ways of choosing the front runners. We could design a series of experiments to determine the biggest influence, OR We could use existing data or experience, OR We could make a judgement purely on opinion
Plan Do Check Act

CAUSE & EFFECT DIAGRAM - Example

Plan

Do

Check

Act

WORKSHOP & PRESENTATION

Plan

Do

Check

Act

HISTOGRAM
WHAT IT IS?
Histograms are effective Q.C. tools which are used in the analysis of data. They are used as a check on specific process parameters to determine where the greatest amount of variation occurs in the process, or to determine if process specifications are exceeded. This statistical method does not prove that a process is in a state of control. Nonetheless, histograms alone have been used to solve many problems in quality control.
Plan Do Check Act

HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS
How well is the histogram centered?

The centering of the data provides information on the process aim about some mean or nominal value. How wide is the histogram?

Looking at histogram width defines the variability of the process about the aim.
Plan Do Check Act

HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS
What is the shape of the histogram? Remember that the data is expected to form a normal or bell-shaped curve. Any significant change or anomaly usually indicates that there is something going on in the process which is causing the quality problem.
Plan Do Check Act

NORMAL

Depicted by a bell-shaped curve


Most frequent measurement appears as center of distribution Less frequent measurements taper gradually at both ends of distribution Indicates that a process is running normally (only common causes are present).
Plan Do Check Act

BI-MODAL

Distribution appears to have two peaks May indicate that data from more than one process are mixed together  Materials may come from two separate vendors  Samples may have come from two separate machines.
Plan Do Check Act

CLIFF-TYPE

Appears to end sharply or abruptly at one end Indicates possible sorting or inspection of non-conforming parts.
Plan Do Check Act

SAWTOOTHED
Also commonly referred to as a comb distribution, appears as an alternating jagged pattern Often indicates a measuring problem  Improper gage readings  Gage not sensitive enough for readings.

Plan Do Check Act

SKEWED
Positively Skewed Negatively Skewed

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Excercise
Construct an Histogram for the four distribution from the set data Plot Data. Can you determine the type of distribution from the Histogram? Can you determine the bimodal from the Histogram?

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Dist 1

Dist 2

This tool is given free

Dist 3

Dist 4

Measurements of 50 items from process XYZ 147 131 198 190 165 170 178 157 168 145
Plan Do

179 137 142 161 155 125 181 135 141 177
Check Act

185 141 205 157 169 177 155 148 151 154

125 142 150 165 158 108 186 171 162 137

210 166 141 155 150 193 145 124 150 160

TALLY CHART RANGE 100-109 110-119 120-129 130-139 140-149 150-159 160-169 170-179 180-189 190-199 200-209 210-219 TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act

TALLY | ||| |||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||| ||| | | |||| ||||| ||| | | 1 0 3 4 9

NUMBER

11 8 6 3 3 1 1 50

HISTOGRAM
A tally is a simple form of categorising the data so as to let it speak for itself. In the first column, we have the basic categories themselves: 100 109, 110 119, and so on. In the second column, there is the tally the actual count of the number of items found in that category. In the third column is the actual number in the category, or the frequency. We now have the data in a form which speaks to us. The next obvious step is to display the data on a graph.
Plan Do Check Act

Histogram of Data
Normal 12 10 8 Frequency 6 4 2 0 100 120 140 160 Data 180 200
Mean 158.4 StDev 21.80 N 50

Histogram of Data
Normal 125 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 100 120 140 160 Data 180 200 185
Mean StDev N 158.4 21.80 50

If we add the tolerance limits to the graph, we can see that we are going to have a large proportion of rejects from the process. From this it is easy to see how vital the concept of the frequency diagram is to analysing process capabilities
Plan Do Check Act

F u cy req en

Compute the -Mean -Median -Standard Deviation -Range

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Check Sheets
Counting and accumulating data WHAT IS A CHECK SHEETS?

One of the most common form of data collection, the check sheet is a structured form containing a list of things you want to measure, inspect or record.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Check Sheets
WHAT DOES CHECKLIST PREVENT





Forget to inspect Late inspection Ineffective inspection Partial inspection Not knowing who did the inspection No record for inspection done No action for inspection done
Do Check Act

    
Plan

Check Sheets
Product Number: 123456 Product Name: Widgits Line Name: Auto1 Process Name: Moulding 30/7 {M}
||||

Defective part
Mould Cracked Fibres Grit Pinholes Cracks Other TOTAL

31/7 {T}
|||

1/8 {W}
|||| |

2/8 {T}
|||

3/8 {F}
||||

TOTAL

21 8 14

||

||||

||||

||

|||

||||

||||

||

9 2

|||

|||

7 8 61

13

14

15

11

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Check Sheets
Check sheets are used to systematically record data from historical sources or from observations as they happen so that patterns and trends can be clearly detected and shown. Check sheets minimise clerical effort since the operator merely adds a mark to the tally on the prepared sheet rather than writing out a figure.
Plan Do Check Act

Product: Copper Pipe Date:14th April 2003 Manufacturing Stage: Final insp Inspectors Name: Sam Type of Defect: scratch, incomplete, misshapen Lot No: 24 Total No. inspected: 2530 Remarks: All inspected

Type Scratches Cracks Incomplete Misshapen Others //// //// //// //// ////

Check //// //// //// //// // //// //// //// /// //// //// //// //// //// / ///

Sub-Total 22 19 25 4 7

Grand Total Total Rejects //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //

77 54

PARETO DIAGRAM The 80/20 Principle :


Achieving More With Less

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Pareto Discovery

In the late 19th century, an Italian economist by the name of Vilfredo Pareto undertook a study on the distribution of wealth in Italy. Pareto discovered that about 80% of the wealth in Italy was distributed to only 20% of the Italian families. In society, 80% of the value of all crimes committed was caused by 20% of the criminals In life, most happiness enjoyed by a person occurred during 20% of his lifetime. At work, 80% of ones valuable output occurred in 20% of his time
Plan Do Check Act

The 80/20 Thinking & Analysis


To engage in 80/20 thinking, we must constantly ask ourselves: What is the 20% that is leading the 80%? What are the vital few causes or inputs as opposed to the trivial many ?

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The 80/20 Principle, as applied to Quality Management

The pioneer of the 80/20 principle was Joseph Juran : - the great Quality Management Practitioner - the man behind the global quality revolution of the late 20th century

This Romanian-born US Engineer Juran alternately called the Pareto Principle or the 80/20 Principle the so-called The Rule of the Vital Few and the Trivial Many virtually synonymous with the search for high quality products and services.
Plan Do Check Act

Why The 80/20 Principle Is So Important ?


Whether you realize it or not, the 80/20 Principle applies to: Your life Your social world The place where you work Your business For each individual and each business, it is always possible to obtain much more that is of value and avoid what has negative value, with much less input of effort, expense or investment.
Plan Do Check Act

80/20 As Applied To Daily Life


Only do things we are best at doing and enjoy most In every important aspect in life, work out where 20% of effort will lead to 80% of return Choose your career and employers with care, and if possible, employ others rather than being employed yourself Make the most of the lucky few streaks in your life Strive for excellence in few things, rather than good performance in many Calm down, work less and target a limited number of goals
Plan Do Check Act

80/20 Thinking Is Reflective

The objective of the 80/20 Thinking is to generate actions which will make sharp improvements in your life and that of others
Plan Do Check Act

80/20 Thinking Is Reflective


To be strategic is to concentrate on what is important in the long run, on those few things that can give us a comparative advantage, on what is important to us than others, and to plan and execute the resulting plan with determination and steadfastness.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

80/20 Insights For Individuals


80 % of achievements and happiness in life, takes place in 20% of our time Our lives are profoundly affected for good and ill, by a few events and a few decisions in our life Everyone can achieve something significant. The key is not effort, but finding the right thing to achieve There are winners and losers and always more of the latter. You can be a winner by choosing the right competition, the right team and the right methods to win
Plan Do Check Act

80/20 As It Applies To Business


o That losses (manufactured goods that have to be rejected because of poor quality) do not arise from a large number of causes. Rather the causes are always mal-distributed in such a way that a small percentage of the quality characteristics always contributes a high percentage of the quality loss o And if you remedy the critical 20% of your quality gaps, you will realize 80% of the benefits. o The first 80% typically includes the first breakthrough in continuous improvement
Plan Do Check Act

Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems

Kadang-kadang sebagian besar masalah disebabkan oleh segelintir sebab. Sebagai contoh, 80% dari downtime disebabkan oleh 20% dari mesin; 80% Revenue berasal dari 20% pelanggan. Aturan 80/20 adalah satu cara untuk memprioritaskan usaha supaya tertumpu (fokus) pada apa yang lebih penting.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Part Cum % Annual # Of Total Usage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


Plan

Cost Per $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 98.00 0.79 8.25 0.87 2.00 9.75 0.07 0.26 0.03 10.70
Act

Annual Cost

Cum Cum % Inv. Ann. Cost Of Total Class 49% 80% 88% 95% 96% 97% 98% 99% 99% 100% A A B B B C C C C C

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do

5000 395000 10000 75000 5000 1000 125000 30000 250000 600
Check

$ 490,000 $ 490,000 $ 312,050 $ 802,050 $ 82,500 $ 884,550 $ 65,250 $ 949,800 $ 10,000 $ 959,800 $ 9,750 $ 969,550 $ 8,750 $ 978,300 $ 7,800 $ 986,100 $ 7,500 $ 993,600 $ 6,420 $ 1,000,020

Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault A. DRY JOINT B. MISSED COMPONENT C. REVERSED COMPONENT D. ARCING E. OPEN CIRCUIT F. OTHER No. 2 5 8 4 1 3

TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act

23

Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault C. REVERSED COMPONENT B. MISSED COMPONENT D. ARCING F. OTHER A. DRY JOINT E. OPEN CIRCUIT No. 8 5 4 3 2 1

TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act

23

Plan

Do

Check

Act

This tool is given free

Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems

5 4 3
REVERSED COMPONENT MISSED COMPONENT

2
ARCING OTHER DRY JOINT

1
OPEN CIRCUIT

C
Plan Do

B
Check Act

Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault
C. REVERSED COMPONENT B. MISSED COMPONENT D. ARCING F. OTHER A. DRY JOINT E. OPEN CIRCUIT

No.
8 5 4 3 2 1

COST
2 2 5 1 4 6

TOTAL COST
16 10 20 3 8 6

TOTAL

23

63

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault
D. ARCING C. REVERSED COMPONENT B. MISSED COMPONENT A. DRY JOINT E. OPEN CIRCUIT F. OTHER

No.
4 8 5 2 1 3

COST
5 2 2 4 6 1

TOTAL COST
20 16 10 8 6 3

TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act

23

63

This tool is given free

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems

20

16 10 8 6
ARCING REVERSED COMPONENT MISSED COMPONENT DRY JOINT OPEN CIRCUIT

3
OTHER

D
Plan Do

C
Check

B
Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Overview Detailed look at flowcharting Real world examples


Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Overview of Flowcharts What is a flowchart? How are they useful?

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

What is a flowchart?
Process Flow Diagram A diagram illustrating the activities of a process One of Ishikawas seven basic tools of quality
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Brief History
No originator, or father of flowcharts Forms of flowcharts have always been used Give us insight into historical processes
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts - Picturing the process


Flowchart Symbols

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Start/End The terminator symbol marks the starting or ending point of the system. It usually contains the word "Start" or "End."

Action or Process A box can represent a single step ("add two cups of of flour"), or and entire sub-process ("make bread") within a larger process.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Document A printed document or report.

Decision A decision or branching point. Lines representing different decisions emerge from different points of the diamond.
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Input/Output Represents material or information entering or leaving the system, such as customer order (input) or a product (output).

Connector Indicates that the flow continues where a matching symbol (containing the same letter) has been placed.
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Flow Line Lines indicate the sequence of steps and the direction of flow.

Delay Indicates a delay in the process.


Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Merge Indicates a step where two or more sub-lists or subprocesses become one.

Subroutine Indicates a sequence of actions that perform a specific task embedded within a larger process. This sequence of actions could be described in more detail on a separate flowchart.
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Manual Loop Indicates a sequence of commands that will continue to repeat until stopped manually.

Data storage Indicates a step where data gets stored.


Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

How are they useful?


Create visual maps of a process Help with planning a project Quality improvement tool Identify processes that need improvement Identify unnecessary/ problem steps in a process Good communication tool
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Common Rules of Flowcharts


Indicate and label all elements of the project Sequence of events is clear No gaps or dead ends Must be logical to the user Use correct symbols
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts

Real World Use of Flowcharts Production

Picturing the process

Manufacturing Used to identify critical path Accounting Help visualize money flow Services Restaurants Real estate
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Real World (contd)


Education Curriculum flowcharts Student flow through process Hospitals Patient flow Medical processes
Plan Do Check Act

Flowcharts
Picturing the process

Summary :
Valuable and unique quality improvement tool Simple and effective way of visualizing and understanding a process Entire organization has an effect on the flowchart Everyone involved can take part in improving the process
Plan Do Check Act

Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables WHAT IS IT? Shows relationship between 2 characteristic values HOW DOES IT RELATE? Number of working years and the salary! The plating time and the plating thickness! Dimensions before and after assembly!
Plan Do Check Act

Scatter Diagrams Measuring relationships between variables


When Scatter Diagram are prepared check the following: Is there any correlation? Are there any abnormally plotted points? Is there a need for stratification?
Plan Do Check Act

Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables

Example Exercise :
The rise in temperature in the motor coil of an electric shaver needs to be controlled so it does not exceed 500C. The data shown in the next slide is the results of a survey carried out to find out the relationship between the coil temperature (X) and the surface temperature of the motor case (Y). Collect more then 30 pairs of data to show relationship
Plan Do Check Act

Scatter Diagrams
No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 X 30.6 33.0 33.2 33.5 34.2 34.3 34.7 35.6 35.6 35.7 35.7 35.9 36.0 36.2 36.3 36.4 Y 15.9 20.0 17.7 19.0 22.5 19.9 20.9 20.3 22.9 19.7 21.9 23.7 18.9 21.2 20.5 22.3 No 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 X 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.5 37.5 37.8 37.8 38.3 38.6 38.7 38.8 38.8 38.9 39.2 39.3 39.5 Y 23.2 21.5 22.4 20.1 23.3 21.8 23.0 23.3 22.9 24.5 20.7 21.5 23.1 23.1 23.3 22.0 No 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 X 39.5 40.0 40.3 40.4 40.5 40.5 40.6 41.0 41.2 41.3 41.3 41.8 42.0 42.1 42.8 42.9 Y 24.5 22.0 23.0 20.9 21.3 29.9 25.7 23.7 24.4 22.2 25.7 26.8 25.0 23.1 26.6 25.5 No 49 50 X 43.8 44.5 Y 26.3 26.8

Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
X-Bar = 38.308 Y = mX + C , and Y-Bar = 22.608 C = Y mX C = 22.608 (0.645*38.308) C = 22.61 24.71 C = - 2.1 The Regression Equation is Y = 0.645X 2.101
m = xy n(x-Bar)(y-Bar) n(x-Bar)(yx -n(x-Bar) n(xr= ______nxy - xy______ = .771 [nx- (x)][ny- (y)]
Do Check Act

Gradient, m = 0.645

See Scatter plot Data file.

Plan

Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
Regression
Prob(>|t|) Parameter b0 b1 Residual St dev R2 R2(adj) F Prob(>F)
Plan Do Check

Est value -2.11 0.65 1.64 0.59 0.59 70.42

St dev 2.96 0.08

t student 0.48 -0.72 0.00 8.39 y = b0 + b1.x1

Y = -2.11 + 0.65X R2 = 0.59 P-Value = 0

0.00
Act

There is a Correlation

Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
Fitted Line Plot
Y = - 2.114 + 0.6453 X 30.0 27.5 25.0 Y 22.5 20.0 17.5 15.0 30
Plan Do
S R-Sq R-Sq(adj) 1.64175 59.5% 58.6%

32

34
Check

36

38 X Act

40

42

44

46

Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables

There is a positive correlation between X and Y. But how good is the correlation??? The value of r = 0.7711 The Regression Model is 59.59 % accurate.
Plan Do Check Act

Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
Positiv Correlation Positive
5 5 4.5 4.5

Negative Correlation

3.5 150 400 650 5

3.5

No Correlation

150

400

650

An increase in y may depend increas upon an increase in x.

4.5

An decrease in y may depend upon an increase in x.

3.5

Positive Correlation?

150

400

650 5

Negative Correlation?

4.5

There is no demonstrated connection between x and y.

4.5

3.5 150 400 650

3.5 150 400 650

If X is increased, y may also increase.


Plan Do Check Act

If X is increased, y may decrease.

Control Charts
Identifying Sources Of Variations
Control charts are used to monitor, control and improve process performance by focussing on its variation and its cause. The control chart can be thought of as a target. The average line is the bull's-eye and the control limits are the extremes of the target. Control charts are used by taking periodic measurements or observations of products or processes. These results are compared with calculated control limits, and if the limits are exceeded action is taken (and recorded) to bring the process back into control.
Plan Do Check Act

About This Module


Control charts portray process performance and separate causes of variation: Random Assignable Control Chart Systems are: A proven technique for improving productivity Effective in defect prevention Prevent unnecessary process adjustments Provide diagnostic information Provide information about process capability

Six Sigma, A Quest for Process Perfection Meet Goals and Attack Variation
\DataFile\Attribut mtw \DataFile\Variable.mtw Plan Do Check Act

What We Will Learn.


1. Control charts are a powerful tool to hold the gains. 2. How control charts discriminate between common cause and assignable cause variation. 3. Why control charts must be designed to fit the data type and the control purpose.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Uses of Control Charts


1) Attain a state of statistical control: All subgroup averages and ranges within control limits - no assignable causes of variation present 2) Monitor a process 3) Determine process capability
Jurans Quality Control Handbook, 4th edition, page 24.7

What happens after an out-of-control situation occurs at the core of a successful SPC program?

Plan

Do

Check

Act

General Concepts
w = some characteristic of interest

X W = mean of each sample


Sw = standard deviation of w Upper Control Limit UCL ! X  3S w Centerline =

X
LCL ! X  3S w

Lower Control Limit

Therefore 99.73% of points will be within the control limits unless there is an assignable cause

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Components of a Control Chart


Upper Control Limit

U Chart for Defects


4 UCL=3.794

Sample Count

Center Line

U=1.930

0 0 10 20

LCL=0.06613

Sample Number

Lower Control Limit

How many points do we need to set the initial control limits?


Check Act

Plan

Do

Control Chart Selection Tree


Type of data
Discrete Variable

Count

Count or Classification

Attribute

No Subgroup >1?

Yes

Fixed

Fixed or variable opportunity?

Variable

Fixed

Fixed or variable opportunity?

Variable

IMR Chart

X Bar and R or X Bar and S

C Chart

U Chart

NP Chart

P Chart

Supplement with EWMA if CTQ is sensitive to small process shifts

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Definitions
Non-conformance (defect) A single instance of a failure to meet some requirement Non-conforming Unit (defective) A single item containing one or more non-conformance

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Types of Attribute Control Charts


c chart: Number of non-conformances in a sample
Use & effectiveness: All subgroups are the same size Effective when the number of non-conformances possible on a unit is large, but the percentage of any single nonconformance is small Example: Surface irregularities, flaws, pinholes on continuous or extensive products such as yarn, wire, paper, textiles or other sheeted materials. The chance of a nonconformance occurring at any one spot is small, but the overall opportunity for non-conformance may be great.*
*Jurans Quality Control Handbook, Fourth Edition
Plan Do Check Act

Types of Attribute Control Charts


u chart: Defects Per Unit (DPU)
Use & effectiveness:
Use when several independent (required) non-conformities may occur in one unit, document, etc. Samples not required to be the same size Example: Complex assembly or document; electronic assembly, purchase order, bill of material, etc.

np chart: Number Non-conforming


Use & effectiveness:
Use when direct count of the number of non-conforming in a subgroup is desired. All subgroup sizes must be the same (Juran 24.22).

p chart: Fraction or Proportion Non-conforming


Use & effectiveness:
Use to describe a single quality characteristic or two or more characteristics considered collectively. Samples not required to be the same size
Plan Do Check Act

c (Count of Defects) Chart Formulae

!c3 c UCL
Center Line ! c

!c3 c LCL
Plan Do Check Act

u (Defects per Unit) Chart Formulae

u UCL ! u  3 n

Center Line ! u

u LCL ! u  3 n
Plan Do Check Act

np Number Nonconforming Chart Formulae


UCL = n p + 3 n p (1 - p) CL = n p LCL = n p - 3 n p (1 - p)

Plot the number of nonconforming not the percentage of nonconforming. Variable sample sizes are OK.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

P (Proportion Defective) Chart Formulae


p (1 p) UCL ! p  3 n
Center line = p

p (1  p) LCL ! p  3 n
To estimate p ( p) measure 20 - 25 samples calculate the  average proportion defective. Use this as a trial p until more data is available. Variable sample sizes are OK.
Plan Do Check Act

C Chart Example File= /Datafiles/Attribut.mtw


Stat>Control Charts>Attribute Charts>C Chart

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The C Chart
C Chart of C Chart Data 1
50

1
Sample Count 40 UCL=34.35 30

20

_ C=20.7

10 LCL=7.05 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 Sample

Worksheet: Attribut.MTW

Data 36 41 6 and 15 were the points 46 result of errors. Replace them with asterisks to indicate missing data then replot.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The New Chart


C Chart of C Chart Data
35 UCL=32.86 30 Sample Count 25 20 15 10 5 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 Sample 36 41 46 LCL=6.31

_ C=19.58

Worksheet: Attribut.MTW
Plan Do Check Act

The U Chart

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The U Chart
U Chart of Defects found
2.0

Sample Count Per Unit

Note: the control limits changed as the sample size changed.

1.5

UCL=1.439

1.0

_ U=0.763

0.5

0.0 1 3 5 7 9 11 Sample 13 15 17 19

LCL=0.086

Tests performed with unequal sample sizes Worksheet: Attribut.MTW

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The NP Chart

NP charts should be used only when the subgroup size is uniform.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The NP Chart
40

NP Chart of Batch 1 1 1

30 Sample Count

UCL=30.98

20

__ NP=19.17

10 LCL=7.36

1
0 1 6 11 16 21 26 Sample 31 36 41 46

Worksheet: Attribut.MTW Note: The session window describes the special causes identified on the chart.
Plan Do Check Act

The P Chart

Plan

Do

Check

Act

The P Chart
P Chart of Defectives
0.20

UCL=0.1885

0.15 Proportion

0.10

_ P=0.0955

0.05

0.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Sample 17 19 21 23 25

LCL=0.0026

Tests performed with unequal sample sizes Worksheet: Attribut.MTW

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Control Charts for Variable Data


Much more sensitive than charts for attribute data charts
X bar and R X bar and s

Critical decisions
Sample size - the width of the control limits is inversely proportional to the sample size for any multiple of s Subgroups - chances of differences due to assignable causes within subgroups should be minimized (same operator, shift, head, material etc.)

Plan

Do

Check

Act

X and R Control Chart Formulae & Constants X Control Limits =X A R


2

R Upper Control Limit = D 4 R R Lower Control Limit = D3 R


Sample Size 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Plan Do

A2 1.880 1.023 .729 .577 .483 .419 .373 .337 .308


Check Act

D3 .076 .136 .184 .223

D4 3.267 2.574 2.282 2.114 2.004 1.924 1.864 1.816 1.777

d2 1.128 1.693 2.059 2.326 2.534 2.704 2.847 2.970 3.078

X and s Chart Formulae & X Control Limits = X A1 s Constants


s Upper Control Limit = B4 s s Lower Control Limit = B3 s
N

A1 2.121 1.732 1.500 1.342 1.225

B3 0 0 0 0 .030

B4 3.267 2.568 2.089 2.089 1.970

2 3 4 5 6

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Creating an X-bar and R Chart

Plan

Do

Check

Act

An X-Bar and R Chart


Xbar-R Chart of measure1, ..., measure5
1 1 1 5

41 Sample Mean

UCL=41.294 _ _ X=40.000

40
6

39
1 1 1

6 1

LCL=38.706

38 5 10 15 20 25 Sample

30

35

40

45

4.5 Sample Range

UCL=4.743

3.0 _ R=2.243 1.5

0.0 5 10 15 20 25 Sample 30 35 40 45

LCL=0

Worksheet: Variable.MTW

The numbers show violations of the assumption of control. The nature of the violation is given in the session window.
Plan Do Check Act

StatGuide Interprets the Tests

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Rules of Standard Deviation where the data is?


UCL A 3 Sigma 2 Sigma 1 Sigma 60-75% C B A 1 Sigma 2 Sigma 3 Sigma LCL Time 90-98%

% of Data
99-99.9%

Measured Variable
Plan

B C

Do

Check

Act

Test 1

Test 2

One or more points beyond the 3W limit

2 out of 3 pts > 2 std Dev from the center line (same side)

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Test 3

4 out of 5 pts > 1 Std Dev from the center line (same side) Test 4

8 pts in a row > 1 Std Dev from the center line (either side)

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Test for special causes (pattern) ( For Range Chart )

One or more points beyond the 3W limit

8 pts in a row > 1 Std Dev from the center line (either side)

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Cycle Pattern

* The cycle pattern repeats continuously. * This is an indication of special causes

Plan

Do

Check

Act

* Trend is identified with - Points moving in one direction ( up or down ) - Points does not change direction continuously.

Trends are easily noticeable Trends occurs when more than six points continuously moves upwards or downwards.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Mixture

Points falling near the UCL or LCL crossing the center line. Mixture pattern contains 2 different types of patterns on the same chart. one falling on the UCL and the other on the LCL. Mixture pattern occurs when 8 points continuously fall on both side of the centerline without any point on Zone C.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Systematic

Continuously points are alternating up, down, up, down without changes. Points not necessarily alternating only, as long it is moving up and down, it is termed systematic. Systematic pattern is occuring as long as 14 points continuously is alternating up and down.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Hugging at centerline

All the points distribution comparing with the width between UCL and LCL : Points are distributed at the centerline. No points at UCL and LCL Hugging shows: - There is special causes existing or the process has changed. - Sampling method is not good - Two population existing (Bimodal) Hugging happens if more than 15 points are distributed in Zone C.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Shewharts concept of variation


Every process has variation; some process exhibits controlled variation , while others exhibits uncontrolled variation - (Walter Shewhart)

Controlled variation exhibits patterned variation characteristic which is stable and consistent against time.

Uncontrolled variation exhibits inconsistent variation which changes against time. This type of variation is not consistent and not stable.
Plan Do Check Act

Causes of Variation
Controlled Variation = Common Causes
We will call any unknown random cause of variation a chance cause or a common cause, the terms are synonymous and will be used as such. If the influence of any particular chance cause is very small, and if the number of chance causes of variation are very large and relatively constant, we have a situation where the variation is predictable within limits. You can see from the definition above, that a system such as this qualifies as a controlled system. Where Dr. Shewhart used the term chance cause, Dr. W. Edwards Deming coined the term common cause to describe the same phenomenon.

Uncontrolled Variation = Special Causes


At times, the variation is caused by a source of variation that is not part of the constant system. These sources of variation were called assignable causes by Shewhart, special causes of variation by Dr. Deming. Experience indicates that special causes of variation can usually be found without undue difficulty, leading to a process that is less variable.
Plan Do Check Act

Common causes Vs Special Causes


Special Causes

Common causes

Breakthrough Improvement

To achieve our goal, which will we concentrate, common causes or special causes?

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Intuitive SPC -Case Study 1


~The factory scrap level is at a year low of 2% ~Manager presents an award to the plant ~Ceremony in the cafeteria:Pizza and refreshment for all! ~Everyone should be proud of what you have accomplished
0.03 0.02 0.01

Complains per million units

Party Time

A
Plan Do Check Act

Year 1

Intuitive SPC -Case Study 1


~Three consecutive months of scrap increases ~Manager wishes he could take back the award. ~Instead of holding the gains, scrap went right back up ~Manager decides:"This group just needs tough management
Complains per million units
0.03 0.02 0.01

Manager wants to take back the award

J F

J J
Plan Do Check Act

Year 1

Intuitive SPC -Case Study 1


~ Scrap rises to a value of 2.6% ~ Manager decides to take action. ~ A "special meeting" is called to solve this problem once and for all. ~ After a sound lecture on the importance of scrap, the manager leaves. Employees aren't sure what to do. ~ Besides, they have other metrics which have more importance. So they do nothing.
0.03 0.02 0.01

Complains per million units

Scrap is highest this year. Action needed!!!

J F

J J A S O
Plan Do Check Act

Year 1

Intuitive SPC -Case Study 1


~Manager has seen reduced scrap levels since the end of last year. "Things are looking - up!" (Although nothing had been done to change the system) ~His takeaway: "A tough management style gets results"
Complains per million units
0.03 0.02 0.01

Manager Conclude: Tough management style gets results J F M


Plan

M
Do

J J A SONDJ F M A
Check Act

Year 1

Year 2

Intuitive SPC -Case Study 1


In this excercise, whats your opinion with regards to the Managers action? Is the Managers action valid? Is the Managers action fruitful? Kalau dilihat mengunakan control chart, bagaimana rupanya?

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Manager: "Hey, I made my decision based on data - How can I go wrong ?" Black Belt: "Your decisions were made from observing high and low points as signals. When in reality, it was all noise. Look at the data, there was no significant change in the process."
Complains per million units

Control Chart shows the VOP

0.03 0.02 0.01

UCL

LCL

J F
Plan Do

J J A SONDJ F M A
Act

Year 1
Check

Year 2

Pokerchip Excercise
(1) Take sample from process Pokerchip once an hour, total sample is 5 each time. Obtain data from Normal distribution with mean = 100 and stdev = 10. (2) Continue collecting sample until 15 samples are obtained. (3) Enter data into XBar-R Chart dan estimate: - Mean Sample Xbar-Bar - Range Sample Rbar - Stdev Sample X bar (4) Save data into file Pokerchip.excel.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

This Tool Is Given Free

This Tool Is Given Free

This Tool Is Given Free

Pokerchip Excercise

x-bar-bar 98.98 UCL 111.8

R-bar UCL LCL

22.23 47.02 0

s-bar UCL LCL

8.976 18.75 0

LCL 86.16

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Excercise:
Open file Tensile_Strength. Plot Xbar / R chart for Strength. An Engineer who has 10 years experience in the process says he face no problem with the process. Do you belief what he is saying? Analyze the control chart that has been plotted.

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Tensile Strength X-Bar R Chart


Xbar-R Chart of Strength
1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1

58 Sample M ean 56 54 52 50 1 3 5
1 5

8 1 1 1 1

_ C L=55.803 U _ X=55.093 LC L=54.382

1 1

11

13 Sample

15

17

19

21

23

25

8 6 4 2 0 1 3 5 7 9 11
1 1

Sample Range

U C L=2.605 _ R=1.232
2

LC L=0 23 25

13 Sample

15

17

19

21

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Does the process has problems? Is the process in-control?

Control Chart for Batch process


Range chart shows variation within batch. However, X bar R chart is not suitable. X bar chart only uses variation within batch for determining control limit. This assumption when variation between batch can be ignored (negligible). Generally, variation between batach is greater than variation within batch. For batch process, the type of control chart is IMR-R chart; where every mean sample is expected an individual value.

Batch 1 X-Bar, R
Plan Do Check Act

Batch 2 X-Bar, R

Batch 3 X-Bar, R

I-MR-R Charts
I-Chart CL = X UCL = X + 2.66 MR LCL = X 2.66 MR MR Chart CL = MR UCL = D4 MR LCL = D3 MR Range Chart CL = R UCL = D4 R LCL = D3 R
Plan Do Check Act

(D4 dan D3 when n=2, because MR is range between 2 continuous measurement)

I-MR-R Chart Output


I-MR-R/S (Between/Within) Chart of Strength
UCL=61.61 60 Subgroup Mean _ X=55.09

55

50 LCL=48.57

Batch mean Batch-to-Batch variation Variation within Batch


MR of Subgroup Mean 8

11

13

15

17

19

21

23

25 UCL=8.010

4 __ MR=2.452 0 1 8 3 5 7 9 11
1 1 1

LCL=0 13 15 17 19 21 23 25

Sam ple Range

4 UCL=2.605 _ R=1.232 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 Sample 15 17 19


2

LCL=0 23 25

21

Plan

Do

Check

Act

Comparison between Xbar chart dan I-MR chart for mean sample
Xbar-R Chart of Strength
1 1 1 1 1 6 6 1 1

58 Sample Mean 56 54 52 50 1 3 5

U C L=56.361 _ _ X=55.093 LC L=53.825

1 1

1 1

1 1

11

13 Sample

15

17

19

21

23

25

Control limit only depicts variation within batch. Subgroup Mean

8 Sample Range 6 4
1

I-MR-R/S (Between/Within) Chart of Strength


UCL=61.61 S b rou M u g p ean 60

U C L=4.647
_ X=55.09 _ R=2.198 2

55

2 0
1 2 2 21 2 2 23

50 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

LC L=0
25

LCL=48.57

11

M of S bg p M R u rou ean

13 Sample

15

17

19

21

23

25

UCL=8.010

Control limit depicts variation between and within batch

4 __ MR=2.452 0 1 8 3 5 7 9 11
1 1 1

LCL=0 13 15 17 19 21 23 25

S amp Rang le e

4 UCL=2.605 _ R=1.232 0

Plan 1

Do 5

Check 11 9

13 Sample

Act

LCL=0 23 25

15

17

19

21

CONTROL CHART FOR INDIVIDUAL DATA.


Sometimes, we are forced to use one measurement only (compared with taking one sample containing more than one measurement). (Jumlah sample n = 1) This happens when, - measurement is expensive Example : Test destroying the product (destructive test) - Measurement obtained from standard sources. Example : pH measurement for chemical mixture

Based on total Sample n = 1


Plan Do Check Act

I MR Control Charts
I CHART Centre Line = X Upper Control Limit = X + 2.66 MR Lower Control Limit = X - 2.66 MR MR CHART Centre Line = MR Upper Control Limit = 3.27 MR Lower Control Limit = None
Plan Do Check Act

Sample X MR 1 4 ... 2 4 ... 0 3 3.3 ... 0.7 4 4.7 ... 1.4 5 5.3 ... 0.6

Print Chart
140.00

X Chart

Return To Data Entry Screen

120.00

100.00

X Value

80.00

Pokerchip UCL X LCL X

60.00

Data Mean

40.00

This Tool is Given Free


20.00

0.00 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 Batch Number

Print Chart

Moving Range Control Chart

Return To Data Entry Screen

40 35

This Tool is Given Free


30 25 MR Value 20 15 10 5 0 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 Batch Number Moving Range UCL MR LCL MR MR Mean

END 7 QC Tools

Você também pode gostar