Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Overview
What are Quality Circles? How Do Quality Circles Work? How Can They be Used in an Organization?
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Increase Productivity Improve Quality Boost Employee Morale Increase in employee quality consciousness Problem prevention becomes habitual Promotion of employee motivation Improvement in the human relations More effective company communication
Do Check Act
Plan
More active job involvement Utilization of problem solving capabilities Contribution to personnel development Encouragement of teamwork Improvement of work environment Development of safety awareness Control and improvement of quality Productivity improvement Increased job security
Do Check Act
Plan
CATEGORIES OF DATA
Primary Data Secondary Data
Plan
Do
Check
Act
PRIMARY DATA
The data, which are collected from the units or individual respondents directly for the purpose of certain study or information. Example: If an experiment is conducted to know the effect of fertilizer doses on the yield OR the effect of a drug on the patients, the observation taken on each plot or patient constitute the primary data.
Plan Do Check Act
SECONDARY DATA
The data, which had been collected by certain people or agency, and statistically treated. Now the information contained in it is used again from records, processed and statistically analyzed to extract some information for other purpose.
Plan Do Check Act
SECONDARY DATA
Example: Secondary data is obtained from year books, census report, survey reports, official reports or reported experimental findings.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
ANALYSIS OF DATA
One of the most important objectives is to process the observed data and transform it to a form most suitable for decision making.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
DATA PROCESSING
Before tabulation of primary data, it should be edited for:
Plan
ANALYSIS OF DATA The measures of central tendency and dispersion are parts of data analysis along with the estimation and testing of hypothesis:
Plan
ANALYSIS OF DATA The data: 4,5,5,4,8,4,3,7. Mean = 4+5+5+4+8+4+3+7 8 Mean = 40/8 = 5 Median = 3,4,4,4,5,5,7,8 ( Select Two centered Data) Median = ( 4+5)/2 = 4.5 Mode
Plan Do Check
P Value = 0.1377 Data is Normal Median =4.5 This tool is given free
Mean = 5
Range = 5
Mode = 4
STD Dev=1.69
Plan
Do
Check
Act
MODULE 3
The Basic 7 Quality Tools
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Plan
Frequency Diagrams ( Histograms ) Cause and Effect (Ishikawa) Diagrams Check Sheets Pareto diagrams Flowcharts Scatter Diagrams Control Charts
Do Check Act
Fishbone Diagrams
No statistics involved Maps out a process/problem Makes improvement easier Looks like a Fish Skeleton
Plan Do Check Act
Fishbone Diagrams
Area A
4 1 2 3 5 6
Area B
1 2 3
4 5 6
Possible Causes
4 5 6 3 2 1 6 3 5 2 4 1
PROBLEM (EFFECT)
Area C
Plan Do Check
Area D
Act
Fishbone Diagrams
Step 1 - Identify the Problem Step 2 - Draw spine and bones Step 3 - Identify different areas where problems may arise from Step 4 - Identify what these specific causes could be Step 5 Use the finished diagram to brainstorm solutions to the main problems.
Plan Do Check Act
Fishbone Diagrams
Machines
Solder Gun
Size
Manpower
Skill Training
Heat sink
Physical limits
Power Source
Methods
Plan Do Check
Materials
Act
In the above example, Ive added some causes and some common categories know as the 4 Ms Machines, Manpower, Methods and Materials. How do we arrive at the possible causes? The best (and most common) method is brainstorming. This generates a large number of ideas in a short period of time. Once the diagram is complete, then we can continue with the evaluation. We obviously can not tackle all the problems at once because there are too many and besides some will have such small effects that they will not be worth bothering about.
Plan Do Check Act
Fishbone Diagrams
Machines
Solder Gun
Size
Manpower
Skill Training
Heat sink
Physical limits
Power Source
Methods
Plan Do Check
Materials
Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
HISTOGRAM
WHAT IT IS?
Histograms are effective Q.C. tools which are used in the analysis of data. They are used as a check on specific process parameters to determine where the greatest amount of variation occurs in the process, or to determine if process specifications are exceeded. This statistical method does not prove that a process is in a state of control. Nonetheless, histograms alone have been used to solve many problems in quality control.
Plan Do Check Act
HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS
How well is the histogram centered?
The centering of the data provides information on the process aim about some mean or nominal value. How wide is the histogram?
Looking at histogram width defines the variability of the process about the aim.
Plan Do Check Act
HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS
What is the shape of the histogram? Remember that the data is expected to form a normal or bell-shaped curve. Any significant change or anomaly usually indicates that there is something going on in the process which is causing the quality problem.
Plan Do Check Act
NORMAL
BI-MODAL
Distribution appears to have two peaks May indicate that data from more than one process are mixed together Materials may come from two separate vendors Samples may have come from two separate machines.
Plan Do Check Act
CLIFF-TYPE
Appears to end sharply or abruptly at one end Indicates possible sorting or inspection of non-conforming parts.
Plan Do Check Act
SAWTOOTHED
Also commonly referred to as a comb distribution, appears as an alternating jagged pattern Often indicates a measuring problem Improper gage readings Gage not sensitive enough for readings.
SKEWED
Positively Skewed Negatively Skewed
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Excercise
Construct an Histogram for the four distribution from the set data Plot Data. Can you determine the type of distribution from the Histogram? Can you determine the bimodal from the Histogram?
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Dist 1
Dist 2
Dist 3
Dist 4
Measurements of 50 items from process XYZ 147 131 198 190 165 170 178 157 168 145
Plan Do
179 137 142 161 155 125 181 135 141 177
Check Act
185 141 205 157 169 177 155 148 151 154
125 142 150 165 158 108 186 171 162 137
210 166 141 155 150 193 145 124 150 160
TALLY CHART RANGE 100-109 110-119 120-129 130-139 140-149 150-159 160-169 170-179 180-189 190-199 200-209 210-219 TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act
TALLY | ||| |||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||| ||| | | |||| ||||| ||| | | 1 0 3 4 9
NUMBER
11 8 6 3 3 1 1 50
HISTOGRAM
A tally is a simple form of categorising the data so as to let it speak for itself. In the first column, we have the basic categories themselves: 100 109, 110 119, and so on. In the second column, there is the tally the actual count of the number of items found in that category. In the third column is the actual number in the category, or the frequency. We now have the data in a form which speaks to us. The next obvious step is to display the data on a graph.
Plan Do Check Act
Histogram of Data
Normal 12 10 8 Frequency 6 4 2 0 100 120 140 160 Data 180 200
Mean 158.4 StDev 21.80 N 50
Histogram of Data
Normal 125 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 100 120 140 160 Data 180 200 185
Mean StDev N 158.4 21.80 50
If we add the tolerance limits to the graph, we can see that we are going to have a large proportion of rejects from the process. From this it is easy to see how vital the concept of the frequency diagram is to analysing process capabilities
Plan Do Check Act
F u cy req en
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Check Sheets
Counting and accumulating data WHAT IS A CHECK SHEETS?
One of the most common form of data collection, the check sheet is a structured form containing a list of things you want to measure, inspect or record.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Check Sheets
WHAT DOES CHECKLIST PREVENT
Forget to inspect Late inspection Ineffective inspection Partial inspection Not knowing who did the inspection No record for inspection done No action for inspection done
Do Check Act
Plan
Check Sheets
Product Number: 123456 Product Name: Widgits Line Name: Auto1 Process Name: Moulding 30/7 {M}
||||
Defective part
Mould Cracked Fibres Grit Pinholes Cracks Other TOTAL
31/7 {T}
|||
1/8 {W}
|||| |
2/8 {T}
|||
3/8 {F}
||||
TOTAL
21 8 14
||
||||
||||
||
|||
||||
||||
||
9 2
|||
|||
7 8 61
13
14
15
11
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Check Sheets
Check sheets are used to systematically record data from historical sources or from observations as they happen so that patterns and trends can be clearly detected and shown. Check sheets minimise clerical effort since the operator merely adds a mark to the tally on the prepared sheet rather than writing out a figure.
Plan Do Check Act
Product: Copper Pipe Date:14th April 2003 Manufacturing Stage: Final insp Inspectors Name: Sam Type of Defect: scratch, incomplete, misshapen Lot No: 24 Total No. inspected: 2530 Remarks: All inspected
Type Scratches Cracks Incomplete Misshapen Others //// //// //// //// ////
Check //// //// //// //// // //// //// //// /// //// //// //// //// //// / ///
Sub-Total 22 19 25 4 7
Grand Total Total Rejects //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //
77 54
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Pareto Discovery
In the late 19th century, an Italian economist by the name of Vilfredo Pareto undertook a study on the distribution of wealth in Italy. Pareto discovered that about 80% of the wealth in Italy was distributed to only 20% of the Italian families. In society, 80% of the value of all crimes committed was caused by 20% of the criminals In life, most happiness enjoyed by a person occurred during 20% of his lifetime. At work, 80% of ones valuable output occurred in 20% of his time
Plan Do Check Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
The pioneer of the 80/20 principle was Joseph Juran : - the great Quality Management Practitioner - the man behind the global quality revolution of the late 20th century
This Romanian-born US Engineer Juran alternately called the Pareto Principle or the 80/20 Principle the so-called The Rule of the Vital Few and the Trivial Many virtually synonymous with the search for high quality products and services.
Plan Do Check Act
The objective of the 80/20 Thinking is to generate actions which will make sharp improvements in your life and that of others
Plan Do Check Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems
Kadang-kadang sebagian besar masalah disebabkan oleh segelintir sebab. Sebagai contoh, 80% dari downtime disebabkan oleh 20% dari mesin; 80% Revenue berasal dari 20% pelanggan. Aturan 80/20 adalah satu cara untuk memprioritaskan usaha supaya tertumpu (fokus) pada apa yang lebih penting.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Cost Per $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 98.00 0.79 8.25 0.87 2.00 9.75 0.07 0.26 0.03 10.70
Act
Annual Cost
Cum Cum % Inv. Ann. Cost Of Total Class 49% 80% 88% 95% 96% 97% 98% 99% 99% 100% A A B B B C C C C C
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do
5000 395000 10000 75000 5000 1000 125000 30000 250000 600
Check
$ 490,000 $ 490,000 $ 312,050 $ 802,050 $ 82,500 $ 884,550 $ 65,250 $ 949,800 $ 10,000 $ 959,800 $ 9,750 $ 969,550 $ 8,750 $ 978,300 $ 7,800 $ 986,100 $ 7,500 $ 993,600 $ 6,420 $ 1,000,020
Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault A. DRY JOINT B. MISSED COMPONENT C. REVERSED COMPONENT D. ARCING E. OPEN CIRCUIT F. OTHER No. 2 5 8 4 1 3
TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act
23
Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault C. REVERSED COMPONENT B. MISSED COMPONENT D. ARCING F. OTHER A. DRY JOINT E. OPEN CIRCUIT No. 8 5 4 3 2 1
TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act
23
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems
5 4 3
REVERSED COMPONENT MISSED COMPONENT
2
ARCING OTHER DRY JOINT
1
OPEN CIRCUIT
C
Plan Do
B
Check Act
Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault
C. REVERSED COMPONENT B. MISSED COMPONENT D. ARCING F. OTHER A. DRY JOINT E. OPEN CIRCUIT
No.
8 5 4 3 2 1
COST
2 2 5 1 4 6
TOTAL COST
16 10 20 3 8 6
TOTAL
23
63
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems Fault
D. ARCING C. REVERSED COMPONENT B. MISSED COMPONENT A. DRY JOINT E. OPEN CIRCUIT F. OTHER
No.
4 8 5 2 1 3
COST
5 2 2 4 6 1
TOTAL COST
20 16 10 8 6 3
TOTAL
Plan Do Check Act
23
63
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Pareto Diagrams
Focus on key problems
20
16 10 8 6
ARCING REVERSED COMPONENT MISSED COMPONENT DRY JOINT OPEN CIRCUIT
3
OTHER
D
Plan Do
C
Check
B
Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
What is a flowchart?
Process Flow Diagram A diagram illustrating the activities of a process One of Ishikawas seven basic tools of quality
Plan Do Check Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Brief History
No originator, or father of flowcharts Forms of flowcharts have always been used Give us insight into historical processes
Plan Do Check Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Start/End The terminator symbol marks the starting or ending point of the system. It usually contains the word "Start" or "End."
Action or Process A box can represent a single step ("add two cups of of flour"), or and entire sub-process ("make bread") within a larger process.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Decision A decision or branching point. Lines representing different decisions emerge from different points of the diamond.
Plan Do Check Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Input/Output Represents material or information entering or leaving the system, such as customer order (input) or a product (output).
Connector Indicates that the flow continues where a matching symbol (containing the same letter) has been placed.
Plan Do Check Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Flow Line Lines indicate the sequence of steps and the direction of flow.
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Merge Indicates a step where two or more sub-lists or subprocesses become one.
Subroutine Indicates a sequence of actions that perform a specific task embedded within a larger process. This sequence of actions could be described in more detail on a separate flowchart.
Plan Do Check Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Manual Loop Indicates a sequence of commands that will continue to repeat until stopped manually.
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Flowcharts
Manufacturing Used to identify critical path Accounting Help visualize money flow Services Restaurants Real estate
Plan Do Check Act
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Flowcharts
Picturing the process
Summary :
Valuable and unique quality improvement tool Simple and effective way of visualizing and understanding a process Entire organization has an effect on the flowchart Everyone involved can take part in improving the process
Plan Do Check Act
Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables WHAT IS IT? Shows relationship between 2 characteristic values HOW DOES IT RELATE? Number of working years and the salary! The plating time and the plating thickness! Dimensions before and after assembly!
Plan Do Check Act
Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
Example Exercise :
The rise in temperature in the motor coil of an electric shaver needs to be controlled so it does not exceed 500C. The data shown in the next slide is the results of a survey carried out to find out the relationship between the coil temperature (X) and the surface temperature of the motor case (Y). Collect more then 30 pairs of data to show relationship
Plan Do Check Act
Scatter Diagrams
No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 X 30.6 33.0 33.2 33.5 34.2 34.3 34.7 35.6 35.6 35.7 35.7 35.9 36.0 36.2 36.3 36.4 Y 15.9 20.0 17.7 19.0 22.5 19.9 20.9 20.3 22.9 19.7 21.9 23.7 18.9 21.2 20.5 22.3 No 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 X 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.5 37.5 37.8 37.8 38.3 38.6 38.7 38.8 38.8 38.9 39.2 39.3 39.5 Y 23.2 21.5 22.4 20.1 23.3 21.8 23.0 23.3 22.9 24.5 20.7 21.5 23.1 23.1 23.3 22.0 No 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 X 39.5 40.0 40.3 40.4 40.5 40.5 40.6 41.0 41.2 41.3 41.3 41.8 42.0 42.1 42.8 42.9 Y 24.5 22.0 23.0 20.9 21.3 29.9 25.7 23.7 24.4 22.2 25.7 26.8 25.0 23.1 26.6 25.5 No 49 50 X 43.8 44.5 Y 26.3 26.8
Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
X-Bar = 38.308 Y = mX + C , and Y-Bar = 22.608 C = Y mX C = 22.608 (0.645*38.308) C = 22.61 24.71 C = - 2.1 The Regression Equation is Y = 0.645X 2.101
m = xy n(x-Bar)(y-Bar) n(x-Bar)(yx -n(x-Bar) n(xr= ______nxy - xy______ = .771 [nx- (x)][ny- (y)]
Do Check Act
Gradient, m = 0.645
Plan
Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
Regression
Prob(>|t|) Parameter b0 b1 Residual St dev R2 R2(adj) F Prob(>F)
Plan Do Check
0.00
Act
There is a Correlation
Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
Fitted Line Plot
Y = - 2.114 + 0.6453 X 30.0 27.5 25.0 Y 22.5 20.0 17.5 15.0 30
Plan Do
S R-Sq R-Sq(adj) 1.64175 59.5% 58.6%
32
34
Check
36
38 X Act
40
42
44
46
Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
There is a positive correlation between X and Y. But how good is the correlation??? The value of r = 0.7711 The Regression Model is 59.59 % accurate.
Plan Do Check Act
Scatter Diagrams
Measuring relationships between variables
Positiv Correlation Positive
5 5 4.5 4.5
Negative Correlation
3.5
No Correlation
150
400
650
4.5
3.5
Positive Correlation?
150
400
650 5
Negative Correlation?
4.5
4.5
Control Charts
Identifying Sources Of Variations
Control charts are used to monitor, control and improve process performance by focussing on its variation and its cause. The control chart can be thought of as a target. The average line is the bull's-eye and the control limits are the extremes of the target. Control charts are used by taking periodic measurements or observations of products or processes. These results are compared with calculated control limits, and if the limits are exceeded action is taken (and recorded) to bring the process back into control.
Plan Do Check Act
Six Sigma, A Quest for Process Perfection Meet Goals and Attack Variation
\DataFile\Attribut mtw \DataFile\Variable.mtw Plan Do Check Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
What happens after an out-of-control situation occurs at the core of a successful SPC program?
Plan
Do
Check
Act
General Concepts
w = some characteristic of interest
X
LCL ! X 3S w
Therefore 99.73% of points will be within the control limits unless there is an assignable cause
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Sample Count
Center Line
U=1.930
0 0 10 20
LCL=0.06613
Sample Number
Plan
Do
Count
Count or Classification
Attribute
No Subgroup >1?
Yes
Fixed
Variable
Fixed
Variable
IMR Chart
C Chart
U Chart
NP Chart
P Chart
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Definitions
Non-conformance (defect) A single instance of a failure to meet some requirement Non-conforming Unit (defective) A single item containing one or more non-conformance
Plan
Do
Check
Act
!c3 c UCL
Center Line ! c
!c3 c LCL
Plan Do Check Act
u UCL ! u 3 n
Center Line ! u
u LCL ! u 3 n
Plan Do Check Act
Plot the number of nonconforming not the percentage of nonconforming. Variable sample sizes are OK.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
p (1 p) LCL ! p 3 n
To estimate p ( p) measure 20 - 25 samples calculate the average proportion defective. Use this as a trial p until more data is available. Variable sample sizes are OK.
Plan Do Check Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
The C Chart
C Chart of C Chart Data 1
50
1
Sample Count 40 UCL=34.35 30
20
_ C=20.7
10 LCL=7.05 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 Sample
Worksheet: Attribut.MTW
Data 36 41 6 and 15 were the points 46 result of errors. Replace them with asterisks to indicate missing data then replot.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
_ C=19.58
Worksheet: Attribut.MTW
Plan Do Check Act
The U Chart
Plan
Do
Check
Act
The U Chart
U Chart of Defects found
2.0
1.5
UCL=1.439
1.0
_ U=0.763
0.5
0.0 1 3 5 7 9 11 Sample 13 15 17 19
LCL=0.086
Plan
Do
Check
Act
The NP Chart
Plan
Do
Check
Act
The NP Chart
40
NP Chart of Batch 1 1 1
30 Sample Count
UCL=30.98
20
__ NP=19.17
10 LCL=7.36
1
0 1 6 11 16 21 26 Sample 31 36 41 46
Worksheet: Attribut.MTW Note: The session window describes the special causes identified on the chart.
Plan Do Check Act
The P Chart
Plan
Do
Check
Act
The P Chart
P Chart of Defectives
0.20
UCL=0.1885
0.15 Proportion
0.10
_ P=0.0955
0.05
0.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Sample 17 19 21 23 25
LCL=0.0026
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Critical decisions
Sample size - the width of the control limits is inversely proportional to the sample size for any multiple of s Subgroups - chances of differences due to assignable causes within subgroups should be minimized (same operator, shift, head, material etc.)
Plan
Do
Check
Act
B3 0 0 0 0 .030
2 3 4 5 6
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
41 Sample Mean
UCL=41.294 _ _ X=40.000
40
6
39
1 1 1
6 1
LCL=38.706
38 5 10 15 20 25 Sample
30
35
40
45
UCL=4.743
0.0 5 10 15 20 25 Sample 30 35 40 45
LCL=0
Worksheet: Variable.MTW
The numbers show violations of the assumption of control. The nature of the violation is given in the session window.
Plan Do Check Act
Plan
Do
Check
Act
% of Data
99-99.9%
Measured Variable
Plan
B C
Do
Check
Act
Test 1
Test 2
2 out of 3 pts > 2 std Dev from the center line (same side)
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Test 3
4 out of 5 pts > 1 Std Dev from the center line (same side) Test 4
8 pts in a row > 1 Std Dev from the center line (either side)
Plan
Do
Check
Act
8 pts in a row > 1 Std Dev from the center line (either side)
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Cycle Pattern
Plan
Do
Check
Act
* Trend is identified with - Points moving in one direction ( up or down ) - Points does not change direction continuously.
Trends are easily noticeable Trends occurs when more than six points continuously moves upwards or downwards.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Mixture
Points falling near the UCL or LCL crossing the center line. Mixture pattern contains 2 different types of patterns on the same chart. one falling on the UCL and the other on the LCL. Mixture pattern occurs when 8 points continuously fall on both side of the centerline without any point on Zone C.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Systematic
Continuously points are alternating up, down, up, down without changes. Points not necessarily alternating only, as long it is moving up and down, it is termed systematic. Systematic pattern is occuring as long as 14 points continuously is alternating up and down.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Hugging at centerline
All the points distribution comparing with the width between UCL and LCL : Points are distributed at the centerline. No points at UCL and LCL Hugging shows: - There is special causes existing or the process has changed. - Sampling method is not good - Two population existing (Bimodal) Hugging happens if more than 15 points are distributed in Zone C.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Controlled variation exhibits patterned variation characteristic which is stable and consistent against time.
Uncontrolled variation exhibits inconsistent variation which changes against time. This type of variation is not consistent and not stable.
Plan Do Check Act
Causes of Variation
Controlled Variation = Common Causes
We will call any unknown random cause of variation a chance cause or a common cause, the terms are synonymous and will be used as such. If the influence of any particular chance cause is very small, and if the number of chance causes of variation are very large and relatively constant, we have a situation where the variation is predictable within limits. You can see from the definition above, that a system such as this qualifies as a controlled system. Where Dr. Shewhart used the term chance cause, Dr. W. Edwards Deming coined the term common cause to describe the same phenomenon.
Common causes
Breakthrough Improvement
To achieve our goal, which will we concentrate, common causes or special causes?
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Party Time
A
Plan Do Check Act
Year 1
J F
J J
Plan Do Check Act
Year 1
J F
J J A S O
Plan Do Check Act
Year 1
M
Do
J J A SONDJ F M A
Check Act
Year 1
Year 2
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Manager: "Hey, I made my decision based on data - How can I go wrong ?" Black Belt: "Your decisions were made from observing high and low points as signals. When in reality, it was all noise. Look at the data, there was no significant change in the process."
Complains per million units
UCL
LCL
J F
Plan Do
J J A SONDJ F M A
Act
Year 1
Check
Year 2
Pokerchip Excercise
(1) Take sample from process Pokerchip once an hour, total sample is 5 each time. Obtain data from Normal distribution with mean = 100 and stdev = 10. (2) Continue collecting sample until 15 samples are obtained. (3) Enter data into XBar-R Chart dan estimate: - Mean Sample Xbar-Bar - Range Sample Rbar - Stdev Sample X bar (4) Save data into file Pokerchip.excel.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Pokerchip Excercise
22.23 47.02 0
8.976 18.75 0
LCL 86.16
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Excercise:
Open file Tensile_Strength. Plot Xbar / R chart for Strength. An Engineer who has 10 years experience in the process says he face no problem with the process. Do you belief what he is saying? Analyze the control chart that has been plotted.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
58 Sample M ean 56 54 52 50 1 3 5
1 5
8 1 1 1 1
1 1
11
13 Sample
15
17
19
21
23
25
8 6 4 2 0 1 3 5 7 9 11
1 1
Sample Range
U C L=2.605 _ R=1.232
2
LC L=0 23 25
13 Sample
15
17
19
21
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Batch 1 X-Bar, R
Plan Do Check Act
Batch 2 X-Bar, R
Batch 3 X-Bar, R
I-MR-R Charts
I-Chart CL = X UCL = X + 2.66 MR LCL = X 2.66 MR MR Chart CL = MR UCL = D4 MR LCL = D3 MR Range Chart CL = R UCL = D4 R LCL = D3 R
Plan Do Check Act
55
50 LCL=48.57
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25 UCL=8.010
4 __ MR=2.452 0 1 8 3 5 7 9 11
1 1 1
LCL=0 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
LCL=0 23 25
21
Plan
Do
Check
Act
Comparison between Xbar chart dan I-MR chart for mean sample
Xbar-R Chart of Strength
1 1 1 1 1 6 6 1 1
58 Sample Mean 56 54 52 50 1 3 5
1 1
1 1
1 1
11
13 Sample
15
17
19
21
23
25
8 Sample Range 6 4
1
U C L=4.647
_ X=55.09 _ R=2.198 2
55
2 0
1 2 2 21 2 2 23
50 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
LC L=0
25
LCL=48.57
11
M of S bg p M R u rou ean
13 Sample
15
17
19
21
23
25
UCL=8.010
4 __ MR=2.452 0 1 8 3 5 7 9 11
1 1 1
LCL=0 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
S amp Rang le e
4 UCL=2.605 _ R=1.232 0
Plan 1
Do 5
Check 11 9
13 Sample
Act
LCL=0 23 25
15
17
19
21
I MR Control Charts
I CHART Centre Line = X Upper Control Limit = X + 2.66 MR Lower Control Limit = X - 2.66 MR MR CHART Centre Line = MR Upper Control Limit = 3.27 MR Lower Control Limit = None
Plan Do Check Act
Sample X MR 1 4 ... 2 4 ... 0 3 3.3 ... 0.7 4 4.7 ... 1.4 5 5.3 ... 0.6
Print Chart
140.00
X Chart
120.00
100.00
X Value
80.00
60.00
Data Mean
40.00
Print Chart
40 35
END 7 QC Tools