Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Michael Porter on CA
Competitive advantage grows fundamentally out of the value a firm is able to create for its buyers that exceeds the firm s cost of creating it. It may take the form of prices lower than competitors for equivalent benefits or the provision of unique benefits that more than offset a premium price.
Competitive Advantage
Having a competitive advantage is necessary for a firm to compete in the market But what is more important is whether the competitive advantage is sustainable A firm must identify its position relative to the competition in the market By knowing if it is a leader, challenger, follower or nicher, it can adopt appropriate strategies to compete
Examples of SCA
For many years, Singapore Airlines were riding on its SCA of having the best in-flight service As more airlines improved their service and narrowed the gap, SIA sought other competitive advantages among which are
The most modern fleet Outstanding Service on the Ground A super entertainment system in its cabins Comfort in its First Class cabins at an unparallel level
Advantages of CA
Enables
The firm the Capability for Superior Value Delivery The capability, for capturing Above Average Rate of Return The capability, for Converting Good Products into Successful Products.
In finance
Assets Liquidity Cash flow Costs Profitability Quality of Financial Management etc.
In Mfg/Ops
Size or Capacity of prodn Locational advantage Prodn facilities Raw material their cost, quality and availability Automation Inventory management Flexibilty etc
In R&D
Nature, Depth and Quality of R&D Resource allocation Quality, Expertise and Experience of R&D personnel etc
In HR
Quality, Expertise and Experience of personnel Morale and Motivation of people Personnel turnover
Product range
Widest product range in terms of products, shades and pack sizes
Brand power
Brands like Apex, Ace, Apcolite are quite powerful
Distribution
Over 90% accuracy in forecasting, even month to month, far superior to competitors, over 100 fastest moving SKUs monitored day to day Countrywide distribution, AP reaches all the markets where organized as well as unorganized reach 15000 dealers across the country, nearest competitors has less than 10000 Large network of regional offices, depots and sales personnel AP s average inventory level is 28 days, whereas industry standard is 51 days, at the same time the service to the customer is much higher as compared to the competitor in terms of availability of material.
Credit control
Outstanding is received within 25 days, where as for the competitors it is 40 days or above
Service First company to provide paint solutions, online solutions, world class display showrooms
Manufacturing/Operations factors Size advantage as compared to competition In house production ensures high reliability in supplies and quality assurance Four production locations spread Finance factors Leader in profits and operating margins ROI 40%, rest of the industry 22% Cash rich Corporate factors Many accolades and awards 1995 Corporate excellence award from HBSA & ET One of the India s most excellent companies by IDBI Amongst top 5 paint manufacturers in the world by KC Luyben of Amsterdam And many
Competition
Competition is the battle between businesses to win consumer acceptance and loyalty. The free-enterprise system ensures that businesses make decisions about what to produce, how to produce it, and what price to charge for the product or service. Competition is a basic premise of the free-enterprise system because it is believed that having more than one business competing for the same consumers will cause the products and/or services to be provided at a better quality and a lower cost than if there were no competitors. In other words, competition should provide the consumers with the best value for their hard-earned money.
Market Share
Last 2 Last yr Last yr Current Last 2 Last yr
Mind Share
Last yr Current Last 2 Last yr
Heart Share
Last yr Current
A B C
39% 53% 8%
Types of Competition
Characteristics Number of competitors Perfect/Pure Competition Many Monopolistic Competition Few to many Oligopoly Very few Monopoly No direct competition Regulated by government
Ease of entry or Easy exit from industry Similarity of goods/services offered by competing firms Same
Seemingly different Similar or different No directly but may be quite competing products similar Some Some Considerable (in true monopoly) Little (in regulated one)
Examples
Agricultural Fast-food produce, non restaurant, tooth branded low paste, shampoo etc involvement items
Focus
Here co. focuses its effort on serving few market segments well rather than going after the entire market.
Do the worst. These try to be good on all strategic count and end up being not good at anything.
Competitive Forces
Michael Porter has identified five forces that determine the intrinsic long-run attractiveness of a market as follows: a. Industry competitors (segment rivalry): a segment is unattractive if it already contains numerous, strong or aggressive competitors. These condition will lead to frequent price wars, advertising battles, and new product introduction (expensive to compete) e.g. cellular phone market b. Substitute products: a segment is unattractive if substitutes place a limit on prices and on profits
Competitive Forces
c. Potential entrants: a segment s attractiveness varies with the height of its entry and exit barriers. The most attractive segment is entry barriers are high and exit barriers are low. But the worst case when entry barriers are low and exit barriers are high e.g. airline industry. The main points of entry barriers: higher capital investment, economies of scale, patent and licensing, strategic location, raw materials, distributors, reputation etc The main points of exit barriers: moral or legal obligation to employees, creditors, customers; less worthy of book value assets, higher vertical integration (be able to make lower operating cost and more controllable) Buyers growing bargaining power: a segment is unattractive when buyers are concentrated, product is undifferentiated, price sensitive, switching costs are low. Thus, firms must develop superior offers than competitors made. Suppliers growing bargaining power: a segment is unattractive when suppliers are concentrated, few substitutes, supplied product is an important input, switching costs are high. Thus, firms must win-win relation
d.
e.