Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A.-L. Asikainen, Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor M. Squicciarini, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Outline
Outline
The construction sector and its importance; Characterising construction and its innovative activities. Aim of the study and motivation; The construction sector in the NACE classification; A value chain-based wide definition of the sector: Core and non-core activities; Performance indicators for core and non-core construction; R&D and innovation in construction; Conclusions.
Characterising construction
Characterising construction
2a
EU27; 10.7 Finland; 8.5 France; 9 Germany; 9.7 Great Britain; 9.1 Greece; 6.5 Hungary; 11.8 Italy; 9.7 Latvia; 11.5 Lithuania; 11.5 Luxembourg; 11.8 Malta; 10 Netherlands; 10.2 Norway; 11.6 Poland; 9.2 Portugal; 12.3 Romania; 10.6 Slovakia; 9.1 Slovenia; 10.7 Switzerland; 10.7 0 5 10 Sweden; 15.1
Ireland; 19.6
Spain; 19 Turkey; 28 20 25 30
15
Source: Authors own compilation on data from FIEC (2008) Productivity Conference 2009, 14 - 15 October, Saltsjbaden
Characterising construction
2b
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
1995 4.2 6 6 5.7 5.5 9.1 3.2 1996 4.3 5.8 6 5.9 5.7 9 3.1 1997 4.3 5.6 6 6.2 6 5.2 8.4 3.2 1998 4.6 5.5 6.3 6 6.2 5.5 7.4 3 1999 4.7 5.6 6.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 6.1 2.7 2000 4.7 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.9 6.6 2.5 2001 4.9 5.7 5.9 4.7 5.3 5.7 7.4 2.4 2002 4.9 5.7 6.3 4.6 5.3 5.9 5.4 2.3 2003 4.8 5.7 6.8 4.5 4.7 6.1 6 2.4 2004 4.9 5.8 7 5 5.1 7.1 5.7 2.4 2005 5.2 6 7 5 4.9 7.9 5.3 2.5 2006 5.1 6.2 7.5 5.4 4.7 8.3 5.2 2.7 8.4 5.7 2.9 6.5 7.9 5.6 2007
United States EU27 total Aus tralia Turkey Brazil India Russian Federation South Africa
Source: Authors own compilation on data from OECD Factbook 2009 Productivity Conference 2009, 14 - 15 October, Saltsjbaden
Characterising construction
Characterising construction
Characterising construction
Project-based organisations
Supply clients with custom-designed products and services, on a project base. Impossibility to produce a test piece. Project-specific innovations difficult to translate into firm-wide capability.
Characterising construction
4a
Construction workforce
Senior, executive, and business process managers Construction managers Non-construction professional, technical, IT, and other office -based staff Wood trades and interior fit-out Bricklayers Building envelope specialists Painters and decorators Plasterers and dry liners Roofers Floorers Glaziers Specialist building operatives nec* Scaffolders Plant operatives Plant mechanics/fitters Steel erectors/structural Labourers nec* Electrical trades and installation Plumbing and HVAC Trades Logistics Civil engineering operatives nec* Nonconstruction operatives Total (SIC 45)
2009 98,010 219,080 282,340 281,150 88,160 92,590 135,660 48,300 46,520 38,050 41,740 56,170 24,260 46,750 27,060 28,330 116,590 177,880 176,920 32,280 59,660 123,930 2,241,430
As % of SIC^45 4.37 9.77 12.60 12.54 3.93 4.13 6.05 2.15 2.08 1.70 1.86 2.51 1.08 2.09 1.21 1.26 5.20 7.94 7.89 1.44 2.66 5.53 100.00
Source: Authors own compilation on data from the UK Construction Skills Network, 2009 Productivity Conference 2009, 14 - 15 October, Saltsjbaden
Characterising construction
Project-based organisations
Supply clients with custom-designed products and services, on a project base. Impossibility to produce a test piece. Project-specific innovations difficult to translate into firm-wide capability.
Construction in NACE
Construction in NACE
Upstream activities, mainly manufacturing ones, whose output is an input into construction core activities + services preceding constr. core phases
Upstream activities, mainly manufacturing ones, whose output is an input into construction core activities + services preceding constr. core phases
Downstream activities, normally carried out in connection to a building or civil engineering work. E.g. maintenance of buildings, real estate services, facility mngt.
Upstream activities, mainly manufacturing ones, whose output is an input into construction core activities + services preceding constr. core phases
Downstream activities, normally carried out in connection to a building or civil engineering work. E.g. maintenance of buildings, real estate services, facility mngt.
Broad range of production and service activities, from wholesale of construction materials, to renting machinery and equipment, to recycling waste and scrap.
Pre-production: 14.11; 17.54; 20.20; 20.3; 24.30; 25.23; 26.14; 25.25, 26.30; 26.4; 26.51; 26.52; 26.53; 26.6; 26.7; 28.11; 28.12; 28.22; 29.52; 28.72; 36.63; 74.2
Core activities: 45
Support activities & services 37.20; 45.31; 51.53; 51.54; 52.46; 71.32; 74.2
71 Renting of machinery and equipment without operator and of personal and household goods
71.32 Renting of construction and civil engineering machinery and equipment
28.2
Performance indicators
10
Construction
28.9 (3.26)
572.3 (1.72)
145.1 (-1.86)
3.9 (3.63)
Non-core manufacturing
30.4 (3.52)
8408 (8.5)
188.6 (3.57)
37.3 (6.11)
Non-core service
33.3 (3.32)
1795 (6.37)
367 (18.0)
14.2 (6.1)
Source: Authors own compilation on Statistics Finland data Productivity Conference 2009, 14 - 15 October, Saltsjbaden
Performance indicators
11
Sector
Num. Obs. Internal R&D External R&D 3.5 11.8 14.5 12.7
Percentage values Inv. machines 16.6 29.3 32.3 29.8 Acq. Ext. knowledge 4 8.4 10.5 9.4 Continuous R&D 40.8 54.8 64.2 61.8 Occasional R&D 59.2 45.2 35.8 38.2
Performance indicators
12
Sector
Percentage values Process innovators 5.944 8.979 13.396 11.773 Share turnover Inno. new to market 0.728 2.204 3.346 2.842 Share turnover Inno. new to firm 1.909 3.659 5.096 4.475
Performance indicators
13
Sector
Percentage values Trademarks 1.2 6.7 7.1 6.3 2.4 11.8 12.2 10.9 Designs 0.7 4.9 4.6 4.2
Conclusions
14
To conclude
We propose a value-chain based definition of construction, able to better capture the importance and dynamics of the sector. The definition is NACE based and does not require NACE classifications to be changed. -> Comparability through time and across countries; immediate applicability. The construction industry looks very different when non-core activities are considered, in terms of all indicators. Ignoring this leads to a general misperception of the sector. The proposed value-chain definition of construction helps uncovering leverage points, and formulating more effective policies, especially innovation ones.