Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Outline
What is Earned Value? Government Requirements Small Project Usage Why Use Earned Value? Earned Value in a Nutshell Conclusions
November 21, 2005 2
Government Requirements
OMB Circular A-11, Exhibit 300 (2004)
Requires EVMS for all major acquisitions Agencies must have ANSI-compliant EVMS in place by December 31, 2005 EVMS data must be used to identify problems and provide realistic final cost estimates as a part of decision packages
Government Requirements
These requirements apply to large projects or programs; DOD requires
Contract Value $50M: validated ANSI-compliant EVMS, structured reports and reviews, ongoing surveillance $50M > Contract Value $20M: ANSI-compliant EVMS (validation not required), tailored reports and reviews, ongoing surveillance Contract Value < $20M: EVMS optional, ongoing surveillance
TSP expands the use of EVM to the project level Use of PSP and TSP helps projects meet their commitments (Tuma, D. and Webb, D., Personal Earned Value:
Why Projects Using the Team Software Process Consistently Meet Schedule Commitments, Crosstalk, March 2005, p. 17.)
PSP and TSP are registered service marks of Carnegie Mellon University
November 21, 2005 8
JWST FITS Writer development INS Master Schedule development DMS Automated Test System development
November 21, 2005 9
Provides objective measures of progress Allows early detection of budget and schedule problems Allows an objective projection of eventual project cost and schedule
November 21, 2005 10
11
Consider task duration Select Earned Value Methods that are as objective as possible
12
Objectivity
Current Date
Value ($1000s)
$50
$-
11/26/2005
10/28/2006
12/23/2006
11/24/2007
7/8/2006
9/2/2006
6/9/2007
10/1/2005
1/21/2006
3/18/2006
5/13/2006
2/17/2007
4/14/2007
8/4/2007
9/29/2007
1/19/2008
3/15/2008
Date
November 21, 2005 14
5/10/2008
PV
$200
BAC=$200
Value ($1000s)
$150
PMB
$100
PV EV AC
SV=EV-PV=($30)
$50
CV=EV-AC=($17)
AC
$11/26/2005 10/28/2006 7/8/2006 9/2/2006 10/1/2005 1/21/2006 3/18/2006 5/13/2006
EV
12/23/2006 11/24/2007 6/9/2007 2/17/2007 4/14/2007 8/4/2007 9/29/2007 1/19/2008 3/15/2008 5/10/2008
Date
November 21, 2005 15
Budget At Completion (BAC) sum of the planned value plus the Undistributed Budget
November 21, 2005 18
$200
Value ($1000s)
CPI=EV/AC=0.81
$150
PV EV AC
$100
VAC=BAC-EAC=($33)
ETC=(BAC-EV)/CPI=$146
11/26/2005 10/28/2006 12/23/2006 11/24/2007 10/1/2005 1/21/2006 3/18/2006 5/13/2006 2/17/2007 4/14/2007 9/29/2007 1/19/2008 3/15/2008 5/10/2008 7/8/2006 9/2/2006 6/9/2007 8/4/2007
ETC
$50
$-
Date
November 21, 2005 19
Cost Performance Index (CPI) productivity measure: is the work costing what was expected? CPI = EV/AC
< 1 Inefficient, > 1 Efficient
November 21, 2005 20
EV
AC SV BV CV BAC SPI CPI ETC EAC VAC
(none)
(none) SV=EV - PV BV=PV - AC CV=EV - AC BAC= UB + S PV SPI=EV/PV CPI=EV/AC ETC=(BAC-EV) /CPI EAC=AC+ETC VAC = BAC - EAC
>0 = Under, <0 = Over >0 = Ahead, <0 = Behind >0 = Under, <0 = Over >0 = Productive, <0 = Unproductive UB=Undistributed Budget >1 = Faster, <1 = Slower >1 = Efficient, < 1 = Inefficient
22
Costs of EVMS
Marginal cost of using EVMS is estimated at less than 1% to a few% of total contract cost
Based mainly on large DOD contracts with experienced EVMS users Some costs are unnecessary according to EVMS criteria, but effort is put into those activities anyway
Expect costs to be higher at STScI due to inexperience in using EVM and our culture
Mitigated by our implementation
Christensen, David S., The Costs and Benefits of the Earned Value Management Process, Acquisition review Quarterly, Fall, 1998, p. 373.
23
The most common problem product teams face is unreasonable schedule pressure. When teams are forced to work to unreasonable schedules, they are unable to make useful plans. Every plan they produce misses managements edicted schedule and is therefore unacceptable. As a result, they must work without the guidance of an orderly plan. Under these conditions, the team will generally take much longer to complete the project than they otherwise would.
Watts Humphrey, Pathways to Process Maturity: The Personal Software Process and Team Software Process, SEI Interactive, June 1999.
26