Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Opthtal. Physiol. Opt. 2002 22: 248-256. Experimento: delineamento inteiramente casualizado O objetivo estimar o grau de variao de uma medida particular e em muitos casos comparar diferentes fontes de variao em espao e em tempo. Neste caso, neste exemplo, as componentes de varincia so mais teis que o teste F para indicar que a variao entre dias quase duas vezes aquela num nico dia.
One-way
ANOVA
model in which the objective is not to measure a fixed effect but to estimate the degree of variation of a particular measurement and to compare different sources of variation in space and/or time. These designs are often called nested or hierarchical designs. Hence, in our glaucoma trial, we may wish to determine the degree of variability in the response to a treatment within a single patient, between different patients, or with time. The most important statistics from a random effects model are the components of variance which estimate the variance associated with each of these sources of variation influencing a measurement. Hence, the nested design is particularly useful in preliminary experiments designed to estimate different sources of variation and hence, in the design of experiments.
Statistical guidelines for clinical studies of human vision. Richard A Armstrong, Leon N Davies, Mark C M Dunne and Bernard Gilmartin. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 31 (2011) 123136.
n = 1 paciente medida = IOP = presso intra-ocular trs sesses de medies distanciadas de 3 dias cada sesso Days = dias 3 ; 6 e 9 dias. Foram efetuadas 5 medies no mesmo indivduo: - aps cada 1 min foi efetuada sucessivamente uma leitura da presso e, tambm, no 3 dia; no 6 dia e no 9 dia.
Valores
Sesso 1
18 19 20 19 21
Sesso 2
17 18 16 17 17
Sesso 3
19 18 20 20 19
C2 Days
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
Clicar em Results e check box (X) Display expected mean squares and variance components
Clicamos em OK ANOVA: IOP versus Days Factor Type Levels Days random 3
Values 1, 2, 3
DF 2 12 14
MS 8.8667 0.8333
F 10.64
P 0.002
S = 0.912871
R-Sq = 63.94%
R-Sq(adj) = 57.93%
No STATISTICA for Windows -- ANOVA one-way com o fator Days como Var. Independente
Univariate Tests of Significance for IOP (Spreadsheet1) Sigma-restricted parameterization Effective hypothesis decomposition SS Intercept Days Error 5152.267 17.733 10.000 Degr. of - Freedom 1 2 12 MS 5152.267 8.867 0.833 F 6182.720 10.640 p 0.000000 0.002198
Expected Mean Square for Each Term (using unrestricted model) (2) + 5 (1) (2)
1 2
Error term 2
Concluso: Expected Mean Square for Each Term (using unrestricted model) (2) + 5 (1) (2)
1 2
Error term 2
prefervel medir uma vez a cada 3 dias do que medir num nico dia vrias vezes !
aconselhvel medir a presso s uma vez, mas numa amostra de dias e no medir seguidamente a cada 1 minuto
A variao a cada 3 dias = 1.6067 o dobro da variao a cada 1 minuto num dia = 0.833 .................................. Se IOP variasse consideravelmente de minuto a minuto, mas em mdia pouco entre os dias, ento, a melhor estratgia seria obter vrias medies de IOP num nico dia. Se a variao de minuto a minuto fosse desprezvel, mas houvesse variao significante de dia para dia, seria melhor medir IOP s uma vez, mas numa amostra de dias. o caso desse nosso exemplo: - pois a variao a cada 3 dias = 1.6067 o dobro da variao a cada 1 minuto num dia = 0.833. ..................................
http://udel.edu/~mcdonald/statanovapart.html
On the other hand, if the among-rat portion of the variance was low, that would
tell you that the mean values for different rats were all about the same, while there was a lot of variation among the measurements on each rat. You could design your big experiment with fewer rats and more observations per rat, or you could try to figure out why there's so much variation among measurements and control it better.
.................................