Você está na página 1de 4

Original Article

Vision-related quality of life in patients after ocular penetrating injuries


Qualidade de vida relacionada viso em pacientes aps ferimentos oculares penetrantes

Harun Yksel1, Fatih M. Trkc1, Muhammed ahin1, Yasin inar1, Abdullah K. Cing1, Zeynep zkurt1, Yasin Bez2, hsan aa1

ABSTRACT RESUMO
Purpose: To measure and investigate visual functioning and health-related quality Objetivo: Medir e investigar a funo visual e a qualidade de vida relacionada sade
of life (QOL) in patients after ocular penetrating injuries (OPI). (QOL) em pacientes aps ferimentos ocular penetrantes (OPI).
Methods: Fifty-four adult patients with OPI and 26 healthy control subjects were Mtodo: Cinquenta e quatro pacientes adultos com OPI e 26 indivduos saudveis
enrolled in the study. The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (controles) foram includos no estudo. O questionrio de funo visual do National Eye
(NEI VFQ-25) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36) were administered. Institute (NEI VFQ-25) e a avaliao curta de 36 itens (Short Form Health Survey - SF 36)
Sociodemographic and clinical data also were collected. The primary outcome foram administrados. Dados sociais, demogrficos e clnicos tambm foram coletados.
measures were comparisons and multivariate analysis among groups for the NEI As comparaes e anlise multivariada entre os grupos para as subescalas do NEI
VFQ-25 and SF 36 subscale scores. VFQ-25 e do SF 36 foram consideradas como resultados primrios.
Results: All NEI VFQ-25 scores, except general health, were significantly lower in Resultados: Todos os ndices do NEI VFQ-25, exceto sade geral, foram significati-
the OPI group than those in the control group. All SF 36 scores were significantly vamente menores no grupo OPI do que aqueles no grupo controle. Todos os ndices
lower in the OPI group than in the control group. The NEI VFQ-25 subscale item do SF 36 foram significativamente menores no grupo OPI do que no grupo controle.
scores showed no significant differences with respect to age, educational level, Os ndices das subescalas do NEI VFQ-25 no apresentaram diferenas significativas
or visual acuity in the injured eye. The SF 36 subscale item scores revealed no em relao idade, escolaridade, ou acuidade visual no olho ferido. Os ndices das
significant differences according to gender or educational level. subescalas do SF 36 no revelaram diferenas significativas de acordo com o nvel de
Conclusions: Patients with OPI have increased psychological symptoms and lower escolaridade ou sexo.
levels of QOL than healthy control subjects have. Deteriorations in QOL should Concluses: Pacientes com OPI apresentaram sintomas psicolgicos aumentados e
be kept in mind when managing patients with OPI. nveis mais baixos de qualidade de vida que os indivduos saudveis. Deterioraes na
qualidade de vida devem ser consideradas ao gerenciar pacientes com OPI.
Keywords: Eye injuries, penetrating; Quality of life; Questionnaires Descritores: Ferimentos oculares penetrantes; Qualidade de vida; Questionrios

INTRODUCTION and SF 36 scores(6). NEI VFQ-25 was developed to assess a patients


Ocular trauma, one of the most common causes of visual loss and perception of QOL and visual function, and has been used to assess
impairment, can contribute considerably to a decreased quality of life the quality of vision in retinal vein occlusion(7), diabetic retinopathy(8),
(QOL). Among the types of ocular trauma, ocular penetrating injuries glaucoma(9), and after ocular surgery(4,5). SF 36 evaluates the effect of
(OPI) are the leading cause of unilateral vision loss. In the United Sta- overall health on QOL(10).
tes, the incidence of OPI was reported to be 3.81 per 100,000 persons. Here, we report vision-related QOL (VR-QOL) and health-related
Many of these injuries are preventable(1). QOL (HR-QOL) in a population of patients with OPI using NEI VFQ-25
OPI lead to varying degrees of vision loss, depending on the and SF 36 questionnaires. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
complications, location, and size of the injury. The majority of people study to measure VR-QOL and HR-QOL in patients with OPI.
who suffer OPI are young individuals(2). Therefore, loss of vision and
visual prognosis is more important for a longer life expectancy. Ocular
METHODS
pathology in young patients does not only affect visual acuity (VA)
but also affects occupational and social functions(3). In the practice Institutional review board approval was obtained through the
of ophthalmology, visual function tests, such as visual field analysis, university ethics committee, and the study was conducted in com-
do not provide information about the psychological consequences pliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent
of decreased vision and QOL(4,5). To the best of our knowledge, no was obtained from the participants. This prospective study enrolled
published study has examined the impact of OPI on QOL. 54 patients with OPI who were scheduled for vision care at the De-
In our study, we used the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual partment of Ophthalmology. Patients were enrolled in the study if
Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and the 36-Item Short Form they were aged 18 years, at least 6 months into the clinical course
Health Survey (SF 36) to better understand the impact of OPI on QOL. after the injury (to achieve relatively stable results of visual outcomes),
In previous studies, decreases in visual acuity affected NEI VFQ-25 and had no other systemic or ocular disease that could affect vision.

Submitted for publication: November 19, 2013 Funding: No specific financial support was available for this study.
Accepted for publication: January 3, 2014 Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest: None of the authors have any potential conflicts of
Study conducted at Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey. interest to disclose.
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey. Corresponding author: Harun Yksel. Dicle niversitesi Tp Fakltesi - Sur/Diyarbakr, Turkey -
2
Department of Psychiatry, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey. E-mail: drharunyuksel@gmail.com

http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20140024 Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014;77(2):95-8 95


Vision-related quality of life in patients after ocular penetrating injuries

A complete ophthalmological examination, including visual acuity, significantly lower in the OPI group than in the control group. All
intraocular pressure measurements, and biomicroscopic evalua patients with OPI had sustained an injury in only one eye. The mean
tion of the anterior segment and fundus was performed for all follow-up for patients after surgery was 8.4 3.1 (6-19) months. Male
participants. To correlate visual acuity with subscale responses, the and female patients in the OPI group showed no difference in NEI
Snellen visual acuity of the affected eye was converted to a logMar VFQ-25 and SF 36 scores.
equivalent. A correlation analysis of the NEI VFQ-25 and SF 36 scores, age,
Data, including age, gender, and best-corrected visual acuity, of visual acuity, and gender are presented in table 3. A linear regression
all participants were recorded. All participants completed the SF 36 analysis was performed with the variables that showed a significant
and VFQ-25 questionnaires to evaluate their HR-QOL and VR-QOL, correlation. In the regression analysis, the NEI VFQ-25 composite
respectively. The control group consisted of age, gender, and edu-
cation level matched patients who were admitted to our clinic for
examination with no pathology that affected visual function. Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the ocular penetrating injury
patients and control subjects
Measurements of psychological state and QOL SF 36
OPI n (%) Control n (%) p
SF 36 is the most widely used self-report scale that measures Sex
HR-QOL. It successfully measures the HR-QOL of patients with
medical or psychological disorders, as well as healthy subjects. The Female 12 (22.2) 09 (34.6)
scale can assess the positive and negative aspects of health, and it is Male 42 (77.8) 17 (65.4) 0.238
considered sensitive to small changes in disability status. It was first Duration 8.4 3.1 (6-19) month
developed by Ware and Sherbourne in 1992(10). It provides scores Educational level
ranging between 0 and 100 that represent QOL in eight dimensions
of health (physical functioning, physical role difficulty, bodily pain, Elementary school 02 (03.7) 02 (07.7)
general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional role Junior high school 09 (16.7) 04 (15.4) 0.564
difficulty, and mental health). Higher scores reflect a better QOL. The High school 40 (74.1) 20 (76.9)
validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the SF 36 was demons-
logMar VA 0.76 0.89 0.0 0.0 p<0.001
trated by Kocyigit et al. in 1999(11).
Type of the injury
NEI VFQ-25 Corneal 32 (59.3)
NEI VFQ-25 was used to assess VR-QOL in our participants. It is Corneoscleral 09 (16.7)
a validated and reliable instrument that assesses the dimensions of Scleral 13 (24.1)
self-reported and vision-targeted health status, which are most im Age 30.5 8.2 33.0 4.6 0.158
portant for persons with chronic eye disease.
The NEI VFQ-25 has been translated into Turkish, and its reliability
and validity have been established. This version, which was used in
previous studies, was administered to all subjects(12). VR-QOL, which Table 2. Test result of NEI VFQ-25 and SF 36 tests
measures visual functioning level in 12 dimensions, was assessed
using NEI VFQ-25. It generates subscales for the following 12 dimensions Subscale OPI group Control group p value
of VR-QOL: general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, NEI VFQ-25 (mean SD) (mean SD)
distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific General health 80.1 25.4 091.7 11.7 <0.092
mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific depen-
General vision 50.4 18.1 095.4 8.6 <0.001
dency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. Finally, an overall
composite score is calculated that serves as an average of all subscales, Ocular pain 58.7 13.6 098.1 6.8 <0.001
excluding the general health subscale. Scores range from 0 to 100, Near activity 54.8 12.3 099.0 3.4 <0.001
with higher scores indicating a better QOL(13). Distance activity 56.5 15.5 097.1 7.0 <0.001

Statistical analysis Social function 63.0 19.9 100.0 0 <0.001


Mental health 53.3 11.4 100.0 0 <0.001
Statistical analysis were performed with Statistical Program for
Social Science version 15 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Independent Role difficulties 52.5 12.9 100.0 0 <0.001
sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlational Dependency 66.8 17.6 100.0 0 <0.001
analysis, and linear regression were used in the statistical analysis. The Driving (6/13) 56.9 3.4 093.6 7.0 <0.001
data are presented as the mean standard deviation.
Color vision 70.8 17.3 100.0 0 <0.001
Peripheral vision 58.2 21.3 100.0 0 <0.001
RESULTS
Composite score 58.1 21.3 099.8 0.7 <0.001
The study participants included 54 patients who had undergone
SF 36 (mean SD) (mean SD)
surgery because of OPI occurring at least 6 months before the study
began. In addition, we examined 26 healthy control subjects. There Physical functioning 98.2407 3.2443 100.0000 0 <0.001
were no differences between groups in terms of age, gender, or edu- Social functioning 73.3796 21.3139 94.7115 7.2224 <0.001
cation level. The demographic characteristics of the patients and the Physical problems 53.3704 44.1478 97.1154 8.1453 <0.001
control group are given in table 1.
Pain 66.3889 21.9454 87.8462 4.6276 <0.001
SF 36 and NEI VFQ-25 scores are presented in table 2. All NEI VFQ-25
scores, except general health, were significantly lower in the OPI Emotional problems 55.5557 46.2426 100.0000 0 <0.001
group than in the control group. The study participants answered Mental health 65.5556 13.1043 85.2308 5.7432 <0.001
all questions, except driving-related questions. Driving-related Energy and vitality 59.0741 12.4033 83.2692 5.6466 <0.001
questions were answered by only 6 (11%) patients in the OPI group
and 13 (50%) subjects in the control group. All SF 36 scores were General perception of health 48.5556 17.8997 89.1923 8.3331 <0.001

96 Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014;77(2):95-8


Yksel H, et al.

score was affected by the final visual acuity, social function, and emo scores. Schareder et al.(16) evaluated patients with open eye injuries
tional status sub-scores of the SF 36 (Table 4). In addition, the final and examined how the trauma affected their work life, QOL, and emo-
visual acuity was affected by the NEI VFQ-25 composite score and tional well-being. They reported that QOL was negatively affected in
initial visual acuity (Table 5). Gender and education level were not patients with an ocular injury. However, in that study they, did not
related to the NEI VFQ-25 composite score or the final visual acuity. report information about their questionnaire; therefore, it is uncertain
if a standard questionnaire was used. In our study, the effect of OPI on
DISCUSSION QOL was analyzed with standard questionnaires and compared with
the QOL of healthy controls.
To our knowledge, the present study is the first to compare the
psychological status and QOL of patients with OPI to those of healthy Patients with vision loss due to ocular trauma not only suffer vision
control subjects. The results of the current study demonstrate that impairments, they also experience deterioration in social functioning
OPI patients have increased psychological symptoms and lower that can decrease labor in the workplace. Many patients with vision
levels of QOL than healthy control subjects. loss cannot continue their employment and need to change their
OPI, which are usually observed in young individuals, is the lea- occupation or obtain disability status(13). Therefore, QOL of those indi-
ding cause of unilateral vision loss; men are more often affected than viduals is seriously affected. In our study, the overall health of patients
women(2). In our study, the male/female ratio was consistent with in the OPI group was affected and the SF 36 scores, which determine
those reported in the literature. However, there was no significant the HR-QOL, were significantly lower in the group than in the con-
effect of gender on QOL. trol group. Rofail et al. compared QOL in patients who underwent
Many studies have found the size and location of the wound are primary or secondary enucleation because of OPI(17). They reported
important indicators for the visual prognosis(2,14). Corneoscleral OPI that QOL was more affected in patients who underwent primary enu-
has a poorer prognosis in terms of visual acuity(14,15). In our study, there cleation than in those who underwent secondary enucleation. They
was no relationship between OPI location and NEI VFQ-25 or SF 36 suggested that, if possible, the eyeball should not be removed during
the primary repair. However, in that study, QOL was not compared
between patients with OPI and control subjects.
Table 3. The correlations between visual acuity, age duration of OPI The NEI VFQ-25 composite scores observed in the present study
with the NEI VFQ-25* scores were lower than those reported for patients with PDR, SMD, or Behets
Visual acuity Age disease in other studies(8,18,19). Our patients were younger than those
Test scores r p r p in other studies; therefore, young individuals may experience a greater
General health -0.507 <0.001 -0.271 0.279 impact on their QOL with permanent vision loss due to trauma than
with other diseases. The NEI VFQ-25 scores for a younger patient group
General vision -0.582 <0.001 -0.311 0.122
with ocular chemical burns reported in a study(13) were similar to
Ocular pain -0.224 0.103 -0.224 0.271 those observed in our study. In that study, patients with bilateral
Near activity -0.386 0.004 -0.200 0.327 injuries had severely decreased composite scores in NEI VFQ-25(16).
Distance activity -0.496 <0.001 -0.353 0.077 No patient had bilateral trauma in our study.
Social function -0.468 <0.001 -0.433 0.027 Using NEI VFQ-25, Onal et al. reported that general health was
more influenced than general vision in patients with Behets disea
Mental health -0.443 0.001 -0.296 0.141
se(18). In contrast, the present study found that OPI affected vision
Role difficulties -0.437 0.001 -0.240 0.238 more than general health. We suggest that this difference is based
Dependency -0.477 <0.001 -0.171 0.403 on the systemic involvement of the Behets disease, whereas OPI is
Color vision -0.402 0.430 -0.097 0.637 usually localized to one eye.
Peripheral vision -0.178 0.197 -0.111 0.591 Previous reports indicated that QOL is affected by ocular disea-
ses(18,20,21). In this study, SF 36, a widely known instrument, was used
Composite score -0.574 <0.001 -0.393 0.047
to assess HR-QOL. Using the same questionnaire, QOL changes were
*NEI VFQ-25= National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire.
reported with central serous chorioretinopathy, age-related macular
degeneration, and Behets disease(8,18,20). In our patients first VA exam,
the composite score of NEI VFQ-25 and the mental health score of
Table 4. Regression analysis of the factors that were found to be effective SF 36 affected the final VA. Level of education, age, and gender had
on composite score of NEI VFQ-25* in a univariate analysis no effect on the final VA. In contrast to Onal et al., who reported that
Beta t p value education level and age affected the visual prognosis in Behets
Social function 0.850 11.64 0.000
disease(15); another study found that education, general vision, near
vision, and social functioning scores decreased. They suggested that
Final visual acuity 0.555 06.09 0.000
a high level of education increases the patients awareness and
Emotional score of SF 36 0.273 02.28 0.027 knowledge of their disease.
Dependent variable= composite score of VFQ 25 r2=0.81. In this study, we showed that OPI patients showed poorer vision
*NEI VFQ-25= The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire. and health-related QOL than healthy subjects. In addition, general
vision was more affected than general health in patients with OPI.
Furthermore, deterioration in QOL should be considered in patients
Table 5. Regression analysis of the factors that were found to be effective with OPI. Deterioration in QOL may lead to psychiatric disorders. Pa-
on final visual acuity in a univariate analysis tients should be evaluated in this aspect and psychiatric help should
Beta t p value
be given when necessary.
Composite score of NEI VFQ-25* -0.810 -9.942 0.000
First visual acuity -0.231 -2.404 0.020 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Dependent variable is final visual accuity. r2=0.66. We are grateful to Dicle University DUBAP for their sponsorship
*NEI VFQ-25= The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire. about English editing of this manuscript.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014;77(2):95-8 97


Vision-related quality of life in patients after ocular penetrating injuries

REFERENCE 11. Koyiit H, Aydemir , Fiek G, lmez N, Memi A. Validity and reliability of Turkish
version of Short Form-36 (SF-36). J Drug Treat. 1999;12:102-6.
1. Kuhn F, Morris, R, Witherspoon CD, Mann L. Epidemiology of blinding trauma in the 12. Toprak AB, Eser E, Guler C, Baser FE, Mayali H. Cross-validation of the Turkish version
United States Eye Injury Registry. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13(3):209-6. of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25).
2. Yalcin Tk O, Tok L, Eraslan E, Ozkaya D, Ornek F, Bardak Y. Prognostic factors influen- Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005;12(4):259-69.
cing final visual acuity in open globe injuries. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1794-800. 13. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. National Eye Ins-
3. Le Q, Chen Y, Wang X, Li Y, Hong J, Xu J. Vision-related quality of life in patients with titute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the
ocular chemical burns. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8951-6. 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function e Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol.
4. Massof RW, Rubin GS. Visual function assessment questionnaires. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1050-8.
2001;45(6):531-48. 14. Agrawal R, Rao G, Naigaonkar R, Ou X, Desai SS. Prognostic factors for vision outcome
5. Vitale S, Schein OD. Qualitative research in functional vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin. after surgical repair of open globe injuries. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(6):465-70.
2003;43(2):17-30. 15. Soylu M, Sizmaz S, Cayli S. Eye injury (ocular trauma) in southern Turkey: epidemio-
6. Chia EM, Mitchell P, Ojaimi E, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ. Unilateral visual impairment and logy, ocular survival, and visual outcome. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(2):143-8.
health related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 16. Schrader WF. Open globe injuries: epidemiological study of two eye clinics in Ger-
87(4):392-5. many, 1981-1999. Croat Med J. 2004;45(3):268-74.
7. Awdeh RM, Elsing SH, Deramo VA, Stinnett S, Lee PP, Fekrat S. Vision-related quality of 17. Rofail M, Lee G. A, ORourke P. Quality of life after open-globe injury. Ophthalmology.
2006;13:(6)1057.e1-3.
life in persons with unilateral branch retinal vein occlusion using the 25-item National
18. Onal S, Savar F, Akman M, Kazokoglu H. Vision- and health-related quality of life in
Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(3):319-23.
patients with Behet uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(10):1265-71.
8. Klein R, Moss SE, Klein BE, Gutierrez P, Mangione CM. The NEI-VFQ-25 in people with
19. Leys A, Zlateva G, Shah SN, Patel M. Quality of life in patients with age-related macular
long-term type 1 diabetes mellitus: the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic degeneration: results from the VISION study. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(6):792-8.
Retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(5):733-40. 20. Sahin A, Bez Y, Kaya MC, Trkc FM, Sahin M, Yksel H. Psychological distress and poor
9. Wren PA, Musch DC, Janz NK, Niziol LM, Guire KE, Gillespie BW; CIGTS Study Group. quality of life in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol.
Contrasting the use of 2 vision-specific quality of life questionnaires in subjects with 2014;29(2):73-6.
open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(5):403-11. 21. Trkc FM, Sahin A, Bez Y, Yksel H, Cinar Y, Krat Cing A, et al. Vision-related quality
10. Ware J, Sherbourne E. Donald C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). of life in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol.
I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83. 2013 Oct 28; doi:10.3109/08820538.2013.839818.

17o Congresso de Oftalmologia USP


16o Congresso de Auxiliar de
Oftalmologia USP

28 e 29 de julho de 2014
Centro de Convenes Rebouas
So Paulo - SP

Informaes:
Tels.: (11) 5084-9174/5082-3030
E-mail: secretariausp@jdeeventos.com.br
Site: www.oftalmologiausp.com.br

98 Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014;77(2):95-8

Você também pode gostar