Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
0283
Available: https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV17025
REVIEW PAPER
ARTIGO DE REVISÃO
Catarina Moura Freitas*; Emídio Polónio Preto**; Carla Alexandra Fernandes Nascimento***
Abstract
Background: Clinical deterioration is sometimes mishandled in hospital wards resulting in increased likelihood of
cardiorespiratory arrest, unplanned intensive care admissions, and death.
Objectives: To identify nursing interventions aimed at the early detection of the clinical deterioration of ward
patients.
Methodology: Integrative literature review through the search for published and gray literature in CINAHL,
MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect databases.
Results: A total of 534 documents were identified, of which 11 were selected for data extraction and analysis.
Conclusion: The monitoring of vital signs, either individually or in combination or to obtain an early warning
score, is the most widely performed nursing intervention identified in the literature.
Resumo Resumen
Enquadramento: A deterioração clínica da pessoa nem Marco contextual: El deterioro clínico de la persona
sempre é bem gerida em contexto de enfermaria resul- no siempre se gestiona bien en el contexto de la enfer-
tando numa maior probabilidade de paragem cardior- mería, lo que da como resultado una mayor probabi-
respiratória, internamentos não programados em uni- lidad de parada cardiorrespiratoria, internamientos no
dade de cuidados intensivos e aumento da mortalidade. programados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos y un
Objetivos: Identificar intervenções de enfermagem rea- aumento de la mortalidad.
lizadas na deteção atempada da deterioração clínica da Objetivos: Identificar las intervenciones de enfermería
pessoa em contexto de enfermaria hospitalar. realizadas en la detección temprana del deterioro clínico
Metodologia: Revisão integrativa da literatura, realiza- de la persona en el contexto de la enfermería hospita-
da através da pesquisa de trabalhos publicados e litera- laria.
tura cinzenta nas bases de dados CINAHL, MEDLINE Metodología: Revisión integradora de la literatura, rea-
e ScienceDirect. lizada a través de la investigación de trabajos publicados
Resultados: Identificaram-se 534 resultados, dos quais y literatura gris en las bases de datos CINAHL, ME-
se selecionaram 11 documentos para análise e extração DLINE y ScienceDirect.
dos dados. Resultados: Se identificaron 534 resultados, de los
Conclusão: A avaliação dos sinais vitais, quer de forma cuales se seleccionaron 11 documentos para analizarlos
individual, quer de forma a obter uma avaliação em es- y extraer los datos.
calas de early warning score, são as intervenções de enfer- Conclusión: La evaluación de los signos vitales, tanto
magem realizadas identificadas na literatura. de forma individual, como para obtener una evaluación
en escalas de early warning score, son las intervenciones
Palavras-chave: deterioração clínica; cuidados de en- de enfermería realizadas identificadas en la literatura.
fermagem; monitorização fisiológica; segurança do pa-
ciente Palabras clave: deterioro clínico; atención de enferme-
ría; monitoreo fisiológico; seguridad del paciente
*MSc., RN, Hospital of Santo Espírito da Ilha Terceira, 9700-042, Angra do Heroísmo, Por-
tugal [catarinamfreitas@hotmail.com]. Contribution to the article: literature search; data
collection, analysis, and discussion; article writing.
Address for correspondence: Rua Dr. João Costa nº 11, Santa Luzia, 9700-042, Angra do
Heroísmo, Portugal.
**RN, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital of Santo Espírito da Ilha Terceira, 9700-042, Angra do
Heroísmo, Portugal [eppblack@hotmail.com]. Contribution to the article: data analysis
and discussion; article writing.
***Ph.D., Adjunct Professor, Medical-Surgical/Adult and Elderly Department, Lisbon Scho- Received for publication: 14.03.17
ol of Nursing, 1600-190, Lisboa, Portugal [carla.nascimento@esel.pt]. Contribution to the
article: data analysis and discussion; article writing Accepted for publication: 16.06.17
122
conducted according to the Joanna Briggs lation, context, language, date of publi-
Institute guidelines (Joanna Briggs In- cation, and nursing intervention for de-
stitute [JBI], 2015), based on a research tection of deterioration (Table 1). The
question designed using the PCC (Popu- population was composed of adults aged
lation, Concept, and Context) strategy: 18 to 65 years. An initial search showed a
Which nursing interventions promote the study published in 2005 on nursing inter-
safety of the patient at risk for clinical de- ventions for the detection of clinical de-
terioration in a ward? terioration; for this reason, this date was
The inclusion and exclusion criteria of established as the minimum date possible
studies were defined based on the popu- for inclusion.
Table 1
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Nursing interventions for the early detection of Interventions performed by nursing students and/or
Intervention
clinical deterioration other nursing categories that do not exist in Portugal
123
Number of articles identified through database
Identification
searching (n = 532) Additional articles identified through
+ other sources (n = 2)
MEDLINE:132; CINAHL: 260; SCIENCE
DIRECT:140
The process of evaluating the methodological quality of the articles was conducted
independently by two reviewers using the JBI - Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and
The Review
processInstrument
of evaluating the methodolog-
(MAStARI) earlyand
critical appraisal tools detection
the JBI of clinical deterioration.
- Qualitative Assessment This
ical and
quality of the articles was conducted is often confirmed by the monitoring
Review Instrument critical appraisal tool for studies of quantitative and qualitative, of vi-
independently by two reviewers using the tal parameters such as respiratory rate, heart
JBI -respectively. The information was extracted and synthetized from quantitative and qualitative
Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment rate, and blood pressure (Andrews & Water-
and studies
Reviewusing the JBI-MAStARI
Instrument (MAStARI)and JBIcriti-
QARI Critical
man,Appraisal Checklist
2005; Liaw, for Interpretive
Scherpbier, &
Klainin-Yo-
cal appraisal tools and
Critical Research data the JBI - Qualitative
extraction bas, Table
tools, respectively. & Rethans,
2 includes2011).
data onHowever, authors
the publication
Assessment and Review Instrument critical such as Andrews and Waterman
itself and the methodology used: type of study, study objective, main findings, and identified
(2005) and
appraisal tool for studies of quantitative and Odell (2015) have reported gaps in nurses’
nursing interventions.
qualitative, respectively. The information interventions to conduct a complete mon-
was extracted and synthetized from quan- itoring of vital signs and, although this is a
titative andand
Results qualitative studies using the key nursing intervention, the evidence on
interpretation
JBI-MAStARI and JBI QARI Critical Ap- monitoring is scarce.
praisal Checklist for Interpretive & Critical According to Aneman (2010), the predicting
The monitoring
Research and recording
data extraction tools, ofrespectively.
vital signs are essential
signs of nursing
clinicalinterventions
instability arefor present
the earlyseveral
Tabledetection
2 includes datadeterioration.
of clinical on the publication hours before
This is often confirmed by the clinical
monitoringdeterioration,
of vital regard-
itselfparameters
and the such
methodology used:
as respiratory rate,type
heartof
rate, less of progression
and blood to cardiac
pressure (Andrews or cardiopul-
& Waterman,
study, study objective, main findings, and monary arrest, which could enable a timely
2005; Liaw, Scherpbier, Klainin-Yobas, & Rethans, 2011). However, authors such as
identified nursing interventions. intervention. In this review, all studies have
Andrews and Waterman (2005) and Odell (2015)identified have reported gaps in nurses’
the monitoring of interventions
vital signs as a
nursing intervention, whether performed in
Results and interpretation isolation or combined, that enables the cal-
culation of an Early Warning Score (EWS).
The monitoring and recording of vital signs According to Benner (2001), an experienced
are essential nursing interventions for the nurse is able to identify the patient’s clin-
124
ical deterioration before explicit alterations physical, social, and emotional strengths and
in vital signs by providing an early warning coping resources” (p. 205).
signal; however, nurses recognize the need The purpose of the EWS is to provide an ac-
to confirm these findings. Therefore, in both cessible and systematic way to assess the pa-
literature reviews (S2 and S5), nurses’ intu- tients’ health status and guide the response
ition and use of subjective data emerge as in case of a situation of clinical deteriora-
a way of recognizing the patient’s clinical tion, based on a scoring system of physio-
deterioration and only after these will the logical measures obtained at the time of ad-
nurses assess the vital signs to confirm their mission or in regular monitoring moments
findings. during hospitalization (Capan, Ivy, Rohled-
Since physiological variables are often in- er, Hickman, & Huddleston, 2015). Since
terrelated by compensatory mechanisms, its introduction in health institutions, EWSs
heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, have been updated and modified. Exam-
level of consciousness, pulse oximetry, and ples are the Modified Early Warning Score
urine output should be fully assessed and (MEWS) and the National Early Warning
documented (Aneman, 2010; Smith & Pr- Score (NEWS; Kyriacos et al., 2014). In the
ytherch, 2011). same way as the initial EWS, these scales
Vital signs are currently assessed using elec- result from the monitoring of five physio-
tronic equipment, but there is evidence that, logical parameters: heart rate, respiratory
outside ICUs, respiratory rate is assessed rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature,
through observation, leading to insufficient, and level of consciousness. In addition, the
subjective, and unreliable results (Smith & NEWS includes peripheral oxygen satura-
Prytherch, 2011). S4, S5, S6, and S9 are in tion and supplemental oxygen, and, in some
line with this idea, indicating that observa- institutions, the MEWS includes peripheral
tion, touch, and hearing are used as mon- oxygen saturation, urine output, blood glu-
itoring methods by assessing the patient’s cose and/or analytical levels, and pain. These
skin color, temperature, and respiratory pat- parameters, although they are not part of the
tern (depth and sounds). scale, are considered in situations of clinical
According to Osborne, Douglas, Reid, deterioration (Kyriacos et al., 2014). Taking
Jones, and Gardner (2015), although clini- into account that alterations in heart rate,
cal deterioration requires other nursing in- respiratory rate, blood pressure, and level of
terventions beyond the monitoring of vital consciousness are indicators of physiological
signs, this was the most widely used nursing deterioration, a combined monitoring of
intervention. The authors believe that this these parameters is expected to have a higher
finding is associated with the current focus predictive value than an isolated monitoring
on parameters specified by the RRSs, which (Smith & Prytherch, 2011).
could lead nurses to undervalue the perfor- As already mentioned, vital signs were as-
mance of a more comprehensive patient as- sessed in order to group values and obtain
sessment. If performed, this comprehensive a EWS. In this way, the calculation of the
assessment could allow for the early detec- MEWS to detect clinical deterioration was
tion of subtle changes in the patient’s health also one of the nursing interventions identi-
status. In line with this, Kyriacos, Jelsma, fied in 8 of the 11 reviewed studies (S1, S3,
James, and Jordan (2014) underline that it S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, and S11). As with nurses’
is not enough to assess and record vital signs intuition and use of subjective data, which
because the patient’s safety continues to rely are confirmed by the monitoring of vital
on the nurses’ clinical judgment. Accord- signs, S4 also found that the MEWS was
ing to Tanner (2006), clinical judgment in only calculated to confirm the situation of
nursing requires “an understanding of not clinical deterioration rather than to detect it.
only the pathophysiological and diagnostic The sum of the points assigned to each pa-
aspects of a patient’s clinical presentation rameter results in the EWS, which is used
and disease, but also the illness experience to increase the frequency of monitoring of
for both the patient and family and their vital signs, request the collaboration of more
125
experienced professionals, or call the rapid tal, nurses’ perceptions of the effectiveness
response team (RRT) (Smith & Prytherch, of communication and collaboration with-
2011). The request for differentiated help in the multidisciplinary team increased,
and the activation of an RRT seem to be the number of unplanned ICU admissions
the nursing interventions used to respond increased, and the number of unexpect-
to the identified situation of clinical deteri- ed deaths decreased. However, S6 showed
oration (S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, and S11). that SBAR was used by only one out of 47
The MEWS was considered to be an ef- nurses with training to use it. In turn, in
fective instrument of communication of S3, this tool is considered to be an effective
the clinical deterioration to the physician strategy to increase the number of nurses’
since it allows systematizing findings and clinical observations.
presenting them in an objective manner In view of the above, as stated by Mitchell
(S1, S3, S5, S7, and S11). Although three et al. (2010) it is possible to say that a time-
studies (S3, S6, and S7) mentioned the use ly intervention to prevent or stop the pro-
of the Situation, Background, Assessment, gression of clinical deterioration requires a
Recommendation (SBAR) communication set of interventions that includes the moni-
tool to convey information, different re- toring and interpretation of vital signs, fol-
sults were obtained. S7 concluded that, af- lowed by an effective communication and
ter the introduction of this tool in a hospi- adequate clinical response.
Table 2.
Synthesis of the evidence found
Identified nursing
Study identification Method Study objective Main findings
interventions
126
S3 - Mitchell, I. A., To determine
McKay, H., Van Leuvan, whether the in-
C., Berry, R., McCutch- troduction of
eon, C., Avard, B., … a multi-faceted The introduction of a multi-fac-
Monitoring of vital
Lamberth, P. (2010). A intervention (track eted intervention in the ward
Quan- signs, calculation
prospective controlled and trigger system to detect clinical deterioration
titative, of the MEWS,
trial of the effect of a and an education may benefit patients through
pro- activate/notify the
multi-faceted intervention program, COM- the increased monitoring of vital
spective medical response.
on early recognition and PASS©) to detect signs and triggering of a medical
study.
intervention in deterio- clinical deteriora- review following an episode of
rating hospital patients. tion would decrease clinical instability.
Resuscitation, 81(6), the rate of prede-
658–666.doi:10.1016/j. termined adverse
resuscitation.2010.03.001 outcomes.
S4 - Donohue, L. A.,
Nurses detected clinical deteriora-
& Endacott, R. (2010).
tion when assessing their patients
Track, trigger and To examine the
visually, looking for recurring
teamwork: Commu- perceptions of ward Visual assessment
signs and symptoms, and com-
nication of deteriora- Qual- and RRT nurses of the patient;
paring their evolution over time.
tion in acute medical itative about the manage-
Although the EWS was not a key
and surgical wards. study. ment of ward pa- Calculation of the
component of patient assessment,
Intensive and Critical tients with clinical EWS.
it was frequently used to quantify
Care Nursing, 26(1), deterioration.
deterioration when any changes
10–17 doi:10.1016/j.
were detected.
iccn.2009.10.006.
127
The introduction of the SBAR
communication tool increased
nurses’ perception of effective Patient (Air-
S7 - De Meester, K.,
communication and collaboration. way; Breathing
Verspuy, M., Monsieurs, To determine how
Nurses were better prepared to and ventilation;
K. G., & Van Bogaert, the use of SBAR
contact and communicate changes Circulation; Dis-
P. (2013). SBAR im- can improve the
to a physician by using SBAR ability; Exposure/
proves nurse-physician perception of an
Quan- items. The number of unplanned environmental
communication and re- effective nurse-phy-
titative ICU admissions increased in the control - ABCDE)
duces unexpected death: sician communi-
study. post-intervention period and the assessment;
A pre and post interven- cation and collab-
number of unexpected deaths Calculation of the
tion study. Resuscitation, oration in serious
decreased. The number of RRT EWS (MEWS);
84(9), 1192–1196. adverse events in
calls remained unchanged. These Communication
doi:10.1016/j.resuscita- hospital wards.
results seem to indicate that the with the physician
tion.2013.03.016
introduction of SBAR allows for (through SBAR).
the early detection and response in
case of clinical deterioration.
128
S10 - Fasolino, T., &
Verdin, T. 15). Nurs-
ing Surveillance and
Physiological Signs of
This study found records of mul-
Deterioration. Med-
tiple physiological measurements
surg Nursing: Official
of systolic and diastolic blood
Journal of the Academy
pressure, heart and respiratory
of Medical-Surgical
rate, and SpO2 within regular
Nurses, 24(6), 397–402. Quan- To determine the Monitoring of
intervals for medical-surgical
Retrieved from http:// titative, impact of nursing vital signs (blood
patients. However, there is no
web.a .ebscohost.com. retro- surveillance on pressure, heart rate,
record of mental status assess-
ez-jmk. statsbiblioteket. spective rapid clinical deteri- respiratory rate,
ment and urine output was only
dk:2048/ehost/pd- study. oration. SpO2).
recorded a few times. Specific
fviewer/pdfviewer?sid=-
components of nursing surveil-
ca11ab2c-ad1d-4249-
lance that permit recognition
ad3a-a7963c497679@
of patient clinical deterioration
session-
remained unclear.
mgr4005&vid=1&hid=
4212%5Cnhttp://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/26863702
129
References R., McCutcheon, C., Avard, B., … Lamberth, P.
(2010). A prospective controlled trial of the effect
Andrews, T., & Waterman, H. (2005). Packaging: of a multi-faceted intervention on early recognition
A grounded theory of how to report physiologi- and intervention in deteriorating hospital patients.
cal deterioration effectively. Journal of Advanced Resuscitation, 81(6), 658–666. doi: 10.1016/j.resus-
Nursing, 52(5), 473–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- citation.2010.03.001.
2648.2005.03615.x. National Patient Safety Agency. (2007). Recognising and
Aneman, A. (2010). The rapid response system (manage- responding appropriately to early signs of deterioration
ment, organisation). In H. Flaatten, R. P. Moreno, in hospitalised patients. London, England: NHS. Re-
C. Putensen, & A. Rhodes (Eds.), Organisation and trieved from http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/EasySite-
management of intensive care (pp. 41–52). Berlin, Web/getresource.axd?AssetID=60151.
Deutschland: MWV Medizinish Wissenschaftliche Odell, M. (2015). Detection and management of the
Verlagsgesellscaft mbH & Co. KG. deteriorating ward patient: An evaluation of nursing
Benner, P. (2001). De iniciado a perito: Excelência e poder practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(1–2), 173–
na prática clínica de enfermagem. Coimbra, Portugal: 182. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12655.
Quarteto. Osborne, S., Douglas, C., Reid, C., Jones, L., & Gard-
Capan, M., Ivy, J. S., Rohleder, T., Hickman, J., & ner, G. (2015). The primacy of vital signs – Acute
Huddleston, J. M. (2015). Individualizing and op- care nurses’ and midwives’ use of physical assessment
timizing the use of early warning scores in acute skills: A cross sectional study. International Journal
medical care for deteriorating hospitalized patients. of Nursing Studies, 52(5), 951–962. doi: 10.1016/j.
Resuscitation, 93, 107–112. doi:10.1016/j.resuscita- ijnurstu.2015.01.014.
tion.2014.12.032. Preece, M. H., Hill, A., Horswill, M. S., & Watson, M.
Courtenay, M., Nancarrow, S., & Dawson, D. (2013). O. (2012). Supporting the detection of patient de-
Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting: A terioration: Observation chart design affects the rec-
scoping review. Human Resources for Health, 11(1), ognition of abnormal vital signs. Resuscitation, 83(9),
57. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-57. 1111–8. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.009.
Edwards, I.R. (2005). WHO World Alliance for patient Smith, G. B., & Prytherch, D. R. (2011). An overview
safety. Drug Safety, 28(5), 379-386. Geneva. doi: of the afferent limb. In M. DeVita, K. Hillman, &
10.2165/00002018-200528050-00002. R. Bellomo (Eds.), Textbook of rapid response systems:
Joshi, K., Campbell, V., Gooch, R., Anstey, C., & Landy, Concept and implementation (pp. 177–188). London,
M. (2015). Adult deterioration detection system England: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-92853-
(Q-Adds) based rapid response system (Rrs) reduc- 1.
es severity of illness and length of stay of Icu admis- Soar, J., Nolan, J. P., Böttiger, B. W., Perkins, G. D., Lott,
sions from the ward in a regional hospital. Intensive C., Carli, P., … Deakin, C. D. (2015). European re-
Care Medicine Experimental, 3(Suppl 1), A141. doi: suscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015.
10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A141. Resuscitation, 95, 100–147. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscita-
Kronick, S. L., Kurz, M. C., Lin, S., Edelson, D. P., Berg, tion.2015.07.016.
R. A., Billi, J. E., … Welsford, M. (2015). Part 4: Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A re-
Systems of care and continuous quality improve- search-based model of clinical judgment in nursing.
ment. Circulation, 132(18 suppl 2), S397–S413. doi: The Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204–211.
10.1161/CIR.0000000000000258. Retrieved from http://www.mccc.edu/nursing/docu-
Kyriacos, U., Jelsma, J., James, M., & Jordan, S. (2014). ments/Thinking_Like_A_Nurse_Tanner.pdf.
Monitoring vital signs: Development of a modified The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2015). The Joanna Briggs
early warning scoring (Mews) system for general Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for JBI
wards in a developing country. PLoS ONE, 9(1). doi: scoping reviews, 1–24. Retrieved from http://joan-
10.1371/journal.pone.0087073 nabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManu-
Liaw, S. Y., Scherpbier, A., Klainin-Yobas, P., & Rethans, J. al_Mixed-Methods-Review-Methods-2014-ch1.pdf.
J. (2011). A review of educational strategies to improve Winters, B. D., & DeVita, M. (2015). Rapid response
nurses’ roles in recognizing and responding to deteri- systems history and terminology. In M. A. DeVita,
orating patients. International Nursing Review, 58(3), K. Hillman, & R. Bellomo (Eds.), Textbook of rapid
296–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00915.x. response systems: Concept and Implementation (Vol. 1).
Mitchell, I. A., McKay, H., Van Leuvan, C., Berry, Springer. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
130